Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This prospective, multi-center, observational study will evaluate factors influencing the use of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in real life setting. Data will be collected from participants for 12 months following initiation of tocilizumab treatment.
Interventions
Tocilizumab administered according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult participants, \>/= 18 years of age * Patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom the rheumatologist decides to start tocilizumab in combination with DMARD or as monotherapy
Exclusion criteria
* Current participation in a clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion | Day 1 | The number of participants assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy versus tocilizumab combination therapy is reported. A multivariate analysis was performed to search for predictive factors for the initiation of tocilizumab in monotherapy. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide | Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years) | The percentage of participants who discontinued leflunomide treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. |
| Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine | Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years) | The percentage of participants who discontinued sulfasalazine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. |
| Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine | Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years) | The percentage of participants who discontinued hydroxychloroquine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. |
| Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) | Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years) | The percentage of participants who discontinued treatment with unspecified csDMARDs prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. |
| Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | Up to 30 months | — |
| Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | Up to 13.4 months | The percentage of participants who received infusions is presented by category of total infusions received over the study period. |
| Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period | Up to 30 months | The percentage of participants with no modifications (dose modification or discontinuation) is presented. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study | Up to 30 months | csDMARD intensification was defined as an addition of a csDMARD without suppression of other csDMARD, dose increase of a csDMARD, switch (addition and suppression) of a csDMARD without intolerance, biological abnormality or symptom improvement to the suppressed csDMARD, or modification of the MTX administration route (from oral route to intramuscular/subcutaneous) with dose increase or maintenance. |
| Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12 | Month 12 | DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.2 was considered to be DAS28-ESR LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome. |
| Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12 | Month 12 | DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of \<2.6 was considered to be DAS28-ESR remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome. |
| Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years) | The percentage of participants who discontinued MTX treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. Reason for discontinuation Other Intolerance = intolerance other than cytopenia or hepatic cytolysis. |
| Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12 | Month 12 | CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤2.8 was considered to be CDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome. |
| Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12 | Month 12 | SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter (mg/L)) per , and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤11 was considered to be SDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome. |
| Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12 | Month 12 | SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, CRP (mg/L), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.3 was considered to be SDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome. |
| Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12 | Month 12 | ACR20/50/70 response was calculated as improvement (from baseline) of at least 20/50/70% (respectively) of tender and of swollen joints, and improvement from baseline of least 20/50/70% (respectively) in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: participant's pain assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) score, and ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/L). Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome. |
| Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12 | Month 12 | EULAR response was categorized as good or moderate response and was calculated as the difference between DAS28-ESR scores at baseline and Month 12. DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. * If diminution from baseline \>1.2 and score ≤3.2 at Month 12 = good response * If diminution from baseline \>1.2 and score \>3.2 at Month 12 = moderate response * If diminution from baseline \>0.6 and ≤1.2, and score ≤5.1 at Month 12 = moderate response * If diminution from baseline \>0.6 and ≤1.2, and score \>5.1 at Month 12 = non-response * If diminution from baseline ≤1.2 at Month 12 = non-response * Participants with missing data were considered as non-response |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Baseline; Month 6; Month 12 | The HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform daily living activities. This composite index score ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (total functional disability) and includes questions regarding 8 domains (dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score | Baseline; Month 6, Month 12 | The RAID questionnaire is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on participant quality of life. This composite index score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst) and includes questions regarding 7 domains (pain, functional disability assessment, fatigue, sleep, physical well-being, emotional well-being, coping). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state. |
| Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire. | Baseline; Month 6; Month 12 | Participants were asked: If you were to remain in the same condition for the next few months as you have been over the last 8 days, would this be 1) acceptable, 2) unacceptable? The percentage of participants who responded acceptable at each time point is presented. |
| Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | Up to 30 months | An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding if accompanied by clinical symptoms, results in a change in study treatment, results in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy or clinically significant in the investigator's judgment), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12 | Month 12 | CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤10 was considered to be CDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome. |
Countries
France
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Participants were not allocated to study arms but were separated according to therapy regimen post hoc for efficacy and safety analyses. Of the 608 participants enrolled 5 were not eligible for analysis (1 was found to be duplicate and 4 did not receive tocilizumab infusion).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tocilizumab Monotherapy Tocilizumab administered as monotherapy according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice. | 228 |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy Tocilizumab administered in combination with other standard of care therapy according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice. | 349 |
| Total | 577 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 53 |
| Overall Study | Death | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Treatment Efficacy | 88 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 29 |
| Overall Study | No Reason Reported | 10 |
| Overall Study | Not Evaluable for Efficacy | 26 |
| Overall Study | Patient No Longer Wanted to Participate | 12 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tocilizumab Monotherapy | Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 55.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 | 56.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 180 Participants | 274 Participants | 454 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 48 Participants | 75 Participants | 123 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 112 / 234 | 182 / 369 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 31 / 234 | 43 / 369 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion
The number of participants assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy versus tocilizumab combination therapy is reported. A multivariate analysis was performed to search for predictive factors for the initiation of tocilizumab in monotherapy.
Time frame: Day 1
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion | Monotherapy | 228 participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion | Combination Therapy | 349 participants |
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
The HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform daily living activities. This composite index score ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (total functional disability) and includes questions regarding 8 domains (dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.
Time frame: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
Population: Participants in the Efficacy population who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab, who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Baseline (n = 171, 251) | 1.62 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| All Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Change at Month 6 (n = 85, 121) | -0.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| All Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Change at Month 12 (n = 74, 106) | -0.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Baseline (n = 171, 251) | 1.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Change at Month 6 (n = 85, 121) | -0.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Change at Month 12 (n = 74, 106) | -0.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score
The RAID questionnaire is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on participant quality of life. This composite index score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst) and includes questions regarding 7 domains (pain, functional disability assessment, fatigue, sleep, physical well-being, emotional well-being, coping). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.
Time frame: Baseline; Month 6, Month 12
Population: Participants in the Efficacy population who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab, who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score | Baseline (n = 170, 252) | 6.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.98 |
| All Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score | Change at Month 6 (n = 82, 122) | -2.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.23 |
| All Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score | Change at Month 12 (n = 72, 108) | -2.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.29 |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score | Baseline (n = 170, 252) | 5.92 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score | Change at Month 6 (n = 82, 122) | -2.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score | Change at Month 12 (n = 72, 108) | -2.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.34 |
Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 9.1 infusions | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 9.7 infusions | Standard Deviation 4 |
Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12
DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.2 was considered to be DAS28-ESR LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12 | 41.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12 | 44.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine
The percentage of participants who discontinued hydroxychloroquine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued hydroxychloroquine and with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine | Therapeutic escape | 30.0 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine | Primary failure | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine | Reason Not Specified | 20.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide
The percentage of participants who discontinued leflunomide treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued leflunomide and with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide | Therapeutic escape | 17.6 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide | Intolerance | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide | Patient's Choice | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide | Primary Failure | 32.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)
The percentage of participants who discontinued MTX treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. Reason for discontinuation Other Intolerance = intolerance other than cytopenia or hepatic cytolysis.
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued MTX and with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Therapeutic escape | 12.6 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Cytopenia | 4.4 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Hepatic Cytolysis | 20.4 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Other Intolerance | 46.1 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Patient's Choice | 4.9 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Primary Failure | 8.7 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Remission | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX) | Reason Not Specified | 2.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine
The percentage of participants who discontinued sulfasalazine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued sulfasalazine and with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine | Therapeutic escape | 23.5 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine | Intolerance | 41.2 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine | Primary failure | 35.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
The percentage of participants who discontinued treatment with unspecified csDMARDs prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued treatment with unspecified csDMARDs and with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) | Therapeutic escape | 26.6 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) | Intolerance | 38.0 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) | Patient's Choice | 1.3 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) | Primary Failure | 27.8 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) | Remission | 1.3 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) | Reason Not Specified | 5.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period
The percentage of participants who received infusions is presented by category of total infusions received over the study period.
Time frame: Up to 13.4 months
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 5 Infusions | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 9 Infusions | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 2 Infusions | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 10 Infusions | 4.4 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 6 Infusions | 3.9 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 11 Infusions | 7.9 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 4 Infusions | 3.5 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 12 Infusions | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 7 Infusions | 6.6 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 13 Infusions | 17.1 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 3 Infusions | 7.0 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 14 Infusions | 11.0 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 8 Infusions | 3.5 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 15 Infusions | 0.4 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 1 Infusion | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 15 Infusions | 0.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 1 Infusion | 4.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 2 Infusions | 4.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 3 Infusions | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 4 Infusions | 4.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 5 Infusions | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 6 Infusions | 5.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 7 Infusions | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 8 Infusions | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 9 Infusions | 5.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 10 Infusions | 5.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 11 Infusions | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 12 Infusions | 22.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 13 Infusions | 18.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period | 14 Infusions | 9.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.
Participants were asked: If you were to remain in the same condition for the next few months as you have been over the last 8 days, would this be 1) acceptable, 2) unacceptable? The percentage of participants who responded acceptable at each time point is presented.
Time frame: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
Population: Participants in the Efficacy population who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab, who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire. | Baseline (n = 168, 246) | 25.6 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire. | Month 6 (n = 101, 153) | 69.3 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire. | Month 12 (n = 84, 132) | 84.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire. | Baseline (n = 168, 246) | 34.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire. | Month 6 (n = 101, 153) | 73.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire. | Month 12 (n = 84, 132) | 79.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding if accompanied by clinical symptoms, results in a change in study treatment, results in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy or clinically significant in the investigator's judgment), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Population: Safety population, defined as participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 54.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 53.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12
ACR20/50/70 response was calculated as improvement (from baseline) of at least 20/50/70% (respectively) of tender and of swollen joints, and improvement from baseline of least 20/50/70% (respectively) in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: participant's pain assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) score, and ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/L). Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12 | ACR20 | 32.5 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12 | ACR50 | 21.9 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12 | ACR70 | 9.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12 | ACR20 | 26.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12 | ACR50 | 16.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12 | ACR70 | 9.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study
csDMARD intensification was defined as an addition of a csDMARD without suppression of other csDMARD, dose increase of a csDMARD, switch (addition and suppression) of a csDMARD without intolerance, biological abnormality or symptom improvement to the suppressed csDMARD, or modification of the MTX administration route (from oral route to intramuscular/subcutaneous) with dose increase or maintenance.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Population: Participants in Efficacy population who received at least 1 infusion of tocilizumab, who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, and with no permanent discontinuation of tocilizumab treatment over the study period. For efficacy criteria with response/non response values, participants with non-evaluable response were considered as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study | 8.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study | 4.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12
CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤2.8 was considered to be CDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12 | 9.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12 | 8.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12
CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤10 was considered to be CDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12 | 31.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12 | 23.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12
DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of \<2.6 was considered to be DAS28-ESR remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12 | 34.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12 | 35.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12
EULAR response was categorized as good or moderate response and was calculated as the difference between DAS28-ESR scores at baseline and Month 12. DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. * If diminution from baseline \>1.2 and score ≤3.2 at Month 12 = good response * If diminution from baseline \>1.2 and score \>3.2 at Month 12 = moderate response * If diminution from baseline \>0.6 and ≤1.2, and score ≤5.1 at Month 12 = moderate response * If diminution from baseline \>0.6 and ≤1.2, and score \>5.1 at Month 12 = non-response * If diminution from baseline ≤1.2 at Month 12 = non-response * Participants with missing data were considered as non-response
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12 | Good Response | 40.4 percentage of participants |
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12 | Moderate Response | 9.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12 | Good Response | 38.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12 | Moderate Response | 10.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period
The percentage of participants with no modifications (dose modification or discontinuation) is presented.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period | 48.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period | 56.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12
SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, CRP (mg/L), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.3 was considered to be SDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12 | 10.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12 | 9.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12
SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter (mg/L)) per , and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤11 was considered to be SDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12 | 30.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab Combination Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12 | 23.2 percentage of participants |