Skip to content

An Observational Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) As Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

Evaluation of Factors Influencing Use of RoActemra® as Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Real Life Setting - ACT SOLO

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01474291
Acronym
ACT SOLO
Enrollment
608
Registered
2011-11-18
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2016-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This prospective, multi-center, observational study will evaluate factors influencing the use of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in real life setting. Data will be collected from participants for 12 months following initiation of tocilizumab treatment.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALTocilizumab

Tocilizumab administered according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult participants, \>/= 18 years of age * Patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom the rheumatologist decides to start tocilizumab in combination with DMARD or as monotherapy

Exclusion criteria

* Current participation in a clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study InclusionDay 1The number of participants assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy versus tocilizumab combination therapy is reported. A multivariate analysis was performed to search for predictive factors for the initiation of tocilizumab in monotherapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued LeflunomideDay 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)The percentage of participants who discontinued leflunomide treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued SulfasalazineDay 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)The percentage of participants who discontinued sulfasalazine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued HydroxychloroquineDay 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)The percentage of participants who discontinued hydroxychloroquine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)The percentage of participants who discontinued treatment with unspecified csDMARDs prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study PeriodUp to 30 months
Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study PeriodUp to 13.4 monthsThe percentage of participants who received infusions is presented by category of total infusions received over the study period.
Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study PeriodUp to 30 monthsThe percentage of participants with no modifications (dose modification or discontinuation) is presented.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the StudyUp to 30 monthscsDMARD intensification was defined as an addition of a csDMARD without suppression of other csDMARD, dose increase of a csDMARD, switch (addition and suppression) of a csDMARD without intolerance, biological abnormality or symptom improvement to the suppressed csDMARD, or modification of the MTX administration route (from oral route to intramuscular/subcutaneous) with dose increase or maintenance.
Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12Month 12DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.2 was considered to be DAS28-ESR LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12Month 12DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of \<2.6 was considered to be DAS28-ESR remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)The percentage of participants who discontinued MTX treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. Reason for discontinuation Other Intolerance = intolerance other than cytopenia or hepatic cytolysis.
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12Month 12CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤2.8 was considered to be CDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12Month 12SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter (mg/L)) per , and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤11 was considered to be SDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12Month 12SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, CRP (mg/L), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.3 was considered to be SDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12Month 12ACR20/50/70 response was calculated as improvement (from baseline) of at least 20/50/70% (respectively) of tender and of swollen joints, and improvement from baseline of least 20/50/70% (respectively) in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: participant's pain assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) score, and ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/L). Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12Month 12EULAR response was categorized as good or moderate response and was calculated as the difference between DAS28-ESR scores at baseline and Month 12. DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. * If diminution from baseline \>1.2 and score ≤3.2 at Month 12 = good response * If diminution from baseline \>1.2 and score \>3.2 at Month 12 = moderate response * If diminution from baseline \>0.6 and ≤1.2, and score ≤5.1 at Month 12 = moderate response * If diminution from baseline \>0.6 and ≤1.2, and score \>5.1 at Month 12 = non-response * If diminution from baseline ≤1.2 at Month 12 = non-response * Participants with missing data were considered as non-response
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreBaseline; Month 6; Month 12The HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform daily living activities. This composite index score ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (total functional disability) and includes questions regarding 8 domains (dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) ScoreBaseline; Month 6, Month 12The RAID questionnaire is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on participant quality of life. This composite index score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst) and includes questions regarding 7 domains (pain, functional disability assessment, fatigue, sleep, physical well-being, emotional well-being, coping). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.
Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.Baseline; Month 6; Month 12Participants were asked: If you were to remain in the same condition for the next few months as you have been over the last 8 days, would this be 1) acceptable, 2) unacceptable? The percentage of participants who responded acceptable at each time point is presented.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to 30 monthsAn adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding if accompanied by clinical symptoms, results in a change in study treatment, results in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy or clinically significant in the investigator's judgment), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12Month 12CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤10 was considered to be CDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were not allocated to study arms but were separated according to therapy regimen post hoc for efficacy and safety analyses. Of the 608 participants enrolled 5 were not eligible for analysis (1 was found to be duplicate and 4 did not receive tocilizumab infusion).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
Tocilizumab administered as monotherapy according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice.
228
Tocilizumab Combination Therapy
Tocilizumab administered in combination with other standard of care therapy according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice.
349
Total577

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event53
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLack of Treatment Efficacy88
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up29
Overall StudyNo Reason Reported10
Overall StudyNot Evaluable for Efficacy26
Overall StudyPatient No Longer Wanted to Participate12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab MonotherapyTocilizumab Combination TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
180 Participants274 Participants454 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
48 Participants75 Participants123 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
112 / 234182 / 369
serious
Total, serious adverse events
31 / 23443 / 369

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion

The number of participants assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy versus tocilizumab combination therapy is reported. A multivariate analysis was performed to search for predictive factors for the initiation of tocilizumab in monotherapy.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabNumber of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study InclusionMonotherapy228 participants
All TocilizumabNumber of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study InclusionCombination Therapy349 participants
Comparison: Influence of baseline factor Patient's Age (\>=65) upon physician's decision to initiate tocilizumab monotherapy (multivariate analysis).p-value: 0.02395% CI: [1.06, 2.3]Wald Chi-square
Comparison: Influence of baseline factor No methotrexate (MTX) sequences within the two last years upon physician's decision to initiate tocilizumab monotherapy (multivariate analysis).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.92, 8.43]Wald Chi-square
Comparison: Influence of baseline factor Past history of severe infectious disease upon physician's decision to initiate tocilizumab monotherapy (multivariate analysis).p-value: 0.021295% CI: [1.11, 3.7]Wald Chi-square
Comparison: Influence of baseline factor Higher Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) (unit=1) on physician decision to initiate tocilizumab monotherapy; DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using 28-joint count, ESR (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores correspond to greater disease activity (multivariate analysis).p-value: 0.007695% CI: [1.05, 1.41]Wald Chi-square
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

The HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform daily living activities. This composite index score ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (total functional disability) and includes questions regarding 8 domains (dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12

Population: Participants in the Efficacy population who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab, who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreBaseline (n = 171, 251)1.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
All TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreChange at Month 6 (n = 85, 121)-0.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
All TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreChange at Month 12 (n = 74, 106)-0.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreBaseline (n = 171, 251)1.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreChange at Month 6 (n = 85, 121)-0.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreChange at Month 12 (n = 74, 106)-0.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score

The RAID questionnaire is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on participant quality of life. This composite index score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst) and includes questions regarding 7 domains (pain, functional disability assessment, fatigue, sleep, physical well-being, emotional well-being, coping). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 6, Month 12

Population: Participants in the Efficacy population who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab, who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) ScoreBaseline (n = 170, 252)6.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
All TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) ScoreChange at Month 6 (n = 82, 122)-2.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
All TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) ScoreChange at Month 12 (n = 72, 108)-2.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) ScoreBaseline (n = 170, 252)5.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) ScoreChange at Month 6 (n = 82, 122)-2.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) ScoreChange at Month 12 (n = 72, 108)-2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Secondary

Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period

Time frame: Up to 30 months

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All TocilizumabMean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period9.1 infusionsStandard Deviation 4.3
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyMean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period9.7 infusionsStandard Deviation 4
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12

DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.2 was considered to be DAS28-ESR LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 1241.2 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 1244.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine

The percentage of participants who discontinued hydroxychloroquine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.

Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)

Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued hydroxychloroquine and with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued HydroxychloroquineTherapeutic escape30.0 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued HydroxychloroquinePrimary failure50.0 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued HydroxychloroquineReason Not Specified20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide

The percentage of participants who discontinued leflunomide treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.

Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)

Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued leflunomide and with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued LeflunomideTherapeutic escape17.6 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued LeflunomideIntolerance47.1 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued LeflunomidePatient's Choice2.9 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued LeflunomidePrimary Failure32.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)

The percentage of participants who discontinued MTX treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. Reason for discontinuation Other Intolerance = intolerance other than cytopenia or hepatic cytolysis.

Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)

Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued MTX and with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Therapeutic escape12.6 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Cytopenia4.4 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Hepatic Cytolysis20.4 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Other Intolerance46.1 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Patient's Choice4.9 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Primary Failure8.7 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Remission0.5 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)Reason Not Specified2.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine

The percentage of participants who discontinued sulfasalazine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.

Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)

Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued sulfasalazine and with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued SulfasalazineTherapeutic escape23.5 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued SulfasalazineIntolerance41.2 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued SulfasalazinePrimary failure35.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)

The percentage of participants who discontinued treatment with unspecified csDMARDs prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.

Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)

Population: Participants in the Tocilizumab Monotherapy group (Efficacy population) who discontinued treatment with unspecified csDMARDs and with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)Therapeutic escape26.6 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)Intolerance38.0 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)Patient's Choice1.3 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)Primary Failure27.8 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)Remission1.3 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)Reason Not Specified5.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period

The percentage of participants who received infusions is presented by category of total infusions received over the study period.

Time frame: Up to 13.4 months

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period5 Infusions4.8 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period9 Infusions2.6 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period2 Infusions4.8 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period10 Infusions4.4 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period6 Infusions3.9 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period11 Infusions7.9 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period4 Infusions3.5 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period12 Infusions16.7 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period7 Infusions6.6 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period13 Infusions17.1 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period3 Infusions7.0 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period14 Infusions11.0 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period8 Infusions3.5 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period15 Infusions0.4 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period1 Infusion5.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period15 Infusions0.9 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period1 Infusion4.6 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period2 Infusions4.0 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period3 Infusions2.6 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period4 Infusions4.0 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period5 Infusions5.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period6 Infusions5.4 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period7 Infusions2.6 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period8 Infusions2.6 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period9 Infusions5.4 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period10 Infusions5.4 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period11 Infusions6.3 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period12 Infusions22.3 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period13 Infusions18.3 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period14 Infusions9.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.

Participants were asked: If you were to remain in the same condition for the next few months as you have been over the last 8 days, would this be 1) acceptable, 2) unacceptable? The percentage of participants who responded acceptable at each time point is presented.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12

Population: Participants in the Efficacy population who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab, who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.Baseline (n = 168, 246)25.6 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.Month 6 (n = 101, 153)69.3 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.Month 12 (n = 84, 132)84.5 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.Baseline (n = 168, 246)34.1 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.Month 6 (n = 101, 153)73.2 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.Month 12 (n = 84, 132)79.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding if accompanied by clinical symptoms, results in a change in study treatment, results in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy or clinically significant in the investigator's judgment), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

Time frame: Up to 30 months

Population: Safety population, defined as participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events54.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events53.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12

ACR20/50/70 response was calculated as improvement (from baseline) of at least 20/50/70% (respectively) of tender and of swollen joints, and improvement from baseline of least 20/50/70% (respectively) in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: participant's pain assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) score, and ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/L). Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12ACR2032.5 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12ACR5021.9 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12ACR709.6 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12ACR2026.4 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12ACR5016.9 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12ACR709.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study

csDMARD intensification was defined as an addition of a csDMARD without suppression of other csDMARD, dose increase of a csDMARD, switch (addition and suppression) of a csDMARD without intolerance, biological abnormality or symptom improvement to the suppressed csDMARD, or modification of the MTX administration route (from oral route to intramuscular/subcutaneous) with dose increase or maintenance.

Time frame: Up to 30 months

Population: Participants in Efficacy population who received at least 1 infusion of tocilizumab, who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, and with no permanent discontinuation of tocilizumab treatment over the study period. For efficacy criteria with response/non response values, participants with non-evaluable response were considered as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study8.2 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study4.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12

CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤2.8 was considered to be CDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 129.6 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 128.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12

CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤10 was considered to be CDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 1231.1 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 1223.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12

DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of \<2.6 was considered to be DAS28-ESR remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 1234.6 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 1235.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12

EULAR response was categorized as good or moderate response and was calculated as the difference between DAS28-ESR scores at baseline and Month 12. DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. * If diminution from baseline \>1.2 and score ≤3.2 at Month 12 = good response * If diminution from baseline \>1.2 and score \>3.2 at Month 12 = moderate response * If diminution from baseline \>0.6 and ≤1.2, and score ≤5.1 at Month 12 = moderate response * If diminution from baseline \>0.6 and ≤1.2, and score \>5.1 at Month 12 = non-response * If diminution from baseline ≤1.2 at Month 12 = non-response * Participants with missing data were considered as non-response

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12Good Response40.4 percentage of participants
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12Moderate Response9.6 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12Good Response38.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12Moderate Response10.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period

The percentage of participants with no modifications (dose modification or discontinuation) is presented.

Time frame: Up to 30 months

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period48.2 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period56.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12

SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, CRP (mg/L), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.3 was considered to be SDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 1210.1 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 129.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12

SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter (mg/L)) per , and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤11 was considered to be SDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy population, defined as all participants who received at least one infusion of tocilizumab and who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 1230.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab Combination TherapyPercentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 1223.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026