Skip to content

Effect of Roflumilast at Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Effect of Roflumilast 500 μg Tablets Once Daily at Acute COPD Exacerbations Treated With Standard Therapy of Oral Steroids and Antibiotics. A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01473758
Acronym
TREAT
Enrollment
81
Registered
2011-11-17
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2017-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation

Keywords

COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Roflumilast

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to investigate if roflumilast can reduce the neutrophilic inflammation at acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In addition, the potential benefit of roflumilast on severity and recovery periods of acute COPD exacerbations will be assessed using patient diaries and questionnaires.

Detailed description

Participants will be asked whether they agree to participate in the measurements of arterial stiffness. Participants who agree will be included in the substudy, with the target of 60 patients with arterial stiffness measurements to complete the trial. Study was terminated due to difficulty in identifying further eligible patients for this exploratory study within a reasonable time.

Interventions

DRUGRoflumilast

500 µg tablet, od, oral administration in the morning after breakfast

DRUGPlacebo

tablet, od, oral administration in the morning after breakfast

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent (IC) * Age ≥ 40 years * History of COPD for at least 12 months prior to enrollment (Visit V0) * Chronic productive cough for 3 months in each of the 2 years prior to enrollment (if other causes of productive cough have been excluded) and/or an exacerbation with predominantly bronchitic symptoms at enrollment * Presentation of an acute exacerbation of COPD that will be associated with increased sputum volume or change in sputum colour * Documented fixed airway obstruction determined by an FEV1/FVC ratio (post-bronchodilator) \< 70% (if a pulmonary function test is not possible at Visit V0 a previous measurement can be taken which must not be older than 6 months) * Former smoker (defined as: smoking cessation at least 1 year ago) or current smoker both with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years Main

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of asthma and/or other relevant lung disease * Known alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency * Recurrent exacerbations (within 8 weeks of a preceding exacerbation) * Treatment of current exacerbation with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics already started at enrollment * Treatment with PDE4 inhibitors within 3 months prior to Visit V0 * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 14Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 14Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst).
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst).
Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status.
Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status.
Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction.
Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction.
Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8Any changes in the participant's usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8Any changes in the participant's usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach)Day 14Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer.
Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Exacerbation Length (Initial Approach)8 WeeksExacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary.
Exacerbation Length (Extended Approach)8 WeeksExacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary.
Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach)Baseline and Days 14 and 28Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach)Baseline and Days 14 and 28Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach)Day 14Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 1 investigative site in the United Kingdom from 16 February 2012 to 25 March 2014.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) were enrolled equally in 1 of 2 treatment groups, once a day placebo or roflumilast 500 µg in Cycle 1. Participants were re-randomized in Cycle 2 to once a day placebo or roflumilast 500 µg and are counted as new participants.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Roflumilast 500 μg
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations.
38
Placebo
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations.
43
Total81

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Cycle 1Adverse Event10200
Cycle 1Withdrawal by Subject1100
Cycle 2Adverse Event0050

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRoflumilast 500 μgPlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
≤ 65 years
7 participants11 participants18 participants
Age, Customized
> 65 years
31 participants32 participants63 participants
Baseline COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score
< 10
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Baseline COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score
≥ 10
16 participants25 participants41 participants
Baseline COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score
Missing
20 participants15 participants35 participants
Chronic Bronchitis
No
14 participants17 participants31 participants
Chronic Bronchitis
Yes
24 participants26 participants50 participants
Gender
Female
16 Participants15 Participants31 Participants
Gender
Male
22 Participants28 Participants50 Participants
Historical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations
< 2
28 participants28 participants56 participants
Historical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations
≥ 2
10 participants15 participants25 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
36 participants42 participants78 participants
Smoking status
Current smoker
8 participants11 participants19 participants
Smoking status
Former smoker
30 participants32 participants62 participants
Smoking status
Non-smoker
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI)
Missing
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI)
Normal Weight
15 participants18 participants33 participants
Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI)
Obese
9 participants9 participants18 participants
Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI)
Overweight
11 participants15 participants26 participants
Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI)
Underweight
3 participants0 participants3 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 3825 / 4344 / 4828 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 381 / 434 / 481 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 14

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach)-19.569 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 1.906
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach)-19.157 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 1.855
p-value: 0.878695% CI: [-5.766, 4.943]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 14

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach)-18.705 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 2.263
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach)-20.109 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 1.995
p-value: 0.649195% CI: [-4.731, 7.538]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach)

Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Days 14 and 28

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=28, 28)-0.128 meters/secondStandard Error 0.247
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=19, 28)-0.316 meters/secondStandard Error 0.323
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=19, 28)-0.511 meters/secondStandard Error 0.273
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=28, 28)-0.326 meters/secondStandard Error 0.245
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach)

Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Days 14 and 28

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=14, 24)-0.380 meters/secondStandard Error 0.413
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=18, 24)-0.047 meters/secondStandard Error 0.337
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=14, 24)-0.474 meters/secondStandard Error 0.321
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=18, 24)-0.343 meters/secondStandard Error 0.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)

Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)-16.166 mg/LStandard Error 0.41
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)5.720 mg/LStandard Error 3.6
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 42)-8.250 mg/LStandard Error 3.802
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=31, 44)-15.152 mg/LStandard Error 1.219
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=31, 44)-13.793 mg/LStandard Error 1.034
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)-16.901 mg/LStandard Error 0.417
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 42)-9.254 mg/LStandard Error 3.375
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)-5.257 mg/LStandard Error 3.518
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)

Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)-15.579 mg/liter(L)Standard Error 0.485
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)4.836 mg/liter(L)Standard Error 4.249
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 38)-9.179 mg/liter(L)Standard Error 4.11
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=26, 40)-14.889 mg/liter(L)Standard Error 1.395
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=26, 40)-13.057 mg/liter(L)Standard Error 1.133
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)-16.518 mg/liter(L)Standard Error 0.461
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 38)-8.018 mg/liter(L)Standard Error 3.533
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)-4.369 mg/liter(L)Standard Error 3.812
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)

Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 42)0.051 umol/LStandard Error 0.521
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=32, 40)0.147 umol/LStandard Error 0.599
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=31, 42)-2.155 umol/LStandard Error 0.533
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=44, 43)-3.971 umol/LStandard Error 0.246
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=31, 42)-1.162 umol/LStandard Error 0.462
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=44, 43)-3.839 umol/LStandard Error 0.244
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=32, 40)-0.091 umol/LStandard Error 0.524
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 42)-0.148 umol/LStandard Error 0.519
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)

Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=34, 39)-3.916 umol/LStandard Error 0.286
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 38)0.404 umol/LStandard Error 0.625
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=27, 36)0.210 umol/LStandard Error 0.676
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=26, 38)-2.127 umol/LStandard Error 0.625
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=26, 38)-1.144 umol/LStandard Error 0.515
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=34, 39)-3.976 umol/LStandard Error 0.261
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=27, 36)0.014 umol/LStandard Error 0.567
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 38)-0.184 umol/LStandard Error 0.571
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)

Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)0.061 mmol/LStandard Error 0.139
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=46, 45)1.767 mmol/LStandard Error 0.408
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 43)0.189 mmol/LStandard Error 0.235
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=42, 45)0.942 mmol/LStandard Error 0.254
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 43)0.215 mmol/LStandard Error 0.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=42, 45)0.364 mmol/LStandard Error 0.246
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=46, 45)0.973 mmol/LStandard Error 0.408
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)-0.008 mmol/LStandard Error 0.119
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)

Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)1.617 mmol/LStandard Error 0.426
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)1.000 mmol/LStandard Error 0.3
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)0.067 mmol/LStandard Error 0.156
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)0.255 mmol/LStandard Error 0.272
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)0.226 mmol/LStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)1.027 mmol/LStandard Error 0.397
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)-0.020 mmol/LStandard Error 0.129
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)0.432 mmol/LStandard Error 0.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)

Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)0.350 pg/mLStandard Error 0.59
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)-0.394 pg/mLStandard Error 0.355
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)-0.139 pg/mLStandard Error 0.414
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)-0.799 pg/mLStandard Error 0.333
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)-0.806 pg/mLStandard Error 0.312
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)-1.002 pg/mLStandard Error 0.602
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)-0.757 pg/mLStandard Error 0.368
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)-0.841 pg/mLStandard Error 0.349
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)

Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)1.274 pg/mLStandard Error 0.682
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)0.217 pg/mLStandard Error 0.359
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)0.657 pg/mLStandard Error 0.431
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)-0.003 pg/mLStandard Error 0.329
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)0.464 pg/mLStandard Error 0.288
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)0.378 pg/mLStandard Error 0.647
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)0.541 pg/mLStandard Error 0.366
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)0.495 pg/mLStandard Error 0.324
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)

Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)-12.314 pg/mLStandard Error 0.652
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)-7.587 pg/mLStandard Error 2.088
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)1.607 pg/mLStandard Error 2.543
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)-10.811 pg/mLStandard Error 1.064
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)-6.069 pg/mLStandard Error 2.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)-11.802 pg/mLStandard Error 0.665
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)-9.604 pg/mLStandard Error 0.918
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)-7.619 pg/mLStandard Error 1.838
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)

Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)-12.469 pg/mLStandard Error 0.782
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)-1.973 pg/mLStandard Error 1.918
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)-8.108 pg/mLStandard Error 2.36
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)-11.665 pg/mLStandard Error 1.129
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)-9.431 pg/mLStandard Error 0.937
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)-11.904 pg/mLStandard Error 0.742
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)-7.243 pg/mLStandard Error 1.997
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)-5.728 pg/mLStandard Error 1.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)

FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)1.282 percentStandard Error 0.795
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)1.394 percentStandard Error 0.85
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)2.045 percentStandard Error 0.974
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)1.393 percentStandard Error 0.827
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)-1.881 percentStandard Error 0.765
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)-1.128 percentStandard Error 0.799
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)-1.198 percentStandard Error 0.888
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)-1.830 percentStandard Error 0.834
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)

FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)1.575 percentStandard Error 0.933
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)1.874 percentStandard Error 1.012
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)2.350 percentStandard Error 1.138
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)1.636 percentStandard Error 0.951
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)-1.669 percentStandard Error 0.828
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)-1.064 percentStandard Error 0.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)-1.029 percentStandard Error 0.982
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)-1.796 percentStandard Error 0.914
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)0.063 litersStandard Error 0.027
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)0.084 litersStandard Error 0.031
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n= 43, 45)0.062 litersStandard Error 0.029
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)0.050 litersStandard Error 0.034
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)0.005 litersStandard Error 0.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)0.012 litersStandard Error 0.028
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n= 43, 45)0.018 litersStandard Error 0.029
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)-0.003 litersStandard Error 0.028
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)0.083 litersStandard Error 0.035
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)0.051 litersStandard Error 0.031
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)0.064 litersStandard Error 0.039
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)0.095 litersStandard Error 0.037
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)0.010 litersStandard Error 0.033
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)0.010 litersStandard Error 0.029
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)0.001 litersStandard Error 0.031
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)0.028 litersStandard Error 0.031
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)

Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)0.048 litersStandard Error 0.052
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)0.046 litersStandard Error 0.054
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)0.053 litersStandard Error 0.062
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)0.034 litersStandard Error 0.065
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44)0.084 litersStandard Error 0.058
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45)0.062 litersStandard Error 0.053
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44)0.067 litersStandard Error 0.057
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45)0.146 litersStandard Error 0.053
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)

Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)0.002 litersStandard Error 0.06
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)0.039 litersStandard Error 0.062
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)0.044 litersStandard Error 0.072
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)0.039 litersStandard Error 0.072
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40)0.086 litersStandard Error 0.062
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41)0.057 litersStandard Error 0.056
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41)0.166 litersStandard Error 0.056
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40)0.075 litersStandard Error 0.062
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42)-1207.678 pg/mLStandard Error 133.298
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39)-725.454 pg/mLStandard Error 195.921
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38)-1115.741 pg/mLStandard Error 200.367
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=26, 32)-860.191 pg/mLStandard Error 206.289
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=26, 32)-962.342 pg/mLStandard Error 189.817
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42)-923.325 pg/mLStandard Error 130.533
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38)-877.871 pg/mLStandard Error 172.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39)-705.849 pg/mLStandard Error 192.89
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35)-1232.929 pg/mLStandard Error 212.663
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38)-1317.400 pg/mLStandard Error 143.748
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=22, 29)-1042.097 pg/mLStandard Error 225.619
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35)-822.715 pg/mLStandard Error 221.328
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=22, 29)-996.485 pg/mLStandard Error 196.729
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38)-934.624 pg/mLStandard Error 133.217
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35)-955.365 pg/mLStandard Error 174.734
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35)-695.955 pg/mLStandard Error 206.201
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38)-264788.038 pg/mLStandard Error 62440.42
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42)-193222.856 pg/mLStandard Error 39595.196
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=25, 32)-168204.970 pg/mLStandard Error 51760.361
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39)-172069.810 pg/mLStandard Error 41341.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=25, 32)-205822.814 pg/mLStandard Error 46476.985
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42)-215296.477 pg/mLStandard Error 38432.424
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38)-160441.028 pg/mLStandard Error 53963.528
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39)-195751.307 pg/mLStandard Error 40449.866
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38)-174718.396 pg/mLStandard Error 45481.71
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35)-149198.139 pg/mLStandard Error 47388.834
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35)-255317.294 pg/mLStandard Error 70915.154
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=21, 29)-204731.356 pg/mLStandard Error 50404.332
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=21, 29)-223918.341 pg/mLStandard Error 43039.568
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38)-227274.816 pg/mLStandard Error 41821.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35)-160587.365 pg/mLStandard Error 57944.793
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35)-199515.687 pg/mLStandard Error 43965.789
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42)-8606.357 ng/mLStandard Error 1747.094
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39)-8380.855 ng/mLStandard Error 1871.93
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38)-12692.279 ng/mLStandard Error 2220.374
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=26, 32)-9424.227 ng/mLStandard Error 2275.981
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=26, 32)-8527.766 ng/mLStandard Error 2078.411
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42)-4380.803 ng/mLStandard Error 1713.047
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38)-5351.001 ng/mLStandard Error 1933.964
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39)-5929.775 ng/mLStandard Error 1843.806
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35)-13744.824 ng/mLStandard Error 2476.123
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35)-8072.784 ng/mLStandard Error 2144.895
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=22, 29)-10248.612 ng/mLStandard Error 2578.146
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38)-9253.786 ng/mLStandard Error 1997.077
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=22, 29)-9478.460 ng/mLStandard Error 2234.238
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35)-6318.878 ng/mLStandard Error 2002.939
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35)-5944.184 ng/mLStandard Error 2041.587
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38)-4521.397 ng/mLStandard Error 1863.867
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42)-202235.344 µg/mLStandard Error 12993.506
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39)-143831.510 µg/mLStandard Error 34043.871
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38)-183452.324 µg/mLStandard Error 22560.241
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=25, 33)-118129.436 µg/mLStandard Error 25397.042
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=25, 33)-156544.533 µg/mLStandard Error 22550.054
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42)-206912.465 µg/mLStandard Error 12543.143
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38)-130613.019 µg/mLStandard Error 19255.852
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39)-110144.325 µg/mLStandard Error 33211.578
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=21, 30)-141985.838 µg/mLStandard Error 28278.566
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35)-200905.068 µg/mLStandard Error 25432.984
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38)-222995.020 µg/mLStandard Error 14887.254
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35)-149211.318 µg/mLStandard Error 39523.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=21, 30)-169389.587 µg/mLStandard Error 23767.879
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35)-125385.276 µg/mLStandard Error 36629.962
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35)-149865.936 µg/mLStandard Error 20549.567
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38)-224606.396 µg/mLStandard Error 13669.986
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39)-0.341 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 0.206
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40)-0.174 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 0.271
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36)0.031 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 1.044
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32)1.714 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 1.969
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40)-0.214 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 0.263
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32)0.913 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 1.655
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39)-0.141 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 0.202
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36)1.518 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 0.952
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37)-0.110 percentage of eosinophilsStandard Error 0.326
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35)-0.259 percentage of eosinophilsStandard Error 0.245
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34)0.043 percentage of eosinophilsStandard Error 1.209
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30)2.187 percentage of eosinophilsStandard Error 2.278
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30)1.086 percentage of eosinophilsStandard Error 1.766
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34)1.597 percentage of eosinophilsStandard Error 1.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35)-0.100 percentage of eosinophilsStandard Error 0.225
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37)-0.188 percentage of eosinophilsStandard Error 0.288
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35)0.229 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.353
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37)0.430 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.254
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34)0.039 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.183
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30)-0.095 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.187
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30)-0.051 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.137
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35)0.182 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.326
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34)-0.325 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.155
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37)0.295 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.225
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39)0.109 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.308
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40)0.309 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.25
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36)-0.118 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.173
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32)-0.203 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.164
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32)-0.208 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.132
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39)-0.015 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.303
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36)-0.431 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.158
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40)0.195 percentage of lymphocytesStandard Error 0.243
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39)14.679 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 3.74
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40)20.331 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 3.745
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32)19.075 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 5.003
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36)29.510 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 4.717
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32)16.322 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 4.156
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39)17.228 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 3.704
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40)21.599 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 3.667
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36)14.463 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 4.367
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35)11.393 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 3.837
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37)16.062 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 3.929
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34)27.535 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 5.284
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30)16.593 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 5.539
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30)15.877 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 4.171
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35)15.430 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 3.559
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34)13.382 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 4.503
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37)20.774 percentage of macrophagesStandard Error 3.506
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39)-14.637 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 3.748
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40)-20.690 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 3.758
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36)-29.848 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 4.721
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32)-21.327 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 5.009
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32)-17.328 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 4.188
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39)-16.060 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 3.713
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36)-14.664 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 4.371
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40)-21.052 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 3.678
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35)-11.325 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 3.837
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37)-16.770 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 3.983
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34)-27.760 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 5.275
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30)-19.663 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 5.561
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30)-17.047 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 4.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35)-14.484 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 3.559
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34)-13.837 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 4.498
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37)-20.346 percentage of neutrophilsStandard Error 3.55
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=41, 42)-23.512 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 2.448
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=45, 43)-26.634 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 3.03
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=30, 40)-29.023 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 3.347
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=28, 36)-19.551 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 3.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=28, 36)-26.855 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 3.536
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=30, 40)-22.920 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 2.947
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=45, 43)-26.335 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 3.124
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=41, 42)-25.332 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 2.471
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=35, 39)-25.559 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 3.529
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=32, 38)-21.813 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 2.706
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=25, 37)-29.200 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 4.022
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=24, 33)-24.477 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 2.708
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Change at Day 56 (n=24, 33)-26.474 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 2.341
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Change at Day 7 (n=35, 39)-27.563 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 3.334
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Change at Day 28 (n=25, 37)-22.218 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 3.362
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)Change at Day 14 (n=32, 38)-25.111 10^6 cells/gram sputumStandard Error 2.505
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)

The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 1 (n=37, 38)6.232 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.424
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 5 (n=25, 41)-0.347 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.621
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 3 (n=29, 41)2.044 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.847
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 6 (n=23, 41)-0.668 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.402
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 2 (n=37, 40)3.558 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.178
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 7 (n=24, 37)-0.121 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 8 (n=19, 30)-0.010 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.061
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 4 (n=27, 42)0.545 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.732
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 8 (n=19, 30)-0.031 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.045
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 1 (n=37, 38)3.009 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.052
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 2 (n=37, 40)1.074 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.876
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 3 (n=29, 41)0.458 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.627
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 4 (n=27, 42)0.429 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.534
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 5 (n=25, 41)-0.170 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.459
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 6 (n=23, 41)-0.043 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.295
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 7 (n=24, 37)0.014 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.232
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)

The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=21, 37)-0.412 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.613
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=27, 34)6.448 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.503
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=19, 37)-0.924 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.411
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=28, 36)3.778 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.239
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=20, 33)-0.228 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.342
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=24, 37)2.002 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.915
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=18, 30)0.002 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.059
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=23, 38)0.559 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.739
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=18, 30)-0.048 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.044
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=24, 37)0.278 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.669
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=28, 36)0.804 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.911
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=23, 38)0.277 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.536
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=21, 37)-0.392 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.448
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=19, 37)-0.062 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.297
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=20, 33)0.048 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.253
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=27, 34)2.695 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.096
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)

Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=35, 43)-1.328 hoursStandard Error 0.357
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=43, 42)-1.305 hoursStandard Error 0.319
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=31, 42)-0.833 hoursStandard Error 0.402
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=42, 38)-1.472 hoursStandard Error 0.353
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=30, 39)-1.271 hoursStandard Error 0.372
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=42, 44)-1.314 hoursStandard Error 0.343
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=30, 38)-0.714 hoursStandard Error 0.443
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=30, 39)-1.144 hoursStandard Error 0.363
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=30, 38)-0.068 hoursStandard Error 0.401
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=42, 38)-0.276 hoursStandard Error 0.344
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=43, 42)-0.472 hoursStandard Error 0.307
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=42, 44)0.099 hoursStandard Error 0.324
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=35, 43)-0.266 hoursStandard Error 0.325
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=31, 42)0.158 hoursStandard Error 0.369
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=30, 39)-0.478 hoursStandard Error 0.333
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=30, 39)-0.247 hoursStandard Error 0.344
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)

Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=34, 34)-1.313 hoursStandard Error 0.416
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=34, 38)-0.974 hoursStandard Error 0.359
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=34, 40)-1.077 hoursStandard Error 0.374
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=28, 39)-1.131 hoursStandard Error 0.414
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=26, 38)-0.826 hoursStandard Error 0.465
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=25, 35)-1.154 hoursStandard Error 0.448
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=26, 35)-1.194 hoursStandard Error 0.449
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=26, 34)-0.812 hoursStandard Error 0.532
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=26, 34)0.037 hoursStandard Error 0.458
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=34, 34)-0.105 hoursStandard Error 0.391
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=26, 38)0.280 hoursStandard Error 0.407
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=34, 38)-0.328 hoursStandard Error 0.333
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=26, 35)-0.340 hoursStandard Error 0.394
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=34, 40)0.226 hoursStandard Error 0.335
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=25, 35)-0.062 hoursStandard Error 0.386
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=28, 39)-0.306 hoursStandard Error 0.354
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)

Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=46, 42)-13.958 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.147
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=33, 42)-5.568 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.847
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=44, 44)-5.360 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.676
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=32, 41)-2.186 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.515
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=44, 44)-5.776 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.772
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=31, 40)-8.513 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.544
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=37, 43)-6.660 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.546
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=31, 39)-4.563 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.741
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=37, 43)1.133 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.126
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=46, 42)-8.447 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.865
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=44, 44)1.029 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.488
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=44, 44)2.038 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.421
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=31, 39)0.950 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.091
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=33, 42)0.269 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.396
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=32, 41)-4.596 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.076
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=31, 40)-1.974 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.952
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)

Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=28, 38)-3.557 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.061
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=37, 38)-16.551 liters/minuteStandard Error 5.144
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=35, 40)-6.067 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.564
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=35, 40)-4.996 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.914
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=29, 39)-4.595 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.421
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=27, 37)-3.795 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.546
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=27, 36)-7.178 liters/minuteStandard Error 5.212
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=27, 35)-2.877 liters/minuteStandard Error 5.388
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=27, 35)-0.956 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.418
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=28, 38)-1.224 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.287
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=29, 39)-0.420 liters/minuteStandard Error 2.737
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=37, 38)-9.915 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.442
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=27, 36)-4.186 liters/minuteStandard Error 4.264
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=35, 40)-0.304 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.899
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=27, 37)-5.559 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.68
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=35, 40)0.687 liters/minuteStandard Error 3.36
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)

Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=48, 46)3.110 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.257
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=47, 46)1.171 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.285
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=44, 46)0.850 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.267
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=38, 44)0.751 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.312
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=34, 43)0.437 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.287
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=33, 43)0.041 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.257
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=31, 41)0.503 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.247
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=31, 40)0.451 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.274
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=31, 40)0.530 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.237
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=48, 46)2.593 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.246
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=34, 43)0.907 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.259
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=47, 46)1.402 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.267
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=31, 41)0.533 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.216
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=44, 46)0.802 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=33, 43)0.661 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.231
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=38, 44)0.924 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.282
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)

Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=38, 42)2.930 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.286
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=37, 42)1.130 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.314
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=35, 42)0.906 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.299
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=30, 40)0.552 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.298
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=29, 39)0.413 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.305
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=28, 39)0.141 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=27, 37)0.442 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.294
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=27, 36)0.626 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.361
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=27, 36)0.612 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.297
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=38, 42)2.587 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.254
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=29, 39)0.882 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.254
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=37, 42)1.331 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.272
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=27, 37)0.673 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.243
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=35, 42)0.790 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.258
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=28, 39)0.681 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.258
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=30, 40)0.922 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.248
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)

Any changes in the participant's usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=48, 46)0.787 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=47, 46)0.767 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.172
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=44, 46)0.338 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.103
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=38, 44)0.379 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.144
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=34, 43)0.191 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.107
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=33, 43)0.127 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.107
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=31, 41)0.179 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.116
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=31, 40)0.084 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=31, 40)0.171 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.075
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=48, 46)0.730 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.162
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=34, 43)0.244 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.096
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=47, 46)0.780 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.161
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=31, 41)0.156 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.103
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=44, 46)0.177 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=33, 43)0.196 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.096
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=38, 44)0.206 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.129
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)

Any changes in the participant's usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=38, 42)0.849 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.194
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=37, 42)0.682 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=35, 42)0.281 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.115
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=30, 40)0.185 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.118
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=29, 39)0.130 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.123
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=28, 39)0.128 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=27, 37)0.112 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.117
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=27, 36)0.122 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.101
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=27, 36)0.127 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.084
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=38, 42)0.769 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.174
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=29, 39)0.263 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.103
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=37, 42)0.804 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.167
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=27, 37)0.135 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.097
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=35, 42)0.188 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.099
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=28, 39)0.204 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.108
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=30, 40)0.217 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.099
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)

The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 1 (n=35, 39)7.163 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.859
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 2 (n=37, 40)4.839 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.259
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 3 (n=29, 42)2.988 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.87
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 4 (n=27, 42)0.909 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.861
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 5 (n=25, 41)-0.657 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.554
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 6 (n=23, 41)-0.889 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.976
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 7 (n=24, 38)-0.311 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.654
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 8 9n=19, 33)-0.240 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.244
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 8 9n=19, 33)-0.115 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.178
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 1 (n=35, 39)4.697 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.077
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 5 (n=25, 41)-0.318 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.129
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 2 (n=37, 40)1.433 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.652
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 7 (n=24, 38)-0.075 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.479
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 3 (n=29, 42)0.179 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.363
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 6 (n=23, 41)-0.140 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.706
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 4 (n=27, 42)0.743 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.344
Secondary

Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)

The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=19, 37)-1.688 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.015
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=21, 37)-1.058 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.748
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=24, 38)2.080 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.041
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=25, 35)6.182 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.271
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=20, 34)-0.773 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.698
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=23, 38)0.002 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.003
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=18, 32)-0.190 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.259
Roflumilast 500 μgChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=28, 36)4.423 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.538
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 8 (n=18, 32)-0.154 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.191
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 2 (n=28, 36)1.558 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.864
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 1 (n=25, 35)4.753 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.385
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 3 (n=24, 38)0.317 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.494
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 4 (n=23, 38)0.657 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.459
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 5 (n=21, 37)-0.307 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.276
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 6 (n=19, 37)-0.002 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.738
PlaceboChange From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Change at Week 7 (n=20, 34)0.002 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.514
Secondary

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)

The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 3 (n=29, 41)16.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 6 (n=23, 41)12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.58
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 1 (n=37, 38)20.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.26
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 2 (n=37, 40)18.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.54
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 4 (n=27, 42)16.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.21
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 5 (n=25, 41)14.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.28
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 7 (n=24, 37)13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.38
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 8 (n=19, 30)13.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.68
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 8 (n=19, 30)15.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.25
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 3 (n=29, 41)16.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.73
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 5 (n=25, 41)15.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.93
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 4 (n=27, 42)15.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.26
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 7 (n=24, 37)14.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.44
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 1 (n=37, 38)19.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.03
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 6 (n=23, 41)15.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.12
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 2 (n=37, 40)17.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.32
Secondary

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)

The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 4 (n=23, 38)15.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.85
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 2 (n=28, 36)17.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.86
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 5 (n=21, 37)14.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.41
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 1 (n=27, 34)19.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.65
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 6 (n=19, 37)12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.85
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 3 (n=24, 37)15.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.84
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 7 (n=20, 33)13.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.93
Roflumilast 500 μgChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 8 (n=18, 30)12.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.85
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 8 (n=18, 30)15.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.25
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 1 (n=27, 34)19.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 2 (n=28, 36)17.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.48
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 3 (n=24, 37)16.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 4 (n=23, 38)15.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.42
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 5 (n=21, 37)14.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.04
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 6 (n=19, 37)15.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
PlaceboChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 7 (n=20, 33)14.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.48
Secondary

Exacerbation Length (Extended Approach)

Exacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbation Length (Extended Approach)13.0 days
PlaceboExacerbation Length (Extended Approach)14.0 days
Secondary

Exacerbation Length (Initial Approach)

Exacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbation Length (Initial Approach)12.0 days
PlaceboExacerbation Length (Initial Approach)14.0 days
Secondary

Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)

The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 1 (n=35, 39)45.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.19
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 2 (n=37, 40)42.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.07
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 3 (n=29, 42)39.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.27
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 4 (n=27, 42)38.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.37
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 5 (n=25, 41)35.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.03
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 6 (n=23, 41)33.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.45
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 7 (n=24, 38)34.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.09
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 8 (n=19, 33)34.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 8 (n=19, 33)39.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.25
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 1 (n=35, 39)45.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.39
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 5 (n=25, 41)39.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.13
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 2 (n=37, 40)42.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.81
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 7 (n=24, 38)38.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.52
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 3 (n=29, 42)39.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 6 (n=23, 41)39.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.62
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)Week 4 (n=27, 42)40.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Secondary

Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)

The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 3 (n=24, 38)38.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.22
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 4 (n=23, 38)38.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 1 (n=25, 35)45.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.54
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 2 (n=28, 36)41.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.39
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 5 (n=21, 37)35.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.11
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 6 (n=19, 37)35.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 7 (n=20, 34)35.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
Roflumilast 500 μgExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 8 (n=18, 32)34.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 8 (n=18, 32)39.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.34
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 3 (n=24, 38)40.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.22
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 5 (n=21, 37)39.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.55
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 7 (n=20, 34)38.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.05
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 1 (n=25, 35)45.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 6 (n=19, 37)39.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.05
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 2 (n=28, 36)42.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.07
PlaceboExacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)Week 4 (n=23, 38)40.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.26
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Roflumilast 500 μgPercentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach)45.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach)51.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach)

Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Roflumilast 500 μgPercentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach)37.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach)55.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026