Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation
Conditions
Keywords
COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Roflumilast
Brief summary
The purpose of this trial is to investigate if roflumilast can reduce the neutrophilic inflammation at acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In addition, the potential benefit of roflumilast on severity and recovery periods of acute COPD exacerbations will be assessed using patient diaries and questionnaires.
Detailed description
Participants will be asked whether they agree to participate in the measurements of arterial stiffness. Participants who agree will be included in the substudy, with the target of 60 patients with arterial stiffness measurements to complete the trial. Study was terminated due to difficulty in identifying further eligible patients for this exploratory study within a reasonable time.
Interventions
500 µg tablet, od, oral administration in the morning after breakfast
tablet, od, oral administration in the morning after breakfast
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Written informed consent (IC) * Age ≥ 40 years * History of COPD for at least 12 months prior to enrollment (Visit V0) * Chronic productive cough for 3 months in each of the 2 years prior to enrollment (if other causes of productive cough have been excluded) and/or an exacerbation with predominantly bronchitic symptoms at enrollment * Presentation of an acute exacerbation of COPD that will be associated with increased sputum volume or change in sputum colour * Documented fixed airway obstruction determined by an FEV1/FVC ratio (post-bronchodilator) \< 70% (if a pulmonary function test is not possible at Visit V0 a previous measurement can be taken which must not be older than 6 months) * Former smoker (defined as: smoking cessation at least 1 year ago) or current smoker both with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years Main
Exclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of asthma and/or other relevant lung disease * Known alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency * Recurrent exacerbations (within 8 weeks of a preceding exacerbation) * Treatment of current exacerbation with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics already started at enrollment * Treatment with PDE4 inhibitors within 3 months prior to Visit V0 * Other protocol-defined
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 14 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 14 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56 | FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates. |
| Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). |
| Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). |
| Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. |
| Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. |
| Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | Any changes in the participant's usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | Any changes in the participant's usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach) | Day 14 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer. |
| Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Exacerbation Length (Initial Approach) | 8 Weeks | Exacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary. |
| Exacerbation Length (Extended Approach) | 8 Weeks | Exacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary. |
| Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Days 14 and 28 | Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach) | Baseline and Days 14 and 28 | Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. |
| Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 | Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction. |
| Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach) | Day 14 | Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer. |
Countries
United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants took part in the study at 1 investigative site in the United Kingdom from 16 February 2012 to 25 March 2014.
Pre-assignment details
Participants with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) were enrolled equally in 1 of 2 treatment groups, once a day placebo or roflumilast 500 µg in Cycle 1. Participants were re-randomized in Cycle 2 to once a day placebo or roflumilast 500 µg and are counted as new participants.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. | 38 |
| Placebo Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. | 43 |
| Total | 81 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cycle 1 | Adverse Event | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Cycle 1 | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Cycle 2 | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Roflumilast 500 μg | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized ≤ 65 years | 7 participants | 11 participants | 18 participants |
| Age, Customized > 65 years | 31 participants | 32 participants | 63 participants |
| Baseline COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score < 10 | 2 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants |
| Baseline COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score ≥ 10 | 16 participants | 25 participants | 41 participants |
| Baseline COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score Missing | 20 participants | 15 participants | 35 participants |
| Chronic Bronchitis No | 14 participants | 17 participants | 31 participants |
| Chronic Bronchitis Yes | 24 participants | 26 participants | 50 participants |
| Gender Female | 16 Participants | 15 Participants | 31 Participants |
| Gender Male | 22 Participants | 28 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Historical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations < 2 | 28 participants | 28 participants | 56 participants |
| Historical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations ≥ 2 | 10 participants | 15 participants | 25 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 2 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 36 participants | 42 participants | 78 participants |
| Smoking status Current smoker | 8 participants | 11 participants | 19 participants |
| Smoking status Former smoker | 30 participants | 32 participants | 62 participants |
| Smoking status Non-smoker | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI) Missing | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI) Normal Weight | 15 participants | 18 participants | 33 participants |
| Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI) Obese | 9 participants | 9 participants | 18 participants |
| Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI) Overweight | 11 participants | 15 participants | 26 participants |
| Weight Category by Body Mass Index (BMI) Underweight | 3 participants | 0 participants | 3 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 35 / 38 | 25 / 43 | 44 / 48 | 28 / 47 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 38 | 1 / 43 | 4 / 48 | 1 / 47 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 14
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach) | -19.569 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 1.906 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach) | -19.157 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 1.855 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 14
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach) | -18.705 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 2.263 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach) | -20.109 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 1.995 |
Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach)
Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Days 14 and 28
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=28, 28) | -0.128 meters/second | Standard Error 0.247 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=19, 28) | -0.316 meters/second | Standard Error 0.323 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=19, 28) | -0.511 meters/second | Standard Error 0.273 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=28, 28) | -0.326 meters/second | Standard Error 0.245 |
Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach)
Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Days 14 and 28
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=14, 24) | -0.380 meters/second | Standard Error 0.413 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=18, 24) | -0.047 meters/second | Standard Error 0.337 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=14, 24) | -0.474 meters/second | Standard Error 0.321 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=18, 24) | -0.343 meters/second | Standard Error 0.29 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach)
Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | -16.166 mg/L | Standard Error 0.41 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | 5.720 mg/L | Standard Error 3.6 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 42) | -8.250 mg/L | Standard Error 3.802 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=31, 44) | -15.152 mg/L | Standard Error 1.219 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=31, 44) | -13.793 mg/L | Standard Error 1.034 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | -16.901 mg/L | Standard Error 0.417 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 42) | -9.254 mg/L | Standard Error 3.375 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | -5.257 mg/L | Standard Error 3.518 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach)
Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | -15.579 mg/liter(L) | Standard Error 0.485 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 4.836 mg/liter(L) | Standard Error 4.249 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 38) | -9.179 mg/liter(L) | Standard Error 4.11 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=26, 40) | -14.889 mg/liter(L) | Standard Error 1.395 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=26, 40) | -13.057 mg/liter(L) | Standard Error 1.133 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | -16.518 mg/liter(L) | Standard Error 0.461 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 38) | -8.018 mg/liter(L) | Standard Error 3.533 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | -4.369 mg/liter(L) | Standard Error 3.812 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach)
Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 42) | 0.051 umol/L | Standard Error 0.521 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=32, 40) | 0.147 umol/L | Standard Error 0.599 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=31, 42) | -2.155 umol/L | Standard Error 0.533 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=44, 43) | -3.971 umol/L | Standard Error 0.246 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=31, 42) | -1.162 umol/L | Standard Error 0.462 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=44, 43) | -3.839 umol/L | Standard Error 0.244 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=32, 40) | -0.091 umol/L | Standard Error 0.524 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 42) | -0.148 umol/L | Standard Error 0.519 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach)
Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=34, 39) | -3.916 umol/L | Standard Error 0.286 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 38) | 0.404 umol/L | Standard Error 0.625 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=27, 36) | 0.210 umol/L | Standard Error 0.676 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=26, 38) | -2.127 umol/L | Standard Error 0.625 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=26, 38) | -1.144 umol/L | Standard Error 0.515 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=34, 39) | -3.976 umol/L | Standard Error 0.261 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=27, 36) | 0.014 umol/L | Standard Error 0.567 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 38) | -0.184 umol/L | Standard Error 0.571 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach)
Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | 0.061 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.139 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=46, 45) | 1.767 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.408 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 43) | 0.189 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.235 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=42, 45) | 0.942 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.254 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 43) | 0.215 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.21 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=42, 45) | 0.364 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.246 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=46, 45) | 0.973 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.408 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | -0.008 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.119 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach)
Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 1.617 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.426 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 1.000 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | 0.067 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.156 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | 0.255 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.272 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | 0.226 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.23 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 1.027 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.397 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | -0.020 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.129 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 0.432 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.27 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach)
Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | 0.350 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.59 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | -0.394 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.355 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | -0.139 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.414 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | -0.799 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.333 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | -0.806 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.312 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | -1.002 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.602 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | -0.757 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.368 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | -0.841 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.349 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach)
Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 1.274 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.682 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 0.217 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.359 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | 0.657 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.431 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | -0.003 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.329 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | 0.464 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.288 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 0.378 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.647 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | 0.541 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.366 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 0.495 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.324 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)
Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | -12.314 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.652 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | -7.587 pg/mL | Standard Error 2.088 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | 1.607 pg/mL | Standard Error 2.543 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | -10.811 pg/mL | Standard Error 1.064 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | -6.069 pg/mL | Standard Error 2.49 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | -11.802 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.665 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | -9.604 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.918 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | -7.619 pg/mL | Standard Error 1.838 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)
Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | -12.469 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.782 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | -1.973 pg/mL | Standard Error 1.918 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | -8.108 pg/mL | Standard Error 2.36 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | -11.665 pg/mL | Standard Error 1.129 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | -9.431 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.937 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | -11.904 pg/mL | Standard Error 0.742 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | -7.243 pg/mL | Standard Error 1.997 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | -5.728 pg/mL | Standard Error 1.73 |
Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach)
FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | 1.282 percent | Standard Error 0.795 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | 1.394 percent | Standard Error 0.85 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | 2.045 percent | Standard Error 0.974 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | 1.393 percent | Standard Error 0.827 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | -1.881 percent | Standard Error 0.765 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | -1.128 percent | Standard Error 0.799 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | -1.198 percent | Standard Error 0.888 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | -1.830 percent | Standard Error 0.834 |
Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach)
FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 1.575 percent | Standard Error 0.933 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 1.874 percent | Standard Error 1.012 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | 2.350 percent | Standard Error 1.138 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | 1.636 percent | Standard Error 0.951 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | -1.669 percent | Standard Error 0.828 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | -1.064 percent | Standard Error 0.87 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | -1.029 percent | Standard Error 0.982 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | -1.796 percent | Standard Error 0.914 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach)
FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | 0.063 liters | Standard Error 0.027 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | 0.084 liters | Standard Error 0.031 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n= 43, 45) | 0.062 liters | Standard Error 0.029 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | 0.050 liters | Standard Error 0.034 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | 0.005 liters | Standard Error 0.03 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | 0.012 liters | Standard Error 0.028 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n= 43, 45) | 0.018 liters | Standard Error 0.029 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | -0.003 liters | Standard Error 0.028 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach)
FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 0.083 liters | Standard Error 0.035 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 0.051 liters | Standard Error 0.031 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | 0.064 liters | Standard Error 0.039 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | 0.095 liters | Standard Error 0.037 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | 0.010 liters | Standard Error 0.033 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 0.010 liters | Standard Error 0.029 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | 0.001 liters | Standard Error 0.031 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 0.028 liters | Standard Error 0.031 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach)
Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | 0.048 liters | Standard Error 0.052 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | 0.046 liters | Standard Error 0.054 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | 0.053 liters | Standard Error 0.062 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | 0.034 liters | Standard Error 0.065 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=32, 44) | 0.084 liters | Standard Error 0.058 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=47, 45) | 0.062 liters | Standard Error 0.053 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=33, 44) | 0.067 liters | Standard Error 0.057 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=43, 45) | 0.146 liters | Standard Error 0.053 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach)
Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 0.002 liters | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 0.039 liters | Standard Error 0.062 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | 0.044 liters | Standard Error 0.072 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | 0.039 liters | Standard Error 0.072 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=27, 40) | 0.086 liters | Standard Error 0.062 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 41) | 0.057 liters | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=33, 41) | 0.166 liters | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=28, 40) | 0.075 liters | Standard Error 0.062 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42) | -1207.678 pg/mL | Standard Error 133.298 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39) | -725.454 pg/mL | Standard Error 195.921 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38) | -1115.741 pg/mL | Standard Error 200.367 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=26, 32) | -860.191 pg/mL | Standard Error 206.289 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=26, 32) | -962.342 pg/mL | Standard Error 189.817 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42) | -923.325 pg/mL | Standard Error 130.533 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38) | -877.871 pg/mL | Standard Error 172.95 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39) | -705.849 pg/mL | Standard Error 192.89 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35) | -1232.929 pg/mL | Standard Error 212.663 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38) | -1317.400 pg/mL | Standard Error 143.748 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=22, 29) | -1042.097 pg/mL | Standard Error 225.619 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35) | -822.715 pg/mL | Standard Error 221.328 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=22, 29) | -996.485 pg/mL | Standard Error 196.729 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38) | -934.624 pg/mL | Standard Error 133.217 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35) | -955.365 pg/mL | Standard Error 174.734 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35) | -695.955 pg/mL | Standard Error 206.201 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38) | -264788.038 pg/mL | Standard Error 62440.42 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42) | -193222.856 pg/mL | Standard Error 39595.196 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=25, 32) | -168204.970 pg/mL | Standard Error 51760.361 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39) | -172069.810 pg/mL | Standard Error 41341.33 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=25, 32) | -205822.814 pg/mL | Standard Error 46476.985 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42) | -215296.477 pg/mL | Standard Error 38432.424 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38) | -160441.028 pg/mL | Standard Error 53963.528 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39) | -195751.307 pg/mL | Standard Error 40449.866 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38) | -174718.396 pg/mL | Standard Error 45481.71 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35) | -149198.139 pg/mL | Standard Error 47388.834 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35) | -255317.294 pg/mL | Standard Error 70915.154 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=21, 29) | -204731.356 pg/mL | Standard Error 50404.332 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=21, 29) | -223918.341 pg/mL | Standard Error 43039.568 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38) | -227274.816 pg/mL | Standard Error 41821.023 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35) | -160587.365 pg/mL | Standard Error 57944.793 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35) | -199515.687 pg/mL | Standard Error 43965.789 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42) | -8606.357 ng/mL | Standard Error 1747.094 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39) | -8380.855 ng/mL | Standard Error 1871.93 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38) | -12692.279 ng/mL | Standard Error 2220.374 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=26, 32) | -9424.227 ng/mL | Standard Error 2275.981 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=26, 32) | -8527.766 ng/mL | Standard Error 2078.411 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42) | -4380.803 ng/mL | Standard Error 1713.047 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38) | -5351.001 ng/mL | Standard Error 1933.964 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39) | -5929.775 ng/mL | Standard Error 1843.806 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35) | -13744.824 ng/mL | Standard Error 2476.123 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35) | -8072.784 ng/mL | Standard Error 2144.895 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=22, 29) | -10248.612 ng/mL | Standard Error 2578.146 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38) | -9253.786 ng/mL | Standard Error 1997.077 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=22, 29) | -9478.460 ng/mL | Standard Error 2234.238 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35) | -6318.878 ng/mL | Standard Error 2002.939 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35) | -5944.184 ng/mL | Standard Error 2041.587 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38) | -4521.397 ng/mL | Standard Error 1863.867 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42) | -202235.344 µg/mL | Standard Error 12993.506 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39) | -143831.510 µg/mL | Standard Error 34043.871 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38) | -183452.324 µg/mL | Standard Error 22560.241 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=25, 33) | -118129.436 µg/mL | Standard Error 25397.042 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=25, 33) | -156544.533 µg/mL | Standard Error 22550.054 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 42) | -206912.465 µg/mL | Standard Error 12543.143 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=26, 38) | -130613.019 µg/mL | Standard Error 19255.852 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=36, 39) | -110144.325 µg/mL | Standard Error 33211.578 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=21, 30) | -141985.838 µg/mL | Standard Error 28278.566 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35) | -200905.068 µg/mL | Standard Error 25432.984 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38) | -222995.020 µg/mL | Standard Error 14887.254 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35) | -149211.318 µg/mL | Standard Error 39523.47 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=21, 30) | -169389.587 µg/mL | Standard Error 23767.879 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=30, 35) | -125385.276 µg/mL | Standard Error 36629.962 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=22, 35) | -149865.936 µg/mL | Standard Error 20549.567 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=31, 38) | -224606.396 µg/mL | Standard Error 13669.986 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39) | -0.341 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 0.206 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40) | -0.174 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 0.271 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36) | 0.031 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 1.044 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32) | 1.714 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 1.969 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40) | -0.214 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 0.263 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32) | 0.913 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 1.655 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39) | -0.141 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 0.202 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36) | 1.518 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 0.952 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37) | -0.110 percentage of eosinophils | Standard Error 0.326 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35) | -0.259 percentage of eosinophils | Standard Error 0.245 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34) | 0.043 percentage of eosinophils | Standard Error 1.209 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30) | 2.187 percentage of eosinophils | Standard Error 2.278 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30) | 1.086 percentage of eosinophils | Standard Error 1.766 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34) | 1.597 percentage of eosinophils | Standard Error 1.02 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35) | -0.100 percentage of eosinophils | Standard Error 0.225 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37) | -0.188 percentage of eosinophils | Standard Error 0.288 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35) | 0.229 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.353 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37) | 0.430 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.254 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34) | 0.039 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.183 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30) | -0.095 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.187 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30) | -0.051 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.137 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35) | 0.182 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.326 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34) | -0.325 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.155 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37) | 0.295 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.225 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39) | 0.109 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.308 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40) | 0.309 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.25 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36) | -0.118 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.173 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32) | -0.203 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.164 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32) | -0.208 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.132 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39) | -0.015 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.303 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36) | -0.431 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.158 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40) | 0.195 percentage of lymphocytes | Standard Error 0.243 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39) | 14.679 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 3.74 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40) | 20.331 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 3.745 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32) | 19.075 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 5.003 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36) | 29.510 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 4.717 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32) | 16.322 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 4.156 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39) | 17.228 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 3.704 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40) | 21.599 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 3.667 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36) | 14.463 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 4.367 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35) | 11.393 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 3.837 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37) | 16.062 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 3.929 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34) | 27.535 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 5.284 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30) | 16.593 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 5.539 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30) | 15.877 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 4.171 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35) | 15.430 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 3.559 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34) | 13.382 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 4.503 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37) | 20.774 percentage of macrophages | Standard Error 3.506 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39) | -14.637 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 3.748 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40) | -20.690 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 3.758 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36) | -29.848 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 4.721 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32) | -21.327 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 5.009 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=20, 32) | -17.328 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 4.188 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=37, 39) | -16.060 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 3.713 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=29, 36) | -14.664 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 4.371 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=39, 40) | -21.052 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 3.678 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35) | -11.325 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 3.837 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37) | -16.770 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 3.983 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34) | -27.760 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 5.275 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30) | -19.663 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 5.561 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=16, 30) | -17.047 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 4.229 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=30, 35) | -14.484 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 3.559 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=24, 34) | -13.837 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 4.498 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=31, 37) | -20.346 percentage of neutrophils | Standard Error 3.55 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=41, 42) | -23.512 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 2.448 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=45, 43) | -26.634 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 3.03 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=30, 40) | -29.023 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 3.347 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=28, 36) | -19.551 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 3.92 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=28, 36) | -26.855 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 3.536 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=30, 40) | -22.920 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 2.947 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=45, 43) | -26.335 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 3.124 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=41, 42) | -25.332 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 2.471 |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=35, 39) | -25.559 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 3.529 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=32, 38) | -21.813 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 2.706 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=25, 37) | -29.200 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 4.022 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=24, 33) | -24.477 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 2.708 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 56 (n=24, 33) | -26.474 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 2.341 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 7 (n=35, 39) | -27.563 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 3.334 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 28 (n=25, 37) | -22.218 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 3.362 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | Change at Day 14 (n=32, 38) | -25.111 10^6 cells/gram sputum | Standard Error 2.505 |
Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)
The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 1 (n=37, 38) | 6.232 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.424 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 5 (n=25, 41) | -0.347 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.621 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 3 (n=29, 41) | 2.044 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.847 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 6 (n=23, 41) | -0.668 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.402 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 2 (n=37, 40) | 3.558 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.178 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 7 (n=24, 37) | -0.121 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 8 (n=19, 30) | -0.010 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.061 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 4 (n=27, 42) | 0.545 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.732 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 8 (n=19, 30) | -0.031 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.045 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 1 (n=37, 38) | 3.009 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.052 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 2 (n=37, 40) | 1.074 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.876 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 3 (n=29, 41) | 0.458 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.627 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 4 (n=27, 42) | 0.429 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.534 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 5 (n=25, 41) | -0.170 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.459 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 6 (n=23, 41) | -0.043 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.295 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 7 (n=24, 37) | 0.014 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.232 |
Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)
The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=21, 37) | -0.412 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.613 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=27, 34) | 6.448 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.503 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=19, 37) | -0.924 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.411 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=28, 36) | 3.778 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.239 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=20, 33) | -0.228 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.342 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=24, 37) | 2.002 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.915 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=18, 30) | 0.002 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.059 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=23, 38) | 0.559 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.739 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=18, 30) | -0.048 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.044 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=24, 37) | 0.278 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.669 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=28, 36) | 0.804 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.911 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=23, 38) | 0.277 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.536 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=21, 37) | -0.392 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.448 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=19, 37) | -0.062 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.297 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=20, 33) | 0.048 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.253 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=27, 34) | 2.695 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.096 |
Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach)
Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=35, 43) | -1.328 hours | Standard Error 0.357 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=43, 42) | -1.305 hours | Standard Error 0.319 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=31, 42) | -0.833 hours | Standard Error 0.402 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=42, 38) | -1.472 hours | Standard Error 0.353 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=30, 39) | -1.271 hours | Standard Error 0.372 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=42, 44) | -1.314 hours | Standard Error 0.343 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=30, 38) | -0.714 hours | Standard Error 0.443 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=30, 39) | -1.144 hours | Standard Error 0.363 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=30, 38) | -0.068 hours | Standard Error 0.401 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=42, 38) | -0.276 hours | Standard Error 0.344 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=43, 42) | -0.472 hours | Standard Error 0.307 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=42, 44) | 0.099 hours | Standard Error 0.324 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=35, 43) | -0.266 hours | Standard Error 0.325 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=31, 42) | 0.158 hours | Standard Error 0.369 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=30, 39) | -0.478 hours | Standard Error 0.333 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=30, 39) | -0.247 hours | Standard Error 0.344 |
Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach)
Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=34, 34) | -1.313 hours | Standard Error 0.416 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=34, 38) | -0.974 hours | Standard Error 0.359 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=34, 40) | -1.077 hours | Standard Error 0.374 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=28, 39) | -1.131 hours | Standard Error 0.414 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=26, 38) | -0.826 hours | Standard Error 0.465 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=25, 35) | -1.154 hours | Standard Error 0.448 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=26, 35) | -1.194 hours | Standard Error 0.449 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=26, 34) | -0.812 hours | Standard Error 0.532 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=26, 34) | 0.037 hours | Standard Error 0.458 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=34, 34) | -0.105 hours | Standard Error 0.391 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=26, 38) | 0.280 hours | Standard Error 0.407 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=34, 38) | -0.328 hours | Standard Error 0.333 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=26, 35) | -0.340 hours | Standard Error 0.394 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=34, 40) | 0.226 hours | Standard Error 0.335 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=25, 35) | -0.062 hours | Standard Error 0.386 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=28, 39) | -0.306 hours | Standard Error 0.354 |
Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach)
Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=46, 42) | -13.958 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.147 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=33, 42) | -5.568 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.847 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=44, 44) | -5.360 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.676 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=32, 41) | -2.186 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.515 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=44, 44) | -5.776 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.772 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=31, 40) | -8.513 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.544 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=37, 43) | -6.660 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.546 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=31, 39) | -4.563 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.741 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=37, 43) | 1.133 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.126 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=46, 42) | -8.447 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.865 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=44, 44) | 1.029 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.488 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=44, 44) | 2.038 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.421 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=31, 39) | 0.950 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.091 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=33, 42) | 0.269 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.396 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=32, 41) | -4.596 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.076 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=31, 40) | -1.974 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.952 |
Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach)
Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=28, 38) | -3.557 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.061 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=37, 38) | -16.551 liters/minute | Standard Error 5.144 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=35, 40) | -6.067 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.564 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=35, 40) | -4.996 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.914 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=29, 39) | -4.595 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.421 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=27, 37) | -3.795 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.546 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=27, 36) | -7.178 liters/minute | Standard Error 5.212 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=27, 35) | -2.877 liters/minute | Standard Error 5.388 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=27, 35) | -0.956 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.418 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=28, 38) | -1.224 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.287 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=29, 39) | -0.420 liters/minute | Standard Error 2.737 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=37, 38) | -9.915 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.442 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=27, 36) | -4.186 liters/minute | Standard Error 4.264 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=35, 40) | -0.304 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.899 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=27, 37) | -5.559 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.68 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=35, 40) | 0.687 liters/minute | Standard Error 3.36 |
Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)
Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=48, 46) | 3.110 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.257 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=47, 46) | 1.171 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.285 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=44, 46) | 0.850 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.267 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=38, 44) | 0.751 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.312 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=34, 43) | 0.437 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.287 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=33, 43) | 0.041 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.257 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=31, 41) | 0.503 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.247 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=31, 40) | 0.451 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.274 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=31, 40) | 0.530 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.237 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=48, 46) | 2.593 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.246 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=34, 43) | 0.907 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.259 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=47, 46) | 1.402 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.267 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=31, 41) | 0.533 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.216 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=44, 46) | 0.802 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.25 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=33, 43) | 0.661 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.231 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=38, 44) | 0.924 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.282 |
Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)
Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=38, 42) | 2.930 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.286 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=37, 42) | 1.130 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.314 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=35, 42) | 0.906 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.299 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=30, 40) | 0.552 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.298 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=29, 39) | 0.413 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.305 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=28, 39) | 0.141 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=27, 37) | 0.442 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.294 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=27, 36) | 0.626 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.361 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=27, 36) | 0.612 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.297 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=38, 42) | 2.587 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.254 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=29, 39) | 0.882 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.254 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=37, 42) | 1.331 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.272 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=27, 37) | 0.673 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.243 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=35, 42) | 0.790 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.258 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=28, 39) | 0.681 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.258 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=30, 40) | 0.922 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.248 |
Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach)
Any changes in the participant's usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=48, 46) | 0.787 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=47, 46) | 0.767 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.172 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=44, 46) | 0.338 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.103 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=38, 44) | 0.379 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.144 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=34, 43) | 0.191 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.107 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=33, 43) | 0.127 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.107 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=31, 41) | 0.179 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.116 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=31, 40) | 0.084 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.086 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=31, 40) | 0.171 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.075 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=48, 46) | 0.730 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.162 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=34, 43) | 0.244 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.096 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=47, 46) | 0.780 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.161 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=31, 41) | 0.156 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.103 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=44, 46) | 0.177 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.095 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=33, 43) | 0.196 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.096 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=38, 44) | 0.206 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.129 |
Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach)
Any changes in the participant's usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=38, 42) | 0.849 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.194 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=37, 42) | 0.682 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.19 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=35, 42) | 0.281 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.115 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=30, 40) | 0.185 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.118 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=29, 39) | 0.130 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.123 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=28, 39) | 0.128 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=27, 37) | 0.112 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.117 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=27, 36) | 0.122 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.101 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=27, 36) | 0.127 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.084 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=38, 42) | 0.769 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.174 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=29, 39) | 0.263 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.103 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=37, 42) | 0.804 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.167 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=27, 37) | 0.135 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.097 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=35, 42) | 0.188 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.099 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=28, 39) | 0.204 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.108 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=30, 40) | 0.217 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.099 |
Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)
The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 1 (n=35, 39) | 7.163 scores on a scale | Standard Error 2.859 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 2 (n=37, 40) | 4.839 scores on a scale | Standard Error 2.259 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 3 (n=29, 42) | 2.988 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.87 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 4 (n=27, 42) | 0.909 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.861 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 5 (n=25, 41) | -0.657 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.554 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 6 (n=23, 41) | -0.889 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.976 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 7 (n=24, 38) | -0.311 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.654 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 8 9n=19, 33) | -0.240 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.244 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 8 9n=19, 33) | -0.115 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.178 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 1 (n=35, 39) | 4.697 scores on a scale | Standard Error 2.077 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 5 (n=25, 41) | -0.318 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.129 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 2 (n=37, 40) | 1.433 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.652 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 7 (n=24, 38) | -0.075 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.479 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 3 (n=29, 42) | 0.179 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.363 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 6 (n=23, 41) | -0.140 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.706 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 4 (n=27, 42) | 0.743 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.344 |
Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)
The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=19, 37) | -1.688 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.015 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=21, 37) | -1.058 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.748 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=24, 38) | 2.080 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.041 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=25, 35) | 6.182 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.271 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=20, 34) | -0.773 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.698 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=23, 38) | 0.002 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.003 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=18, 32) | -0.190 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.259 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=28, 36) | 4.423 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.538 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 8 (n=18, 32) | -0.154 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.191 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 2 (n=28, 36) | 1.558 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.864 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 1 (n=25, 35) | 4.753 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.385 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 3 (n=24, 38) | 0.317 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.494 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 4 (n=23, 38) | 0.657 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.459 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 5 (n=21, 37) | -0.307 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.276 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 6 (n=19, 37) | -0.002 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.738 |
| Placebo | Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Change at Week 7 (n=20, 34) | 0.002 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.514 |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)
The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst).
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 3 (n=29, 41) | 16.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.08 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 6 (n=23, 41) | 12.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.58 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 1 (n=37, 38) | 20.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.26 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 2 (n=37, 40) | 18.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.54 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 4 (n=27, 42) | 16.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.21 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 5 (n=25, 41) | 14.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.28 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 7 (n=24, 37) | 13.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.38 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 8 (n=19, 30) | 13.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.68 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 8 (n=19, 30) | 15.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.25 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 3 (n=29, 41) | 16.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.73 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 5 (n=25, 41) | 15.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.93 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 4 (n=27, 42) | 15.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.26 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 7 (n=24, 37) | 14.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.44 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 1 (n=37, 38) | 19.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.03 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 6 (n=23, 41) | 15.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.12 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 2 (n=37, 40) | 17.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.32 |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)
The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst).
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 4 (n=23, 38) | 15.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.85 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 2 (n=28, 36) | 17.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.86 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 5 (n=21, 37) | 14.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.41 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 1 (n=27, 34) | 19.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.65 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 6 (n=19, 37) | 12.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.85 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 3 (n=24, 37) | 15.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.84 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 7 (n=20, 33) | 13.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.93 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 8 (n=18, 30) | 12.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.85 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 8 (n=18, 30) | 15.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.25 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 1 (n=27, 34) | 19.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 2 (n=28, 36) | 17.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.48 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 3 (n=24, 37) | 16.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 4 (n=23, 38) | 15.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.42 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 5 (n=21, 37) | 14.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.04 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 6 (n=19, 37) | 15.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.23 |
| Placebo | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 7 (n=20, 33) | 14.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.48 |
Exacerbation Length (Extended Approach)
Exacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary.
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbation Length (Extended Approach) | 13.0 days |
| Placebo | Exacerbation Length (Extended Approach) | 14.0 days |
Exacerbation Length (Initial Approach)
Exacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary.
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbation Length (Initial Approach) | 12.0 days |
| Placebo | Exacerbation Length (Initial Approach) | 14.0 days |
Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach)
The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 1 (n=35, 39) | 45.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.19 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 2 (n=37, 40) | 42.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.07 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 3 (n=29, 42) | 39.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.27 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 4 (n=27, 42) | 38.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.37 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 5 (n=25, 41) | 35.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.03 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 6 (n=23, 41) | 33.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.45 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 7 (n=24, 38) | 34.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.09 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 8 (n=19, 33) | 34.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 8 (n=19, 33) | 39.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.25 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 1 (n=35, 39) | 45.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.39 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 5 (n=25, 41) | 39.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.13 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 2 (n=37, 40) | 42.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.81 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 7 (n=24, 38) | 38.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.52 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 3 (n=29, 42) | 39.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.82 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 6 (n=23, 41) | 39.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.62 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | Week 4 (n=27, 42) | 40.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach)
The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 3 (n=24, 38) | 38.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.22 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 4 (n=23, 38) | 38.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 1 (n=25, 35) | 45.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.54 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 2 (n=28, 36) | 41.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.39 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 5 (n=21, 37) | 35.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.11 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 6 (n=19, 37) | 35.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.75 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 7 (n=20, 34) | 35.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.69 |
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 8 (n=18, 32) | 34.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 8 (n=18, 32) | 39.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.34 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 3 (n=24, 38) | 40.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.22 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 5 (n=21, 37) | 39.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.55 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 7 (n=20, 34) | 38.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.05 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 1 (n=25, 35) | 45.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 6 (n=19, 37) | 39.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.05 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 2 (n=28, 36) | 42.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.07 |
| Placebo | Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | Week 4 (n=23, 38) | 40.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.26 |
Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer.
Time frame: Day 14
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach) | 45.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach) | 51.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach)
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer.
Time frame: Day 14
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast 500 μg | Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach) | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach) | 55.2 percentage of participants |