Skip to content

Study on OsseoSpeed™ TX Narrow Implants in the Lower Jaw in a Chinese Population

An Open, Prospective, Multi-center Study to Evaluate OsseoSpeed™ TX Single Implant 3 mm Diameter in the Anterior Mandible. A 3-years Follow-up Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01473355
Enrollment
45
Registered
2011-11-17
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2019-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partially Edentulous Jaw

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of OsseoSpeed™ TX 3mm diameter implant in a Chinese population by evaluation of marginal bone level alteration, implant stability and implant survival in the posterior mandible up to 3 years after loading. Hypothesis: Early loading of the 3 mm implant is a safe and predictable procedure.

Interventions

OsseoSpeed™ TX narrow implants (diameter 3 mm) of lengths 11-15 mm

Sponsors

Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Provision of informed consent 2. Aged 20-75 years at enrolment 3. History of edentulism in the study area of at least two months 4. Presence of natural teeth, partial prosthesis and/or implants in the opposite jaw in contact with the planned crowns 5. Deemed by the investigator to have a bone height and width suitable for 3.0 mm diameter study implant 6. Deemed by the investigator as likely to present an initially stable implant situation

Exclusion criteria

1. Unlikely to be able to comply with study procedures, as judged by the investigator 2. Uncontrolled pathologic processes in the oral cavity 3. Known or suspected current malignancy 4. History of radiation therapy in the head and neck region 5. History of chemotherapy within 5 years prior to surgery 6. Systemic or local disease or condition that could compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration, as deemed by the investigator 7. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus 8. Corticosteroids or any other medication that could influence post-operative healing and/or osseointegration 9. Smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day 10. Present alcohol and/or drug abuse 11. Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study (applies to both Astra Tech staff and staff at the study site) 12. Previous enrollment in the present study 13. Simultaneous participation in another clinical study, or participation in a clinical study during the last weeks prior to enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Survived ImplantsMeasured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.Implant survival rate evaluated by clinically and radiographically counting the number of implants remaining in function

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal Bone Level AlterationMeasured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.Marginal bone level determined from radiographs and expressed as the distance from a reference point on the implant to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal aspect of the implant. Marginal bone level expressed in millimeters at the 3 year follow-up visit compared to values obtained at delivery of permanent restoration i.e. loading (baseline).
Number of Stable ImplantsMeasured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.Implant stability evaluated clinically/manually (recorded as stable yes/no).
Evaluation of the Periimplant Mucosa Condition - By Assessment of PPDMeasured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.Condition of the periimplant mucosa by assessment of probing pocket depth (PPD). Change in pocket depth expressed in millimeters at the 3-year follow-up visit, compared to values obtained at delivery of permanent restoration, i.e. loading (baseline). Negative value = increased pocket depth.
Evaluation of the Periimplant Mucosa Condition - By Assessment of BoPMeasured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.Condition of the periimplant mucosa by assessment of Bleeding on Probing (BoP). Presented as % of implants that show presence of bleeding on probing at time of the 3-year follow-up visit.
Presence of PlaqueMeasured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.Occurence of plaque around the study implant. Presented as number of implants that show presence of plaque at time of the 3 years follow-up visit after implant loading.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OsseoSpeed™ TX
OsseoSpeed™ TX narrow implants (diameter 3 mm) in lengths of 11-15 mm
45
OsseoSpeed™ TX
OsseoSpeed™ TX narrow implants (diameter 3 mm) in lengths of 11-15 mm
75
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOsseoSpeed™ TX
Age, Continuous52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.86
Region of Enrollment
China
45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Survived Implants

Implant survival rate evaluated by clinically and radiographically counting the number of implants remaining in function

Time frame: Measured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.

Population: All participants treated with at least one study implant.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
OsseoSpeed™ TXNumber of Survived Implants74 Implants
Secondary

Evaluation of the Periimplant Mucosa Condition - By Assessment of BoP

Condition of the periimplant mucosa by assessment of Bleeding on Probing (BoP). Presented as % of implants that show presence of bleeding on probing at time of the 3-year follow-up visit.

Time frame: Measured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.

Population: 39 subjects (65 implants) completed the 3-year follow-up visit. Protocol deviations were excluded, giving a per-protocol analysis population of 34 subjects (60 implants) for the BoP analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
OsseoSpeed™ TXEvaluation of the Periimplant Mucosa Condition - By Assessment of BoP33 Implants
Secondary

Evaluation of the Periimplant Mucosa Condition - By Assessment of PPD

Condition of the periimplant mucosa by assessment of probing pocket depth (PPD). Change in pocket depth expressed in millimeters at the 3-year follow-up visit, compared to values obtained at delivery of permanent restoration, i.e. loading (baseline). Negative value = increased pocket depth.

Time frame: Measured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.

Population: 39 subjects (65 implants) completed the 3-year follow-up visit. Protocol deviations were excluded, giving a per-protocol analysis population of 34 subjects (60 implants) for the PPD analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OsseoSpeed™ TXEvaluation of the Periimplant Mucosa Condition - By Assessment of PPD-0.03 millimeterStandard Deviation 0.59
Secondary

Marginal Bone Level Alteration

Marginal bone level determined from radiographs and expressed as the distance from a reference point on the implant to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal aspect of the implant. Marginal bone level expressed in millimeters at the 3 year follow-up visit compared to values obtained at delivery of permanent restoration i.e. loading (baseline).

Time frame: Measured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.

Population: 39 subjects (65 implants) completed the 3-year follow-up visit. Protocol deviations were excluded, giving a per-protocol analysis population of 34 subjects (60 implants). Three of the radiographs were not possible to evaluate, giving an overall number of 32 subjects (57 implants) as basis for the Marginal Bone Level analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OsseoSpeed™ TXMarginal Bone Level Alteration-0.02 millimeterStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Number of Stable Implants

Implant stability evaluated clinically/manually (recorded as stable yes/no).

Time frame: Measured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.

Population: 39 subjects (65 implants) completed the 3-year follow-up visit. Analysis of implant stability was performed on the all patients treated population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
OsseoSpeed™ TXNumber of Stable Implants65 Implants
Secondary

Presence of Plaque

Occurence of plaque around the study implant. Presented as number of implants that show presence of plaque at time of the 3 years follow-up visit after implant loading.

Time frame: Measured at the 3 year follow-up after implant loading.

Population: 39 subjects (65 implants) completed the 3-year follow-up visit. Protocol deviations were excluded, giving a per-protocol analysis population of 34 subjects (60 implants) for the plaque analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
OsseoSpeed™ TXPresence of Plaque49 Implants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026