Hepatitis c
Conditions
Keywords
HIV, Hepatitis C, Decision-Making, chronic
Brief summary
The purpose of the LEAP-C (learning, experiencing and preparing for hepatitis C treatment) study is to see if a brief (4-week) small group intervention will help people with HIV/HCV co-infection make an informed decision about Hepatitis C treatment.
Detailed description
Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection is a major problem for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-infected patients. Without HCV treatment, increasing numbers of HIV positive patients will die either from end stage liver disease or from HIV-related complications because of the inability to use antiretroviral agents due their hepatotoxicity. Major advances in understanding HCV treatment in this population have occurred within the past several years. Yet, only a small proportion of co-infected patients receive HCV treatment (approximately 15%). Moreover, few studies have explored patient decision-making related to HCV treatment in HIV co-infected patients. The major gap in our knowledge is how best to support patients as they engage in the HCV treatment decision making process with their health care provider. Therefore, the purpose of this phase II study is to test the feasibility of conducting a theoretically-derived group intervention with HIV/HCV co-infected adults to support active engagement in HCV treatment decision-making. The primary aims are to: (1) determine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining a sample of HIV/HCV co-infected adults to complete a protocol that involves randomization into the 4-week HCV Positive Life Skills group intervention or usual care and completion of two data collection interviews (at baseline and week 12), (2) establish the preliminary effect size of the HCV Positive Life Skills group intervention on HCV knowledge, decisional conflict, patient-provider communication, health-related quality of life, symptom experience and engagement with health care providers, (3) explore the capacity of the group intervention to influence HCV knowledge, decisional conflict, patient-provider communication, engagement with health care providers, health related quality of life and symptom experience and (4) describe the components of the intervention and usual care (through qualitative interviews) that are most useful for helping HIV/HCV co-infected patients engage in decision-making about HCV treatment. A mixed method approach will be used. 50 HIV/HCV co-infected participants will be randomized equally to receive either the group intervention or usual care. Then qualitative interviews, using qualitative descriptive methods, will be conducted with 10-12 participants to identify the most salient parts of the intervention and usual care that support effective decision-making about HCV treatment. The investigators will also compare the time spent with both groups, identify variability in the control condition, describe the number of subjects who start HCV treatment and further refine the intervention manual and intervention fidelity procedures in preparation for a full scale multi-site randomized clinical trial.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALLeap-c group intervention
4-week group intervention to help HIV/HCV co-infected patients reframe negative appraisals associated with hCV treatment, increase HCV knowledge, increase skills related to working with health care providers
Sponsors
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Men and Women (18 years of age or older) who have both HIV and chronic Hepatitis C (they need to have a detectable Hepatitis C viral load) HIV/HCV co-infected adults who have NEVER started treatment HIV/HCV co-infected adults who DO NOT have a MEDICAL reason that would make it dangerous to treat their hepatitis C (for example, severe cirrhosis already) HIV/HCV co-infected adults who would be willing to be RANDOMIZED into a group session or standard of care (one on one care with a HCV provider)
Exclusion criteria
Non-English Speaking Children under age 18 HCV mono-infected adults HIV/HCV co-infected adults who have received any HCV treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Decrease in decisional conflict related to HCV treatment 12 weeks post treatment | Up to 12 weeks | Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention decreased decisional conflict. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Increase in knowledge related to HCV treatment 12 weeks post treatment | Up to 12 weeks | Collect data at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention improved HCV-related knowledge. |
| Increase in communication between subject and health care provider from baseline to week 12. | Up to 12 weeks | Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has improved the subjects' perception of communication with their health care provider. |
| Proportion of subjects electing HCV treatment 6 months after enrollment in the feasibility study. | 6 months | Collect data on the study sample to determine the proportion of subjects who began HCV treatment 6 months after enrollment in the study. |
| Number of symptoms experienced by HCV infected subjects from baseline to week 12 | Up to 12 weeks | Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has decreased the number of symptoms experienced by the research subjects. |
| Severity of symptoms experienced by HCV infected subjects from baseline to week 12 | Up to 12 weeks | Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has decreased the severity of symptoms experienced by the research subjects. |
| Increase in subjects' health related quality of life from baseline to 12 weeks after study enrollment | Up to 12 weeks | Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has improved subjects' perception of health related quality of life. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed