Skip to content

Nivolumab (BMS-936558; MDX-1106) in Combination With Sunitinib, Pazopanib, or Ipilimumab in Subjects With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) (CheckMate 016)

A Phase 1 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) Plus Sunitinib, Pazopanib or Ipilimumab in Subjects With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01472081
Enrollment
194
Registered
2011-11-16
Start date
2012-02-09
Completion date
2021-06-03
Last updated
2021-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clear-cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma

Brief summary

The purpose is to determine the safety, effectiveness and best dose to use when giving Nivolumab in combination with Sunitinib, Pazopanib, or Ipilimumab for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALNivolumab
BIOLOGICALPazopanib
DRUGSunitinib
BIOLOGICALIpilimumab

Sponsors

Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects with histological confirmation of RCC * Advanced or metastatic disease * Measurable disease as defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria * Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥80% * Available tumor tissue (archival or recent acquisition) * Subjects enrolled in the I-1, I-3 expansion arms and IN-3 addition arms must not have received any prior systemic therapy for RCC with the following exceptions: 1. One prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy for localized or locally advanced RCC is allowed provided recurrence occurred ≥ 6 months after the last dose of the adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy 2. Only prior cytokine based treatment for metastatic RCC \[eg, interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) or interleukin 2 (IL-2)\] as prior therapy is allowed

Exclusion criteria

* Active central nervous system (CNS) metastases * Active or history of autoimmune disease * Ongoing symptomatic cardiac dysrhythmias or uncontrolled atrial fibrillation * History of cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attack within the past 12 months * History of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months * Chronic systemic steroids (\>10 mg/day Prednisone equivalents) or any other immunosuppressive agents * White blood cell (WBC) \<2,000/mm3 * Neutrophiles \<1,500/mm3 * Platelets \<100,000/mm3 * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>3x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Total Bilirubin \>1.5x ULN (except subjects with Gilbert syndrome, total bilirubin \<3.0 mg/dL) * Cardiac ejection fraction \<LLN (lower limit of normal) * Serum creatinine \>1.5x ULN or creatinine clearance \<40 mL/min (Cockroft-Gault formula)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationFrom date of first dose to date of last dose plus 100 days (assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)Safety assessments by treatment arm and dose level were based on incidence of AEs, and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Grade (Gr) 1=Mild, Gr 2=Moderate, Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)From date of first dose to date of disease progression or subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first (assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)BOR was defined as the best response designation over the study as a whole, recorded between the date of first dose of study medication and the date of objectively documented progression per RECIST 1.1 criteria or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)From date of first dose to interim analysis (Assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)ORR was defined as the proportion of participants who achieved a BOR of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) in the population of interest. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Duration of Response (DOR)From date of first dose to date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)DOR was computed for participants with BOR of CR or PR only, and defined as the time between the date of first documented objective response and the date of the first subsequent disease progression or death. Participants who remained alive and had not progressed were censored on the last tumor assessment date (prior to subsequent cancer therapy).
Rate of Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 2424 weeksRate of PFS at week 24 was defined as the proportion of participants remaining progression free or surviving at 24 weeks, calculated by the product-limit method (Kaplan-Meier estimate) which took into account censored data. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessment and did not die were censored on the date of first dose of study medication.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From date of first dose to date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of first disease progression or death. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessment and did not die were censored on the date of first dose of study medication.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

194 participants were enrolled; 153 were treated. Participants were enrolled but not treated due to the following reasons: withdrawal of consent (n=5), no longer met study criteria (n=32), administrative reason by sponsor (n=1), or other reasons (n=3)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm S: SUN + NIV2
Nivolumab 2 mg/kg administered on Day 1 and 22 of each 6 week (42 day) cycle as a 1-hour IV infusion followed 60 minutes later with Sunitinib 50 mg orally on Day 1 - 28 of each 42 day cycle until Progressive Disease (PD), toxicity or discontinuation for other reasons.
7
Arm S: SUN + NIV5
Nivolumab 5 mg/kg administered on Day 1 and 22 of each 6 week (42 day) cycle as a 1-hour IV infusion followed 60 minutes later with Sunitinib 50 mg orally on Day 1 - 28 of each 42 day cycle until Progressive Disease (PD), toxicity or discontinuation for other reasons.
26
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2
Nivolumab 2 mg/kg administered on Day 1 and 22 of each 6 week (42 day) cycle as a 1-hour IV infusion followed 60 minutes later with Pazopanib 800 mg orally on Day 1 - 42 of each 42 day cycle until Progressive Disease (PD), toxicity or discontinuation for other reasons.
20
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3
Induction: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion followed by Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg administered IV infusion over 90 minutes every 3 weeks for 4 doses. Maintenance: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion every 2 weeks, starting 3 weeks after the 4th dose of induction therapy or after Day 113 if the 4th dose of induction therapy had not been administered due to treatment delays.
47
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1
Induction: Nivolumab 1 mg/kg was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion followed by Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg administered IV infusion over 90 minutes every 3 weeks for 4 doses. Maintenance: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion every 2 weeks, starting 3 weeks after the 4th dose of induction therapy or after Day 113 if the 4th dose of induction therapy had not been administered due to treatment delays.
47
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3
Induction: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion followed by Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg administered IV infusion over 90 minutes every 3 weeks for 4 doses. Maintenance: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion every 2 weeks, starting 3 weeks after the 4th dose of induction therapy or after Day 113 if the 4th dose of induction therapy had not been administered due to treatment delays.
6
Total153

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event unrelated to study drug000010
Overall StudyContinuing treatment at time of analysis141890
Overall StudyDeath000010
Overall StudyDisease Progression4101231223
Overall StudyNo longer meets study criteria001000
Overall StudyPoor/non-compliance001010
Overall StudyStudy drug toxicity2946132
Overall StudySubject request to discontinue treatment031100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject000001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm S: SUN + NIV2Arm S: SUN + NIV5Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Total
Age, Continuous56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.36
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.62
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.52
53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.58
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.71
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.71
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants22 Participants18 Participants42 Participants40 Participants5 Participants134 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants5 Participants0 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants22 Participants18 Participants44 Participants45 Participants6 Participants141 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants7 Participants2 Participants14 Participants9 Participants1 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants19 Participants18 Participants33 Participants38 Participants5 Participants120 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 3320 / 2047 / 4746 / 476 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 3313 / 2029 / 4730 / 474 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation

Safety assessments by treatment arm and dose level were based on incidence of AEs, and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Grade (Gr) 1=Mild, Gr 2=Moderate, Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling.

Time frame: From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 100 days (assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (grade 3-4)1 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (grade 3-4)5 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (any grade)7 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (any grade)3 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (grade 3-4)2 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (any grade)3 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (any grade)7 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (grade 3-4)0 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (grade 3-4)6 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (any grade)2 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (any grade)26 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (grade 3-4)10 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (any grade)26 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (grade 3-4)24 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (any grade)12 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (grade 3-4)22 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (any grade)16 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (grade 3-4)14 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (any grade)10 participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (grade 3-4)9 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (any grade)20 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (grade 3-4)16 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (grade 3-4)14 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (grade 3-4)4 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (any grade)20 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (any grade)13 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (grade 3-4)10 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (any grade)2 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (grade 3-4)2 participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (any grade)5 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (any grade)11 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (any grade)43 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (grade 3-4)3 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (grade 3-4)20 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (grade 3-4)33 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (any grade)47 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (grade 3-4)18 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (grade 3-4)9 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (any grade)29 participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (any grade)5 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (any grade)47 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (grade 3-4)29 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (any grade)30 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (grade 3-4)16 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (grade 3-4)24 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (any grade)45 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (any grade)16 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (grade 3-4)34 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (grade 3-4)11 participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (any grade)15 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (any grade)2 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (any grade)3 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (grade 3-4)6 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-Causality AEs (any grade)6 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-cause AEs led to discontinuation (grade 3-4)0 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (grade 3-4)4 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (grade 3-4)5 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related AEs (any grade)6 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDrug-related SAEs (grade 3-4)3 participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll-causality SAEs (any grade)4 participants
Secondary

Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)

BOR was defined as the best response designation over the study as a whole, recorded between the date of first dose of study medication and the date of objectively documented progression per RECIST 1.1 criteria or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Time frame: From date of first dose to date of disease progression or subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first (assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Progressive Disease0 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Partial Response5 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Complete Response1 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Unable to Determine0 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Stable Disease1 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Complete Response0 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Progressive Disease1 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Unable to Determine3 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Partial Response11 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Stable Disease11 percentage of participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Partial Response8 percentage of participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Progressive Disease4 percentage of participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Unable to Determine0 percentage of participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Stable Disease7 percentage of participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Complete Response1 percentage of participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Stable Disease19 percentage of participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Complete Response5 percentage of participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Partial Response14 percentage of participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Progressive Disease8 percentage of participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Unable to Determine1 percentage of participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Progressive Disease8 percentage of participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Complete Response0 percentage of participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Unable to Determine3 percentage of participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Partial Response19 percentage of participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Stable Disease17 percentage of participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Complete Response0 percentage of participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Progressive Disease1 percentage of participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Partial Response0 percentage of participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Unable to Determine0 percentage of participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Best Overall Response Rate (BOR)Stable Disease5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was computed for participants with BOR of CR or PR only, and defined as the time between the date of first documented objective response and the date of the first subsequent disease progression or death. Participants who remained alive and had not progressed were censored on the last tumor assessment date (prior to subsequent cancer therapy).

Time frame: From date of first dose to date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Duration of Response (DOR)45.6 weeks
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Duration of Response (DOR)78.1 weeks
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Duration of Response (DOR)30.1 weeks
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Duration of Response (DOR)88.7 weeks
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Duration of Response (DOR)85.9 weeks
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Duration of Response (DOR)NA weeks
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the proportion of participants who achieved a BOR of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) in the population of interest. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From date of first dose to interim analysis (Assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Objective Response Rate (ORR)85.7 percentage of participants
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Objective Response Rate (ORR)42.3 percentage of participants
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Objective Response Rate (ORR)45.0 percentage of participants
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Objective Response Rate (ORR)40.4 percentage of participants
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Objective Response Rate (ORR)40.4 percentage of participants
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Objective Response Rate (ORR)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of first disease progression or death. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessment and did not die were censored on the date of first dose of study medication.

Time frame: From date of first dose to date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed up to March 2016, approximately 49 months)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Progression-free Survival (PFS)11.3 months
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Progression-free Survival (PFS)12.7 months
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Progression-free Survival (PFS)7.2 months
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Progression-free Survival (PFS)7.7 months
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Progression-free Survival (PFS)9.4 months
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Progression-free Survival (PFS)8.5 months
Secondary

Rate of Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24

Rate of PFS at week 24 was defined as the proportion of participants remaining progression free or surviving at 24 weeks, calculated by the product-limit method (Kaplan-Meier estimate) which took into account censored data. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessment and did not die were censored on the date of first dose of study medication.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm S: SUN + NIV2Rate of Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24100 Percentage of participants with PFS
Arm S: SUN + NIV5Rate of Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 2472.9 Percentage of participants with PFS
Arm P: PAZ + NIV2Rate of Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 2454.9 Percentage of participants with PFS
Arm I-1: IPI1 + NIV3Rate of Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 2455.6 Percentage of participants with PFS
Arm I-3: IPI3 + NIV1Rate of Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 2463.8 Percentage of participants with PFS
Arm IN-3: IPI3 + NIV3Rate of Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24NA Percentage of participants with PFS

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026