Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide 400 µg BID (Twice a Day)Compared to Placebo in Patients With Stable Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

A Multiple Dose, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, 2 Period Crossover Clinical Trial to Assess the Effect of Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BID on Exercise Endurance in Patients With Stable Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01471171
Enrollment
112
Registered
2011-11-15
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2017-01-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Keywords

COPD, Antimuscarinic

Brief summary

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice a day (BID) administered twice a day versus placebo on exercise endurance and on hyperinflation and dyspnoea at rest and during exercise after 3 weeks of treatment.

Interventions

1 puff of 400 micro grams in the morning (09:00 ± 1h) and in the evening (21:00 ± 1h)

DRUGPlacebo

1 puff of placebo in the morning (09:00 ± 1h) and 1 puff in the evening (21:00 ± 1h)

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male and female patients aged ≥ 40 with stable moderate to severe COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines). * Post-salbutamol Forced Expiratory Volume in one second(FEV1) \< 80% and ≥ 30% of predicted normal value and Post-salbutamol FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) \< 70%. * Current or ex-smokers of ≥ 10 pack-years * Functional residual capacity (FRC) measured by body plethysmography at Screening Visit ≥ 120% of predicted value

Exclusion criteria

* History or current diagnosis of asthma * Signs of an exacerbation within 6 weeks ( or 3 months if results in hospitalisation) prior to the screening visit or during the run-in period. * Clinically significant respiratory and/or cardiovascular conditions or laboratory abnormalities. * Conditions where the use of anticholinergic drugs is contraindicated, such as known symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy, bladder neck obstruction or narrow-angle glaucoma. * Patients with an oxygen saturation \< 85% during cycle exercise on room air at Screening Visit, Run- in Visit and Visit 1. * Contra-indications of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. * Patient who in the investigator's opinion will need to start a pulmonary rehabilitation program during the study and/or patients who have just started/finished pulmonary rehabilitation at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Endurance Time (Seconds)Week 3Change from baseline in endurance time during constant work rate cycle ergometry to symptom limitation at 75% of Maximum Work load (Wmax) after 3 weeks of treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Trough Inspiratory Capacity (IC) (Litres)Week 3Change from baseline in trough IC after 3 weeks of treatment
Change From Baseline in Intensity of DyspnoeaWeek 3Change from baseline in intensity of dyspnoea based on the Borg CR10 Scale® (ranging from '0'=nothing at all to '10'=extremely strong/maximal dyspnoea, the highest possible numerical value) at isotime during constant work rate cycle ergometry after 3 weeks of treatment.

Countries

Germany, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 16 enrolling sites. A total of 14 sites randomised patients: 10 sites in Germany, 3 sites in Spain and one site in the United Kingdom. The first patient was screened in November 2011 and the last patient visit was in June 2012.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible patients entered a 14-21 day run-in period to assess disease stability. During this period, one site visit was performed to familiarise patients with study testing procedures (body plethysmography, spirometry and a constant work rate cycle exercise test).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study Safety Population
All patients randomized into the crossover study were included in the safety population
112
Total112

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Treatment Period 1Adverse Event41
Treatment Period 2Adverse Event10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study Safety Population
Age, Continuous60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Gender
Female
36 Participants
Gender
Male
76 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
89 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
3 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 1114 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1112 / 108

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Endurance Time (Seconds)

Change from baseline in endurance time during constant work rate cycle ergometry to symptom limitation at 75% of Maximum Work load (Wmax) after 3 weeks of treatment.

Time frame: Week 3

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who took at least one dose of investigational medicinal product, and had at least a baseline and one post-dose corresponding assessment value of the primary efficacy variable in one of the 2 treatment periods. 2 patients from the safety population were excluded from the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidChange From Baseline in Endurance Time (Seconds)68.3 SecondsStandard Error 18.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endurance Time (Seconds)9.8 SecondsStandard Error 19
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Intensity of Dyspnoea

Change from baseline in intensity of dyspnoea based on the Borg CR10 Scale® (ranging from '0'=nothing at all to '10'=extremely strong/maximal dyspnoea, the highest possible numerical value) at isotime during constant work rate cycle ergometry after 3 weeks of treatment.

Time frame: Week 3

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who took at least one dose of investigational medicinal product, and had at least a baseline and one post-dose corresponding assessment value of the primary efficacy variable in one of the 2 treatment periods. 2 patients from the safety population were excluded from the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidChange From Baseline in Intensity of Dyspnoea-0.48 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intensity of Dyspnoea0.15 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Trough Inspiratory Capacity (IC) (Litres)

Change from baseline in trough IC after 3 weeks of treatment

Time frame: Week 3

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who took at least one dose of investigational medicinal product, and had at least a baseline and one post-dose corresponding assessment value of the primary efficacy variable in one of the 2 treatment periods. 2 patients from the safety population were excluded from the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidChange From Baseline in Trough Inspiratory Capacity (IC) (Litres)0.098 LitresStandard Error 0.024
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Trough Inspiratory Capacity (IC) (Litres)0.020 LitresStandard Error 0.025

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026