Crohn's Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The study hypothesis is to establish the safety and tolerability of long-term open-label (OL) CP-690,550 therapy in subjects with Crohn's disease.
Interventions
ORAL TABLET, TWICE DAILY
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects who complete 26-week maintenance treatment of the A3921084 study or subjects who withdraw early due to A3921084 study treatment failure (see Appendix 5). * Women of childbearing potential must test negative for pregnancy prior to study enrolment. * Sexually active females of childbearing potential are required to use adequate contraceptive methods during the study period and until completion of the follow-up procedures. No specific contraceptive measures are required in male subjects during study participation.
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects who have been discontinued due to protocol violation(s) (as determined by the Sponsor) in the A3921084 study. * Subjects who were discontinued from the A3921084 study due to an adverse event. * Subjects likely to require any non-elective surgery or surgery requiring overnight stay (with the exception of minor same day outpatient procedures that will not interfere with study drug dosing).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adjudicated Potential Cardiovascular Events | From baseline to Week 52 | Pre-specified cardiovascular events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. Potential events of interest (pEoI) were identified by the investigator, sponsor, review of alerts from central electrocardiogram assessments, and by search of adverse events (AE)/serious adverse event (SAE) listings for events coded to death (coronary and non-coronary), myocardial infarction (non-fatal), all coronary revascularization, unstable angina, stroke (fatal and non-fatal), transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial vascular disease, dyspnoea, and chest pain. The independent reviewers (IRs) determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the definitions summarized from the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium 'Standardized Definitions for End Point Events in Cardiovascular Trials' published October 2010. |
| Adjudicated Malignancy Events | From baseline to Week 52 | Pre-specified malignancy events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by the investigator, sponsor, potential primary event notifications (i.e. malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) for a specific protocol, events submitted for histopathology review for potential malignancies which met the criteria for potential malignancies, and by search of AE/SAE listings for events coded to Malignant tumors Standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQ) (20000194). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, a ten-digit multi-axial classification of the site (4 characters), morphology (4 digits), behavior (1 digit), and grading (1 digit) of neoplasms. |
| Adjudicated Hepatic Injury Events | From baseline to Week 52 | Pre-specified liver injury events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor & search of clinical, safety & laboratory databases (potential Hy's law event, ALT/AST ≥5 x ULN, events meeting hepatic discontinuation criteria, SAEs coded to MedDRA hepatobiliary system organ class (SOC), AEs/SAEs coded to MedDRA liver infections or infectious biliary disorders SMQ, AEs coded to MedDRA drug-induced liver injury (DILI) preferred term or any death with ALT or AST ≥3xULN, bilirubin ≥2xULN or jaundice). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessing DILI (definite, highly likely, probable, possible, unlikely, unrelated or undetermined), pattern (hepatocellular, mixed, cholestatic or undetermined), likely, competing or alternative cause(s), severity (mild, moderate, severe, fatal/transplantation or undetermined), Hy's law case, recovery & liver failure (all yes, no or undetermined). |
| Adjudicated Opportunistic Infection Events | From baseline to Week 52 | Pre-specified opportunistic infection events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor & search of SAE listings for serious infections coded to MedDRA infections & infestations SOC &/or events meeting pre-specified criteria for IR pre-screening to determine if adjudication is required. IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to definitions for opportunistic infections (invasive fungal infections per the European Organization for Research & Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group & the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group \[EORTC/MSG\] Consensus Group definitions, endemic fungal infections per the EORTC/MSG Consensus Group definitions, other fungal infections, viral, bacterial & parasitic infections & vaccine dissemination) & special interest infections (actinomycosis, Legionella & mononucleosis-like toxoplasmosis). |
| Adjudicated Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforation Events | From baseline to Week 52 | Pre-specified GI perforation events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. The pEoI were identified via search of AE/SAE listings using the MedDRA GI Perforation SMQ. The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification based on whether a GI perforation occurred and if yes, the location within the GI tract, possible contributing medical conditions and/or concomitant medications. |
| Adjudicated Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Events | From baseline to Week 52 | Pre-specified ILD events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by searches of the clinical, safety & laboratory databases (AEs coded to the MedDRA ILD SMQ and events nominated by the study clinician or clinical lead). The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessment of the ILD event (probably ILD, possible ILD, alternative diagnosis likely, other or insufficient information to classify). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 Baseline | Week 48 | Steroid-free clinical remission at Week 48 was a CDAI \<150 points in participants who were steroid-free at Week 48. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. |
| Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48 | Use of corticosteroids (yes or no) was recorded at baseline and throughout the study. Percentage of participants taking corticosteriod at each visit was reported. |
| Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | From baseline to Week 48 | There was a single study treatment dose adjustment allowed, at the discretion of the Investigator, from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, after the initial 8 weeks of fixed open label treatment and for the remaining treatment period of 40 weeks. Percentage of participants whose study treatment were switched from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID after initial assignment was reported. |
| Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up | Fecal calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up | The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Baseline and Week 48/early termination (ET) | The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument for measuring disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Baseline and Week 48/ET | The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL. |
| Percentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET Visit | Week 48/ET | The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. A score ≥170 corresponds to clinical remission. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. |
| Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48 | Week 48 | CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of less than (\<) 150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95 percent (%) Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Baseline and Week 48/ET visit | The component and domain scores were scored using the United States (US) 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Baseline and Week 48/ET visit | The component and domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Baseline and Week 48/ET visit | EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Change From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Baseline and Week 48/ET visit | EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state. |
| EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET Visit | Baseline and Week 48/ET visit | EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeters (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Change From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET Visit | Baseline and Week 48/ET visit | EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. |
| Percentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's Disease | From baseline to Week 52/follow-up | The number of participants hospitalized due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit. |
| Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | From baseline to Week 52/follow-up | The length of hospitalizations due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | Week 48/ET visit | The IBD PRTI modified questionnaire comprises 3 individual questions administered to the participant: participant satisfaction with study treatment; participant preference for study drug over prior treatment (this question on participant preference for study drug is prefaced by a simple question of previous treatment/s for IBD received in order to place the preference question into context) and participant willingness to reuse the study treatment again. Each of these questions (except the question on previous treatment, which is informational only) is scored on a 5 point Likert scale. PSA = Patient Satisfaction Assessment; PPTA = Patient Previous Treatment Assessment; PPA = Patient Preference Assessment; PWA = Patient Willingness Assessment. |
| Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up | CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up | CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. Clinical response was defined as a CDAI score reduction of at least 100 points from the A3921083 study baseline value. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
| Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | From baseline to Week 52 | Relapse was defined as an increase in CDAI of more than (\>) 100 points from the baseline and an absolute CDAI score of \>220 points. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Data presented are rates estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves. n = number of participants remaining at risk. |
| Observed CDAI Score by Week | Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up | CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants remaining at risk. |
| Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up | CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants with non-missing data. |
Countries
Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Netherlands, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study was conducted in participants who completed the 26-week maintenance treatment of Study A3921084 or who withdrew early due to A3921084 study treatment failure according to prespecified criteria.
Pre-assignment details
Participants were assigned to either the 5 milligram (mg) twice daily (BID) or 10 mg BID treatment group according to clinical remission status as assessed by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score at the end of the A3921084 study treatment visit or early termination visit due to A3921084 study treatment failure.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID Tofacitinib 5 mg tablet for oral administration at a dose of 5 mg BID for up to 48 weeks. | 62 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID Tofacitinib 10 mg tablets (2 x 5 mg tablets) for oral administration at a dose of 10 mg BID for up to 48 weeks. | 88 |
| Total | 150 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse event not related to study drug | 1 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Adverse event related to study drug | 2 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Did not meet entrance criteria | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Insufficient clinical response | 6 | 27 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 41.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 | 38.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 | 39.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 30 Participants | 41 Participants | 71 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 32 Participants | 47 Participants | 79 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 42 / 62 | 58 / 88 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 62 | 14 / 88 |
Outcome results
Adjudicated Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforation Events
Pre-specified GI perforation events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. The pEoI were identified via search of AE/SAE listings using the MedDRA GI Perforation SMQ. The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification based on whether a GI perforation occurred and if yes, the location within the GI tract, possible contributing medical conditions and/or concomitant medications.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52
Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Adjudicated Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforation Events | 2 Number of events meeting criteria |
Adjudicated Hepatic Injury Events
Pre-specified liver injury events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor & search of clinical, safety & laboratory databases (potential Hy's law event, ALT/AST ≥5 x ULN, events meeting hepatic discontinuation criteria, SAEs coded to MedDRA hepatobiliary system organ class (SOC), AEs/SAEs coded to MedDRA liver infections or infectious biliary disorders SMQ, AEs coded to MedDRA drug-induced liver injury (DILI) preferred term or any death with ALT or AST ≥3xULN, bilirubin ≥2xULN or jaundice). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessing DILI (definite, highly likely, probable, possible, unlikely, unrelated or undetermined), pattern (hepatocellular, mixed, cholestatic or undetermined), likely, competing or alternative cause(s), severity (mild, moderate, severe, fatal/transplantation or undetermined), Hy's law case, recovery & liver failure (all yes, no or undetermined).
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52
Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Adjudicated Hepatic Injury Events | 0 Number of events meeting criteria |
Adjudicated Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Events
Pre-specified ILD events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by searches of the clinical, safety & laboratory databases (AEs coded to the MedDRA ILD SMQ and events nominated by the study clinician or clinical lead). The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessment of the ILD event (probably ILD, possible ILD, alternative diagnosis likely, other or insufficient information to classify).
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52
Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs
Adjudicated Malignancy Events
Pre-specified malignancy events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by the investigator, sponsor, potential primary event notifications (i.e. malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) for a specific protocol, events submitted for histopathology review for potential malignancies which met the criteria for potential malignancies, and by search of AE/SAE listings for events coded to Malignant tumors Standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQ) (20000194). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, a ten-digit multi-axial classification of the site (4 characters), morphology (4 digits), behavior (1 digit), and grading (1 digit) of neoplasms.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52
Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Adjudicated Malignancy Events | 0 Number of events meeting criteria |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Adjudicated Malignancy Events | 1 Number of events meeting criteria |
Adjudicated Opportunistic Infection Events
Pre-specified opportunistic infection events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor & search of SAE listings for serious infections coded to MedDRA infections & infestations SOC &/or events meeting pre-specified criteria for IR pre-screening to determine if adjudication is required. IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to definitions for opportunistic infections (invasive fungal infections per the European Organization for Research & Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group & the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group \[EORTC/MSG\] Consensus Group definitions, endemic fungal infections per the EORTC/MSG Consensus Group definitions, other fungal infections, viral, bacterial & parasitic infections & vaccine dissemination) & special interest infections (actinomycosis, Legionella & mononucleosis-like toxoplasmosis).
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52
Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Adjudicated Opportunistic Infection Events | 1 Number of events meeting criteria |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Adjudicated Opportunistic Infection Events | 1 Number of events meeting criteria |
Adjudicated Potential Cardiovascular Events
Pre-specified cardiovascular events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. Potential events of interest (pEoI) were identified by the investigator, sponsor, review of alerts from central electrocardiogram assessments, and by search of adverse events (AE)/serious adverse event (SAE) listings for events coded to death (coronary and non-coronary), myocardial infarction (non-fatal), all coronary revascularization, unstable angina, stroke (fatal and non-fatal), transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial vascular disease, dyspnoea, and chest pain. The independent reviewers (IRs) determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the definitions summarized from the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium 'Standardized Definitions for End Point Events in Cardiovascular Trials' published October 2010.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52
Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Adjudicated Potential Cardiovascular Events | 0 Number of events meeting criteria |
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET Visit
EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit
Population: Participants in the FAS who had non-missing data at Week 48/ET visit
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | -0.02 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | 0.10 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
Change From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET Visit
EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit
Population: Participants in the FAS who had non-missing data at Week 48/ET visit
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET Visit | -3.79 mm | Standard Deviation 20.56 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET Visit | 10.16 mm | Standard Deviation 26.57 |
Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit
The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET
Population: Participants in the FAS who had non-missing data at Week 48/ET visit
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Bowel Function Score, Week 48/ET | -2.72 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Systemic Symptoms Score, Week 48/ET | -1.00 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.83 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Emotional Status Score, Week 48/ET | -3.07 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.48 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Social Function Score, Week 48/ET | -1.19 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.24 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | IBDQ Total Score, Week 48/ET | -7.98 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.93 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Social Function Score, Week 48/ET | 3.66 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.89 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | IBDQ Total Score, Week 48/ET | 18.84 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 40.45 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Bowel Function Score, Week 48/ET | 6.37 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.41 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Emotional Status Score, Week 48/ET | 5.36 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit | Systemic Symptoms Score, Week 48/ET | 3.45 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.43 |
Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week
CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 8 (n=54, 75) | 26.96 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 62.68 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 16 (n=53, 66) | 11.72 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 52.25 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 24 (n=49, 59) | 6.33 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 44.48 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 36 (n=41, 48) | -10.78 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 40.35 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 48 (n=33, 36) | -4.79 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 60.09 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 52/Follow-up (n=38, 43) | 47.66 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 109.73 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 48 (n=33, 36) | -121.94 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 129.21 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 8 (n=54, 75) | -114.31 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 112.44 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 36 (n=41, 48) | -139.81 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 126.18 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 16 (n=53, 66) | -112.02 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 111.09 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 52/Follow-up (n=38, 43) | -107.42 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 119.05 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 24 (n=49, 59) | -122.69 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 117.65 |
Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit
The component and domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Physical component score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -1.47 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.17 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Component Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -1.88 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.05 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Physical Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -1.80 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Role Physical Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -1.38 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.87 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Bodily Pain Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -1.60 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | General Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -1.42 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Vitality Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -1.63 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.39 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Social Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -2.92 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.09 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Role Emotional Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 82) | -2.26 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.29 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | -1.02 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.63 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Social Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 3.69 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.46 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Physical component score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 4.47 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.06 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | General Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 2.25 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.99 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Component Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 3.07 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.53 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 2.87 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.72 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Physical Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 3.49 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.74 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Vitality Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 4.47 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.16 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Role Physical Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 4.60 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.62 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Role Emotional Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 82) | 3.28 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.38 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit | Bodily Pain Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 6.15 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.92 |
Corticosteroid Use Over Time
Use of corticosteroids (yes or no) was recorded at baseline and throughout the study. Percentage of participants taking corticosteriod at each visit was reported.
Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48
Population: SAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 8 | 4.84 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Baseline | 1.61 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 36 | 3.23 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 16 | 4.84 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 48 | 1.61 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 24 | 4.84 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 48 | 7.95 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Baseline | 20.45 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 8 | 21.59 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 16 | 13.64 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 24 | 12.50 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Corticosteroid Use Over Time | Week 36 | 10.23 Percentage of participants |
EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET Visit
EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeters (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET Visit | VAS Score, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 77.98 mm | Standard Deviation 16.18 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET Visit | VAS Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 73.40 mm | Standard Deviation 18.54 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET Visit | VAS Score, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 48.60 mm | Standard Deviation 19.21 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET Visit | VAS Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 57.60 mm | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit
EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Utility Score, Baseline (n=62, 85) | 0.85 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Utility Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 0.84 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Utility Score, Baseline (n=62, 85) | 0.57 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Utility Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 0.66 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit
The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument for measuring disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/early termination (ET)
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Emotional Status Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 66.98 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.27 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Bowel Function Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 58.56 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.86 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Systemic Symptoms Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 26.95 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.36 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Bowel Function Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 55.70 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.82 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Systemic Symptoms Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 25.82 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.28 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | IBDQ Total Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 179.26 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.89 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Social Function Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 32.03 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.59 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Emotional Status Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 69.68 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.58 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Social Function Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 30.75 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.17 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | IBDQ Total Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 187.23 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.38 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Social Function Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 24.18 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.98 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | IBDQ Total Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 127.32 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.17 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | IBDQ Total Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 144.42 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 42.16 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Bowel Function Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 46.70 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.38 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Emotional Status Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 48.61 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.42 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Emotional Status Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 53.19 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.32 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Systemic Symptoms Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 17.20 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.55 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Systemic Symptoms Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 20.35 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Social Function Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 20.80 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.96 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Bowel Function Score, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 40.71 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease
The length of hospitalizations due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52/follow-up
Population: SAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | <3 days | 1.6 Percentage of participnats |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | 7 to 10 days | 0 Percentage of participnats |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | 3 to 6 days | 6.5 Percentage of participnats |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | > 10 days | 0 Percentage of participnats |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | 3 to 6 days | 10.2 Percentage of participnats |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | <3 days | 2.3 Percentage of participnats |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | > 10 days | 3.4 Percentage of participnats |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease | 7 to 10 days | 3.4 Percentage of participnats |
Observed CDAI Score by Week
CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants remaining at risk.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 16 (n=53, 66) | 86.58 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 65.23 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 36 (n=41, 48) | 73.34 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 59.52 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 8 (n=54, 75) | 105.39 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 75.82 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 48 (n=33, 36) | 73.91 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 70.23 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 24 (n=49, 59) | 85.12 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 56.67 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 52/Follow-up (n=38, 43) | 129.32 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 114.82 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Baseline (n=62, 88) | 77.13 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 43.22 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 52/Follow-up (n=38, 43) | 180.65 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 98.8 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Baseline (n=62, 88) | 291.19 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 95.78 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 8 (n=54, 75) | 176.96 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 82.39 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 16 (n=53, 66) | 178.94 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 72.25 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 24 (n=49, 59) | 163.66 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 79.73 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 36 (n=41, 48) | 158.67 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 89.15 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed CDAI Score by Week | Week 48 (n=33, 36) | 154.11 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 71.47 |
Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week
Fecal calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 8 (n=53, 71) | -105.51 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 436.41 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 16 (n=54, 64) | -144.65 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 423.2 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 24 (n=49, 55) | -120.49 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 511.49 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 36 (n=41, 42) | -169.92 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 354.3 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 48 (n=37, 38) | -189.61 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 462.61 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 52/Follow-up (n=48, 57) | -51.33 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 453.73 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 48 (n=37, 38) | -123.87 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 376.7 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 8 (n=53, 71) | -102.82 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 310.1 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 36 (n=41, 42) | -133.82 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 364.51 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 16 (n=54, 64) | -35.28 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 718.82 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 52/Follow-up (n=48, 57) | -109.23 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 389.54 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week | Week 24 (n=49, 55) | -130.68 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) | Standard Deviation 337.23 |
Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 48 (n=43, 44) | -4.55 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 17.81 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 8 (n=61, 82) | -0.44 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 14.78 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 16 (n=58, 72) | -2.46 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 14.54 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 24 (n=54, 61) | -2.76 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 17.59 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 36 (n=46, 51) | -4.42 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 22.29 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 52/Follow-up (n=54, 71) | 3.86 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 21.57 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 36 (n=46, 51) | -12.09 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 30.61 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 48 (n=43, 44) | -11.45 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 31.3 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 24 (n=54, 61) | -9.26 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 30.2 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 8 (n=61, 82) | -4.81 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 26.76 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 52/Follow-up (n=54, 71) | -4.72 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 31.34 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week | Week 16 (n=58, 72) | -7.96 mg per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 25.11 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 Baseline
Steroid-free clinical remission at Week 48 was a CDAI \<150 points in participants who were steroid-free at Week 48. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: Participants in FAS who were on steroids at baseline of this study
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 Baseline | 50.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 Baseline | 9.09 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's Disease
The number of participants hospitalized due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52/follow-up
Population: SAS
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's Disease | 11.3 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's Disease | 15.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study
CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up
Population: Participants in the FAS who met clinical remission criteria at baseline of this study
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Baseline (n=61, 4) | 100.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 8 (n=53, 4) | 75.47 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 16 (n=52, 4) | 84.62 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 24 (n=48, 4) | 85.42 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 36 (n=40, 3) | 92.50 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 48 (n=32, 3) | 87.50 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 52/follow-up (n=37, 3) | 64.86 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Sustained clinical remission (n=31, 3) | 77.42 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Sustained clinical remission (n=31, 3) | 33.33 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Baseline (n=61, 4) | 100.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 36 (n=40, 3) | 33.33 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 8 (n=53, 4) | 50.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 52/follow-up (n=37, 3) | 33.33 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 16 (n=52, 4) | 75.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 48 (n=32, 3) | 100.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 24 (n=48, 4) | 25.00 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study
CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. Clinical response was defined as a CDAI score reduction of at least 100 points from the A3921083 study baseline value. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up
Population: Participants in the FAS who met clinical response or clinical remission criteria at baseline of this study
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 8 (n=54, 20) | 75.93 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Baseline (n=62, 23) | 98.39 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 16 (n=53, 19) | 84.91 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 24 (n=49, 16) | 83.67 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 36 (n=41, 13) | 90.24 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 48 (n=33, 10) | 87.88 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 52/follow-up (n=38, 12) | 65.79 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Sustained clinical remission (n=32, 10) | 75.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Sustained clinical remission (n=32, 10) | 30.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 36 (n=41, 13) | 38.46 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Baseline (n=62, 23) | 17.39 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 8 (n=54, 20) | 35.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 52/follow-up (n=38, 12) | 41.67 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 16 (n=53, 19) | 36.84 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 48 (n=33, 10) | 50.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study | Clinical remission: Week 24 (n=49, 16) | 43.75 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48
CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of less than (\<) 150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95 percent (%) Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) - consisted of all participants enrolled in this OL extension study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48 | Clinical remission (n=33, 36) | 87.88 Percent |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48 | Sustained clinical remission (n=32, 35) | 75.00 Percent |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48 | Clinical remission (n=33, 36) | 55.56 Percent |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48 | Sustained clinical remission (n=32, 35) | 34.29 Percent |
Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit
There was a single study treatment dose adjustment allowed, at the discretion of the Investigator, from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, after the initial 8 weeks of fixed open label treatment and for the remaining treatment period of 40 weeks. Percentage of participants whose study treatment were switched from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID after initial assignment was reported.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 8 | 25.81 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 24 | 3.23 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 36 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 16 | 6.45 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 48 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 16 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 48 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 8 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 24 | 2.27 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit | Week 36 | 1.14 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET Visit
The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. A score ≥170 corresponds to clinical remission. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions.
Time frame: Week 48/ET
Population: Participants in the FAS who had non-missing data at Week 48/ET visit
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET Visit | 70.18 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET Visit | 31.33 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category
The IBD PRTI modified questionnaire comprises 3 individual questions administered to the participant: participant satisfaction with study treatment; participant preference for study drug over prior treatment (this question on participant preference for study drug is prefaced by a simple question of previous treatment/s for IBD received in order to place the preference question into context) and participant willingness to reuse the study treatment again. Each of these questions (except the question on previous treatment, which is informational only) is scored on a 5 point Likert scale. PSA = Patient Satisfaction Assessment; PPTA = Patient Previous Treatment Assessment; PPA = Patient Preference Assessment; PWA = Patient Willingness Assessment.
Time frame: Week 48/ET visit
Population: Participants in the FAS who had a response to PRTI assessment at Week 48/ET visit
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Extremely satisfied | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: Definitely prefer the drug I am receiving now | 88.1 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Dissatisfied | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: Slight preference for drug I'm receiving now | 4.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: Injectable prescription medicines | 40.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Extremely dissatisfied | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: Slight preference for previous treatment | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: Prescription medicines taken by mouth | 45.2 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: No, I definitely prefer my previous treatment | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: Would definitely want to use same drug again | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: Surgery | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: Might want to use the same drug again | 14.3 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: I have no preference either way | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: I am not sure | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: Prescription medicines & surgery | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: Might not want to use same drug again | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Satisfied | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: Definitely not want to use same drug again | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: No treatment | 4.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: Definitely not want to use same drug again | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Extremely dissatisfied | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Dissatisfied | 8.7 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 17.4 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Extremely satisfied | 32.6 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: Injectable prescription medicines | 32.6 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: Prescription medicines taken by mouth | 43.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: Surgery | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: Prescription medicines & surgery | 13.0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPTA: No treatment | 10.9 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: Definitely prefer the drug I am receiving now | 56.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: Slight preference for drug I'm receiving now | 21.7 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: I have no preference either way | 17.4 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: Slight preference for previous treatment | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PPA: No, I definitely prefer my previous treatment | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: Would definitely want to use same drug again | 60.9 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: Might want to use the same drug again | 23.9 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: I am not sure | 10.9 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PWA: Might not want to use same drug again | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category | PSA: Satisfied | 41.3 Percentage of participants |
Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit
The component and domain scores were scored using the United States (US) 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Physical component score, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 50.15 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.73 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Physical component score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 48.43 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.22 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Component Score, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 50.25 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.11 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Component Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 48.79 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.64 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Physical Functioning Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 53.35 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Physical Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 51.40 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.59 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Role Physical Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 50.97 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.22 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Role Physical Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 49.38 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.78 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Bodily Pain Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 51.32 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.55 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Bodily Pain Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 49.57 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | General Health Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 41.60 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.51 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | General Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 40.39 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.08 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Vitality Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 52.78 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.68 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Vitality Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 51.06 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.38 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Social Functioning Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 51.81 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.21 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Social Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 49.42 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.64 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Role Emotional Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 50.12 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.85 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Role Emotional Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 47.97 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.78 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Health Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 49.89 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.84 |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 49.24 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.27 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Health Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 37.61 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.98 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Vitality Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 41.03 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.38 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Role Emotional Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 38.55 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.73 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Physical component score, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 37.80 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.53 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Bodily Pain Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 41.04 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.69 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Physical component score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 41.87 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.06 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Social Functioning Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 36.38 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.29 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Component Score, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 37.17 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.94 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | General Health Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 31.74 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.41 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Component Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 39.60 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.87 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Role Emotional Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 41.13 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.15 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Physical Functioning Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 43.50 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.37 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | General Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 33.45 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.16 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Physical Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 46.81 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.22 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Social Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 39.82 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.39 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Role Physical Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86) | 35.93 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Vitality Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 36.92 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.88 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Role Physical Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 40.04 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.99 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Mental Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83) | 40.13 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.52 |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit | Bodily Pain Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87) | 35.31 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.14 |
Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline
Relapse was defined as an increase in CDAI of more than (\>) 100 points from the baseline and an absolute CDAI score of \>220 points. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Data presented are rates estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves. n = number of participants remaining at risk.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52
Population: Participants in the FAS who met clinical remission criteria at baseline of this study
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 16 (n=51, 3) | 11.86 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 36 (n=38, 3) | 21.42 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 8 (n=55, 4) | 6.78 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 48 (n=7, 0) | 24.69 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 24 (n=46, 3) | 15.46 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 48 (n=7, 0) | NA Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 8 (n=55, 4) | NA Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 16 (n=51, 3) | 25.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 24 (n=46, 3) | 25.00 Percentage of participants |
| Tofacitinib 10 mg BID | Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline | Week 36 (n=38, 3) | 25.00 Percentage of participants |