Skip to content

A Open-Label Study Of CP-690,550 As Long-Term Therapy (48 Weeks) In Subjects With Crohn's Disease

A Open-Label Extension Study Of CP-690,550 As Maintenance Therapy In Patients With Crohn's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01470599
Enrollment
150
Registered
2011-11-11
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2017-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn's Disease

Brief summary

The study hypothesis is to establish the safety and tolerability of long-term open-label (OL) CP-690,550 therapy in subjects with Crohn's disease.

Interventions

DRUGCP-690,550

ORAL TABLET, TWICE DAILY

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 76 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who complete 26-week maintenance treatment of the A3921084 study or subjects who withdraw early due to A3921084 study treatment failure (see Appendix 5). * Women of childbearing potential must test negative for pregnancy prior to study enrolment. * Sexually active females of childbearing potential are required to use adequate contraceptive methods during the study period and until completion of the follow-up procedures. No specific contraceptive measures are required in male subjects during study participation.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who have been discontinued due to protocol violation(s) (as determined by the Sponsor) in the A3921084 study. * Subjects who were discontinued from the A3921084 study due to an adverse event. * Subjects likely to require any non-elective surgery or surgery requiring overnight stay (with the exception of minor same day outpatient procedures that will not interfere with study drug dosing).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adjudicated Potential Cardiovascular EventsFrom baseline to Week 52Pre-specified cardiovascular events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. Potential events of interest (pEoI) were identified by the investigator, sponsor, review of alerts from central electrocardiogram assessments, and by search of adverse events (AE)/serious adverse event (SAE) listings for events coded to death (coronary and non-coronary), myocardial infarction (non-fatal), all coronary revascularization, unstable angina, stroke (fatal and non-fatal), transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial vascular disease, dyspnoea, and chest pain. The independent reviewers (IRs) determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the definitions summarized from the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium 'Standardized Definitions for End Point Events in Cardiovascular Trials' published October 2010.
Adjudicated Malignancy EventsFrom baseline to Week 52Pre-specified malignancy events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by the investigator, sponsor, potential primary event notifications (i.e. malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) for a specific protocol, events submitted for histopathology review for potential malignancies which met the criteria for potential malignancies, and by search of AE/SAE listings for events coded to Malignant tumors Standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQ) (20000194). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, a ten-digit multi-axial classification of the site (4 characters), morphology (4 digits), behavior (1 digit), and grading (1 digit) of neoplasms.
Adjudicated Hepatic Injury EventsFrom baseline to Week 52Pre-specified liver injury events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor & search of clinical, safety & laboratory databases (potential Hy's law event, ALT/AST ≥5 x ULN, events meeting hepatic discontinuation criteria, SAEs coded to MedDRA hepatobiliary system organ class (SOC), AEs/SAEs coded to MedDRA liver infections or infectious biliary disorders SMQ, AEs coded to MedDRA drug-induced liver injury (DILI) preferred term or any death with ALT or AST ≥3xULN, bilirubin ≥2xULN or jaundice). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessing DILI (definite, highly likely, probable, possible, unlikely, unrelated or undetermined), pattern (hepatocellular, mixed, cholestatic or undetermined), likely, competing or alternative cause(s), severity (mild, moderate, severe, fatal/transplantation or undetermined), Hy's law case, recovery & liver failure (all yes, no or undetermined).
Adjudicated Opportunistic Infection EventsFrom baseline to Week 52Pre-specified opportunistic infection events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor & search of SAE listings for serious infections coded to MedDRA infections & infestations SOC &/or events meeting pre-specified criteria for IR pre-screening to determine if adjudication is required. IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to definitions for opportunistic infections (invasive fungal infections per the European Organization for Research & Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group & the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group \[EORTC/MSG\] Consensus Group definitions, endemic fungal infections per the EORTC/MSG Consensus Group definitions, other fungal infections, viral, bacterial & parasitic infections & vaccine dissemination) & special interest infections (actinomycosis, Legionella & mononucleosis-like toxoplasmosis).
Adjudicated Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforation EventsFrom baseline to Week 52Pre-specified GI perforation events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. The pEoI were identified via search of AE/SAE listings using the MedDRA GI Perforation SMQ. The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification based on whether a GI perforation occurred and if yes, the location within the GI tract, possible contributing medical conditions and/or concomitant medications.
Adjudicated Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) EventsFrom baseline to Week 52Pre-specified ILD events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by searches of the clinical, safety & laboratory databases (AEs coded to the MedDRA ILD SMQ and events nominated by the study clinician or clinical lead). The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessment of the ILD event (probably ILD, possible ILD, alternative diagnosis likely, other or insufficient information to classify).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 BaselineWeek 48Steroid-free clinical remission at Week 48 was a CDAI \<150 points in participants who were steroid-free at Week 48. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity.
Corticosteroid Use Over TimeWeeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48Use of corticosteroids (yes or no) was recorded at baseline and throughout the study. Percentage of participants taking corticosteriod at each visit was reported.
Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitFrom baseline to Week 48There was a single study treatment dose adjustment allowed, at the discretion of the Investigator, from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, after the initial 8 weeks of fixed open label treatment and for the remaining treatment period of 40 weeks. Percentage of participants whose study treatment were switched from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID after initial assignment was reported.
Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekBaseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-upFecal calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekBaseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-upThe test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBaseline and Week 48/early termination (ET)The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument for measuring disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitBaseline and Week 48/ETThe IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL.
Percentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET VisitWeek 48/ETThe IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. A score ≥170 corresponds to clinical remission. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions.
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48Week 48CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of less than (\<) 150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95 percent (%) Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBaseline and Week 48/ET visitThe component and domain scores were scored using the United States (US) 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitBaseline and Week 48/ET visitThe component and domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBaseline and Week 48/ET visitEQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET VisitBaseline and Week 48/ET visitEQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state.
EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET VisitBaseline and Week 48/ET visitEQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeters (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Change From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET VisitBaseline and Week 48/ET visitEQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Percentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's DiseaseFrom baseline to Week 52/follow-upThe number of participants hospitalized due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit.
Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's DiseaseFrom baseline to Week 52/follow-upThe length of hospitalizations due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit.
Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryWeek 48/ET visitThe IBD PRTI modified questionnaire comprises 3 individual questions administered to the participant: participant satisfaction with study treatment; participant preference for study drug over prior treatment (this question on participant preference for study drug is prefaced by a simple question of previous treatment/s for IBD received in order to place the preference question into context) and participant willingness to reuse the study treatment again. Each of these questions (except the question on previous treatment, which is informational only) is scored on a 5 point Likert scale. PSA = Patient Satisfaction Assessment; PPTA = Patient Previous Treatment Assessment; PPA = Patient Preference Assessment; PWA = Patient Willingness Assessment.
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyBaseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-upCDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyBaseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-upCDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. Clinical response was defined as a CDAI score reduction of at least 100 points from the A3921083 study baseline value. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.
Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineFrom baseline to Week 52Relapse was defined as an increase in CDAI of more than (\>) 100 points from the baseline and an absolute CDAI score of \>220 points. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Data presented are rates estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves. n = number of participants remaining at risk.
Observed CDAI Score by WeekBaseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-upCDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants remaining at risk.
Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-upCDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Netherlands, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted in participants who completed the 26-week maintenance treatment of Study A3921084 or who withdrew early due to A3921084 study treatment failure according to prespecified criteria.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were assigned to either the 5 milligram (mg) twice daily (BID) or 10 mg BID treatment group according to clinical remission status as assessed by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score at the end of the A3921084 study treatment visit or early termination visit due to A3921084 study treatment failure.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tofacitinib 5 mg BID
Tofacitinib 5 mg tablet for oral administration at a dose of 5 mg BID for up to 48 weeks.
62
Tofacitinib 10 mg BID
Tofacitinib 10 mg tablets (2 x 5 mg tablets) for oral administration at a dose of 10 mg BID for up to 48 weeks.
88
Total150

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse event not related to study drug15
Overall StudyAdverse event related to study drug25
Overall StudyDid not meet entrance criteria10
Overall StudyInsufficient clinical response627
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyOther10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTofacitinib 5 mg BIDTofacitinib 10 mg BIDTotal
Age, Continuous41.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
38.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
39.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants41 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants47 Participants79 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
42 / 6258 / 88
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 6214 / 88

Outcome results

Primary

Adjudicated Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforation Events

Pre-specified GI perforation events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. The pEoI were identified via search of AE/SAE listings using the MedDRA GI Perforation SMQ. The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification based on whether a GI perforation occurred and if yes, the location within the GI tract, possible contributing medical conditions and/or concomitant medications.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52

Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDAdjudicated Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforation Events2 Number of events meeting criteria
Primary

Adjudicated Hepatic Injury Events

Pre-specified liver injury events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor & search of clinical, safety & laboratory databases (potential Hy's law event, ALT/AST ≥5 x ULN, events meeting hepatic discontinuation criteria, SAEs coded to MedDRA hepatobiliary system organ class (SOC), AEs/SAEs coded to MedDRA liver infections or infectious biliary disorders SMQ, AEs coded to MedDRA drug-induced liver injury (DILI) preferred term or any death with ALT or AST ≥3xULN, bilirubin ≥2xULN or jaundice). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessing DILI (definite, highly likely, probable, possible, unlikely, unrelated or undetermined), pattern (hepatocellular, mixed, cholestatic or undetermined), likely, competing or alternative cause(s), severity (mild, moderate, severe, fatal/transplantation or undetermined), Hy's law case, recovery & liver failure (all yes, no or undetermined).

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52

Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDAdjudicated Hepatic Injury Events0 Number of events meeting criteria
Primary

Adjudicated Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Events

Pre-specified ILD events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by searches of the clinical, safety & laboratory databases (AEs coded to the MedDRA ILD SMQ and events nominated by the study clinician or clinical lead). The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessment of the ILD event (probably ILD, possible ILD, alternative diagnosis likely, other or insufficient information to classify).

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52

Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs

Primary

Adjudicated Malignancy Events

Pre-specified malignancy events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by the investigator, sponsor, potential primary event notifications (i.e. malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) for a specific protocol, events submitted for histopathology review for potential malignancies which met the criteria for potential malignancies, and by search of AE/SAE listings for events coded to Malignant tumors Standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQ) (20000194). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, a ten-digit multi-axial classification of the site (4 characters), morphology (4 digits), behavior (1 digit), and grading (1 digit) of neoplasms.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52

Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDAdjudicated Malignancy Events0 Number of events meeting criteria
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDAdjudicated Malignancy Events1 Number of events meeting criteria
Primary

Adjudicated Opportunistic Infection Events

Pre-specified opportunistic infection events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor & search of SAE listings for serious infections coded to MedDRA infections & infestations SOC &/or events meeting pre-specified criteria for IR pre-screening to determine if adjudication is required. IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to definitions for opportunistic infections (invasive fungal infections per the European Organization for Research & Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group & the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group \[EORTC/MSG\] Consensus Group definitions, endemic fungal infections per the EORTC/MSG Consensus Group definitions, other fungal infections, viral, bacterial & parasitic infections & vaccine dissemination) & special interest infections (actinomycosis, Legionella & mononucleosis-like toxoplasmosis).

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52

Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDAdjudicated Opportunistic Infection Events1 Number of events meeting criteria
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDAdjudicated Opportunistic Infection Events1 Number of events meeting criteria
Primary

Adjudicated Potential Cardiovascular Events

Pre-specified cardiovascular events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. Potential events of interest (pEoI) were identified by the investigator, sponsor, review of alerts from central electrocardiogram assessments, and by search of adverse events (AE)/serious adverse event (SAE) listings for events coded to death (coronary and non-coronary), myocardial infarction (non-fatal), all coronary revascularization, unstable angina, stroke (fatal and non-fatal), transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial vascular disease, dyspnoea, and chest pain. The independent reviewers (IRs) determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the definitions summarized from the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium 'Standardized Definitions for End Point Events in Cardiovascular Trials' published October 2010.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52

Population: Participants in the SAS who had pEoI and were adjudicated by IRs

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDAdjudicated Potential Cardiovascular Events0 Number of events meeting criteria
Secondary

Change From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET Visit

EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

Population: Participants in the FAS who had non-missing data at Week 48/ET visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET Visit-0.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET Visit0.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET Visit

EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

Population: Participants in the FAS who had non-missing data at Week 48/ET visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET Visit-3.79 mmStandard Deviation 20.56
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET Visit10.16 mmStandard Deviation 26.57
Secondary

Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit

The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET

Population: Participants in the FAS who had non-missing data at Week 48/ET visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitBowel Function Score, Week 48/ET-2.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitSystemic Symptoms Score, Week 48/ET-1.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.83
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitEmotional Status Score, Week 48/ET-3.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.48
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitSocial Function Score, Week 48/ET-1.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.24
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitIBDQ Total Score, Week 48/ET-7.98 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.93
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitSocial Function Score, Week 48/ET3.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.89
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitIBDQ Total Score, Week 48/ET18.84 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.45
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitBowel Function Score, Week 48/ET6.37 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.41
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitEmotional Status Score, Week 48/ET5.36 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET VisitSystemic Symptoms Score, Week 48/ET3.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.43
Secondary

Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week

CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 8 (n=54, 75)26.96 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 62.68
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 16 (n=53, 66)11.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 52.25
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 24 (n=49, 59)6.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.48
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 36 (n=41, 48)-10.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.35
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 48 (n=33, 36)-4.79 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 60.09
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 52/Follow-up (n=38, 43)47.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 109.73
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 48 (n=33, 36)-121.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 129.21
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 8 (n=54, 75)-114.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 112.44
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 36 (n=41, 48)-139.81 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 126.18
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 16 (n=53, 66)-112.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 111.09
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 52/Follow-up (n=38, 43)-107.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 119.05
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by WeekWeek 24 (n=49, 59)-122.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 117.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit

The component and domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitPhysical component score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-1.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.17
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitMental Component Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-1.88 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.05
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitPhysical Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-1.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitRole Physical Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-1.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.87
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitBodily Pain Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-1.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitGeneral Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-1.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitVitality Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-1.63 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.39
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitSocial Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-2.92 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitRole Emotional Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 82)-2.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.29
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitMental Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)-1.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitSocial Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)3.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.46
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitPhysical component score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)4.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitGeneral Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)2.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.99
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitMental Component Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)3.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.53
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitMental Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)2.87 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.72
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitPhysical Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)3.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.74
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitVitality Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)4.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.16
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitRole Physical Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)4.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.62
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitRole Emotional Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 82)3.28 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.38
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDChange From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET VisitBodily Pain Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)6.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.92
Secondary

Corticosteroid Use Over Time

Use of corticosteroids (yes or no) was recorded at baseline and throughout the study. Percentage of participants taking corticosteriod at each visit was reported.

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48

Population: SAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 84.84 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeBaseline1.61 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 363.23 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 164.84 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 481.61 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 244.84 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 487.95 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeBaseline20.45 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 821.59 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 1613.64 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 2412.50 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDCorticosteroid Use Over TimeWeek 3610.23 Percentage of participants
Secondary

EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET Visit

EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeters (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDEQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET VisitVAS Score, Baseline (n=62, 86)77.98 mmStandard Deviation 16.18
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDEQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET VisitVAS Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)73.40 mmStandard Deviation 18.54
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDEQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET VisitVAS Score, Baseline (n=62, 86)48.60 mmStandard Deviation 19.21
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDEQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET VisitVAS Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)57.60 mmStandard Deviation 24.6
Secondary

EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit

EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDEuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitUtility Score, Baseline (n=62, 85)0.85 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDEuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitUtility Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)0.84 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDEuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitUtility Score, Baseline (n=62, 85)0.57 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDEuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitUtility Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)0.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit

The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument for measuring disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/early termination (ET)

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitEmotional Status Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)66.98 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.27
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBowel Function Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)58.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.86
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSystemic Symptoms Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)26.95 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.36
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBowel Function Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)55.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSystemic Symptoms Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)25.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.28
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitIBDQ Total Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)179.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.89
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSocial Function Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)32.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.59
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitEmotional Status Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)69.68 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.58
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSocial Function Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)30.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitIBDQ Total Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)187.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.38
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSocial Function Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)24.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.98
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitIBDQ Total Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)127.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.17
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitIBDQ Total Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)144.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.16
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBowel Function Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)46.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.38
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitEmotional Status Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)48.61 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.42
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitEmotional Status Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)53.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.32
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSystemic Symptoms Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)17.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.55
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSystemic Symptoms Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)20.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSocial Function Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)20.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.96
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBowel Function Score, Baseline (n=62, 87)40.71 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Secondary

Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease

The length of hospitalizations due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52/follow-up

Population: SAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDLength of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease<3 days1.6 Percentage of participnats
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDLength of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease7 to 10 days0 Percentage of participnats
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDLength of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease3 to 6 days6.5 Percentage of participnats
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDLength of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease> 10 days0 Percentage of participnats
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDLength of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease3 to 6 days10.2 Percentage of participnats
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDLength of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease<3 days2.3 Percentage of participnats
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDLength of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease> 10 days3.4 Percentage of participnats
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDLength of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease7 to 10 days3.4 Percentage of participnats
Secondary

Observed CDAI Score by Week

CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants remaining at risk.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 16 (n=53, 66)86.58 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 65.23
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 36 (n=41, 48)73.34 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 59.52
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 8 (n=54, 75)105.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 75.82
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 48 (n=33, 36)73.91 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 70.23
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 24 (n=49, 59)85.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 56.67
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 52/Follow-up (n=38, 43)129.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 114.82
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekBaseline (n=62, 88)77.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.22
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 52/Follow-up (n=38, 43)180.65 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 98.8
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekBaseline (n=62, 88)291.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 95.78
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 8 (n=54, 75)176.96 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 82.39
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 16 (n=53, 66)178.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 72.25
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 24 (n=49, 59)163.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 79.73
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 36 (n=41, 48)158.67 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 89.15
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved CDAI Score by WeekWeek 48 (n=33, 36)154.11 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 71.47
Secondary

Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week

Fecal calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 8 (n=53, 71)-105.51 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 436.41
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 16 (n=54, 64)-144.65 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 423.2
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 24 (n=49, 55)-120.49 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 511.49
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 36 (n=41, 42)-169.92 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 354.3
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 48 (n=37, 38)-189.61 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 462.61
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 52/Follow-up (n=48, 57)-51.33 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 453.73
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 48 (n=37, 38)-123.87 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 376.7
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 8 (n=53, 71)-102.82 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 310.1
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 36 (n=41, 42)-133.82 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 364.51
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 16 (n=54, 64)-35.28 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 718.82
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 52/Follow-up (n=48, 57)-109.23 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 389.54
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by WeekWeek 24 (n=49, 55)-130.68 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)Standard Deviation 337.23
Secondary

Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week

The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 48 (n=43, 44)-4.55 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 17.81
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 8 (n=61, 82)-0.44 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 14.78
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 16 (n=58, 72)-2.46 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 14.54
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 24 (n=54, 61)-2.76 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 17.59
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 36 (n=46, 51)-4.42 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 22.29
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 52/Follow-up (n=54, 71)3.86 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 21.57
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 36 (n=46, 51)-12.09 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 30.61
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 48 (n=43, 44)-11.45 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 31.3
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 24 (n=54, 61)-9.26 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 30.2
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 8 (n=61, 82)-4.81 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 26.76
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 52/Follow-up (n=54, 71)-4.72 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 31.34
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDObserved Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by WeekWeek 16 (n=58, 72)-7.96 mg per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 25.11
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 Baseline

Steroid-free clinical remission at Week 48 was a CDAI \<150 points in participants who were steroid-free at Week 48. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Participants in FAS who were on steroids at baseline of this study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 Baseline50.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 Baseline9.09 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's Disease

The number of participants hospitalized due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52/follow-up

Population: SAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's Disease11.3 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's Disease15.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study

CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

Population: Participants in the FAS who met clinical remission criteria at baseline of this study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Baseline (n=61, 4)100.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 8 (n=53, 4)75.47 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 16 (n=52, 4)84.62 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 24 (n=48, 4)85.42 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 36 (n=40, 3)92.50 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 48 (n=32, 3)87.50 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 52/follow-up (n=37, 3)64.86 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudySustained clinical remission (n=31, 3)77.42 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudySustained clinical remission (n=31, 3)33.33 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Baseline (n=61, 4)100.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 36 (n=40, 3)33.33 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 8 (n=53, 4)50.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 52/follow-up (n=37, 3)33.33 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 16 (n=52, 4)75.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 48 (n=32, 3)100.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 24 (n=48, 4)25.00 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study

CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. Clinical response was defined as a CDAI score reduction of at least 100 points from the A3921083 study baseline value. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

Population: Participants in the FAS who met clinical response or clinical remission criteria at baseline of this study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 8 (n=54, 20)75.93 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Baseline (n=62, 23)98.39 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 16 (n=53, 19)84.91 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 24 (n=49, 16)83.67 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 36 (n=41, 13)90.24 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 48 (n=33, 10)87.88 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 52/follow-up (n=38, 12)65.79 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudySustained clinical remission (n=32, 10)75.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudySustained clinical remission (n=32, 10)30.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 36 (n=41, 13)38.46 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Baseline (n=62, 23)17.39 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 8 (n=54, 20)35.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 52/follow-up (n=38, 12)41.67 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 16 (n=53, 19)36.84 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 48 (n=33, 10)50.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This StudyClinical remission: Week 24 (n=49, 16)43.75 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48

CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of less than (\<) 150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score \<150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95 percent (%) Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) - consisted of all participants enrolled in this OL extension study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48Clinical remission (n=33, 36)87.88 Percent
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48Sustained clinical remission (n=32, 35)75.00 Percent
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48Clinical remission (n=33, 36)55.56 Percent
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48Sustained clinical remission (n=32, 35)34.29 Percent
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit

There was a single study treatment dose adjustment allowed, at the discretion of the Investigator, from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, after the initial 8 weeks of fixed open label treatment and for the remaining treatment period of 40 weeks. Percentage of participants whose study treatment were switched from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID after initial assignment was reported.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 48

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 825.81 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 243.23 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 360 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 166.45 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 480 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 160 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 480 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 80 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 242.27 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by VisitWeek 361.14 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET Visit

The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. A score ≥170 corresponds to clinical remission. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions.

Time frame: Week 48/ET

Population: Participants in the FAS who had non-missing data at Week 48/ET visit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET Visit70.18 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET Visit31.33 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category

The IBD PRTI modified questionnaire comprises 3 individual questions administered to the participant: participant satisfaction with study treatment; participant preference for study drug over prior treatment (this question on participant preference for study drug is prefaced by a simple question of previous treatment/s for IBD received in order to place the preference question into context) and participant willingness to reuse the study treatment again. Each of these questions (except the question on previous treatment, which is informational only) is scored on a 5 point Likert scale. PSA = Patient Satisfaction Assessment; PPTA = Patient Previous Treatment Assessment; PPA = Patient Preference Assessment; PWA = Patient Willingness Assessment.

Time frame: Week 48/ET visit

Population: Participants in the FAS who had a response to PRTI assessment at Week 48/ET visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Extremely satisfied66.7 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: Definitely prefer the drug I am receiving now88.1 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Dissatisfied0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: Slight preference for drug I'm receiving now4.8 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: Injectable prescription medicines40.5 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Extremely dissatisfied0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: Slight preference for previous treatment0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: Prescription medicines taken by mouth45.2 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: No, I definitely prefer my previous treatment0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: Would definitely want to use same drug again83.3 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: Surgery2.4 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: Might want to use the same drug again14.3 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: I have no preference either way7.1 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: I am not sure2.4 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: Prescription medicines & surgery7.1 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: Might not want to use same drug again0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Satisfied33.3 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: Definitely not want to use same drug again0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: No treatment4.8 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: Definitely not want to use same drug again4.3 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Extremely dissatisfied0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Dissatisfied8.7 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied17.4 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Extremely satisfied32.6 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: Injectable prescription medicines32.6 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: Prescription medicines taken by mouth43.5 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: Surgery0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: Prescription medicines & surgery13.0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPTA: No treatment10.9 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: Definitely prefer the drug I am receiving now56.5 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: Slight preference for drug I'm receiving now21.7 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: I have no preference either way17.4 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: Slight preference for previous treatment4.3 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPPA: No, I definitely prefer my previous treatment0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: Would definitely want to use same drug again60.9 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: Might want to use the same drug again23.9 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: I am not sure10.9 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPWA: Might not want to use same drug again0 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by CategoryPSA: Satisfied41.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit

The component and domain scores were scored using the United States (US) 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitPhysical component score, Baseline (n=62, 86)50.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.73
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitPhysical component score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)48.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.22
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitMental Component Score, Baseline (n=62, 86)50.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.11
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitMental Component Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)48.79 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.64
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitPhysical Functioning Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86)53.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitPhysical Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)51.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.59
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitRole Physical Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86)50.97 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.22
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitRole Physical Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)49.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.78
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBodily Pain Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)51.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.55
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBodily Pain Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)49.57 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitGeneral Health Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)41.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.51
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitGeneral Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)40.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.08
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitVitality Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)52.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.68
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitVitality Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)51.06 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.38
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSocial Functioning Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)51.81 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.21
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSocial Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)49.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.64
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitRole Emotional Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86)50.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.85
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitRole Emotional Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)47.97 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.78
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitMental Health Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)49.89 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitMental Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)49.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.27
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitMental Health Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)37.61 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.98
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitVitality Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)41.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.38
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitRole Emotional Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86)38.55 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.73
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitPhysical component score, Baseline (n=62, 86)37.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.53
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBodily Pain Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)41.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.69
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitPhysical component score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)41.87 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.06
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSocial Functioning Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)36.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.29
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitMental Component Score, Baseline (n=62, 86)37.17 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.94
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitGeneral Health Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)31.74 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.41
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitMental Component Score, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)39.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.87
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitRole Emotional Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)41.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.15
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitPhysical Functioning Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86)43.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.37
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitGeneral Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)33.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.16
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitPhysical Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)46.81 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.22
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitSocial Functioning Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)39.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.39
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitRole Physical Domain, Baseline (n=62, 86)35.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitVitality Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)36.92 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.88
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitRole Physical Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)40.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.99
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitMental Health Domain, Week 48/ET (n=57, 83)40.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.52
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDShort Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET VisitBodily Pain Domain, Baseline (n=62, 87)35.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
Secondary

Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline

Relapse was defined as an increase in CDAI of more than (\>) 100 points from the baseline and an absolute CDAI score of \>220 points. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Data presented are rates estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves. n = number of participants remaining at risk.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52

Population: Participants in the FAS who met clinical remission criteria at baseline of this study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 16 (n=51, 3)11.86 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 36 (n=38, 3)21.42 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 8 (n=55, 4)6.78 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 48 (n=7, 0)24.69 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 5 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 24 (n=46, 3)15.46 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 48 (n=7, 0)NA Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 8 (n=55, 4)NA Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 16 (n=51, 3)25.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 24 (n=46, 3)25.00 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib 10 mg BIDTime to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at BaselineWeek 36 (n=38, 3)25.00 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026