Skip to content

Efficiency Comparison Between Methylprednisolone and Phenol 8% Treatment Using a Trans Sacral Approach - on Lower Back Pain and Limbs

Efficiency Comparison Between Methylprednisolone and Phenol 8% Treatment Using a Trans Sacral Approach - on Lower Back Pain and Limbs

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01468415
Enrollment
60
Registered
2011-11-09
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Keywords

Methylprednisolone, trans sacral block, phenol

Brief summary

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management, Chronic Pain section, recommended Phenol neurolysis when other techniques have failed to provide adequate pain control. In this study we sought to Compare the pain relieve on a Lower Back and Limbs obtained from Methylprednisolone and Phenol 8% Treatment given by Trans Sacral Approach. The study includes patients who suffers from a chronic low back and/or limbs pain which were referred to be given epidural as a treatment. Control group receives 80 mg Methylprednisolone while the test group receives phenol 8%.

Interventions

DRUGphenol

1 cc of 8% phenol dissolved in water or 20cc of 8o mg Methylprednisolone diluted in 0.25% marcaine.

Sponsors

Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-at least 18 years of age; * chronic low back pain of at least 12 weeks duration; * patients which were diagnosed as a candidate for epidural since other techniques have failed to provide adequate pain control * Sciatica due to Lumbar Disc Herniation * Neurogenic Claudication due to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Exclusion criteria

* patients with unbalanced high blood pressure * patients who can not ley prone * patients who consumes anti-clotting medications * patients with bleeding problems * patients with Diabetes * patients who suffers from chronic non-specific lower back and limb pain

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026