Skip to content

Change in Peripheral Oxygen Saturation by Using Different Breathing Procedures in High Altitude

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01468194
Enrollment
30
Registered
2011-11-09
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2011-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Mountain Sickness

Keywords

AMS, HAPE, high altitude, oxygen, saturation, mountain, climbing, breathing

Brief summary

In this investigation the researchers explore whether different types of breathing procedures can improve the peripheral oxygen saturation to reduce the risk of becoming a acute mountain sickness or a high altitude pulmonary edema.

Detailed description

Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a pathological effect of high altitude on humans caused by acute exposure to low partial pressure of oxygen at high altitude. It commonly occurs above 2500 meters of altitude. AMS appears as a collection of nonspecific symptoms acquired at high altitude or in low air pressure resembling a case of flu, carbon monoxide poisoning, or a hangover. It is caused by a drop in pressure and lowering partial pressure of oxygen during increasing altitude. The direct consequence of those changes is a hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (Euler-Lijestrand-mechanism). In addition a rise in pulmonary blood pressure (Hypertonia) can occur so that there is a higher risk of developing a high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE). In this investigation the investigators are exploring whether different types of breathing procedures can improve the peripheral oxygen saturation. We are comparing breathing with no regulation with two different procedures of hyperventilation during trekking in different altitudes. Procedure 1 (hyperventilation 1) describes inhalation during one step and exhalation during the next step. Procedure 2 (hyperventilation 2) describes inhalation and exhalation during one step. The effect of the different breathing procedures can be quantified measuring the peripheral oxygen saturation. In addition the investigators are comparing the breathing rate and the minute ventilation as well as the expiratory end-tidal CO2-partial pressure of the three different breathing procedures. Furthermore, the investigators are examining the ability to concentrate in order to quantify the effect of AMS on organ functions.

Interventions

OTHERBreathing procedure 1

inhalation during one step, exhalation during the next step

OTHERBreathing procedure 2

inhalation and exhalation during one step

Sponsors

MVZ für Laboratoriumsmedizin Koblenz
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Giessen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Exclusion criteria

* acute clinically significant inter-current diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change of peripheral oxygen saturationimmediate after interventionchange of peripheral oxygen saturation under different breathing procedures in different altitudes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change of breathing parametersimmediate after interventionchange of breathing parameters under different breathing procedures in different altitudes * breathing rate * minute ventilation * expiratory end-tidal CO2-partial pressure
change of cognitionimmediate after interventionchange of ability of cognition (measured by d2-test) under different breathing procedures in different altitudes

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026