Skip to content

EBUS-TBNA Versus EBUS-TBNB

Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Versus Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Biopsy (EBUS-TBNB) in the Assessment of Mediastinal and Hilar Lymphadenopathy: a Randomised Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01467635
Enrollment
0
Registered
2011-11-09
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2016-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hilar Lymphadenopathy, Lymphoma, Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy, Mycobacterial Disease, Sarcoidosis

Keywords

Endobronchial ultrasound, Transbronchial needle aspiration, Transbronchial biopsy forceps, Mediastinal lymphadenopathy, Hilar lymphadenopathy

Brief summary

A prospective diagnostic clinical study randomising patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of enlarged mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes to have sampling using the usual EBUS-TBNA needle or a novel biopsy forceps (EBUS-TBNB). The study aims to establish whether the use of EBUS-TBNB can significantly increase the diagnostic yield over EBUS-TBNA, without an increase in complication rates.

Interventions

DEVICEEndobronchial ultrasound guided lymph node sampling

Patients with enlarged mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes have these sampled under endobronchial ultrasound guidance using either the EBUS-TBNA needle or the EBUS-TBNB biopsy forceps.

Sponsors

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Heidelberg University
CollaboratorOTHER
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled for EBUS-TBNA as part of clinical care * Lymph nodes larger than 10mm in diameter * Age \> 18 years * Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications for needle or forceps biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, anticoagulation, thrombocytopenia) * Inability to obtain informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The percentage of lymph nodes sampled resulting in a definitive diagnosis (as defined in the protocol) in the two study arms.18 monthsThe definition of a definitive diagnosis is dependant on the diagnosis and is clarified below: * Carcinoma/lymphoma: The lymph node sample is adequate to make a diagnosis as well as provide immunohistochemistry information enabling subtyping of the tumour. * Sarcoidosis: The presence of well formed epithelioid non-caseating granulomas. * Mycobacterial infection: The presence of caseating granulomas, positive Ziehl Nielson staining for acid fast bacilli, or the tissue successfully cultures Mycobacterium.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The difference in the complication rate between the two study arms24 months

Countries

Germany, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026