Skip to content

Secondary Prevention and Health Promotion After Stroke

Secondary Prevention and Health Promotion After Stroke A Nurse-led Randomized Controlled Open Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01466907
Enrollment
597
Registered
2011-11-08
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2014-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

complication, depression, follow-up, intervention, nurse-led, outcome, secondary prevention, stroke

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to examine to what extent a one year population of stroke patients at a university hospital had well regulated risk factors and health problems one year after stroke, and if a structured nurse-led previous follow-up in the intervention group including referrals if needed could influence health outcome and risk factors one year after stroke.

Detailed description

The follow-up protocol was categorized into Risk factors, Patients' self-reports, and Other health problems. Referral was sent to a physician if medical interventions were needed regarding risk factors measured above the limits as stated in the follow-up protocol in accordance with guidelines,and/or if any self-reported health problems were stated by the patients, or had been detected by the Specialist Nurse. Primary outcome was comparison between the intervention group and control group at one year after stroke regarding proportion of regulated risk factors, and self-reports on health outcome. Results of the two follow-ups of the intervention group were also compared.

Interventions

OTHERSecondary prevention, supportive counselling

Patients' self-reports on Mobility, Self Care, Usual activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health Outcome were registered. Health problems were assessed. Secondary prevention was controlled by measuring blood pressure, Cholesterol levels, HbA1c, Weight to estimate nutritional status. Functional status was assessed. Supportive counselling was provided. Referral was sent to physician if medical interventions were needed.

OTHERStandard care until one year follow-up

No intervention three months after stroke. Assessment one year after stroke and comparison with the intervention group.

Sponsors

Skane University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

WHO criteria for definition of stroke Signed consent

Exclusion criteria

Other diagnosis causing neurological symptoms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Risk factors and health outcome compared between intervention group and control groupBaseline to one year after stroke for both groups.Outcome for both groups after one year was measured as the proportion of risk factors sufficiently treated, the patients' self-reports on health outcome and comparison between the intervention group and the control group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Risk factors and health outcome at two follow-ups.Baseline to one year after strokeComparison of health outcome at three months and one year after stroke in the intervention group.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026