Skip to content

Refining Paracervical Block Techniques for Pain Control in First Trimester Surgical Abortion

Refining Paracervical Block Techniques for Pain Control in First Trimester Surgical Abortion

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01466491
Enrollment
332
Registered
2011-11-08
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2019-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Pain during first-trimester surgical abortion

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the level of pain women experience with a surgical abortion and the effect that varying paracervical block techniques might have on that pain. These different techniques involve wait time following the injection as well as the number of sites injected.

Detailed description

The investigators plan to conduct a single-blinded randomized trial of 350 women undergoing elective first-trimester surgical abortion. Subjects will be randomized to two different paracervical block techniques, but both the medications and the amount of medications will remain the same. Subjects will not know to which group they have been randomized as this knowledge may affect how much pain is felt. Primary Outcome: Patient reported pain with cervical dilation during first trimester surgical abortion. Pain is measured as mm distance from the left of the 100-mm visual analogue (VAS) scale with the anchors 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable (reflecting magnitude of pain) and recorded immediately after completion of cervical dilation. The 100-mm VAS scale is a well established and validated study instrument. Secondary Outcomes: 1. Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, race, gravidity, parity, gestational age, prior vaginal delivery, prior abortion, level of menstrual symptoms 2. Pain (VAS scale): * anticipated * baseline * with speculum insertion * with placement of the PCB * with aspiration * 30 min postoperatively * intrapersonal pain changes (calculated in analysis) * anxiety \[baseline\] (VAS scale; anchors 0 = none, 100mm = worst imaginable): * of pain * of surgery * satisfaction (VAS scale; anchors 0 = not, 100mm = very satisfied): * with pain control * overall abortion experience * adverse events * need for additional intraoperative and/or postoperative pain medication * participants' belief if they were in the intervention or control group

Interventions

DRUGParacervical block technique with lidocaine

The PCB will consist of a total of 20 mL local anesthetic (18 mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL sodium bicarbonate) injected with the following technique: 2 mL are injected at the tenaculum site, 12 o'clock, superficially into the cervix. The tenaculum is placed at 12 o'clock. The remaining 18 mL are injected paracervically (vaginal fornices) over sixty seconds. The injection, occurring in either two or four sites, is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal). It will be followed with either no wait or a three-minute wait period.

Sponsors

Planned Parenthood Federation of America
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age 18 years or older * voluntarily requesting pregnancy termination * ultrasound-confirmed intrauterine pregnancy up to 10 6/7 weeks gestational age * generally healthy * English or Spanish speaking * able or willing to sign an informed consent and agree to terms of the study

Exclusion criteria

* gestational age over 10 6/7 weeks (due to routine use of misoprostol starting at this gestational age at the study sites) * incomplete abortion * failed medical abortion * required or requested IV sedation (prior to randomization) * patient who declines Ibuprofen, Lorazepam or PCB * medical contraindication or allergy to any of the study medications * chronic use of narcotic pain medication or heroin * significant physical or mental health condition * adnexal mass or tenderness on pelvic exam consistent with inflammatory disease * known hepatic disease * women who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not suitable for the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Perception of Painafter completion of cervical dilationTo determine whether varying paracervical block techniques affect patient perception of pain. Pain is measured as mm distance from the left of the 100-mm visual analogue (VAS) scale with the anchors 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable (reflecting magnitude of pain) and recorded immediately after completion of cervical dilation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time Pointsup to several hoursDistance (mm) from the left of the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS anchors: 0=none, 100 mm= worst imaginable) recorded at various points throughout procedure: * prior to medication (baseline) * after speculum insertion * with placement of PCB * with cervical dilation * with aspiration * 30 minutes post-operatively

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
4-site Injection
The superior technique of Phase 1 will be compared to a 4-site technique (both techniques will have no wait prior to dilation unless wait was superior in Phase 1). Paracervical block technique with lidocaine: The PCB will consist of a total of 20 mL local anesthetic (18 mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL sodium bicarbonate) injected with the following technique: 2 mL are injected at the tenaculum site, 12 o'clock, superficially into the cervix. The tenaculum is placed at 12 o'clock. The remaining 18 mL are injected paracervically (vaginal fornices) over sixty seconds. The injection, occurring in either two or four sites, is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal). It will be followed with either no wait or a three-minute wait period.
83
2-site Injection
The superior technique of Phase 1 will be compared to a 2-site technique (2 mL injected at the tenaculum site, 18 mL equally distributed between 4 and 8 o'clock) in a randomized fashion (both techniques will have no wait prior to dilation unless wait was superior in Phase 1). Paracervical block technique with lidocaine: The PCB will consist of a total of 20 mL local anesthetic (18 mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL sodium bicarbonate) injected with the following technique: 2 mL are injected at the tenaculum site, 12 o'clock, superficially into the cervix. The tenaculum is placed at 12 o'clock. The remaining 18 mL are injected paracervically (vaginal fornices) over sixty seconds. The injection, occurring in either two or four sites, is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal). It will be followed with either no wait or a three-minute wait period.
80
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute Wait
Women will be randomized to receive a 4-site PCB followed by a 3-minute wait (PCB 20/4/3) prior to dilation Paracervical block technique with lidocaine: The PCB will consist of a total of 20 mL local anesthetic (18 mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL sodium bicarbonate) injected with the following technique: 2 mL are injected at the tenaculum site, 12 o'clock, superficially into the cervix. The tenaculum is placed at 12 o'clock. The remaining 18 mL are injected paracervically (vaginal fornices) over sixty seconds. The injection, occurring in either two or four sites, is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal). It will be followed with either no wait or a three-minute wait period.
80
4-site PCB Followed by no Wait
Women will be randomized to receive a 4-site PCB followed by no wait (PCB 20/4/0). Paracervical block technique with lidocaine: The PCB will consist of a total of 20 mL local anesthetic (18 mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL sodium bicarbonate) injected with the following technique: 2 mL are injected at the tenaculum site, 12 o'clock, superficially into the cervix. The tenaculum is placed at 12 o'clock. The remaining 18 mL are injected paracervically (vaginal fornices) over sixty seconds. The injection, occurring in either two or four sites, is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal). It will be followed with either no wait or a three-minute wait period.
83
Total326

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyMissing Data0010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0320

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic2-site Injection4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute Wait4-site Injection4-site PCB Followed by no WaitTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
80 Participants80 Participants83 Participants83 Participants326 Participants
Age, Continuous25.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
25.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
25.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
25.575 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Region of Enrollment
United States
80 participants80 participants83 participants83 participants326 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
80 Participants80 Participants83 Participants83 Participants326 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 830 / 800 / 800 / 83
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 830 / 800 / 800 / 83
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 830 / 800 / 800 / 83

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Perception of Pain

To determine whether varying paracervical block techniques affect patient perception of pain. Pain is measured as mm distance from the left of the 100-mm visual analogue (VAS) scale with the anchors 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable (reflecting magnitude of pain) and recorded immediately after completion of cervical dilation.

Time frame: after completion of cervical dilation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
4-site InjectionPatient Perception of Pain60 mmStandard Deviation 30
2-site InjectionPatient Perception of Pain68 mmStandard Deviation 21
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute WaitPatient Perception of Pain56 mmStandard Deviation 32
4-site PCB Followed by no WaitPatient Perception of Pain63 mmStandard Deviation 24
Secondary

Pain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time Points

Distance (mm) from the left of the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS anchors: 0=none, 100 mm= worst imaginable) recorded at various points throughout procedure: * prior to medication (baseline) * after speculum insertion * with placement of PCB * with cervical dilation * with aspiration * 30 minutes post-operatively

Time frame: up to several hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
4-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith aspiration67.75 mmStandard Error 2.52
4-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsAfter speculum insertion29.35 mmStandard Error 2.43
4-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith placement of PCB58.89 mmStandard Error 2.64
4-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith cervical dilation59.76 mmStandard Error 2.84
4-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time Points30 minutes post-operatively26.27 mmStandard Error 2.56
4-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsPrior to medication (baseline)7.65 mmStandard Error 1.27
2-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time Points30 minutes post-operatively22.37 mmStandard Error 2.3
2-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith cervical dilation68.41 mmStandard Error 2.9
2-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith placement of PCB55.31 mmStandard Error 2.69
2-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith aspiration74.05 mmStandard Error 2.56
2-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsAfter speculum insertion27.31 mmStandard Error 2.47
2-site InjectionPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsPrior to medication (baseline)4.84 mmStandard Error 1.3
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsAfter speculum insertion29.3 mmStandard Error 2.7
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith placement of PCB60.0 mmStandard Error 2.8
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time Points30 minutes post-operatively27.3 mmStandard Error 2.6
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith cervical dilation55.6 mmStandard Error 3.1
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith aspiration72.1 mmStandard Error 2.6
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsPrior to medication (baseline)4.2 mmStandard Error 2.5
4-site PCB Followed by no WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith aspiration69.4 mmStandard Error 2.5
4-site PCB Followed by no WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith placement of PCB58.3 mmStandard Error 2.8
4-site PCB Followed by no WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsAfter speculum insertion30.3 mmStandard Error 2.7
4-site PCB Followed by no WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsPrior to medication (baseline)6 mmStandard Error 0.9
4-site PCB Followed by no WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time PointsWith cervical dilation63.2 mmStandard Error 3.1
4-site PCB Followed by no WaitPain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time Points30 minutes post-operatively24.2 mmStandard Error 2.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026