Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of a Medical Device (KULIST)to Treat Perianal Fistulas

An Open Prospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of a Medical Device,KULIST, for the Treatment of Chronic, Non-complicated Perianal Fistulas

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01462747
Enrollment
28
Registered
2011-10-31
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2013-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perianal Fistulas

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of rectally administered activated carbon (medical device KULIST) in chronic, uncomplicated, perianal fistulas.

Detailed description

Patients with chronic uncomplicated perianal fistulas located below levator ani will be treated twice daily with KULIST for 8 weeks. The efficacy will be evaluated by means of an overall clinical evaluation of fistula closure, as well as by anal ultrasonography. Also changes in Patient Assessment of Symptoms and Impact on Daily Function will be evaluated. Safety will be evaluated by standard adverse event /adverse device effects reporting.

Interventions

DEVICEKULIST

Twice daily dosing for 8 weeks

Sponsors

Nordic Drugs AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with perianal fistulas diagnosed by clinical examination and evaluated as not healed/open 2. Fistula classified as intersphincteric and transsphincteric according to Parks´classification (Parks 1976) 3. Superficial fistula involving a part of the external sphincter muscle 4. Age: ≥18 years and ≤ 75 years 5. Informed consent and/or Letter of Authority (as applicable) obtained

Exclusion criteria

6. Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) 7. Rectovaginal fistulas 8. Rectourethral fistulas 9. Rectovesical fistulas 10. Extra-sphincteric and supra-sphincteric fistula according to Parks´classification 11. Complicated fistulas (eg. horse shoe fistulas) as evaluated by the investigator. 12. Any surgical treatment for perianal fistulas 13. Colorectal and/or anal malignancy 14. Other malignancy requiring active treatment 15. Subcutaneous fistulas not involving any part of the external sphincter 16. Other diseases which as per the investigator's opinion should be contraindicated 17. Subjects who are not able to complete study procedures as per the investigator's opinion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical evaluation of fistula healing, change from baselineweek 8 and 24Fistula assessed as healed/not healed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anal ultrasonography, change from baselineweek 8 and 24Healed/not healed
Patient assessment of Symptoms and Impact on Daily Function, change from baselineweek 8 and 24By the use of VAS scales and questionnaires the patients subjective evaluations of symptoms and impact on daily living will be assessed
Safety, change from baselineweek 2, 8, 24Standard collection of adverse events and adverse device effects.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026