Skip to content

ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Expert Study: Does Use of a Bolus Advisor Improve Glycemic Control in Patients Not Achieving Optimal Control Using Multiple Daily Injections (MDI)?

A Prospective, Multi-centre Study With Diabetic Patients Randomized to 24 Weeks Treatment Supported by Either Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter With an Integrated Bolus Advisor or MDI Standard Therapy With Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano Meter (Without Bolus Advisor)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01460446
Acronym
ABACUS
Enrollment
218
Registered
2011-10-26
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2014-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This clinical, prospective, randomized, multi-center study determined if the use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control as measured by a change in HbA1c in patients failing multiple daily injection/intensified conventional therapy (MDI/ICT).

Detailed description

Eligible participants were randomized to 24 weeks multiple daily injection therapy using either the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter with an integrated bolus advisor or the Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano blood glucose meter and manual bolus calculation.

Interventions

DEVICEAviva Expert blood glucose meter
DEVICEAviva Nano blood glucose meter

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must be 18 years of age or older. * Diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes. * Recent HbA1c \> 7.5% (measured within the last 6 weeks at local laboratory). * On multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy for at least 6 months consisting of 1-2 injections per day of long-acting basal insulin (Lantus® or Detemir®) and at least 2 injections per day of regular or rapid-acting analog insulin for meal coverage. * Subject adjusts meal insulin doses based on carbohydrate content of meals. * Subject with Type 2 diabetes may be on stable metformin therapy (therapy unchanged during 3 months prior to study). * Subject has been in Investigator's practice for at least 3 months but may have been seen by another physician in the practice. * Subject has completed carbohydrate (CHO) training within the last 2 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject is on a therapy regimen that conflicts with the study: * Neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) or pre-mixed insulin; * oral anti-diabetic agents, with the exception of metformin; * injectable anti-diabetic agents other than long-acting insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogs or regular insulin (eg, fixed dose therapy); * use of sliding scale insulin therapy that determines insulin dosages based exclusively on specific blood glucose (bG) results. * Subject has participated in another interventional trial within 6 weeks prior to study. * Subject has been diagnosed with any clinically significant infectious disease or major organ system disease, such as gastroparesis or renal disease (at Investigator's discretion). * Subject has used systemic oral or inhaled steroids for more than 7 days within the last 3 months. * Subject is on chemotherapy or radiation therapy (self-reported). * Subject is pregnant or lactating or is currently planning a pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24HbA1C was measured in blood samples at a central laboratory.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Screening to Week 24A symptomatic hypoglycemic episode was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia which was confirmed by a blood glucose reading \< 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Symptoms might include but were not limited to sweating, dizziness, lightheadedness, tremors, nervousness, hunger, headaches, and weakness or tiredness.
Change in the Mean Amplitude of Glucose Excursion (MAGE) From Baseline to Week 243 days prior to Baseline to Week 24Approximately half of the investigational sites monitored glucose levels in participants enrolled in this study using the DexCom Seven® Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring device. The device provides glucose measurements every 5 minutes for up to 7 days. The system contains a sensor, transmitter, and receiver. The sensor is a flexible round wire that goes under the skin to read glucose levels. The transmitter snaps into the sensor and wirelessly sends glucose readings to the receiver. Data was obtained from approximately one-third of participants and was used to calculate MAGE. Data were collected in the 3 days prior to Baseline and the Week 24 visit. The standard deviation of the blood glucose measurements in each 3-day period was calculated. For each glucose measurement, the difference from the previous reading was calculated. Absolute differences smaller than the standard deviation were discarded. MAGE is the mean of the remaining difference scores.
Percentage of Bolus Opportunities Where the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advisor Was Used During the StudyBaseline to Week 24Participants using the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter were encouraged to use the Bolus Advisor utility incorporated into the meter. A bolus opportunity occurs, for example, just before eating a meal.
Number of Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advices Modified Per Day by Participants During the StudyBaseline to Week 24Participants using the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter were encouraged to use the Bolus Advisor utility incorporated into the meter. A bolus opportunity occurs, for example, just before eating a meal.
Correct and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the StudyBaseline to Week 24Participants using the Aviva Nano blood glucose meter received individualized advice in how to use their insulin:carbohydrate ratio (I:CHO) and insulin sensitivity factor (ISF) values to determine their insulin dose. The I:CHO ratio advice was considered to have been used correctly if the meal bolus dose the participant indicated in his/her patient diary was in accordance with the dose which could be calculated based upon the participant's total carbohydrate intake and the I:CHO ratio. The ISF advice was considered to have been correctly used if the correction bolus dose the participant indicated in his/her patient diary was in accordance with the dose which could be calculated based upon the participant's blood glucose target, current blood glucose value, and the ISF.
Percentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Screening to Week 24Participants measured their blood glucose at least 3-4 times daily throughout the study. The mean blood glucose level was calculated for each 3-day period from Baseline to Week 24 and the percentage of 3-day blood glucose levels with the target range of 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L) was calculated for the 2 reporting periods of Screening to Baseline and Week 23 to Week 24.
Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) Score From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24The Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) contains 8 items which can be rated from 0='not at all' to 3='nearly every day'. The total PHQ-8 score is the sum of the responses to the 8 items and ranges from 0 to 24. A lower score indicates less depression. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Number of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline to Week 24The Major Depression Disorder (MDD) scale is derived from the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) and was used to categorize participants in regard to the severity of their depression. There are 5 categories on the MDD scale: None, mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe. The category for each participant is determined from their PHQ-8 score. A total PHQ-8 score of 0 to 4 represents no significant depressive symptoms. A total PHQ-8 score of 5 to 9 represents mild depressive symptoms; 10 to 14, moderate; 15 to 19, moderately severe; and 20 to 24, severe. A higher score indicates more depression.
Change in the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale Score From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24The Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale contains 20 items which can be rated from 0='not a problem' to 4='serious problem'. The total PAID scale score ranges from 0 to 80 with a higher score indicating more diabetes-related problems. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Change in the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-II) Score From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24The Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) contains 33 items (15 items regarding behavior and 18 items regarding worry) which can be rated from 0='never' to 4='always'). The total HFS-II score ranges from 0 to 132 with a higher score indicating more fear. A negative change score indicates improvement.
The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) ScoreBaseline to Week 24The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) contains 6 items which can be scored from 0='very bad' to 6='very good'. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from 0 to 36. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at Baseline only. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for change from Baseline (DTSQc) to study end contains 6 items which can be rated from -3='much worse now' to 3='much better now'). The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from -18 to 18. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at the end of the study (Week 24) only.
Change in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24Participants were asked to assess the carbohydrate content (grams) of 10 standardized meals by using a set of Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) plates, which provide standardized photographs of meals with known carbohydrate values. The mean meal error (MME), an indicator of accuracy, and mean meal absolute error (MMAE), an indicator of variability were calculated from their responses. The MME is defined as the mean of the differences between the estimated carbohydrate content and the actual carbohydrate content over the 10 DAFNE plates. A negative MME indicates an underestimation and a positive MME indicates an overestimation of the actual carbohydrate content. The MMAE is defined as the mean of the absolute value of the differences between the estimated carbohydrate content and the actual carbohydrate content over the 10 DAFNE plates. The MMAE is ≥ 0 with a lower value indicating a better ability to estimate the actual carbohydrate content.

Countries

Germany, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter
Participants used the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter with an integrated bolus advisor to determine the dose of insulin for each injection in their 24 week multiple daily injection therapy.
105
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter
Participants used the Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano blood glucose meter and manual bolus calculation to determine the dose of insulin for each injection in their 24 week multiple daily injection therapy.
113
Total218

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyConsent Withdrawn04
Overall StudyNon-compliance29
Overall StudyNon-compliance & Consent Withdrawn13
Overall StudyOther Reasons Incl. Lost for Follow-Up03
Overall StudyPregnancy10
Overall StudySurgery/Illness11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterAviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterTotal
Age, Continuous42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants53 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants60 Participants121 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 10556 / 113
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 10510 / 113

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24

HbA1C was measured in blood samples at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterChange in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24-0.66 PercentageStandard Deviation 0.72
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterChange in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24-0.47 PercentageStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24

Participants were asked to assess the carbohydrate content (grams) of 10 standardized meals by using a set of Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) plates, which provide standardized photographs of meals with known carbohydrate values. The mean meal error (MME), an indicator of accuracy, and mean meal absolute error (MMAE), an indicator of variability were calculated from their responses. The MME is defined as the mean of the differences between the estimated carbohydrate content and the actual carbohydrate content over the 10 DAFNE plates. A negative MME indicates an underestimation and a positive MME indicates an overestimation of the actual carbohydrate content. The MMAE is defined as the mean of the absolute value of the differences between the estimated carbohydrate content and the actual carbohydrate content over the 10 DAFNE plates. The MMAE is ≥ 0 with a lower value indicating a better ability to estimate the actual carbohydrate content.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study and had data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterChange in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24Mean Meal Error-0.90 GramsStandard Deviation 10
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterChange in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24Mean Meal Absolute Error-2.9 GramsStandard Deviation 8.2
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterChange in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24Mean Meal Error0.07 GramsStandard Deviation 11.2
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterChange in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24Mean Meal Absolute Error0.9 GramsStandard Deviation 9.4
Secondary

Change in the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-II) Score From Baseline to Week 24

The Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) contains 33 items (15 items regarding behavior and 18 items regarding worry) which can be rated from 0='never' to 4='always'). The total HFS-II score ranges from 0 to 132 with a higher score indicating more fear. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study and had data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterChange in the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-II) Score From Baseline to Week 24-3.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterChange in the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-II) Score From Baseline to Week 24-5.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Secondary

Change in the Mean Amplitude of Glucose Excursion (MAGE) From Baseline to Week 24

Approximately half of the investigational sites monitored glucose levels in participants enrolled in this study using the DexCom Seven® Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring device. The device provides glucose measurements every 5 minutes for up to 7 days. The system contains a sensor, transmitter, and receiver. The sensor is a flexible round wire that goes under the skin to read glucose levels. The transmitter snaps into the sensor and wirelessly sends glucose readings to the receiver. Data was obtained from approximately one-third of participants and was used to calculate MAGE. Data were collected in the 3 days prior to Baseline and the Week 24 visit. The standard deviation of the blood glucose measurements in each 3-day period was calculated. For each glucose measurement, the difference from the previous reading was calculated. Absolute differences smaller than the standard deviation were discarded. MAGE is the mean of the remaining difference scores.

Time frame: 3 days prior to Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants with continuous glucose monitoring data at Baseline and at Week 24 who completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterChange in the Mean Amplitude of Glucose Excursion (MAGE) From Baseline to Week 24-20.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41.1
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterChange in the Mean Amplitude of Glucose Excursion (MAGE) From Baseline to Week 24-2.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 32.1
Secondary

Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) Score From Baseline to Week 24

The Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) contains 8 items which can be rated from 0='not at all' to 3='nearly every day'. The total PHQ-8 score is the sum of the responses to the 8 items and ranges from 0 to 24. A lower score indicates less depression. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who had data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterChange in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) Score From Baseline to Week 24-0.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterChange in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) Score From Baseline to Week 24-0.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.87
Secondary

Change in the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale Score From Baseline to Week 24

The Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale contains 20 items which can be rated from 0='not a problem' to 4='serious problem'. The total PAID scale score ranges from 0 to 80 with a higher score indicating more diabetes-related problems. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study and had data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterChange in the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale Score From Baseline to Week 24-4.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterChange in the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale Score From Baseline to Week 24-4.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Secondary

Correct and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the Study

Participants using the Aviva Nano blood glucose meter received individualized advice in how to use their insulin:carbohydrate ratio (I:CHO) and insulin sensitivity factor (ISF) values to determine their insulin dose. The I:CHO ratio advice was considered to have been used correctly if the meal bolus dose the participant indicated in his/her patient diary was in accordance with the dose which could be calculated based upon the participant's total carbohydrate intake and the I:CHO ratio. The ISF advice was considered to have been correctly used if the correction bolus dose the participant indicated in his/her patient diary was in accordance with the dose which could be calculated based upon the participant's blood glucose target, current blood glucose value, and the ISF.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study. Results are only reported for participants using the Aviva Nano blood glucose meter who had data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterCorrect and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the StudyI:CHO - correct (n=88)1.55 Number of advices per dayStandard Deviation 1.1
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterCorrect and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the StudyI:CHO - incorrect (n=88)1.77 Number of advices per dayStandard Deviation 0.9
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterCorrect and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the StudyISF - correct (n=78)0.81 Number of advices per dayStandard Deviation 0.7
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterCorrect and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the StudyISF - incorrect (n=78)2.14 Number of advices per dayStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Number of Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advices Modified Per Day by Participants During the Study

Participants using the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter were encouraged to use the Bolus Advisor utility incorporated into the meter. A bolus opportunity occurs, for example, just before eating a meal.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advices Modified Per Day by Participants During the Study0.3 Number of advices modified per dayStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Number of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24

The Major Depression Disorder (MDD) scale is derived from the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) and was used to categorize participants in regard to the severity of their depression. There are 5 categories on the MDD scale: None, mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe. The category for each participant is determined from their PHQ-8 score. A total PHQ-8 score of 0 to 4 represents no significant depressive symptoms. A total PHQ-8 score of 5 to 9 represents mild depressive symptoms; 10 to 14, moderate; 15 to 19, moderately severe; and 20 to 24, severe. A higher score indicates more depression.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - Moderate (n=100, 93)11 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - None (n=95, 89)67 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - Severe (n=95, 89)0 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - Mild (n=95, 89)21 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - Moderately Severe (n=100, 93)1 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - Moderate (n=95, 89)7 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - None (n=100, 93)66 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - Moderately Severe (n=95, 89)0 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - Severe (n=100, 93)0 Participants
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - Mild (n=100, 93)22 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - Severe (n=95, 89)0 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - None (n=100, 93)55 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - Mild (n=100, 93)26 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - Moderate (n=100, 93)9 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - Moderately Severe (n=100, 93)2 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Baseline - Severe (n=100, 93)1 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - None (n=95, 89)54 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - Mild (n=95, 89)23 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - Moderate (n=95, 89)10 Participants
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24Week 24 - Moderately Severe (n=95, 89)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24

A symptomatic hypoglycemic episode was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia which was confirmed by a blood glucose reading \< 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Symptoms might include but were not limited to sweating, dizziness, lightheadedness, tremors, nervousness, hunger, headaches, and weakness or tiredness.

Time frame: Screening to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Screening to Baseline (n=100, 93)18.9 Episodes per yearStandard Deviation 50.8
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Week 23 to Week 24 (n=93, 91)17.0 Episodes per yearStandard Deviation 43.6
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Screening to Baseline (n=100, 93)23.2 Episodes per yearStandard Deviation 73.8
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterNumber of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Week 23 to Week 24 (n=93, 91)15.8 Episodes per yearStandard Deviation 56.7
Secondary

Percentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24

Participants measured their blood glucose at least 3-4 times daily throughout the study. The mean blood glucose level was calculated for each 3-day period from Baseline to Week 24 and the percentage of 3-day blood glucose levels with the target range of 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L) was calculated for the 2 reporting periods of Screening to Baseline and Week 23 to Week 24.

Time frame: Screening to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterPercentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Screening to Baseline (n=92, 86)50.6 Percentage of measurementsStandard Deviation 14.3
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterPercentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Week 23 to Week 24 (n=92, 86)49.3 Percentage of measurementsStandard Deviation 17.2
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterPercentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Screening to Baseline (n=92, 86)50.7 Percentage of measurementsStandard Deviation 15.1
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterPercentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24Week 23 to Week 24 (n=92, 86)52.2 Percentage of measurementsStandard Deviation 15.5
Secondary

Percentage of Bolus Opportunities Where the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advisor Was Used During the Study

Participants using the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter were encouraged to use the Bolus Advisor utility incorporated into the meter. A bolus opportunity occurs, for example, just before eating a meal.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterPercentage of Bolus Opportunities Where the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advisor Was Used During the Study73.5 Percentage of opportunitiesStandard Deviation 21.9
Secondary

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) Score

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) contains 6 items which can be scored from 0='very bad' to 6='very good'. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from 0 to 36. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at Baseline only. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for change from Baseline (DTSQc) to study end contains 6 items which can be rated from -3='much worse now' to 3='much better now'). The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from -18 to 18. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at the end of the study (Week 24) only.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who completed the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterThe Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) ScoreBaseline (n=99, 93)27.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Aviva Expert Blood Glucose MeterThe Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) ScoreWeek 24 (n=98, 92)11.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterThe Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) ScoreBaseline (n=99, 93)28.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Aviva Nano Blood Glucose MeterThe Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) ScoreWeek 24 (n=98, 92)8.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026