Skip to content

Comparison of Two Treatments for Strabismus Correction: Botulinum Toxin A Associated to Surgery and Surgery Alone

Surgery Associated to Intraoperative Botulinum Toxin A for Large Angle Horizontal Strabismus: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01460355
Enrollment
23
Registered
2011-10-26
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2011-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esotropia, Exotropia

Keywords

strabismus surgery, botulinum toxin, esotropia, exotropia, blepharoptosis

Brief summary

Two different treatments were given to large angle horizontal strabismus (eso and exotropia) adult patients who agree to participate of the study. Inform consents were required for participants. Group 1 (12 patients) received conventional recess-resect surgery plus intraoperative injection of botulinum toxin A (5U). Group 2 (11 patients) received only conventional recess-resect surgery. The patients were randomly located in one of the groups. The angles of horizontal deviation were compared between the groups before and six months after treatment.

Detailed description

Patients underwent recess/resection surgery on the non-fixating eye using conventional technique under local anesthesia. The extent of surgery was determined based on our usual amounts. Before re-attaching the recessed muscle to the sclera, 5 units of botulinum toxin in 0.1 ml of hyaline solution were, or 0.1 ml of hyaline solution alone were was injected into the posterior muscle belly by the surgeon who was unaware of the contents of each syringe.

Interventions

DRUGBotulinum Toxin Type A

injection of 5U in 0.1ml of saline solution will be given to the recessed muscle

DRUGsaline solution

injection of 0,1ml of saline solution will be given to the recessed muscle

Sponsors

University of Campinas, Brazil
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults with large angle horizontal strabismus

Exclusion criteria

* oblique muscle disfunction * previous strabismus surgery * dissociated vertical deviation * paretic or restrictive deviation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
percentage of decrease of the initial angle of strabismus6 to 12 monthsThe percentages of decrease of the initial angle of strabismus were accessed by subtracting the final deviation of the initial deviation, dividing the result by the initial deviation and multiplying it by 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
frequency of induced blepharoptosisFrom the first to the last post operative day of follow upThe presence of induced blepharoptosis was detected by simple inspection and was reported as positive or negative.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026