Skip to content

Phase 3 Study of Tadalafil Once-Daily in Asian Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-a-day Dosing for 12 Weeks in Asian Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01460342
Enrollment
610
Registered
2011-10-26
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2013-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

Prostatic hyperplasia, Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Lower urinary tract

Brief summary

This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design, multinational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil once-a-day dosing for 12 weeks in Asian men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Detailed description

Tadalafil is being investigated as a treatment for men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia \[BPH; also referred to as urinary disturbance or BPH-LUTS (BPH-lower urinary tract symptoms)\] in Japan and overseas. Overseas studies and the Japanese dose-finding study LVIA (NCT00783094) identified tadalafil 5 mg once-daily as the recommended dose. The long-term safety and maintenance of effect was confirmed in the open-label extension of study LVIA. The risk-benefit profile was further studied in the Asian study LVHB (NCT00861757). This study, LVJF, is to confirm the efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once-daily in Asian men with BPH-LUTS.

Interventions

DRUGTadalafil

5 mg (2 x 2.5-mg tablets), given once daily as oral tablet

DRUGPlacebo

2 tablets (identical to 2.5-mg tadalafil tablets) given orally once daily.

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Present with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; also referred to as BPH-LUTS), based on the disease diagnostic criteria, at study entry. * Provide signed informed consent at study entry. * Have BPH-LUTS with a Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ≥13 at beginning of placebo lead-in period. * Have bladder outlet obstruction of intermediate severity as defined by a urinary peak flow rate (Qmax) of ≥4 to ≤15 milliliters per second (mL/sec) \[from a prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) of ≥150 to ≤550 milliliters (mL) and a minimum voided volume of 125 mL\] at beginning of placebo lead-in period. * Have prostate volume ≥20 mL estimated by transabdominal or transrectal ultrasound at study entry. * Agree not to use any other approved or experimental pharmacologic BPH, erectile dysfunction (ED) and/or overactive bladder (OAB) treatments, including alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, or herbal preparations at any time during the study. * Have not taken the following treatments within the indicated duration: * Finasteride therapy for at least 3 months prior to beginning of placebo lead-in period. * Dutasteride therapy for at least 6 months prior to beginning of placebo lead-in period. * Anti-androgenic hormone therapy at least 12 months prior to beginning of placebo lead-in period. * All other BPH therapy (including herbal preparations) for at least 4 weeks prior to beginning of placebo lead-in period. * ED therapy for at least 4 weeks prior to beginning of placebo lead-in period. * OAB therapy for at least 4 weeks prior to beginning of placebo lead-in period. * Demonstrate compliance with study drug administration requirements during the placebo lead-in period by administering ≥70% of prescribed doses, confirmed by documentation that the participant returned ≤30% of prescribed doses at randomization.

Exclusion criteria

* Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \>10.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) at study entry. * PSA ≥4.0 to ≤10.0 ng/mL at study entry, if prostate malignancy has not been ruled out to the satisfaction of an urologist. * Bladder postvoid residual (PVR) ≥300 mL by ultrasound determination at study entry. * History of any of the following pelvic conditions (checked at study entry): * Pelvic surgery or any other pelvic procedure, including radical prostatectomy, pelvic surgery for removal of malignancy, or bowel resection. * Pelvic radiotherapy. * Any pelvic surgical procedure on the urinary tract, including minimally invasive BPH-LUTS therapies and penile implant surgery. * Lower urinary tract malignancy or trauma. * Lower urinary tract instrumentation (including prostate biopsy) within 30 day of study entry. * History of urinary retention or lower urinary tract (bladder) stones within 6 months of study entry. * History of urethral obstruction due to stricture, valves, sclerosis, or tumor. * Current neurologic disease or condition associated with neurogenic bladder (for example, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis) at study entry. * Clinical evidence of prostate cancer. * Clinical evidence of any of the following bladder conditions: * Mullerian duct cysts. * Atonic, decompensated, or hypocontractile bladder. * Detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (contraction of the detrusor without sphincter relaxation). * Intravesical obstruction (for example, intravesical median lobe of the prostate). * Interstitial cystitis. * Clinical evidence of any of the following urinary tract conditions at study entry: * Urinary tract infection. * Urinary tract inflammation (including prostatitis). Urinary tract infection/inflammation is defined as a positive result for leukocyte esterase from a urine dipstick or \>5 white blood cells (WBCs) per high-powered field on urinalysis from a centrifuged, clean-catch, midstream urine specimen. * Current antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infection. * Clinically significant microscopic hematuria as determined by an urologist. * History of significant renal insufficiency, defined as receiving renal dialysis or having an estimated creatinine clearance \<30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) at study entry, as calculated by the central laboratory using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. * Clinical evidence of severe hepatic impairment \[aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) \>3-fold of the upper limit of normal range\] at study entry. * History of any of the following cardiac conditions (checked at study entry): * Angina requiring treatment with long-acting nitrates. * Angina requiring treatment with short-acting nitrates within 90 days of study entry. * Unstable angina within 90 days of study entry. * Positive cardiac stress test without documented evidence of subsequent, effective cardiac intervention. * History of any of the following coronary conditions within 90 days of study entry: * Myocardial infarction. * Coronary artery bypass graft surgery. * Percutaneous coronary intervention (for example, angioplasty or stent placement). * Any evidence of heart disease \[New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥Class III\] within 6 months of study entry. * Systolic blood pressure \>160 or \<90 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or diastolic blood pressure \>100 or \<50 mm Hg at study entry (if stress is suspected, retest under basal conditions), or malignant hypertension. * Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \>9% at study entry. * Scheduled or planned surgery (or any procedure requiring general, spinal, or epidural anesthesia) during the course of the study. * History of significant central nervous system injuries (including stroke or spinal cord injury) within 6 months of study entry. * History of drug, alcohol, or substance abuse within 6 months of study entry. * Current treatment with nitrates, androgens, antiandrogens, estrogens, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists, or anabolic steroids at study entry. * Current systemic treatment with any of the following: * Potent cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors, such as ketoconazole or ritonavir. * CYP3A4 inducers such as rifampicin. * Known or suspected to be hypersensitive to tadalafil, or any study drug components. * Any conditions that would interfere with a participant's ability to provide informed consent or comply with study instructions, would place participant at increased risk, or might confound the interpretation of the study results. * Previously completed or withdrawn from this study or any other study investigating tadalafil. * Received treatment within the last 30 days with a drug or device that has not received regulatory approval for any indications at the time of informed consent. Participants who have been screen failures in previous studies may be eligible.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 WeeksBaseline, 12 weeksThe IPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was based on the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms during the last month. Scores ranged from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) SubscoreBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeksThe IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore was the sum of Questions 2, 4, and 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms) for an IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore that ranged from 0 to 15; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.
Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) SubscoreBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeksThe IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore was the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5, and 6 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms) for an IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore that ranged from 0 to 20; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.
Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) IndexBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeksThe IPSS QoL Index assessed the participant's response to the following question, If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options were 0 (Delighted), 1 (Pleased), 2 (Mostly satisfied), 3 (Mixed, about equally satisfied and dissatisfied), 4 (Mostly dissatisfied), 5 (Unhappy), and 6 (Terrible), for a QoL Index Score that ranged from 0 to 6. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.
Change From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeksThe IPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was based on the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms during the last month. Scores ranged from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.
Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 Weeks12 WeeksThe CGI-I measured the clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores were 1 (Very much better), 2 (Much improved), 3 (Minimally improved), 4 (No change), 5 (Minimally worse), 6 (Much worse), and 7 (Very much worse).
Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) Score at 2 WeeksBaseline, 2 weeksThe mIPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the mIPSS questionnaire, which was a modified version of the IPSS questionnaire. Questions about the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms in the IPSS questionnaire were modified to obtain responses based on time since the last visit rather than during the last month. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an mIPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), and country (Japan/Korea) as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 Weeks12 WeeksThe PGI-I scale measured the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores were 1 (Very much better), 2 (Much improved), 3 (Minimally improved), 4 (No change), 5 (Minimally worse), 6 (Much worse), and 7 (Very much worse).

Countries

Japan, South Korea

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of 3 periods: a screening/wash-out period (pre-randomization, 1 day up to 4 weeks), a placebo lead-in period (pre-randomization, 4 weeks, participant-blinded), and a double-blind treatment period (post-randomization, 12 weeks).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo: 2 tablets \[identical to 2.5-milligram (mg) tadalafil tablets\] given orally once daily for 4 weeks, during the placebo lead-in period and for 12 weeks, during the double-blind treatment period.
304
Tadalafil
Tadalafil: 5 mg (two 2.5-mg tablets), given orally once daily for 12 weeks, during the double-blind treatment period. This followed a 4-week placebo lead-in period \[2 tablets (identical to 2.5-mg tadalafil tablets) given orally once daily\].
306
Total610

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event54
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyPhysician Decision13
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTadalafilPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Age, Customized
<65 years
198 participants201 participants399 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
108 participants103 participants211 participants
Alcohol Use
No
100 participants108 participants208 participants
Alcohol Use
Yes
206 participants196 participants402 participants
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Severity
Mild (IPSS Total Score 0 to 7)
6 participants5 participants11 participants
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Severity
Moderate (IPSS Total Score 8 to 19)
166 participants167 participants333 participants
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Severity
Severe (IPSS Total Score >=20)
134 participants132 participants266 participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)24.0 kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
24.1 kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
24.0 kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scale
Mild
41 participants33 participants74 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scale
Moderate
211 participants218 participants429 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scale
Normal
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scale
Severe
54 participants53 participants107 participants
Current Tobacco Use
No
249 participants249 participants498 participants
Current Tobacco Use
Yes
57 participants55 participants112 participants
Duration of BPH4.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
4.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
4.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scale
Mild
64 participants67 participants131 participants
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scale
Moderate
195 participants187 participants382 participants
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scale
Normal
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scale
Severe
47 participants50 participants97 participants
Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)26.9 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.7
32.7 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50
29.8 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.3
Previous Alpha-Blocker Therapy
No
267 participants261 participants528 participants
Previous Alpha-Blocker Therapy
Yes
39 participants43 participants82 participants
Previous Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia - Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BPH-LUTS) Therapy
No
284 Participants283 Participants567 Participants
Previous Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia - Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BPH-LUTS) Therapy
Yes
22 Participants21 Participants43 Participants
Prostate Volume30.7 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
31.6 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
31.1 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
306 participants304 participants610 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
227 participants222 participants449 participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
79 participants82 participants161 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
306 Participants304 Participants610 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
75 / 30487 / 306
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3042 / 306

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks

The IPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was based on the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms during the last month. Scores ranged from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had non-missing data at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
TadalafilChange From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks-6.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.4, -0.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) Score at 2 Weeks

The mIPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the mIPSS questionnaire, which was a modified version of the IPSS questionnaire. Questions about the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms in the IPSS questionnaire were modified to obtain responses based on time since the last visit rather than during the last month. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an mIPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), and country (Japan/Korea) as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had non-missing data at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) Score at 2 Weeks-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
TadalafilChange From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) Score at 2 Weeks-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
p-value: 0.0695% CI: [-1.2, 0]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index

The IPSS QoL Index assessed the participant's response to the following question, If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options were 0 (Delighted), 1 (Pleased), 2 (Mostly satisfied), 3 (Mixed, about equally satisfied and dissatisfied), 4 (Mostly dissatisfied), 5 (Unhappy), and 6 (Terrible), for a QoL Index Score that ranged from 0 to 6. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had non-missing data at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) IndexChange at Week 4-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) IndexChange at Week 8-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) IndexChange at Week 12-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) IndexChange at Week 4-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) IndexChange at Week 8-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) IndexChange at Week 12-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
p-value: 0.27795% CI: [-0.2, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-0.3, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.03895% CI: [-0.4, 0]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore

The IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore was the sum of Questions 2, 4, and 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms) for an IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore that ranged from 0 to 15; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had non-missing data at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) SubscoreChange at 4 Weeks-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) SubscoreChange at 8 Weeks-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) SubscoreChange at 12 Weeks-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) SubscoreChange at 4 Weeks-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) SubscoreChange at 8 Weeks-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) SubscoreChange at 12 Weeks-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
p-value: 0.0995% CI: [-0.6, 0]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.01195% CI: [-0.8, -0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-0.9, -0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore

The IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore was the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5, and 6 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms) for an IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore that ranged from 0 to 20; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had non-missing data at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) SubscoreChange at Week 4-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) SubscoreChange at Week 8-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) SubscoreChange at Week 12-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) SubscoreChange at Week 4-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) SubscoreChange at Week 8-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
TadalafilChange From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) SubscoreChange at Week 12-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.5, -0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-1.3, -0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-1.5, -0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

The IPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was based on the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms during the last month. Scores ranged from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had non-missing data at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Change at Week 4-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Change at Week 8-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
TadalafilChange From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Change at Week 4-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
TadalafilChange From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Change at Week 8-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2, -0.5]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-2, -0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 Weeks

The CGI-I measured the clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores were 1 (Very much better), 2 (Much improved), 3 (Minimally improved), 4 (No change), 5 (Minimally worse), 6 (Much worse), and 7 (Very much worse).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksVery Much Improved10 participants
PlaceboClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMinimally Worse8 participants
PlaceboClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMinimally Improved115 participants
PlaceboClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMuch Worse0 participants
PlaceboClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMuch Improved74 participants
PlaceboClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksVery Much Worse1 participants
PlaceboClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMissing3 participants
PlaceboClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksNo Change93 participants
TadalafilClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMissing4 participants
TadalafilClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksVery Much Improved14 participants
TadalafilClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMuch Improved103 participants
TadalafilClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMinimally Improved125 participants
TadalafilClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksNo Change59 participants
TadalafilClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMinimally Worse1 participants
TadalafilClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMuch Worse0 participants
TadalafilClinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksVery Much Worse0 participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 Weeks

The PGI-I scale measured the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores were 1 (Very much better), 2 (Much improved), 3 (Minimally improved), 4 (No change), 5 (Minimally worse), 6 (Much worse), and 7 (Very much worse).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMuch Worse0 participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksVery Much Better9 participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMuch Better55 participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksA Little Better138 participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksNo Change90 participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksA Little Worse7 participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksVery Much Worse2 participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMissing3 participants
TadalafilPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMissing4 participants
TadalafilPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksA Little Worse2 participants
TadalafilPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksNo Change55 participants
TadalafilPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksVery Much Better18 participants
TadalafilPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksVery Much Worse0 participants
TadalafilPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMuch Better79 participants
TadalafilPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksMuch Worse0 participants
TadalafilPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 WeeksA Little Better148 participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026