Skip to content

Asenapine in the Treatment of Older Adults With Bipolar Disorder

Asenapine in the Treatment of Older Adults With Bipolar Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01460290
Enrollment
15
Registered
2011-10-26
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2014-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder

Brief summary

Objectives: The investigators propose a first-ever, prospective trial of asenapine in older adults with bipolar disorder (BD) to evaluate effects on mood symptoms, tolerability and functional/general health status. Given the dearth of treatment data on older adults with BD, findings are likely to be of substantial clinical interest, may inform larger future studies and will assist in refining bipolar treatment recommendations. Hypotheses: Primary: Asenapine therapy will be associated with reduced bipolar manic and depressive symptoms in older adults with BD. Secondary: Asenapine therapy will be associated with improved functional and general health status, improved global psychopathology, and good tolerability in older adults with BD.

Interventions

DRUGAsenapine

Asenapine will be administered open-label in pill form. Asenapine will be initiated at 5 mg twice a day and increased as tolerated to a maximum of 20 mg/day. It is anticipated that maximum stable dosing will be achieved by 4 weeks of treatment, although dosage may be reduced due to tolerability concerns at the discretion of the treating research psychiatrist.

Sponsors

Case Western Reserve University
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have type I Bipolar disorder by DSM-IV criteria confirmed on the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) * Subjects must be age 60 or older * Subjects must have sub-optimal response to current psychotropic management including at least one of the following: 1. Behaviors and symptoms of irritability, agitation, mood lability or diminished ability to interact with others in their place of residence 2. Diminished ability to take care of basic personal needs in their place of residence due to symptoms of BD

Exclusion criteria

* History of intolerance or resistance to asenapine * Clinical diagnosis of dementia or Mini-mental state (MMSE) \< 24 * History of TIA, stroke or MI within the past 12 months * Medical illness that is the clear, underlying etiology of BD * Unstable medical illness or condition including prolonged QT interval, which in the opinion of the study investigators, is likely to affect the outcome of the study or the subject's safety * DSM-IV substance dependence (except nicotine or caffeine) within the past 3 months. * Rapid cycling BD defined as 4 or more discrete mood episodes within the previous 12 months. * At high risk for self-harm or suicide

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)Baseline and 12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 52. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Change in Manic Symptoms as Measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)Baseline and 12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Perception of Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)Baseline and 12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 99. A higher score implies a better perceived condition.
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Baseline and 12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Change in Bipolar Disorder Symptoms as Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)Baseline and 12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 18 and the maximum score is 126. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop TaskBaseline and 12 weeksThe Stroop evaluates patients for cognitive functioning. Patients are to read words aloud or name colors as quickly as possible in a 45-second period. The measure contains three tasks, each associated with a subscale as follows: Word, Color, and Color-Word. Each subscale contains 100 items. The raw score range for each of the subscales is 0-100. Each raw subscale score is converted to a T-Score. The possible T-Score range for the Word subscale is 15 to 85. The possible T-Score range for the Color subscale is 8 to 92. The possible T-Score range for the Color-Word subscale is 3 to 98. Higher scores on the subscales indicate better cognitive functioning. Subscales are scored independently and are not added to produce a total score.
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making TestBaseline and 12 weeksThe Trails test is a measure of cognitive functioning. The measure consists of two parts: A and B. In part A, participants are asked to draw a trail connecting a series of numbers in sequential order. In Part B, participants are asked to draw a trail connecting a combination of letters and numbers. The time taken to complete each task is noted as the score (e.g., 78 seconds). For Trails A, there is no upper limit on the score, as subjects are given as much time as is needed for them to complete the task. Higher scores indicate poorer cognitive functioning. In Trails B, the task is timed with an upper limit of five minutes. If, at four minutes, it is determined that the subject will not likely complete the task in the time allotted, then the task can be called off. Higher scores indicate poorer cognitive functioning.
Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)Baseline and 12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 7. A higher score implies a worse condition. The CGI-BP has three scores - Mania Severity, Depression Severity, and Overall Bipolar Illness Severity.
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)Baseline and 12 weeksThe DRS contains items that evaluate cognitive function across 5 subscales: attention, initiation/perseveration, construction, conceptualization, and memory. Subscale raw score ranges are: attention (0-37), initiation/perseveration (0-37), construction (0-6), conceptualization (0-39), and memory (0-25). Raw subscale scores are added for a total raw score with range 0-144. For each raw subscale score, scaled scores are looked up from a battery of 13 tables. Age of the participant determines which table is to be used. Total raw subscale score also has its own scaled score in the tables. In addition to use in determining scaled scores for each of the subscales, these tables are used to look up the scaled score for the total raw score. The tables are contained in the article Robust and Expanded Norms for the Dementia Rating Scale (Pedraza, Lucas, et al. 2010); Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 25; 347-358. Higher scores, raw and scaled, indicate better cognitive functioning.
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)12 weeksThe WHO-DAS II is used to assess patients for difficulties that they experience due to health conditions. Six subscales are represented which cover the following domains: Getting Around (range 1-10), Self Care (range 1-10), Life Activities (range 1-20), Understand/Communicate (range 1-10), Participation in Society (range 1-10), and Getting Along with People (range 1-10). Lower scores represent more positive outcomes, while higher scores represent worse outcomes. Total summary scores were not computed for our analyses and is optional for the measure.
Barnes Drug-induced Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS)Baseline and 12 weeksThis scale is used to measure the presence of akathisia, as may result from use of certain psychotropic medications. The scale contains four items and the score for each item is added to produce the total score. Total scores range from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate more adverse outcomes.
Assessment of Motor Control Abnormality as Measured by the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS)Baseline and 12 weeksThe Simpson-Angus Scale is used to monitor for neurological and musculoskeletal side effects that may be a result of certain psychotropic medications. The scale consists of 10 questions which each can be rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Scores for each item are added to produce a total score. The highest possible total score is 40. Higher scores indicate more adverse outcomes.
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline and 12 weeksEvaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-36). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Total recall scores appear in this entry below.
Change in Perception of Physical Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)Baseline and 12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 99. A higher score implies a better perceived condition.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Asenapine
12-weeks of open-label asenapine treatment Asenapine was administered open-label in pill form. Asenapine was initiated at 5 mg/day and increased as tolerated to a maximum of 20 mg/day. A control group was not used for this study.
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyElevated liver function1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAsenapine
Age, Continuous68.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 52. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants with baseline HAM-D score of 8 or greater were analyzed. Last Observational Carried Forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)Baseline HAM-D17.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
AsenapineChange in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)12 Week HAM-D10.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Primary

Change in Manic Symptoms as Measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants with a baseline YMRS score of 12 or greater were analyzed. LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Manic Symptoms as Measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)Baseline YMRS27.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
AsenapineChange in Manic Symptoms as Measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)12 Week YMRS18.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2
Secondary

Assessment of Motor Control Abnormality as Measured by the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS)

The Simpson-Angus Scale is used to monitor for neurological and musculoskeletal side effects that may be a result of certain psychotropic medications. The scale consists of 10 questions which each can be rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Scores for each item are added to produce a total score. The highest possible total score is 40. Higher scores indicate more adverse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineAssessment of Motor Control Abnormality as Measured by the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS)Baseline SAS0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
AsenapineAssessment of Motor Control Abnormality as Measured by the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS)12 Week SAS0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Barnes Drug-induced Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS)

This scale is used to measure the presence of akathisia, as may result from use of certain psychotropic medications. The scale contains four items and the score for each item is added to produce the total score. Total scores range from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate more adverse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineBarnes Drug-induced Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS)Baseline BARS0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
AsenapineBarnes Drug-induced Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS)12 Week BARS0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Change in Bipolar Disorder Symptoms as Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)

The minimum possible score is 18 and the maximum score is 126. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Bipolar Disorder Symptoms as Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)Baseline BPRS35.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
AsenapineChange in Bipolar Disorder Symptoms as Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)12 Week BPRS28.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)

The DRS contains items that evaluate cognitive function across 5 subscales: attention, initiation/perseveration, construction, conceptualization, and memory. Subscale raw score ranges are: attention (0-37), initiation/perseveration (0-37), construction (0-6), conceptualization (0-39), and memory (0-25). Raw subscale scores are added for a total raw score with range 0-144. For each raw subscale score, scaled scores are looked up from a battery of 13 tables. Age of the participant determines which table is to be used. Total raw subscale score also has its own scaled score in the tables. In addition to use in determining scaled scores for each of the subscales, these tables are used to look up the scaled score for the total raw score. The tables are contained in the article Robust and Expanded Norms for the Dementia Rating Scale (Pedraza, Lucas, et al. 2010); Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 25; 347-358. Higher scores, raw and scaled, indicate better cognitive functioning.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)Baseline DRS131.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)12 Week DRS135.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)

Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-12). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Recognition Discrimination Index appears in this entry below

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline HVLT Recognition Discrimation Index8.6 number of itemsStandard Deviation 2.5
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)12 Week HVLT Recognition Discrimination Index9.6 number of itemsStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)

Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-36). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Total recall scores appear in this entry below.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline HVLT Total Recall15.8 correctly recalled itemsStandard Deviation 5.7
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)12 Week HVLT Total Recall18.2 correctly recalled itemsStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)

Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-12). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Delayed recall scores appear in this entry below.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline HVLT Delayed Recall5.2 correctly recalled itemsStandard Deviation 3
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)12 Week HVLT Delayed Recall5.3 correctly recalled itemsStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)

Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-12). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Retention scores appear in this entry below.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline HVLT Retention73.9 percentage of itemsStandard Deviation 32.7
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)12 Week HVLT Retention71.8 percentage of itemsStandard Deviation 34.4
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task

The Stroop evaluates patients for cognitive functioning. Patients are to read words aloud or name colors as quickly as possible in a 45-second period. The measure contains three tasks, each associated with a subscale as follows: Word, Color, and Color-Word. Each subscale contains 100 items. The raw score range for each of the subscales is 0-100. Each raw subscale score is converted to a T-Score. The possible T-Score range for the Word subscale is 15 to 85. The possible T-Score range for the Color subscale is 8 to 92. The possible T-Score range for the Color-Word subscale is 3 to 98. Higher scores on the subscales indicate better cognitive functioning. Subscales are scored independently and are not added to produce a total score.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop TaskBaseline Word Subscale75.7 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 12
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task12 Week Word Subscale75.9 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 11.5
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop TaskBaseline Color Subscale53.6 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 9.2
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task12 Week Color Subscale58.6 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 7.7
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop TaskBaseline Color-Word Subscale30.3 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 11.4
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task12 Week Color-Word Subscale30.6 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 10.1
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test

The Trails test is a measure of cognitive functioning. The measure consists of two parts: A and B. In part A, participants are asked to draw a trail connecting a series of numbers in sequential order. In Part B, participants are asked to draw a trail connecting a combination of letters and numbers. The time taken to complete each task is noted as the score (e.g., 78 seconds). For Trails A, there is no upper limit on the score, as subjects are given as much time as is needed for them to complete the task. Higher scores indicate poorer cognitive functioning. In Trails B, the task is timed with an upper limit of five minutes. If, at four minutes, it is determined that the subject will not likely complete the task in the time allotted, then the task can be called off. Higher scores indicate poorer cognitive functioning.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making TestBaseline Trails - Part A57.7 secondsStandard Deviation 30.9
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test12 Week Trails - Part A47.3 secondsStandard Deviation 10.4
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making TestBaseline Trails - Part B189.0 secondsStandard Deviation 103.8
AsenapineChange in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test12 Week Trails - Part B126.3 secondsStandard Deviation 52.4
Secondary

Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Participants with a baseline MADRS score of 16 or greater were analyzed. LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Baseline MADRS27.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
AsenapineChange in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)12 Week MADRS18.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2
Secondary

Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)

The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 7. A higher score implies a worse condition. The CGI-BP has three scores - Mania Severity, Depression Severity, and Overall Bipolar Illness Severity.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) and LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)Baseline Overall Severity4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
AsenapineChange in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)12 Week Overall Severity2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
AsenapineChange in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)Baseline Mania Severity2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
AsenapineChange in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)12 Week Mania Severity1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
AsenapineChange in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)Baseline Depression Severity3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
AsenapineChange in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)12 Week Depression Severity1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change in Perception of Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)

The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 99. A higher score implies a better perceived condition.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Perception of Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)Baseline Mental Health Subscore of SF-1238.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
AsenapineChange in Perception of Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)12 Week Mental Health Subscore of SF-1243.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Secondary

Change in Perception of Physical Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)

The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 99. A higher score implies a better perceived condition.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineChange in Perception of Physical Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)Baseline on Physical Health Subscale of SF-1246.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
AsenapineChange in Perception of Physical Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)12 week on Physical Health Subscale of SF-1246.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Secondary

World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)

The WHO-DAS II is used to assess patients for difficulties that they experience due to health conditions. Six subscales are represented which cover the following domains: Getting Around (range 1-10), Self Care (range 1-10), Life Activities (range 1-20), Understand/Communicate (range 1-10), Participation in Society (range 1-10), and Getting Along with People (range 1-10). Lower scores represent more positive outcomes, while higher scores represent worse outcomes. Total summary scores were not computed for our analyses and is optional for the measure.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)12 Week WHO-DAS Getting Along w/ People Subscale2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)12 Week WHO-DAS Self Care Subscale2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)Baseline WHO-DAS Life Activities Subscale9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)12 Week WHO-DAS Life Activities Subscale7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)Baseline WHO-DAS Understand/Communicate Subscale3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)12 Week WHO-DAS Understand/Communicate Subscale3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)Baseline WHO-DAS Participation in Society Subscale4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)12 Week WHO-DAS Participation in Society Subscale3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)Baseline WHO-DAS Getting Along w/ People Subscale3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)Baseline WHO-DAS Getting Around Subscale4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)12 Week WHO-DAS Getting Around Subscale4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
AsenapineWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)Baseline WHO-DAS Self Care Subscale2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026