Bipolar Disorder
Conditions
Brief summary
Objectives: The investigators propose a first-ever, prospective trial of asenapine in older adults with bipolar disorder (BD) to evaluate effects on mood symptoms, tolerability and functional/general health status. Given the dearth of treatment data on older adults with BD, findings are likely to be of substantial clinical interest, may inform larger future studies and will assist in refining bipolar treatment recommendations. Hypotheses: Primary: Asenapine therapy will be associated with reduced bipolar manic and depressive symptoms in older adults with BD. Secondary: Asenapine therapy will be associated with improved functional and general health status, improved global psychopathology, and good tolerability in older adults with BD.
Interventions
Asenapine will be administered open-label in pill form. Asenapine will be initiated at 5 mg twice a day and increased as tolerated to a maximum of 20 mg/day. It is anticipated that maximum stable dosing will be achieved by 4 weeks of treatment, although dosage may be reduced due to tolerability concerns at the discretion of the treating research psychiatrist.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects must have type I Bipolar disorder by DSM-IV criteria confirmed on the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) * Subjects must be age 60 or older * Subjects must have sub-optimal response to current psychotropic management including at least one of the following: 1. Behaviors and symptoms of irritability, agitation, mood lability or diminished ability to interact with others in their place of residence 2. Diminished ability to take care of basic personal needs in their place of residence due to symptoms of BD
Exclusion criteria
* History of intolerance or resistance to asenapine * Clinical diagnosis of dementia or Mini-mental state (MMSE) \< 24 * History of TIA, stroke or MI within the past 12 months * Medical illness that is the clear, underlying etiology of BD * Unstable medical illness or condition including prolonged QT interval, which in the opinion of the study investigators, is likely to affect the outcome of the study or the subject's safety * DSM-IV substance dependence (except nicotine or caffeine) within the past 3 months. * Rapid cycling BD defined as 4 or more discrete mood episodes within the previous 12 months. * At high risk for self-harm or suicide
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 52. A higher score implies a worse condition. |
| Change in Manic Symptoms as Measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Perception of Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 99. A higher score implies a better perceived condition. |
| Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition. |
| Change in Bipolar Disorder Symptoms as Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The minimum possible score is 18 and the maximum score is 126. A higher score implies a worse condition. |
| Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task | Baseline and 12 weeks | The Stroop evaluates patients for cognitive functioning. Patients are to read words aloud or name colors as quickly as possible in a 45-second period. The measure contains three tasks, each associated with a subscale as follows: Word, Color, and Color-Word. Each subscale contains 100 items. The raw score range for each of the subscales is 0-100. Each raw subscale score is converted to a T-Score. The possible T-Score range for the Word subscale is 15 to 85. The possible T-Score range for the Color subscale is 8 to 92. The possible T-Score range for the Color-Word subscale is 3 to 98. Higher scores on the subscales indicate better cognitive functioning. Subscales are scored independently and are not added to produce a total score. |
| Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test | Baseline and 12 weeks | The Trails test is a measure of cognitive functioning. The measure consists of two parts: A and B. In part A, participants are asked to draw a trail connecting a series of numbers in sequential order. In Part B, participants are asked to draw a trail connecting a combination of letters and numbers. The time taken to complete each task is noted as the score (e.g., 78 seconds). For Trails A, there is no upper limit on the score, as subjects are given as much time as is needed for them to complete the task. Higher scores indicate poorer cognitive functioning. In Trails B, the task is timed with an upper limit of five minutes. If, at four minutes, it is determined that the subject will not likely complete the task in the time allotted, then the task can be called off. Higher scores indicate poorer cognitive functioning. |
| Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 7. A higher score implies a worse condition. The CGI-BP has three scores - Mania Severity, Depression Severity, and Overall Bipolar Illness Severity. |
| Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The DRS contains items that evaluate cognitive function across 5 subscales: attention, initiation/perseveration, construction, conceptualization, and memory. Subscale raw score ranges are: attention (0-37), initiation/perseveration (0-37), construction (0-6), conceptualization (0-39), and memory (0-25). Raw subscale scores are added for a total raw score with range 0-144. For each raw subscale score, scaled scores are looked up from a battery of 13 tables. Age of the participant determines which table is to be used. Total raw subscale score also has its own scaled score in the tables. In addition to use in determining scaled scores for each of the subscales, these tables are used to look up the scaled score for the total raw score. The tables are contained in the article Robust and Expanded Norms for the Dementia Rating Scale (Pedraza, Lucas, et al. 2010); Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 25; 347-358. Higher scores, raw and scaled, indicate better cognitive functioning. |
| World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | 12 weeks | The WHO-DAS II is used to assess patients for difficulties that they experience due to health conditions. Six subscales are represented which cover the following domains: Getting Around (range 1-10), Self Care (range 1-10), Life Activities (range 1-20), Understand/Communicate (range 1-10), Participation in Society (range 1-10), and Getting Along with People (range 1-10). Lower scores represent more positive outcomes, while higher scores represent worse outcomes. Total summary scores were not computed for our analyses and is optional for the measure. |
| Barnes Drug-induced Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) | Baseline and 12 weeks | This scale is used to measure the presence of akathisia, as may result from use of certain psychotropic medications. The scale contains four items and the score for each item is added to produce the total score. Total scores range from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate more adverse outcomes. |
| Assessment of Motor Control Abnormality as Measured by the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The Simpson-Angus Scale is used to monitor for neurological and musculoskeletal side effects that may be a result of certain psychotropic medications. The scale consists of 10 questions which each can be rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Scores for each item are added to produce a total score. The highest possible total score is 40. Higher scores indicate more adverse outcomes. |
| Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | Baseline and 12 weeks | Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-36). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Total recall scores appear in this entry below. |
| Change in Perception of Physical Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 99. A higher score implies a better perceived condition. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Asenapine 12-weeks of open-label asenapine treatment
Asenapine was administered open-label in pill form. Asenapine was initiated at 5 mg/day and increased as tolerated to a maximum of 20 mg/day. A control group was not used for this study. | 15 |
| Total | 15 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 |
| Overall Study | Elevated liver function | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Asenapine |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 68.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 13 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 15 |
Outcome results
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 52. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants with baseline HAM-D score of 8 or greater were analyzed. Last Observational Carried Forward (LOCF).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) | Baseline HAM-D | 17.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| Asenapine | Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) | 12 Week HAM-D | 10.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
Change in Manic Symptoms as Measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants with a baseline YMRS score of 12 or greater were analyzed. LOCF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Manic Symptoms as Measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) | Baseline YMRS | 27.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Asenapine | Change in Manic Symptoms as Measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) | 12 Week YMRS | 18.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.2 |
Assessment of Motor Control Abnormality as Measured by the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS)
The Simpson-Angus Scale is used to monitor for neurological and musculoskeletal side effects that may be a result of certain psychotropic medications. The scale consists of 10 questions which each can be rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Scores for each item are added to produce a total score. The highest possible total score is 40. Higher scores indicate more adverse outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: ITT and LOCF.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Assessment of Motor Control Abnormality as Measured by the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) | Baseline SAS | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Asenapine | Assessment of Motor Control Abnormality as Measured by the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) | 12 Week SAS | 0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Barnes Drug-induced Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS)
This scale is used to measure the presence of akathisia, as may result from use of certain psychotropic medications. The scale contains four items and the score for each item is added to produce the total score. Total scores range from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate more adverse outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: ITT and LOCF.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Barnes Drug-induced Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) | Baseline BARS | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Asenapine | Barnes Drug-induced Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) | 12 Week BARS | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Change in Bipolar Disorder Symptoms as Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
The minimum possible score is 18 and the maximum score is 126. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: ITT and LOCF.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Bipolar Disorder Symptoms as Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) | Baseline BPRS | 35.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Asenapine | Change in Bipolar Disorder Symptoms as Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) | 12 Week BPRS | 28.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)
The DRS contains items that evaluate cognitive function across 5 subscales: attention, initiation/perseveration, construction, conceptualization, and memory. Subscale raw score ranges are: attention (0-37), initiation/perseveration (0-37), construction (0-6), conceptualization (0-39), and memory (0-25). Raw subscale scores are added for a total raw score with range 0-144. For each raw subscale score, scaled scores are looked up from a battery of 13 tables. Age of the participant determines which table is to be used. Total raw subscale score also has its own scaled score in the tables. In addition to use in determining scaled scores for each of the subscales, these tables are used to look up the scaled score for the total raw score. The tables are contained in the article Robust and Expanded Norms for the Dementia Rating Scale (Pedraza, Lucas, et al. 2010); Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 25; 347-358. Higher scores, raw and scaled, indicate better cognitive functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) | Baseline DRS | 131.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) | 12 Week DRS | 135.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)
Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-12). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Recognition Discrimination Index appears in this entry below
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | Baseline HVLT Recognition Discrimation Index | 8.6 number of items | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | 12 Week HVLT Recognition Discrimination Index | 9.6 number of items | Standard Deviation 2 |
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)
Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-36). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Total recall scores appear in this entry below.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | Baseline HVLT Total Recall | 15.8 correctly recalled items | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | 12 Week HVLT Total Recall | 18.2 correctly recalled items | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)
Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-12). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Delayed recall scores appear in this entry below.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | Baseline HVLT Delayed Recall | 5.2 correctly recalled items | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | 12 Week HVLT Delayed Recall | 5.3 correctly recalled items | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)
Evaluates cognitive functioning across domains: recall, delayed recall, retention, recognition (each scored separately). The scores given are titled: recall score, delayed recall score, retention score, recognition discrimination index. Total Recall score = items correctly recalled (0-12). Delayed Recall score = items correctly recalled following delay (0-12). Retention score = percent items recalled that were also recalled after delay (0-100). The Recognition Discrimination score = true positives minus false positives (0-12). Recall task has 12 words and involves to recall of words after all of them are read aloud to the patient. Delayed recall tasks involves the same twelve words, except recall is tasked after a 20-25 minute delay. Recognition task has 24 words. Patient evaluated on how many from original list he or she is able to recognize. Higher scores = better outcomes. Retention scores appear in this entry below.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | Baseline HVLT Retention | 73.9 percentage of items | Standard Deviation 32.7 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) | 12 Week HVLT Retention | 71.8 percentage of items | Standard Deviation 34.4 |
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task
The Stroop evaluates patients for cognitive functioning. Patients are to read words aloud or name colors as quickly as possible in a 45-second period. The measure contains three tasks, each associated with a subscale as follows: Word, Color, and Color-Word. Each subscale contains 100 items. The raw score range for each of the subscales is 0-100. Each raw subscale score is converted to a T-Score. The possible T-Score range for the Word subscale is 15 to 85. The possible T-Score range for the Color subscale is 8 to 92. The possible T-Score range for the Color-Word subscale is 3 to 98. Higher scores on the subscales indicate better cognitive functioning. Subscales are scored independently and are not added to produce a total score.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task | Baseline Word Subscale | 75.7 T-Score | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task | 12 Week Word Subscale | 75.9 T-Score | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task | Baseline Color Subscale | 53.6 T-Score | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task | 12 Week Color Subscale | 58.6 T-Score | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task | Baseline Color-Word Subscale | 30.3 T-Score | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Stroop Task | 12 Week Color-Word Subscale | 30.6 T-Score | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test
The Trails test is a measure of cognitive functioning. The measure consists of two parts: A and B. In part A, participants are asked to draw a trail connecting a series of numbers in sequential order. In Part B, participants are asked to draw a trail connecting a combination of letters and numbers. The time taken to complete each task is noted as the score (e.g., 78 seconds). For Trails A, there is no upper limit on the score, as subjects are given as much time as is needed for them to complete the task. Higher scores indicate poorer cognitive functioning. In Trails B, the task is timed with an upper limit of five minutes. If, at four minutes, it is determined that the subject will not likely complete the task in the time allotted, then the task can be called off. Higher scores indicate poorer cognitive functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants who completed cognitive scales at baseline and at Week 12 visit were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test | Baseline Trails - Part A | 57.7 seconds | Standard Deviation 30.9 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test | 12 Week Trails - Part A | 47.3 seconds | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test | Baseline Trails - Part B | 189.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 103.8 |
| Asenapine | Change in Cognitive Status as Measured by the Trail Making Test | 12 Week Trails - Part B | 126.3 seconds | Standard Deviation 52.4 |
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Participants with a baseline MADRS score of 16 or greater were analyzed. LOCF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | Baseline MADRS | 27.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Asenapine | Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | 12 Week MADRS | 18.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.2 |
Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP)
The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 7. A higher score implies a worse condition. The CGI-BP has three scores - Mania Severity, Depression Severity, and Overall Bipolar Illness Severity.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) and LOCF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) | Baseline Overall Severity | 4.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Asenapine | Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) | 12 Week Overall Severity | 2.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Asenapine | Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) | Baseline Mania Severity | 2.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Asenapine | Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) | 12 Week Mania Severity | 1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Asenapine | Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) | Baseline Depression Severity | 3.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Asenapine | Change in Global Psychopathology as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) | 12 Week Depression Severity | 1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Change in Perception of Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)
The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 99. A higher score implies a better perceived condition.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: ITT and LOCF.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Perception of Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12) | Baseline Mental Health Subscore of SF-12 | 38.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| Asenapine | Change in Perception of Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12) | 12 Week Mental Health Subscore of SF-12 | 43.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
Change in Perception of Physical Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)
The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 99. A higher score implies a better perceived condition.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Population: ITT and LOCF.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Change in Perception of Physical Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12) | Baseline on Physical Health Subscale of SF-12 | 46.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Asenapine | Change in Perception of Physical Health as Measured by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12) | 12 week on Physical Health Subscale of SF-12 | 46.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.1 |
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS)
The WHO-DAS II is used to assess patients for difficulties that they experience due to health conditions. Six subscales are represented which cover the following domains: Getting Around (range 1-10), Self Care (range 1-10), Life Activities (range 1-20), Understand/Communicate (range 1-10), Participation in Society (range 1-10), and Getting Along with People (range 1-10). Lower scores represent more positive outcomes, while higher scores represent worse outcomes. Total summary scores were not computed for our analyses and is optional for the measure.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Population: ITT and LOCF.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | 12 Week WHO-DAS Getting Along w/ People Subscale | 2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | 12 Week WHO-DAS Self Care Subscale | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | Baseline WHO-DAS Life Activities Subscale | 9.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.9 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | 12 Week WHO-DAS Life Activities Subscale | 7.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | Baseline WHO-DAS Understand/Communicate Subscale | 3.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | 12 Week WHO-DAS Understand/Communicate Subscale | 3.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | Baseline WHO-DAS Participation in Society Subscale | 4.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | 12 Week WHO-DAS Participation in Society Subscale | 3.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | Baseline WHO-DAS Getting Along w/ People Subscale | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | Baseline WHO-DAS Getting Around Subscale | 4.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | 12 Week WHO-DAS Getting Around Subscale | 4.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Asenapine | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) | Baseline WHO-DAS Self Care Subscale | 2.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |