Skip to content

Stenting Malignant Jaundice for Quality of Life

Endoscopic Palliation of Malignant Biliary Tract Obstruction: Emphasis on Improvement in Quality of Life

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01459965
Enrollment
164
Registered
2011-10-26
Start date
1993-07-31
Completion date
2004-11-30
Last updated
2011-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bile Duct Neoplasms Malignant

Keywords

Jaundice, Biliary stents, Palliation, Quality of Life, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography

Brief summary

Endoscopic stent insertion is considered the method of choice for palliation of malignant bile duct obstruction (MBDO). However, it can cause complications and requires periodic stent exchanges. While endoscopic stenting is clearly indicated for relief of cholangitis or refractory pruritus, its role in patients with jaundice alone is less clear. Endoscopic stenting for this relative indication might be justified, if there is a significant improvement in quality of life (QOL) of such patients. The aim of the investigators study was to determine whether endoscopic stenting for MBDO results in improved QOL.

Detailed description

Most malignant tumors causing bile duct obstruction, such as pancreatic adenocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma, have an extremely poor prognosis. At the time of diagnosis the majority of these tumors will be unresectable with a median survival of 4-6 months. Palliation is the goal for those patients with unresectable tumors and limited survival and for those at high risk for attempts at curative resection. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic stent insertion is considered the method of choice for palliative treatment of malignant bile duct obstruction (MBDO). However, it can cause complications, such as pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, cholangitis and stent migration in a significant proportion of treated patients. Clogging of plastic stents is a predictable consequence and requires periodic stent exchanges with attendant risks and costs. While endoscopic stenting is clearly indicated for relief of cholangitis or refractory pruritus, the role of stenting in patients with jaundice alone, abdominal pain, or failure to thrive due to malignancy is less clear. Given the risk for complications and costs, endoscopic therapy might be justified in these clinical scenarios if quality of life (QOL) is significantly improved. A few available studies have demonstrated improved QOL in stented patients. However, these studies include a small number of patients and/or are retrospective in design. Therefore, more evidence to support routine palliative biliary drainage in patients with MBDO is desired.

Interventions

PROCEDUREERCP with 10 French biliary plastic stent placement

Stent placement of a 10 French biliary plastic stent

PROCEDUREERCP with 11.5 French biliary plastic stent

biliary plastic stent placement

Sponsors

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
CollaboratorOTHER
American College of Gastroenterology
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with suspected or proven malignant biliary obstruction who were unresectable or inoperable and were undergoing ERCP and biliary stenting for biliary depression.

Exclusion criteria

* Had previously undergone biliary stenting * Surgery was planned * A guidewire could not be passed through the stricture * Suspected survival of \< 3 months * Impending duodenal obstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Documented change in Quality Of Life180 days after stent insertionDocumented change in QOL over the first month and over six months after successful biliary drainage compared with that before the procedure. The FACT-G questionnaire administered at baseline, at 1 month after stent insertion and at 180 days after stent insertion was used to assess this outcome. Change from baseline was analyzed at each of these time points separately.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Documented change in symptoms and concerns specific for patients with MBDO180 days after stent placementAn additional 10 item questionnaire was administered at baseline, at 1 month after biliary stenting and at 180 days after biliary stenting.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026