Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, Stages II or III non-small cell lung cancer
Brief summary
The study is designed to determine whether an accelerated course of hypofractionated radiation therapy with daily image guidance and motion assessment/control will allow more effective treatment of poor performance status patients with stage II-III NSCLC, who would benefit from local therapy compared to standard radiation therapy (60 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction).
Detailed description
The study is designed to determine whether an accelerated course of hypofractionated radiation therapy with daily image guidance and motion assessment/control will allow more effective treatment of poor performance status patients with stage II-III NSCLC, who would benefit from local therapy compared to standard radiation therapy (60 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction). Poor performance status patients can be a heterogeneous group, with tumor-related factors, other co-morbidities, or advanced age placing patients in the category. These patients have traditionally been underrepresented in clinical trials, and thus no prospective study has evaluated the efficacy of other radiotherapy dose fractionations in these patients. One phase III trial of poor-risk locally advanced NSCLC (RTOG 93-04) included just over 40% Karnofsky performance status 60-70 patients and showed median survival times of 9.5 and 10.3 months with 60Gy of conventional radiation therapy alone or with recombinant β-interferon \[18\]. 1 year overall survival was just 44% in these patients. This study includes randomization to two arms. Arm A (experimental arm) will include IGRT, 60 Gy in 15 fractions (3 weeks). Arm B will include conventional radiation, 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions (6 weeks) with optional concurrent with carboplatin/taxol . The experimental arm dose for this trial is based on a dose escalation trial at University of Texas Southwestern evaluating the maximum tolerated dose of hypofractionated IGRT in this patient population (Phase I study IRB #072010-050). Doses were escalated from 3 Gy per fraction (total dose 45 Gy) to 4 Gy per fraction (total dose 60 Gy) and evaluation for treatment related toxicity was being performed. Critical structure dose constraints will be expressed as organ dose-volume limits, with limits formulated with the approval of the study investigators using known tolerance data, radiobiological conversion models, and norms used in current practice at academic centers \[27\]. Randomization Schema: Patients will be allocated to the treatment using a randomized permuted block within strata to balance for patient factors other than institution. The stratifying variables are Zubrod performance status (2 vs. \> 2) and stage (II vs. III).
Interventions
RADIATIONRadiation Therapy
Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT)60 Gy in 15 fractions in 3 weeks
RADIATIONConventional radiation
Conventional radiation 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions in 6-7 weeks
Sponsors
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* All patients must be willing and capable to provide informed consent to participate in the protocol. * Patients must have appropriate staging studies identifying them as AJCC stage II or III non small cell lung cancer, (according to AJCC Staging, 6th edition; see appendix III), or recurrent non small cell lung cancer. Histologic confirmation of cancer will be required by biopsy or cytology within 6 months of study entry. * Patients must have the potential for benefit from local therapy (at the discretion of the investigator). * The patient's Zubrod performance status must be 2 or greater OR patients with Zubrod performance status 0-1 and weight loss \>10% are considered eligible. In addition, patients determined to be medically unfit or refusing combined modality therapy are eligible. * Age ≥ 18. * Patients must have measurable or evaluable disease. * Women of childbearing potential and male participants must agree to use an effective method of contraception. * Patients must sign study specific informed consent prior to study entry. * Patients must not have plans for concurrent chemoradiation therapy. * Patients must complete all required pretreatment evaluations
Exclusion criteria
* Total (aggregate) gross tumor volume \> 500 cm3 (500 cc's or 0.5 Liters) * Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in direct overlap of radiation therapy fields. * Chemotherapy given within one week of study registration. * Pregnant or lactating women, as treatment involves unforeseeable risks to the embryo or fetus.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival of Standard Radiation (CFRT) Versus Accelerated, Hypofractionated, Image-guided Conformal Radiotherapy (IGRT) in Treatment of Stage II-III NSCLC in Patients With Poor Performance Status at 1 Year. | 1 year | Percentage of participants with overall survival at 1 year. To compare the efficacy by overall survival of standard radiation versus accelerated, hypofractionated, image-guided conformal radiotherapy in treatment of stage II-III or recurrent NSCLC in patients with poor performance status. Overall survival time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. The stratified log-rank test will be used to test for a statistically significant difference in survival distributions. The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to determine hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the treatment difference in overall survival. Unadjusted ratios and ratios adjusted for stratification variables and other covariates of interest will be computed. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Local Progression of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status | 60 months | The time to disease progression and time to local regression will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. The stratified log-rank test will be used to test for a statistically significant difference in PFS (progression-free survival) and time to local progression distributions. The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to determine hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the treatment difference in progression-free survival and time to local progression. Time to progression will be measured from the date of study enrollment to the date of documented local progression as determined by clinical exam and imaging studies. |
| Disease-free Survival of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 60 months | Percentage of patients with disease-free survival at 60 months. To compare disease-free survival of two radiotherapy treatment regimens in patients with stage II-III NSCLC and poor performance status. Unlike progression-free survival in the advanced cancer setting, which refers to time from treatment to disease progression (or death) in patients who already have measurable cancer in their bodies, DFS (disease-free survival) refers to time from treatment until the recurrence of disease (or death) after undergoing curative-intent treatment. |
| Toxicities of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Poor Performance Status | 60 months | To compare toxicity of two radiotherapy treatment regimens in patient with stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status. Toxicity will be assessed according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. |
| Cost Effectiveness of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 2 years | For the primary analysis, we will estimate cost accumulated within 2 years. An inverse-probability weighting method to calculate average costs for each treatment group will be used to analyze. |
| Quality Adjusted Life Survival Time of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 20 months | The quality-adjusted survival time is just an integration of the utility measures over a patient's survival time, or until the time limit similar as the cost calculation, whichever occurs earlier. To estimate quality adjusted survival time, data from EQ-5D (EuroQol- 5 Dimension a descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension) will first be translated into utility measures. These measures are obtained at discrete time points, so they will be interpolated into the time intervals between the visits. Accordingly, we will use the inverse-probability weighted method of Zhao and Tsiatis to carry out the survival time analysis. |
| Quality of Life of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 6 months | Patient-reported functional status will be assessed with the lung cancer subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L). The FACT-L is a 36-item questionnaire that uses 5-point Likert-type response choices (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 =somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy Arm A:Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT), 60 Gy in 15 fractions in 3 weeks
Radiation Therapy: Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT)60 Gy in 15 fractions in 3 weeks | 50 |
| Conventional Radiation Arm B: Conventional radiation 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions in 6-7 weeks
Conventional radiation: Conventional radiation 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions in 6-7 weeks | 46 |
| Total | 96 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Disease progression. | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Hospitalization. | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Inability to meet trial constraints. | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Radiation Therapy | Conventional Radiation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized Ages 50-59 years | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Age, Customized Ages 60-69 years | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Age, Customized Ages 70-79 years | 18 Participants | 17 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Age, Customized Ages 80-90 years | 13 Participants | 8 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Baseline performance status 0 | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Baseline performance status 1 | 16 Participants | 13 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Baseline performance status 2 | 28 Participants | 29 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Baseline performance status 3 | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 18 Participants | 16 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 31 Participants | 30 Participants | 61 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 50 number of participants | 46 number of participants | 96 number of participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 20 Participants | 13 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 30 Participants | 33 Participants | 63 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 32 / 50 | 26 / 46 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 28 / 50 | 23 / 46 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 50 | 0 / 46 |
Outcome results
Primary
Overall Survival of Standard Radiation (CFRT) Versus Accelerated, Hypofractionated, Image-guided Conformal Radiotherapy (IGRT) in Treatment of Stage II-III NSCLC in Patients With Poor Performance Status at 1 Year.
Percentage of participants with overall survival at 1 year. To compare the efficacy by overall survival of standard radiation versus accelerated, hypofractionated, image-guided conformal radiotherapy in treatment of stage II-III or recurrent NSCLC in patients with poor performance status. Overall survival time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. The stratified log-rank test will be used to test for a statistically significant difference in survival distributions. The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to determine hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the treatment difference in overall survival. Unadjusted ratios and ratios adjusted for stratification variables and other covariates of interest will be computed.
Time frame: 1 year
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy | Overall Survival of Standard Radiation (CFRT) Versus Accelerated, Hypofractionated, Image-guided Conformal Radiotherapy (IGRT) in Treatment of Stage II-III NSCLC in Patients With Poor Performance Status at 1 Year. | 37.7 percentage of participants |
| Conventional Radiation | Overall Survival of Standard Radiation (CFRT) Versus Accelerated, Hypofractionated, Image-guided Conformal Radiotherapy (IGRT) in Treatment of Stage II-III NSCLC in Patients With Poor Performance Status at 1 Year. | 44.6 percentage of participants |
Secondary
Cost Effectiveness of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status.
For the primary analysis, we will estimate cost accumulated within 2 years. An inverse-probability weighting method to calculate average costs for each treatment group will be used to analyze.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Due to patient compliance with questionnaire completion, only 23 patients from Arm A and 29 patients from Arm B were analyzed. Sample size was too small for meaningful cost comparison.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy | Cost Effectiveness of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 26,984 Cost of Treatment (in USD) |
| Conventional Radiation | Cost Effectiveness of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 33,723 Cost of Treatment (in USD) |
Secondary
Disease-free Survival of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status.
Percentage of patients with disease-free survival at 60 months. To compare disease-free survival of two radiotherapy treatment regimens in patients with stage II-III NSCLC and poor performance status. Unlike progression-free survival in the advanced cancer setting, which refers to time from treatment to disease progression (or death) in patients who already have measurable cancer in their bodies, DFS (disease-free survival) refers to time from treatment until the recurrence of disease (or death) after undergoing curative-intent treatment.
Time frame: 60 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy | Disease-free Survival of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 4 percentage of participants |
| Conventional Radiation | Disease-free Survival of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 2 percentage of participants |
Secondary
Quality Adjusted Life Survival Time of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status.
The quality-adjusted survival time is just an integration of the utility measures over a patient's survival time, or until the time limit similar as the cost calculation, whichever occurs earlier. To estimate quality adjusted survival time, data from the VAS (visual analogue scale: the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine') of EQ-5D (EuroQol- 5 Dimension a descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension) will first be translated into utility measures. These measures are obtained at discrete time points, so they will be interpolated into the time intervals between the visits. Accordingly, we will use the inverse-probability weighted method of Zhao and Tsiatis to carry out the survival time analysis.
Time frame: 20 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy | Quality Adjusted Life Survival Time of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 106 adjusted days of follow up |
| Conventional Radiation | Quality Adjusted Life Survival Time of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 83 adjusted days of follow up |
Secondary
Quality Adjusted Life Survival Time of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status.
The quality-adjusted survival time is just an integration of the utility measures over a patient's survival time, or until the time limit similar as the cost calculation, whichever occurs earlier. To estimate quality adjusted survival time, data from EQ-5D (EuroQol- 5 Dimension a descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension) will first be translated into utility measures. These measures are obtained at discrete time points, so they will be interpolated into the time intervals between the visits. Accordingly, we will use the inverse-probability weighted method of Zhao and Tsiatis to carry out the survival time analysis.
Time frame: 20 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy | Quality Adjusted Life Survival Time of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 100 days |
| Conventional Radiation | Quality Adjusted Life Survival Time of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status. | 81 days |
Secondary
Quality of Life of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status.
Patient-reported functional status will be assessed with the lung cancer subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L). The FACT-L is a 36-item questionnaire that uses 5-point Likert-type response choices (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 =somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much).
Time frame: 6 months
Population: Data was not collected due to patient compliance.
Secondary
Time to Local Progression of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status
The time to disease progression and time to local regression will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. The stratified log-rank test will be used to test for a statistically significant difference in PFS (progression-free survival) and time to local progression distributions. The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to determine hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the treatment difference in progression-free survival and time to local progression. Time to progression will be measured from the date of study enrollment to the date of documented local progression as determined by clinical exam and imaging studies.
Time frame: 60 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy | Time to Local Progression of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status | 6.4 months |
| Conventional Radiation | Time to Local Progression of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III NSCLC and Poor Performance Status | 7.3 months |
Secondary
Toxicities of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Poor Performance Status
To compare toxicity of two radiotherapy treatment regimens in patient with stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status. Toxicity will be assessed according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0.
Time frame: 60 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy | Toxicities of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Poor Performance Status | 144 events |
| Conventional Radiation | Toxicities of Two Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens in Patients With Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Poor Performance Status | 120 events |