Skip to content

Staple-line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Three Different Techniques: a Randomized Trial

Staple-line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Three Different Techniques: a Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01459471
Enrollment
120
Registered
2011-10-25
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2011-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complication of Surgical Procedure, Leak; Blood

Brief summary

The main drawback of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the severity of post-operative complications. Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is strongly advocated.

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to prospectively and randomly compare three different techniques of SLR during LSG: oversewing (group A), buttressed transection with a polyglycolide acid and trimethylene carbonate (group B) and staple-line roofing with a gelatin fibrin matrix (group C).

Interventions

PROCEDUREBariatric surgery

Staple line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy

Sponsors

University of Rome Tor Vergata
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
28 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Morbidly obese patients waiting for sleeve gastrectomy

Exclusion criteria

* BMI\<35 Kg/m2, * Important comorbidities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
safety of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by measuring the number of adverse effects, i.e. bleeding and leaks.six monthsa comparison between three techniques of staple line reinforcement. The number of adverse events will be registered and analyzed

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026