Skip to content

Resource-Sparing Curative Treatment for Rectal Cancer

Resource-Sparing Curative Treatment for Rectal Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01459328
Enrollment
350
Registered
2011-10-25
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Carcinoma

Keywords

rectal carcinoma, long course chemo-radiation, short course chemo-rdiation, Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized clinical trial comparing two different neo-adjuvant radiation-based strategies prior to intended surgery for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum. This trial may establish the investigational therapy to be superior to, or at least not inferior to conventional treatment.

Detailed description

This phase III randomised clinical trial compares the outcome of two different neo-adjuvant radiation based treatments for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. This encompasses patients at risk for a positive circumfrential resection margin (CRM+) on baseline assessment imaging and pateints identified as being with a T-descriptor T4 at baseline assessment. The arms compared are as follows: * The investigational arm: short chemo-radiation course(25Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week) +/- surgery. * The conventional arm: protracted chemo-radiation course (50Gy in 25 daily fractions over 5 weeks combined with chemotherapy)+/- surgery. The outcomes include four domains: overall survival, biological effect, quality of life and health-related economics.

Interventions

RADIATIONRadiotherapy

Short course radiotherapy: 25Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week Chemotherapy: - Bolus 5 Fluorouracil 450 mg/m2/day * Injected Leucovorin 20 mg/m2/day for 5 days

Sponsors

Centre Anti Cancer Hopital Frantz Fanon
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital A.C. Camargo
CollaboratorOTHER
Credit Valley Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Columbia
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice
CollaboratorOTHER
Minesterio de Cienca, Tecnologia y Medio Ambiente
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
V.N. Cancer Center GKNM Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Tata Memorial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cancer Center, Bratislava
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Cape Town
CollaboratorOTHER
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
CollaboratorOTHER
International Atomic Energy Agency
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Clinical (i.e. surgical determination) and/or diagnostic image findings consistent with c/uT4 or CRM+ (note that CRM+ must be established by MRI), primary rectal Adenocarcinoma (i.e. histology consistent with origin from rectal mucosa); these constitute LARC for the purpose of this protocol * Treatment will be directed at the primary cancer, being clinically appropriate and given with an initial intent to cure the patient (this includes accepting up front that radiation and surgery are feasible; for surgery, this means that the patient has been determined fit for major surgery by an anaesthesiologist prior to the request for randomization) * Performance status is sufficient to undertake the treatment in either arm (KPS\>50%) * Patient is accessible for required follow-up and data collection * Radiation oncologist expects survival to exceed 6 months from date of diagnosis * Patient provides informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrent rectal cancer * Primary wholly in the sigmoid colon * Considered to be arising in the anal canal * Metastatic disease beyond the pelvis (by clinical assessment and/or diagnostic imaging) * Contraindications to protocol RT or to protocol chemotherapy, such as one or more of the following: * any prior RT to the pelvis; a solitary pelvic kidney within the intended radiation volume * consideration by the most responsible radiation oncologist that the treatment volume is too large, or the amount of small bowel or other critical organs within the treatment volume is too much for safe treatment * significantly abnormal laboratory tests such as impaired renal/liver function * a haemoglobin that is \< 8.0 (or 80, SI) and the patient is not transfused to exceed 8.0 (or 80, SI) * on-going medications that are not compatible with protocol neo-adjuvant chemotherapy as described in this protocol * Significant development issues (such as with age \< 18 yr) * Co-morbidity * Psychiatric diagnosis * Physical impairment * Pregnancy or continuing breast-feeding, that precludes administration of protocol treatments, or that precludes data collection (such as likely to preclude follow-up visits or completing questionnaires)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall SurvivalFrom commencement of radiation (day 1) to death or last follow-up up to 5 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biological Effect and Tumour BiologyPrior to surgical decision in weeks 13-15 and 4 weeks after surgeryMaximum size of the tumor based on imaging and/or up to 3D measures reported by radiologists, comparing baseline and pre-surgical decision inverstigations If definitive surgery is conducted: * Proportion obtaining R0 * Proportion undergoing TME * Status of the neurovascular and neural invasion(s) * Nodal ratio * Tumor sizes CEA results
Quality of LifeFrom date of randomization till the end of follow-up (5 years)
Health-related EconomicsFrom date of randomization till the end of follow-up (5 years)Number of days in hospital Number of surgical procedures Number of days with stomas Protocol required therapies, as actually administered Adverse events that have significant cost implications (i.e. cost-drivers)

Countries

Algeria, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Cuba, India, Indonesia, Italy, Slovakia, South Africa

Contacts

Primary ContactIAEA

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026