Skip to content

Compare Technegas Ventilation-Perfusion SPECT and Xenon Ventilation-Perfusion Planar Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism

A Comparison of Technegas® Ventilation-Perfusion SPECT and Xenon Ventilation-Perfusion Planar Imaging in Subjects Being Evaluated for Pulmonary Embolism

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01458639
Enrollment
18
Registered
2011-10-25
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2015-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism, PE

Brief summary

Phase 3 within-subject trial of Technegas V/Q SPECT and Tc-99m macro-aggregated albumin (MAA) imaging compared to Xenon-133 V/Q planar and Tc-99m macroaggregate of albumin (MAA) imaging for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism (PE).

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3 within-subject trial of Technegas Ventilation SPECT and Tc-99m MAA perfusion imaging compared to xenon (Xe-133) Ventilation Planar and Tc-99m MAA perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of PE. Diagnosis of PE provided by review of the subjects' documented clinical information after 30 days of follow-up. Primary assessments of efficacy will be based on an independent blind reads of the Technegas V/Q SPECT images by three different readers and the independent blind reads of Xe 133 V/Q planar images by three different readers.

Interventions

DRUGTechnegas V SPECT imaging

Technegas V SPECT imaging and Technetium 99m MAA Perfusion imaging for the diagnosis pf pulmonary embolism.

DRUGXenon-133 Ventilation Planar imaging

Xenon-133 Ventilation Planar imaging and Technetium 99m MAA Perfusion imaging for the diagnosis pf pulmonary embolism.

Sponsors

Cyclomedica Australia PTY Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects will be enrolled in Cohort 1 if they meet the following requirements: 1. Male or female, at least 18 years of age. 2. Suspected of having PE and be a candidate for Xe-133 V/Q imaging. 3. Willing and able to provide informed consent. 4. Stable and able to undergo Xe-133 planar imaging, Technegas SPECT imaging, and planar/SPECT perfusion imaging and complete follow-up procedures. 5. Willing and agree to complete study procedures, including follow-up safety assessments. 6. Using adequate birth control, if female and fertile. 7. If female, has a negative urine or serum pregnancy test. 8. Agrees to return for a 24-hour and 30 day follow-up safety assessment. Subjects will be enrolled in Cohort 2 if they meet the above criteria AND subject is likely to have pulmonary embolism based on one or more of the following: 1. Wells Score of 7 or greater. Subjects with a Wells Score less than 7 may be enrolled in Cohort 2 if there is agreement between the investigator and the medical monitor that the subject is at high risk for PE. 2. An abnormal D-dimer test. 3. Positive Doppler ultrasound for DVT. 4. CTA is positive for PE within 24 hours of this imaging study.

Exclusion criteria

Subject 1. Has undergone imaging with Iodine-131 (I-131) within 30 days, Thallium-201 (Tl-201) or Indium-111 (In-111) within 10 days, Fluorine 18 (F-18) within 24 hours, or any other radiopharmaceutical not otherwise specified within 72 hours of this imaging study. 2. Has previously undergone an imaging study with a Tc-99m agent, within 48 hours of this imaging study. 3. Is a pregnant or lactating female. 4. Has received Technegas in the past. 5. Was previously enrolled in another investigational study or received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to dosing. 6. Is hemodynamically unstable. 7. Has received therapeutic dose of low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin within 24 hours prior to dosing or Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) within 4 hours prior to dosing or has received treatment for PE between the time of a positive CTA, if performed, and Technegas V/Q SPECT imaging.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity of Technegas V/Q SPECT for the Diagnosis of PEProspective, 30 days follow-upCompared to the sensitivity of Xenon V/Q Planar imaging. Truth based on blinded reader's assessments of V/Q SPECT images compared with subject's final diagnosis resulting from clinical information at 30 days follow-up.
Specificity of Technegas V/Q SPECT for the Diagnosis of PE.Prospective, 30 days follow-upCompared to the specificity of Xenon V/Q Planar imaging. Truth based on blinded reader's assessments of V/Q SPECT images compared with subject's final diagnosis resulting from clinical information at 30 days follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Imaging for Diagnosis of PEProspective, 30 days follow-upNPV of V/Q imaging for diagnosis of PE is determined by the results of blind-read assessment of images compared with truth using a subject's final clinical diagnosis following 30-day follow-up of occurence of PE or death, whichever occurs first.
Accuracy of Technegas V/Q SPECT and Xenon V/Q Planar Imaging for Diagnosis of PEprospective, 30 days follow-up.Accuracy of V/Q imaging for diagnosis of PE is determined by the results of blind-read assessment of images compared with truth using a subject's final clinical diagnosis following 30-day follow-up of occurence of PE or death, whichever occurs first.
Safety of Technegas in Patients With Possible PEProspective, from enrollment through 30 days follow-upSafety will be assessed by the incidence of treatment emergence adverse events and changes in clinical laboratory measurements, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, physical examination and pulmonary examination before and after treatment.
Likelihood Ratio for Diagnosis of PEProspective, 30 days follow-upLikelihood ratios of V/Q imaging for diagnosis of PE is determined by the results of blind-read assessment of images compared with truth using a subject's final clinical diagnosis following 30-day follow-up of occurence of PE or death, whichever occurs first.
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Imaging for Diagnosis of PEProspective, 30 days follow-upPPV of V/Q imaging for diagnosis of PE is determined by the results of blind-read assessment of images compared with truth using a subject's final clinical diagnosis following 30-day follow-up of occurence of PE or death, whichever occurs first.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment period was November 14, 2012 to June 11, 2014. Subjects were recruited from US medical centers that performed Xenon-133 ventilation scans to evaluate patients for pulmonary embolism (PE).

Pre-assignment details

Subjects suspected of PE to have Xe-133 ventilation/Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) perfusion (VQ) scan. Must have at least one within 72 hours before imaging: D-dimer, Doppler ultrasound for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) for PE. Not have therapeutic dose blood thinner for \> than 72 hrs prior to imaging.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Xenon-133 Ventilation Planar imaging, followed by Technegas Ventilation SPECT imaging with Technetium-99m (Tc-99m) labeled carbon particles, followed by Technetium 99m (Tc-99m) MAA Perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Xe-133 V / Tc-99m MAA Q results compared to Technegas V / Tc-99m MAA Q results.
18
Total18

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyEquipment issue1
Overall StudyInability to obtain subject blood sample1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous59.5 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Sensitivity of Technegas V/Q SPECT for the Diagnosis of PE

Compared to the sensitivity of Xenon V/Q Planar imaging. Truth based on blinded reader's assessments of V/Q SPECT images compared with subject's final diagnosis resulting from clinical information at 30 days follow-up.

Time frame: Prospective, 30 days follow-up

Population: Pulmonary embolism adjudication was to be determined by an Independent Adjudication Committee for primary and secondary outcome data and blinded readings of Xe-133 and Technegas Ventilation and Tc-99m MAA Perfusion images were required for primary outcome data. Due to trial termination PE adjudication and blinded readings of images were not done.

Primary

Specificity of Technegas V/Q SPECT for the Diagnosis of PE.

Compared to the specificity of Xenon V/Q Planar imaging. Truth based on blinded reader's assessments of V/Q SPECT images compared with subject's final diagnosis resulting from clinical information at 30 days follow-up.

Time frame: Prospective, 30 days follow-up

Population: Pulmonary embolism adjudication was to be determined by an Independent Adjudication Committee for primary and secondary outcome data and blinded readings of Xe-133 and Technegas Ventilation and Tc-99m MAA Perfusion images were required for primary outcome data. Due to trial termination PE adjudication and blinded readings of images were not done.

Secondary

Accuracy of Technegas V/Q SPECT and Xenon V/Q Planar Imaging for Diagnosis of PE

Accuracy of V/Q imaging for diagnosis of PE is determined by the results of blind-read assessment of images compared with truth using a subject's final clinical diagnosis following 30-day follow-up of occurence of PE or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: prospective, 30 days follow-up.

Population: PE adjudication for final clinical diagnosis was to be determined by an Independent Adjudication Committee and blinded readings of Xe-133 and Technegas Ventilation and Tc-99m MAA Perfusion images were required for primary and secondary outcome data. Due to trial termination PE adjudication and blinded readings of images were not done.

Secondary

Likelihood Ratio for Diagnosis of PE

Likelihood ratios of V/Q imaging for diagnosis of PE is determined by the results of blind-read assessment of images compared with truth using a subject's final clinical diagnosis following 30-day follow-up of occurence of PE or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Prospective, 30 days follow-up

Population: PE adjudication for final clinical diagnosis was to be determined by an Independent Adjudication Committee and blinded readings of Xe-133 and Technegas Ventilation and Tc-99m MAA Perfusion images were required for primary and secondary outcome data. Due to trial termination PE adjudication and blinded readings of images were not done.

Secondary

Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Imaging for Diagnosis of PE

NPV of V/Q imaging for diagnosis of PE is determined by the results of blind-read assessment of images compared with truth using a subject's final clinical diagnosis following 30-day follow-up of occurence of PE or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Prospective, 30 days follow-up

Population: PE adjudication for final clinical diagnosis was to be determined by an Independent Adjudication Committee and blinded readings of Xe-133 and Technegas Ventilation and Tc-99m MAA Perfusion images were required for primary and secondary outcome data. Due to trial termination PE adjudication and blinded readings of images were not done.

Secondary

Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Imaging for Diagnosis of PE

PPV of V/Q imaging for diagnosis of PE is determined by the results of blind-read assessment of images compared with truth using a subject's final clinical diagnosis following 30-day follow-up of occurence of PE or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Prospective, 30 days follow-up

Population: PE adjudication for final clinical diagnosis was to be determined by an Independent Adjudication Committee and blinded readings of Xe-133 and Technegas Ventilation and Tc-99m MAA Perfusion images were required for primary and secondary outcome data. Due to trial termination PE adjudication and blinded readings of images were not done.

Secondary

Safety of Technegas in Patients With Possible PE

Safety will be assessed by the incidence of treatment emergence adverse events and changes in clinical laboratory measurements, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, physical examination and pulmonary examination before and after treatment.

Time frame: Prospective, from enrollment through 30 days follow-up

Population: All subjects who received Technegas and completed safety follow-up procedures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Overall StudySafety of Technegas in Patients With Possible PESerious adverse events0 participants
Overall StudySafety of Technegas in Patients With Possible PEOther (not including serious) adverse events1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026