Skip to content

Large Overuse of Post-polypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy

Large Overuse of Post-polypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: a Prospective Nation-wide Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01458093
Enrollment
7081
Registered
2011-10-24
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2011-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Surveillance

Brief summary

In colorectal cancer screening era a huge burden of medical resources has been applied to surveillance. Although the adherence to post-polipectomy recommendations is a advocated as a mainstay for quality assurance colonoscopy programs, prospective data on appropriateness of surveillance are lacking. The aim of present study was to evaluate the percentage of subjects in which timing of surveillance colonoscopy in practice agrees with that recommended by guidelines and to identify factors associated to the appropriateness of surveillance.

Interventions

OTHERcolonoscopy

evaluation of surveillance timing adequacy as compared to the guidelines

Sponsors

Valduce Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* consecutive colonoscopy outpatients * adults (18-80 yrs)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with missing data on polyp findings at previous colonoscopy (number, endoscopic or histological features) * Subjects with unsatisfactory quality standards of previous examination (no cecal intubation, inadequate bowel preparation, incomplete polyp resection) * patients with a medical history of inflammatory bowel disease, inherited or other polyposis syndrome and colorectal cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelinesup to one yearTime interval between index and surveillance colonoscopies for patients undergoing post-polypectomy surveillance was calculated and compared to that suggested by the guidelines according to endoscopic findings at previous examination. For each patiens, surveillance time interval was regarded as correct if coherent with the recommended interval +/- 6 months, thus allowing to calculate the proportion of correct prescriptions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Factors associated to surveillance appropriatenessup to one yearThe presence of factors associated to appropriate surveillance prescriptions was investigated by multivariate analysis (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for each factor)

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026