Skip to content

A Study in Korean Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab

A Six Month Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study With a Six Month Open-Label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Korean Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01457950
Enrollment
135
Registered
2011-10-24
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

Keywords

denosumab, Republic of Korea, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if denosumab is effective in increasing bone mineral density at the lumbar spine in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Interventions

DRUGdenosumab

double-blind phase: 60mg subcutaneous injection, single dose

DRUGplacebo

double-blind phase: placebo subcutaneous injection, single dose

DRUGopen-label denosumab

open-label phase: 60mg subcutaneous injection, single dose

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
60 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis * greater than 5 years postmenopausal * aged 60 to 90 years old * absolute bone mineral density value consistent with a T-score less than -2.5 and greater than or equal to - 4.0 at the either the lumbar spine or total hip, as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Subjects with a T-score less than -4.0 are at very high risk for fracture and will be excluded.

Exclusion criteria

* previous or current metabolic bone disease, Paget's or Cushing's disease, or hyperprolactinemia * current hypo- or hyperparathyroidism or hypo- or hyperthyroidism unless on stable thyroid replacement therapy and TSH level meets criteria * rheumatoid arthritis * cirrhosis of the liver or unstable liver disease or ALT or AST greater than or equal to 2.0 times the upper limit of normal, or alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin greater than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal * medications used to treat osteoporosis, defined for type and duration of use, and including IV and oral bisphosphonates * medications that affect bone metabolism including parathyroid hormone or derivatives; anabolic steroids or testosterone; glucocorticosteroids; systemic hormone replacement therapy; selective estrogen receptor modulators; tibolone, calcitonin, and calcitriol or vitamin D derivatives; other bone active drugs including anticonvulsives (but not benzodiazepines) and heparin; chronic systemic ketoconazole, androgens, ACTH, cinacalcet, aluminum, lithium, protease inhibitors, methotrexate, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists * malignancy within 5 years except certain resected types * malabsorption syndrome or gastrointestinal disorders associated with malabsorption * abnormal calcium level * vitamin D deficiency * any laboratory abnormality that will prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with interpretation of study results * severe renal impairment or on dialysis * impaired immune system or subject is taking immunosuppressants * oral or dental conditions including current or past history of osteomyelitis or osteonecrosis of the jaw; active dental or jaw condition with requires oral surgery; planned invasive dental procedure; un-healed dental or oral surgery * any disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent or to comply with study procedures * any physical or psychiatric disorder that will prevent the subject from completing the study or interferes with study results * known to have tested positive for HIV * less than two lumbar vertebrae evaluable for DXA measurements * height, weight, or girth that may preclude accurate DXA measurements * drug or alcohol abuse within 12 months that interferes with understanding or completing the study * known sensitivity to mammalian cell-derived drug products * use of an investigational drug or device within 30 days of enrollment or currently receiving other investigational agent(s)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 6 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Baseline, Month 1 and Month 6Mean percent change from Baseline in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covarience (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 1/6 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.
Median Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at post-Baseline - measure at Baseline) divided by measure at Baseline \* 100.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE)From Baseline up to Month 6An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Change From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 1Baseline and Month 1Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 1 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Vital Sign Changes from Baseline of potential clinical concern for Diastolic Blood Pressure (\<50 or \>120 Bits Per Minutes \[bpm\]), Systolic Blood Pressure (\>170 Millimeters of Mercury \[mmHg\] or \<100 mmHg) and Heart rate (\>110 mmHg or \<50 mmHg) are summarized. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabMonth 6Number of participants with positive and negative results for both neutralizing antibodies to denosumab, and for binding antibodies to denosumab at Month 6 was summarized.
Change From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to DenosumabBaseline and Month 12Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.
Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Month 12Number of participants with positive and negative results for both neutralizing antibodies to denosumab, and for binding antibodies to denosumab at Month 12 was summarized.
Mean Percent Change From Month 6 in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to PlaceboMonth 6 and Month 12Mean percent change from Month 6 in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Month 6 BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by the measure at Month 6 \* 100.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to DenosumabBaseline and Month 12Mean percent change from Baseline in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.
Mean Percent Change From Month 6 in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to PlaceboMonth 6 and Month 12Mean percent change from Month 6 in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Month 6 BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by the measure at Month 6 \* 100.
Median Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to DenosumabBaseline and Month 12Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at post-Baseline - measure at Baseline) divided by measure at Baseline \* 100.
Median Percent Change From Month 6 in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to PlaceboMonth 6 and Month 12Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by measure at Month 6 \* 100.
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Vital Sign Changes from Baseline of potential clinical concern for Diastolic Blood Pressure (\<50 or \>120 Bits Per Minutes \[bpm\]), Systolic Blood Pressure (\>170 Millimeters of Mercury \[mmHg\] or \<100 mmHg) and Heart rate (\>110 mmHg or \<50 mmHg) are summarized. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE) During the Open-Label Extension PhaseFrom Month 6 to Month 12An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Change From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This study consisted of a screening phase of up to 2.5 months, a six-month Double-Blind Treatment Phase and a six-month Open-Label Extension Phase. 371 participants (par.) were screened, 135 par. entered the Double-Blind Treatment Phase, and 123 par. continued into the Open-Label Extension Phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Denosumab 60 mg
Participants received a denosumab 60 milligrams (mg) single subcutaneous (SC) injection at the start of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase. All participants received daily oral supplementation of elemental calcium (at least 1000 mg) and vitamin D (at least 400 International Units \[IU\]).
69
Placebo
Participants received a matching placebo single SC injection at the start of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase. All participants received daily oral supplementation of elemental calcium (at least 1000 mg) and vitamin D (at least 400 IU).
66
Total135

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double-Blind PhaseContinuation Criteria Not Met1000
Double-Blind PhaseProtocol Violation2100
Double-Blind PhaseWithdrawal by Subject6200
Open-Label PhaseAdverse Event0001
Open-Label PhaseProtocol Violation0001
Open-Label PhaseWithdrawal by Subject0020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDenosumab 60 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous67.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.86
66.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.77
66.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.83
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
69 Participants66 Participants135 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
69 Participants66 Participants135 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 6911 / 6612 / 607 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 692 / 661 / 603 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6

Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 6 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat Efficacy (ITTE) Population: all participants who received one dose of study medication, and had a Baseline measure and at least one post-Baseline efficacy measure during the Double-Blind Treatment Phase.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 64.10 Percent changeStandard Error 0.407
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 60.89 Percent changeStandard Error 0.413
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.06, 4.36]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6Albumin/globulin ratio, n=60, 630.020 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1424
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6BUN/creatinine ratio, n=60, 63-7.917 RatioStandard Deviation 25.2917
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6Albumin/globulin ratio, n=60, 630.052 RatioStandard Deviation 0.139
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6BUN/creatinine ratio, n=60, 63-4.063 RatioStandard Deviation 27.3436
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Albumin, n=60,630.217 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 1.8964
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Hemoglobin, n=59, 631.153 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 5.8274
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration, n=59, 63-5.186 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 9.9264
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Total protein, n=60, 63-0.050 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 2.9939
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Total protein, n=60, 63-0.127 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 3.3864
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Albumin, n=60,630.365 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 2.2598
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration, n=59, 63-6.857 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 9.4593
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 6Hemoglobin, n=59, 631.778 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 5.6894
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed. .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Alkaline phosphatase, n=60, 63-24.283 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 15.9513
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Alanine amino transferase, n=60, 632.117 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 6.4047
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Aspartate amino transferase, n=59, 631.034 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 4.4527
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Creatine kinase, n=60, 637.617 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 51.6658
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Gamma glutamyl transferase, n=60, 63-0.133 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 8.4381
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Lactate dehydraogenase, n=59, 636.119 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 18.1156
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Gamma glutamyl transferase, n=60, 63-2.143 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 7.9532
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Alkaline phosphatase, n=60, 63-8.222 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 11.2127
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Creatine kinase, n=60, 633.905 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 31.2052
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Alanine amino transferase, n=60, 63-0.397 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 8.8035
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Lactate dehydraogenase, n=59, 633.889 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 20.4979
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Aspartate amino transferase, n=59, 63-0.032 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 7.4962
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Basophils, n=58, 63-0.003 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.0131
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Eosinophils, n=58, 63-0.019 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1254
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Lymphocytes, n=58, 63-0.047 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.4096
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Monocytes, n=58, 63-0.033 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1094
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Segmented neutrophils, n=58, 630.114 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.3382
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Total neutrophils, n=58, 630.114 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.3382
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Platelet count, n=58, 631.621 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 31.7881
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6White blood cell count, n=58, 630.014 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.4026
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6White blood cell count, n=58, 63-0.517 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.2003
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Basophils, n=58, 63-0.006 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.0165
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Segmented neutrophils, n=58, 63-0.213 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.0934
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Eosinophils, n=58, 63-0.033 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1309
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Platelet count, n=58, 63-6.190 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 35.7874
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Lymphocytes, n=58, 63-0.206 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.593
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Total neutrophils, n=58, 63-0.213 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.0934
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 6Monocytes, n=58, 63-0.059 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1324
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Glucose, n=60, 63-0.873 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.5458
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Sodium, n=60, 63-0.400 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.1249
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Phosphorus inorganic, n=60, 63-0.072 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.1505
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Chloride, n=60, 63-0.200 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.2981
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Triglycerides, n=60, 63-0.166 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.7155
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Potassium, n=59, 630.000 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.39
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Urea/BUN, n=60, 63-0.258 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.1878
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Calcium, n=59, 63-0.020 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.089
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6VLDL cholesterol calculation, n=59, 63-0.098 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.2844
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Magnesium, n=60, 630.004 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0585
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Calcium (corrected), n=1, 10.110 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Sodium, n=60, 630.095 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.9486
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Calcium (corrected), n=1, 10.000 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Calcium, n=59, 630.002 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0768
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Chloride, n=60, 630.444 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.3264
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Glucose, n=60, 63-0.567 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.2118
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Potassium, n=59, 630.060 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.3476
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Magnesium, n=60, 630.009 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0462
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Phosphorus inorganic, n=60, 63-0.063 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.1695
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Triglycerides, n=60, 63-0.156 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.6119
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Urea/BUN, n=60, 63-0.119 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.4134
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6VLDL cholesterol calculation, n=59, 63-0.072 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.281
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Indirect bilirubin, n=60, 631.567 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 3.4757
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Creatinine, n=60, 632.037 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 6.4916
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Total bilirubin, n=60, 631.867 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 3.8947
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Uric acid, n=60, 6311.500 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 38.9622
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Direct bilirubin, n=60, 630.300 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.0301
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Uric acid, n=60, 630.159 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 40.9757
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Direct bilirubin, n=60, 630.222 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.1974
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Indirect bilirubin, n=60, 630.508 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 3.5372
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Total bilirubin, n=60, 630.730 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 3.8404
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 6Creatinine, n=60, 630.940 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 5.1644
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 60.009 Proportion of RBCs in bloodStandard Deviation 0.0196
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 60.013 Proportion of RBCs in bloodStandard Deviation 0.0196
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 60.068 Picograms (PG)/cellStandard Deviation 0.7111
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 60.146 Picograms (PG)/cellStandard Deviation 0.6696
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume at Month 61.695 Femtoliters (FL)Standard Deviation 2.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume at Month 62.397 Femtoliters (FL)Standard Deviation 2.6368
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 60.025 10^12 cells per liter (TI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1844
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 60.037 10^12 cells per liter (TI/L)Standard Deviation 0.192
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 6

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 60.475 percentage (%) of mean RBC volumeStandard Deviation 1.0256
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 60.556 percentage (%) of mean RBC volumeStandard Deviation 0.9242
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 1

Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 1 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 1

Population: ITTE Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 11.35 Percent changeStandard Error 0.375
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 10.62 Percent changeStandard Error 0.38
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6

Mean percent change from Baseline in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covarience (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 1/6 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1 and Month 6

Population: ITTE Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Total hip, Month 1, n=67, 630.74 Percent changeStandard Error 0.238
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Total hip, Month 6, n=69, 642.23 Percent changeStandard Error 0.245
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Femoral neck, Month 1, n=67, 631.30 Percent changeStandard Error 0.344
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Fermoral neck, Month 6, n=69, 642.23 Percent changeStandard Error 0.33
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Trochanter, Month 1, n=67, 630.82 Percent changeStandard Error 0.38
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Trochanter, Month n =69, 642.66 Percent changeStandard Error 0.418
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Trochanter, Month 1, n=67, 630.39 Percent changeStandard Error 0.392
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Total hip, Month 1, n=67, 630.05 Percent changeStandard Error 0.245
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Fermoral neck, Month 6, n=69, 640.84 Percent changeStandard Error 0.343
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Total hip, Month 6, n=69, 640.57 Percent changeStandard Error 0.254
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Trochanter, Month n =69, 640.67 Percent changeStandard Error 0.434
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 1 and Month 6Femoral neck, Month 1, n=67, 63-0.04 Percent changeStandard Error 0.354
Secondary

Median Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6

Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at post-Baseline - measure at Baseline) divided by measure at Baseline \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6

Population: ITTE Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-CTx, Month 1, n=69, 66-80.72 Percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-CTx, Month 3, n=68, 65-82.23 Percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-CTx, Month 6, n=60, 63-74.32 Percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-PINP, Month 1, n=69, 66-18.75 Percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-PINP, Month 3, n=68, 65-77.1 Percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-PINP, Month 6, n=60, 63-76.18 Percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-PINP, Month 3, n=68, 65-21.57 Percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-CTx, Month 1, n=69, 66-14.48 Percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-PINP, Month 1, n=69, 66-4.65 Percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-CTx, Month 3, n=68, 65-27.49 Percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-PINP, Month 6, n=60, 63-21.05 Percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Months 1, 3 and 6s-CTx, Month 6, n=60, 63-21.21 Percent change
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6

Vital Sign Changes from Baseline of potential clinical concern for Diastolic Blood Pressure (\<50 or \>120 Bits Per Minutes \[bpm\]), Systolic Blood Pressure (\>170 Millimeters of Mercury \[mmHg\] or \<100 mmHg) and Heart rate (\>110 mmHg or \<50 mmHg) are summarized. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Systolic blood pressure, High, n=60, 631 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Heart rate, High, n=60, 630 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Systolic blood pressure, Low, n=60, 631 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Heart rate, Low, n=60, 630 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Diastolic blood pressure, Low, n=60, 630 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Heart rate, Low, n=60, 630 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Diastolic blood pressure, Low, n=60, 632 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Systolic blood pressure, High, n=60, 632 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Systolic blood pressure, Low, n=60, 631 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Heart rate, High, n=60, 630 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.

Time frame: From Baseline up to Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who received one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Any AE38 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Any SAE7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Any AE32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Any SAE2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab

Number of participants with positive and negative results for both neutralizing antibodies to denosumab, and for binding antibodies to denosumab at Month 6 was summarized.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabNeutralizing antibodies, Positive, n=0, 0NA Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabNeutralizing antibodies, Negative, n=0, 0NA Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabBinding antibodies, Positive, n=60, 630 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabBinding antibodies, Negative, n=60, 6360 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabBinding antibodies, Negative, n=60, 6363 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabNeutralizing antibodies, Positive, n=0, 0NA Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabBinding antibodies, Positive, n=60, 630 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to DenosumabNeutralizing antibodies, Negative, n=0, 0NA Participants
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT-OL population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 12Albumin/globulin ratio, n=58, 600.016 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1473
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 12BUN/creatinine ratio, n=58, 60-5.776 RatioStandard Deviation 24.4297
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 12Albumin/globulin ratio, n=58, 600.032 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1621
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 12BUN/creatinine ratio, n=58, 602.500 RatioStandard Deviation 27.7962
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT-OL population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Albumin, n=58, 600.293 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 2.111
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Hemoglobin, n=56, 601.411 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 5.7833
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration, n=56, 60-5.679 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 6.6143
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Total protein, n=58, 600.224 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 3.4946
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Total protein, n=58, 600.267 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 2.8216
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Albumin, n=58, 600.450 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 1.9866
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration, n=56, 60-6.650 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 7.7587
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin and Total Protein at Month 12Hemoglobin, n=56, 602.033 Grams (G)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 6.0084
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT-OL population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Alkaline phosphatase, n=58, 60-25.603 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 14.478
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Alanine amino transferase, n=58, 601.810 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 7.9922
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Aspartate amino transferase, n=58, 600.879 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 6.4293
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Creatine kinase, n=58, 60-4.534 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 44.069
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Gamma glutamyl transferase, n=58, 600.4823 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 6.9541
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Lactate dehydraogenase, n=58, 60-0.552 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 19.2237
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Gamma glutamyl transferase, n=58, 60-0.600 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 9.4961
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Alkaline phosphatase, n=58, 60-23.767 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 15.757
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Creatine kinase, n=58, 604.500 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 52.0731
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Alanine amino transferase, n=58, 60-0.150 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 8.9288
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Lactate dehydraogenase, n=58, 60-1.217 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 24.7243
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 12Aspartate amino transferase, n=58, 60-0.467 Internationational Units(IU)/Liter (L)Standard Deviation 6.2666
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT-OL population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Basophils, n=54, 59-0.004 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.0164
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Eosinophils, n=54, 590.024 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1489
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Lymphocytes, n=54, 590.098 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.4436
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Monocytes, n=54, 59-0.009 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1053
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Segmented neutrophils, n=54, 590.014 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.1748
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Total neutrophils, n=54, 590.014 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.1748
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Platelet count, n=55, 60-4.018 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 34.8215
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12White blood cell count, n=54, 590.122 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.1618
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12White blood cell count, n=54, 59-0.369 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.3903
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Basophils, n=54, 59-0.002 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.0148
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Segmented neutrophils, n=54, 59-0.259 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.2035
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Eosinophils, n=54, 590.019 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.186
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Platelet count, n=55, 60-4.233 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 37.7913
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Lymphocytes, n=54, 59-0.089 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.5599
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Total neutrophils, n=54, 59-0.259 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.2035
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at Month 12Monocytes, n=54, 59-0.039 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1443
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT-OL population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Calcium, n=58, 60-0.031 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0944
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Chloride, n=58, 600.328 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.5573
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Glucose, n=58, 60-0.760 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.9331
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Potassium, n=58, 600.047 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.4398
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Magnesium, n=58, 600.009 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0679
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Sodium, n=58, 60-0.172 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.1532
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Phosphorus inorganic, n=58, 60-0.153 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.153
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Triglycerides, n=58, 60-0.144 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.7716
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Urea/BUN, n=58, 60-0.233 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.2183
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12VLDL cholesterol calculation, n=58, 59-0.066 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.3539
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Calcium (corrected), n=0, 0NA Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Triglycerides, n=58, 60-0.033 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.8449
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Calcium (corrected), n=0, 0NA Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Calcium, n=58, 60-0.004 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0904
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Sodium, n=58, 600.067 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.2986
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Chloride, n=58, 600.300 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.4446
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12VLDL cholesterol calculation, n=58, 59-0.044 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.3234
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Glucose, n=58, 60-0.500 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.2985
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Phosphorus inorganic, n=58, 60-0.094 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.1981
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Potassium, n=58, 600.045 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.3078
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Urea/BUN, n=58, 600.158 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.5771
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 12Magnesium, n=58, 600.004 Millimole/Liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0514
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT-OL population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Indirect bilirubin, n=58, 601.034 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 4.0391
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Creatinine, n=58, 600.948 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 5.1157
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Total bilirubin, n=58, 601.276 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 4.6596
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Uric acid, n=58, 604.483 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 41.387
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Direct bilirubin, n=58, 600.241 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.3548
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Uric acid, n=58, 602.000 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 44.0647
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Direct bilirubin, n=58, 600.100 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.298
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Indirect bilirubin, n=58, 600.800 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 3.3385
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Total bilirubin, n=58, 600.900 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 3.5401
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Uric Acid at Month 12Creatinine, n=58, 60-0.015 Micromole/liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 4.6216
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Ony those participants with a value at Baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 120.010 Proportion of RBCs in bloodStandard Deviation 0.0182
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 120.014 Proportion of RBCs in bloodStandard Deviation 0.0185
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Ony those participants with a value at Baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 12-0.304 Picograms (PG)/cell)Standard Deviation 0.7632
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 12-0.310 Picograms (PG)/cell)Standard Deviation 0.5058
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Ony those participants with a value at Baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 120.086 10^12 cells per liter (TI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1634
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 120.103 10^12 cells per liter (TI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1904
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Ony those participants with a value at Baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 120.007 percentage (%) of mean RBC volumeStandard Deviation 0.7897
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 120.203 percentage (%) of mean RBC volumeStandard Deviation 0.8718
Other Pre-specified

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Denosumab

Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat Open-Label (ITT-OL) Population: all participants from the ITT population in the Double-Blind Phase who continued into the Open-Label Extension Phase of the study and received denosumab at Month 6. Ony those participants with a value at Baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Denosumab5.62 Percent changeStandard Error 3.776
Other Pre-specified

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Denosumab

Mean percent change from Baseline in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population. Ony those participants with a value at Baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to DenosumabTotal hip3.07 Percent changeStandard Error 2.476
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to DenosumabFemoral neck3.39 Percent changeStandard Error 3.158
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to DenosumabTrochanter3.39 Percent changeStandard Error 4.653
Other Pre-specified

Mean Percent Change From Month 6 in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Placebo

Mean percent change from Month 6 in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Month 6 BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by the measure at Month 6 \* 100.

Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population. Ony those participants with a value at Month 6 and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Month 6 in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Placebo2.67 Percent changeStandard Error 3.44
Other Pre-specified

Mean Percent Change From Month 6 in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Placebo

Mean percent change from Month 6 in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Month 6 BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by the measure at Month 6 \* 100.

Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population. Ony those participants with a value at Month 6 and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Month 6 in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to PlaceboTotal hip1.46 Percent changeStandard Error 1.701
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Month 6 in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to PlaceboFemoral neck1.12 Percent changeStandard Error 2.668
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Month 6 in Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter BMD at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to PlaceboTrochanter2.13 Percent changeStandard Error 2.762
Other Pre-specified

Median Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Denosumab

Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at post-Baseline - measure at Baseline) divided by measure at Baseline \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population. Ony those participants with a value at Baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Denosumabs-CTx-63.36 Percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Denosumabs-PINP-78.00 Percent change
Other Pre-specified

Median Percent Change From Month 6 in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Placebo

Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by measure at Month 6 \* 100.

Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population. Ony those participants with a value at Month 6 and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Month 6 in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Placebos-CTx-50.90 Percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Month 6 in s-CTX and s-P1NP Biomarkers at Month 12 for Participants Previously Randomized to Placebos-PINP-66.67 Percent change
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12

Vital Sign Changes from Baseline of potential clinical concern for Diastolic Blood Pressure (\<50 or \>120 Bits Per Minutes \[bpm\]), Systolic Blood Pressure (\>170 Millimeters of Mercury \[mmHg\] or \<100 mmHg) and Heart rate (\>110 mmHg or \<50 mmHg) are summarized. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Ony those participants with a value at Baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Diastolic blood pressure, High0 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Diastolic blood pressure, Low2 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Systolic blood pressure, High0 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Systolic blood pressure, Low0 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Heart rate, High0 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Heart rate, Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Heart rate, High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Diastolic blood pressure, High1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Systolic blood pressure, Low2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Diastolic blood pressure, Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Heart rate, Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 12Systolic blood pressure, High2 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE) During the Open-Label Extension Phase

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.

Time frame: From Month 6 to Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE) During the Open-Label Extension PhaseAny AE22 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE) During the Open-Label Extension PhaseAny SAE1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE) During the Open-Label Extension PhaseAny AE29 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Events (SAE) During the Open-Label Extension PhaseAny SAE3 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12

Number of participants with positive and negative results for both neutralizing antibodies to denosumab, and for binding antibodies to denosumab at Month 12 was summarized.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT-OL Population: Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT-OL population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Neutralizing antibodies, Positive, n=0, 0NA Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Neutralizing antibodies, Negative, n=0, 0NA Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Binding antibodies, Positive, n=58, 610 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Binding antibodies, Negative, n=58, 6158 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Binding antibodies, Negative, n=58, 6161 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Neutralizing antibodies, Positive, n=0, 0NA Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Binding antibodies, Positive, n=58, 610 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 12Neutralizing antibodies, Negative, n=0, 0NA Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026