Skip to content

Ofatumumab Subcutaneous Administration in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study to Investigate the MRI Efficacy and Safety of Six Months' Administration of Ofatumumab in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01457924
Acronym
MIRROR
Enrollment
232
Registered
2011-10-24
Start date
2011-11-01
Completion date
2015-06-10
Last updated
2018-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Ofatumumab

Brief summary

Ofatumumab is a novel Immunoglobulin 1ĸ ( IgG1ĸ) lytic monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically binds to the human Cluster of Differentiation 20 (CD20) antigen of which expression is restricted to B lymphocytes from the pre-B cell stage to the plasmacytoid immunoblast stage only. A recent trial with an anti-CD20 mAb (rituximab) demonstrated that targeting B-cells reduces the number of gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 lesions and the relapse rate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Ofatumumab has been shown to be both well tolerated and efficacious in several indications, including a small, placebo-controlled trial in RRMS using an intravenous (IV) formulation. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study will investigate the safety and efficacy of a subcutaneous formulation of ofatumumab in the treatment of subjects with RRMS. The primary objective of the study is to investigate the efficacy as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Other objectives will include evaluation of tolerability/safety, dose-response relationship, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, exposure-response, as well as other clinical endpoints.

Detailed description

Ofatumumab is a novel immunoglobulin G (IgG) 1ĸ lytic monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically binds to the human CD20 antigen of which expression is restricted to B lymphocytes from the pre-B cell stage to the plasmacytoid immunoblast stage only. A recent trial with rituximab demonstrated that targeting B-cells reduces the number of gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 lesions and the relapse rate in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). The intravenous (IV) formulation of ofatumumab has been shown to be both well-tolerated and efficacious in Phase I/II & III clinical trials within in B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL), non-Hodgkin's Follicular Lymphoma (FL), and active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). A Phase II study of ofatumumab in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) subjects, OMS115102 (also known as Study GEN414) is ongoing as of the development of this protocol. The primary objective of the OMS115102 protocol was to investigate the safety of a range of doses (100mg, 300 mg, and 700 mg) of ofatumumab in RRMS subjects, using an IV formulation. The treatment period for OMS115102 has been completed; there are currently 4 subjects ongoing in the Individualized Follow up Phase. In the Week 0 to 24 period the majority of subject who were exposed to active treatment with ofatumumab (active/placebo) had Cluster of Differentiation 19 (CD19+) and CD20+ levels that were suppressed to zero; recovery started for the 100 mg and 300 mg active/placebo groups, at approximately, 12 and 20 weeks after discontinuation of dosing with ofatumumab, respectively. In the 700 mg active/placebo group, all but one subject had a persistent and complete CD19+ suppression at Week 24. In the Week 24 to 48 period, when those who had previously been exposed to placebo were treated with ofatumumab (placebo/active), the majority of the subjects treated with ofatumumab had CD19+ and CD20+ cell levels suppressed to zero (mm3) within one week. Recovery started for the subjects in the 100 mg placebo/active group after approximately 16 weeks (from these subjects' first infusion). In the 300 mg and 700 mg placebo/active groups, all subjects except one (700 mg) had persistent and complete CD19+ suppression at Week 48. This study will evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) efficacy and will investigate the safety of ofatumumab using a subcutaneous (SQ) formulation in subjects with RRMS. This Phase II study will be a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose ranging study in subjects with RRMS. Randomization will be stratified based on the absence or presence of GdE brain lesions present at screening. The core 54 week period of the study is made up of an up to 6-week Screening Phase, a 24-week Treatment Phase, and a 24-week Follow-up Phase. Subjects will attend the clinic a total of approximately twelve times (including Screening) during this core 54-week period of the study. Subjects who have remained enrolled and participate in the study from Screening though the end of the 24-Week Follow-Up Period (Week 48 Visit) will be considered completers. Upon completion or withdrawal from the core study period, subjects will be followed in the Individualized Follow-up Phase. Subjects will return to the clinic every 12 weeks for a B-cell count and other safety assessments. Subjects will remain in Individualized Follow-up (IFU) until CD19+ B-lymphocyte counts recover to LLN or baseline (if \<LLN);OR if B-cell counts have not recovered by the Week 120 visit (100 weeks after the last possible treatment dose at Week 20), until either the B-cell counts or circulating IgG are \>LLN or baseline levels (if \<LLN). Male and female subjects with a diagnosis of RRMS will be screened for eligibility for the study. All non-MRI screening procedures should generally be completed within 14 days of informed consent being given. To the extent possible, investigators are to verify subjects meet all non MRI-related entry criteria before performing screening MRIs. Subjects who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be centrally randomized into the study at the Baseline Visit (Week 0) to receive one of the following treatment arms: SQ administration of ofatumumab 3 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg every 12 weeks, 60 mg every 4 weeks, or placebo. Half of the subjects randomized to the 30 mg group, or to either of the 60 mg groups, will receive a 3 mg conditioning dose at Week 0. Based on tolerability observed in other indications, the 3 mg conditioning dose may produce a more gradual lysis of B-cells, thereby reducing the cytokine release reactions to the initial 30 mg or 60 mg dose and potentially improve tolerability for subjects. The Treatment Phase lasts for 24 weeks and the subject will be seen 8 times during this phase. Upon completion or discontinuation of the Treatment Phase, subjects will enter a 24-week Follow-up Phase, during which they will not receive investigational product. Ideally, no other MS disease-modifying therapies should be taken during this period in order to allow for a clean analysis of safety data and the potential for Cluster of Differentiation (CD)+19 B-lymphocyte cell and immunoglobulin normalization to be assessed. However, if the start of a MS disease-modifying therapy is considered medically necessary, follow up will continue through the completion of the 24-Week Follow-up Phase. The subject will then be withdrawn from the study, and will not enter into the Individualized Follow-up Phase. Upon completion of the 24-Week Follow-up Phase, all subjects who have not started an MS disease modifying therapy (DMT) will enter the Individualized Follow up. During this Phase, subjects will return to the clinic every 12 weeks for a B-cell count and other safety assessments. If a subject starts a MS DMT during this follow-up phase they will be withdrawn from the study. To the extent possible, subjects experiencing a relapse during the study should return immediately to the clinic for evaluation. All MRI scans will be sent to a central reader for analysis. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) will evaluate risks relative to benefits through review of safety and efficacy information on an ongoing basis during the study. Approximately 245 subjects will be screened to provide around 196 subjects for randomization into the study. Assuming an attrition rate of 10% between the baseline visit and the six-month treatment visit, this will provide approximately 176 evaluable subjects.

Interventions

DRUGOfatumumab 3mg

3mg of investigational product

DRUGOfatumumab 30mg

30mg of investigational product

DRUGOfatumumab 60mg

60mg of investigational product

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Able to provide signed, written informed consent to participate in the study * 18-55 years of age. * Definite diagnosis of MS according to the 2010 revisions of the McDonald diagnostic criteria for MS \[Polman, 2011\]. * Subjects do not have any manifestation of another type of MS other than RRMS. * Subjects must have a relapsing-remitting course of disease with at least one of the following prior to screening: * At least one confirmed relapse within the previous year or * At least two confirmed relapses within the previous 2 years or * At least one relapse in the previous 2 years, with a GdE brain lesion on an MRI scan in the past year. * Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 (inclusive) at screening. * Neurologically stable with no evidence of relapse for at least 30 days prior to start of Screening and during the Screening Phase (subjects who relapse during the screening Phase can be re-screened, once the relapse has resolved). * A female subject is eligible to enter the study if she is: * Of non-childbearing potential * Of childbearing potential and NOT pregnant or nursing, has a negative serum pregnancy test at screening, and agrees to one of the following: * Complete abstinence from intercourse for the period from consent into the study until 6 months after the last dose of investigational product; or, * Consistent and correct use of one of the following acceptable methods of birth control for the period from consent into the study until 6 months after the last dose of investigational product: Oral contraceptives (either combined or progesterone only) Injectable progesterone Levonorgestrel implants Estrogenic vaginal ring Percutaneous contraceptive patches Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) with a documented failure rate of \<1% per year Male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study; this male must be the sole partner for the subject Double barrier method: condom and an occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with a vaginal spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository). A female is considered Non-childbearing potential if she is status-post hysterectomy, status-post surgical removal of both ovaries, has current, documented tubal ligation, or is postmenopausal and \>2 years without menses. Female subjects who are post-menopausal \<2 years must be confirmed menopausal by Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and estradiol levels. A female is considered childbearing potential if she has functional ovaries, ducts, and uterus with no impairment that would cause sterility. This includes women with oligomenorrhea (even severe), and women who are perimenopausal or who have just begun to menstruate. * French subjects: In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to, or a beneficiary of, a social security category.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to undergo MRI scans (e.g. due to pacemaker, severe claustrophobia, hypersensitivity to contrast media, or who lack adequate peripheral venous access). * Any clinically significant brain abnormality other than MS found on MRI. * Neurological findings consistent with Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) or confirmed PML (see Appendix 4, Section 11.4, for PML monitoring algorithm). * Subjects whom experience a relapse during the Screening Phase. These subjects may be eligible for re-screening after consultation with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). * History of clinically significant Central Nervous System (CNS) trauma (e.g. traumatic brain injury, cerebral contusion, spinal cord compression) or a history or presence of myelopathy due to spinal cord compression by disk or vertebral disease. * Prior treatment with any of the following: * Systemic glucocorticoids or Adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) within one month prior to screening * Receipt of a live vaccine within 6 weeks prior to screening * Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) or Interferon (IFN)-β (Betaferon, Betaseron, Avonex, or Rebif) within 3 months prior to screening * Any immunomodulatory therapies, excluding glatiramer acetate or IFN-β, within 6 months prior to screening including natalizumab and fingolimod (Gilenya), immunoglobulin, or plasma exchange/plasmapheresis * Any monoclonal antibodies at any time, other than natalizumab (Tysabri) * Any lymphocyte-depleting therapies, including, but not limited to: cladribine, anti-Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4), total body irradiation, or bone marrow transplantation * Any immunosuppressive agents, including, but not limited to: mitoxantrone, azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, or tacrolimus * Past or current history of medically significant adverse effects (including allergic reactions) from: * Cetirizine (or equivalent) * Paracetamol/acetaminophen * Corticosteroids * Known hypersensitivity to components of the investigational product. * Past or current malignancy, except for * Cervical carcinoma Stage 1B (cancer is present but has not spread) or less * Non-invasive basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma * Cancer diagnoses with a duration of complete response (remission) \>5 years * A history of hematologic malignancy excludes a subject from participation, regardless of response. * Electrocardiogram (ECG) showing a clinically significant abnormality at Screening or showing an average QT interval for heart rate corrected using Bazett's Formula (QTcB) or QT interval for heart rate corrected using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) interval \>/=450 msec (\>/=480 msec for subjects with a Bundle Branch Block) over 3 consecutive ECGs. * Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition including, but not limited to, cardiac, renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunodeficiency syndrome, pulmonary, cerebral, psychiatric, or neurological disease which in the opinion of the investigator could affect the subject's safety, impair the subject's reliable participation in the trial, impair the evaluation of endpoints, or necessitate the use of medication not allowed by this protocol. * History of severe, clinically significant CNS trauma (e.g. cerebral contusion, spinal cord compression) or a history or presence of myelopathy due to spinal cord compression by disk or vertebral disease. * Chronic or ongoing active infectious disease requiring long term systemic treatment such as, but not limited to, chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis, tuberculosis, or active hepatitis C. * Previous serious opportunistic or atypical infections. * Positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening for John Cunningham (JC) Virus as measured by plasma John Cunningham Virus (JCV) DNA. * Positive serology for Hepatitis B (HB) defined as a positive test for HBsAg. In addition, if negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive (regardless of HBsAb status), a HB DNA test will be performed and if positive the subject will be excluded. * Prior history, or suspicion, of tuberculosis (TB) * Known history of positive serology for HIV. * Any of the following screening laboratory values: * White blood cells (WBC) \<3.8 GI/L. * Neutrophils \<2 x 109/L. * Platelets \<1.3 x 105 GI/L. * Circulating IgG, Immunoglobulin M (IgM), or Immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels \< lower limit of normal (according to central laboratory range) * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2.0 times the upper limit of normal * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>2.0 times the upper limit of normal * Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \>1.5 times the upper limit of normal * Bilirubin \>1.5 times the upper limit of normal * CD4 count \<500 cells/mm3. * CD19+ B-lymphocyte counts \< lower limit of normal (according to central laboratory range) * Creatinine clearance \<60 mL/minute (by Cockcroft and Gault). * Subjects known or suspected of not being able to comply with a trial protocol (e.g. due to alcoholism, drug dependency or psychological disorder). * A documented history of attempted suicide over the 6 months prior to the screening visit, presents with suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the C-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (SSRS) at the Screening visit, OR if in the investigator's judgment, the subject is at risk for a suicide attempt. * Use of an investigational drug or other experimental therapy for a condition other than MS within 4 weeks, 5 pharmacokinetic half lives or duration of biological effect (whichever is longer) prior to screening. Any prior use of an investigational drug or other experimental therapy for MS at any time should be discussed with the GSK Medical Monitor. * Current participation in any other interventional clinical trial. Participation in a non-interventional trial requires approval of the protocol by the GSK Medical Monitor * French subjects: the French subject has participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Number of New Gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 Lesions at Week 12Week 12The cumulative number of new GdE T1 lesion at Week 12 were analyzed from screening based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The outcome measure was analyzed using an Emax model adjusting for the presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI and assuming the number of new lesions followed a negative binomial distribution. Dose was fitted as a continuous variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative number of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative number of new GdE lesions per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The all evaluable scans (AES) dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each participant analysed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 and Week 48Brain volume is a measure of brain size determined by a MRI scan. Baseline is defined as the par. last available assessment prior to initiation of the IP (i.e. Screening). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-Baseline value.
Cumulative Number of Persistent GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12Week 12The cumulative number of persistent GdE T1 lesions at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI scans at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.
Cumulative Number of All (New Plus Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12Week 12The cumulative number of all (new plus persistent) GdE T1 lesion at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. Anticipating an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative number of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative number of all (new plus persistent) GdE T1 lesions per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.
Total Volume of New GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12Week 12Lesion volume is a measure of lesion size determined by a MRI brain scan. The cumulative volume of new GdE T1 lesions at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. Anticipating an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative volume of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative volume of new GdE T1 lesions per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.
Cumulative Number of New GdE T1 Lesions at Week 24Week 24The cumulative number of new GdE T1 lesion at Week 24 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Anticipating an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative number of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative number of new GdE T1 lesions per scan at Week 24 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each participant analyzed.
Cumulative Number of New and Newly Enlarging GdE T2 Lesions at Week 12Week 12The cumulative number of new and newly enlarging GdE T2 lesions (NET2L) at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. The endpoint was analyzed using a generalized linear model assuming an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative number of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative number of NET2L per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.
Total Volume of New and/or Newly Enlarging T2 Lesions at Week 12Week 12Lesion volume is a measure of lesion size determined by a MRI brain scan. T2 lesions, are indicative of brain myelin content.The cumulative volume of new and/or newly enlarging T2 lesions at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par.
Cumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24 and Week 48The cumulative number of new T1 hypointense lesions at week 24 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par.
Cumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Lesion volume is a measure of lesion size determined by a MRI brain scan. Baseline is defined as the participant's last available assessment prior to initiation of IP. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-Baseline value. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par.
Total Volume of All (New and Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12Week 12Lesion volume is a measure of lesion size determined by a MRI brain scan. The cumulative volume of all (new and persistent) GdE T1 lesions at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. The endpoint was analyzed using a generalized linear model assuming an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative volume of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative volume of all (new and persistent) GdE T1 lesions per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.

Countries

Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A participant (par.) completed the study if he/she completed all assessments up to and including the 24 Week Follow-up Phase (FUP) (Week 48) without prematurely discontinuing.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 324 par. with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) were screened and 232 par. were randomized to 24 Week Treatment Phase (Weeks 0-12 were placebo controlled) of the study. A total of 231 par. received at least one dose of double-blind Investigational Product (IP) and were included in the Safety Population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mg
Par. received ofatumumab matching placebo SC injection q4w from Week 0 to Week 20, except on Week 12 participants received 3 mg ofatumumab SC injection. Participants also received pre-medication of acetaminophen 1 g and antihistamine (cetirizine or equivalent) 10 mg prior to administration of each SC injection of investigational product.
67
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12w
Par. received ofatumumab 3 mg SC injection q12w on Week 1 and Week 12. Participants received matching placebo on Weeks 0, 4, 8, 16 and 20. Participants also received pre-medication of acetaminophen 1 g and antihistamine (cetirizine or equivalent) 10 mg prior to administration of each SC injection of investigational product.
34
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12w
Par. received ofatumumab 3 mg conditioning dose SC injection or matching placebo on Week 0 and received ofatumumab 30 mg SC injection q12w on Week 1 and Week 12. Participants received matching placebo on Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 20. Participants also received pre-medication of acetaminophen 1 g and antihistamine (cetirizine or equivalent) 10 mg prior to administration of each SC injection of investigational product.
32
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12w
Par. received ofatumumab 3 mg conditioning dose SC injection or matching placebo on Week 0 and received ofatumumab 60 mg SC injection q12w on Week 1 and Week 12. Participants received matching placebo on Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 20. Participants also received pre-medication of acetaminophen 1 g and antihistamine (cetirizine or equivalent) 10 mg prior to administration of each SC injection of investigational product.
34
Ofatumumab 60mg q4w
Par. received ofatumumab 3 mg conditioning dose SC injection or matching placebo on Week 0 and received ofatumumab 60 mg SC injection q4w from Week 1 to Week 20. Participants also received pre-medication of acetaminophen 1 g and antihistamine (cetirizine or equivalent) 10 mg prior to administration of each SC injection of investigational product.
64
Total231

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
FUP (Weeks 24-48)Adverse Event00100
FUP (Weeks 24-48)Lost to Follow-up00010
FUP (Weeks 24-48)Physician Decision10100
FUP (Weeks 24-48)Withdrawal by Subject21002
Individualized FUP (Weeks 48+)Lost to Follow-up10100
Individualized FUP (Weeks 48+)Other-Protocol defined stopping criteria34235
Individualized FUP (Weeks 48+)Withdrawal by Subject10121
Treatment Phase (Weeks 0-24)Adverse Event04102
Treatment Phase (Weeks 0-24)Lack of Efficacy10000
Treatment Phase (Weeks 0-24)Other-Protocol defined stopping criteria11002
Treatment Phase (Weeks 0-24)Physician Decision00001
Treatment Phase (Weeks 0-24)Protocol Violation10100
Treatment Phase (Weeks 0-24)Withdrawal by Subject00011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgOfatumumab 3 mg q12wOfatumumab 30 mg q12wOfatumumab 60 mg q12wOfatumumab 60mg q4wTotal
Age, Continuous37.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.38
38.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.29
37.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.04
37.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.67
36.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57
37.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.36
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
65 Participants34 Participants31 Participants34 Participants61 Participants225 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants22 Participants24 Participants22 Participants41 Participants155 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants12 Participants8 Participants12 Participants23 Participants76 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 670 / 340 / 320 / 340 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
41 / 6720 / 3423 / 3222 / 3447 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 671 / 340 / 321 / 344 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Number of New Gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 Lesions at Week 12

The cumulative number of new GdE T1 lesion at Week 12 were analyzed from screening based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The outcome measure was analyzed using an Emax model adjusting for the presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI and assuming the number of new lesions followed a negative binomial distribution. Dose was fitted as a continuous variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative number of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative number of new GdE lesions per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The all evaluable scans (AES) dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each participant analysed.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population comprised of all randomized par. who received at least one dose of IP and who had at least one post screen MRI assessment. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed. Please see footnote of statistical analysis 1 for discrepancy in analysis population Week 24 and 48.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Number of New Gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 Lesions at Week 124.2 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 7.57
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Number of New Gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 Lesions at Week 121.7 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.29
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Number of New Gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 Lesions at Week 122.2 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.41
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Number of New Gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 Lesions at Week 122.2 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.7
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Number of New Gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) T1 Lesions at Week 121.2 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 2.83
Comparison: Note: There is a discrepancy in the number of par. in ITT populations at Wk 24 and Wk 48: 228 and 229 respectively. This resulted from a data issue: one par was incorrectly excluded from ITT pop. at Wk 24, but correctly included in Wk 48. This error affects all source tables, analyses relating to ITT and per protocol populations, primary endpoint and secondary MRI endpoints reported at Wk 24. This discrepancy affects all statistical analyses, but not summary statistics.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.221, 0.548]Non-Linear Emax Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.221, 0.548]Non-Linear Emax Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.221, 0.548]Non-Linear Emax Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.221, 0.548]Non-Linear Emax Model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48

Brain volume is a measure of brain size determined by a MRI scan. Baseline is defined as the par. last available assessment prior to initiation of the IP (i.e. Screening). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 and Week 48

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-22.0 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 38.22
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-13.5 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 26.96
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-12.9 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 14.55
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-7.2 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 22.26
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-5.0 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 28.84
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-8.4 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 26.62
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-13.3 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 34.02
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-7.3 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 29.16
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-11.8 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 55.3
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wChange From Baseline in Brain Volume at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.4 Cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 56.42
Secondary

Cumulative Number of All (New Plus Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12

The cumulative number of all (new plus persistent) GdE T1 lesion at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. Anticipating an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative number of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative number of all (new plus persistent) GdE T1 lesions per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Number of All (New Plus Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 127.4 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 13.9
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Number of All (New Plus Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 122.9 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 4.62
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Number of All (New Plus Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 124.5 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 7.09
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Number of All (New Plus Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 124.0 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 6.7
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Number of All (New Plus Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 123.1 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 6.82
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.16, 0.6]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.07595% CI: [0.29, 1.06]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.03595% CI: [0.27, 0.95]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.19, 0.55]Generalized Linear Model
Secondary

Cumulative Number of New and Newly Enlarging GdE T2 Lesions at Week 12

The cumulative number of new and newly enlarging GdE T2 lesions (NET2L) at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. The endpoint was analyzed using a generalized linear model assuming an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative number of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative number of NET2L per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Number of New and Newly Enlarging GdE T2 Lesions at Week 123.7 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 6.72
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Number of New and Newly Enlarging GdE T2 Lesions at Week 121.2 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 2.38
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Number of New and Newly Enlarging GdE T2 Lesions at Week 121.6 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 2.79
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Number of New and Newly Enlarging GdE T2 Lesions at Week 121.7 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 2.67
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Number of New and Newly Enlarging GdE T2 Lesions at Week 120.8 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 1.55
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.15, 0.58]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.17, 0.68]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.00695% CI: [0.21, 0.77]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.11, 0.35]Generalized Linear Model
Secondary

Cumulative Number of New GdE T1 Lesions at Week 24

The cumulative number of new GdE T1 lesion at Week 24 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Anticipating an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative number of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative number of new GdE T1 lesions per scan at Week 24 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each participant analyzed.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Number of New GdE T1 Lesions at Week 245.6 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 9.34
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Number of New GdE T1 Lesions at Week 242.2 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.8
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Number of New GdE T1 Lesions at Week 242.5 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.88
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Number of New GdE T1 Lesions at Week 242.2 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.83
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Number of New GdE T1 Lesions at Week 241.4 Cumulative number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.04
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.2, 0.72]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.2, 0.72]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.19, 0.65]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.13, 0.39]Generalized Linear Model
Secondary

Cumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48

The cumulative number of new T1 hypointense lesions at week 24 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par.

Time frame: Week 24 and Week 48

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.4 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 0.96
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480.6 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 1.27
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.4 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 1.26
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480.5 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 1.26
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.5 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 1.01
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480.5 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 0.98
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480.6 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 1.25
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.5 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 1.12
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.3 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 0.78
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480.3 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 0.96
Secondary

Cumulative Number of Persistent GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12

The cumulative number of persistent GdE T1 lesions at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI scans at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Number of Persistent GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 123.2 Number of lesions per scanStandard Deviation 7.41
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Number of Persistent GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 121.2 Number of lesions per scanStandard Deviation 1.94
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Number of Persistent GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 122.3 Number of lesions per scanStandard Deviation 3.94
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Number of Persistent GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 121.8 Number of lesions per scanStandard Deviation 3.31
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Number of Persistent GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 121.8 Number of lesions per scanStandard Deviation 4.81
Secondary

Cumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48

Lesion volume is a measure of lesion size determined by a MRI brain scan. Baseline is defined as the participant's last available assessment prior to initiation of IP. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-Baseline value. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2486.9 mm^3Standard Deviation 240.4
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48113.6 mm^3Standard Deviation 270.89
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2443.1 mm^3Standard Deviation 131.96
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4854.2 mm^3Standard Deviation 137.74
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2467.4 mm^3Standard Deviation 147
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4863.2 mm^3Standard Deviation 143.14
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48116.3 mm^3Standard Deviation 370.35
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2465.0 mm^3Standard Deviation 139.14
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2442.9 mm^3Standard Deviation 140.93
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wCumulative Volume of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4853.2 mm^3Standard Deviation 173.62
Secondary

Total Volume of All (New and Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12

Lesion volume is a measure of lesion size determined by a MRI brain scan. The cumulative volume of all (new and persistent) GdE T1 lesions at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. The endpoint was analyzed using a generalized linear model assuming an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative volume of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative volume of all (new and persistent) GdE T1 lesions per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgTotal Volume of All (New and Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 121039.6 mm^3Standard Deviation 1809.97
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wTotal Volume of All (New and Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12386.2 mm^3Standard Deviation 628.41
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wTotal Volume of All (New and Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12886.2 mm^3Standard Deviation 1637.47
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wTotal Volume of All (New and Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12426.5 mm^3Standard Deviation 679.44
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wTotal Volume of All (New and Persistent) GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12344.4 mm^3Standard Deviation 735.57
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [0.05, 0.58]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.24895% CI: [0.15, 1.63]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.18195% CI: [0.15, 1.43]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.1, 0.62]Generalized Linear Model
Secondary

Total Volume of New and/or Newly Enlarging T2 Lesions at Week 12

Lesion volume is a measure of lesion size determined by a MRI brain scan. T2 lesions, are indicative of brain myelin content.The cumulative volume of new and/or newly enlarging T2 lesions at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgTotal Volume of New and/or Newly Enlarging T2 Lesions at Week 121204.5 mm^3Standard Deviation 3426.79
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wTotal Volume of New and/or Newly Enlarging T2 Lesions at Week 12279.9 mm^3Standard Deviation 695.75
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wTotal Volume of New and/or Newly Enlarging T2 Lesions at Week 12611.3 mm^3Standard Deviation 1042.06
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wTotal Volume of New and/or Newly Enlarging T2 Lesions at Week 12293.8 mm^3Standard Deviation 576.35
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wTotal Volume of New and/or Newly Enlarging T2 Lesions at Week 12167.9 mm^3Standard Deviation 450.65
Secondary

Total Volume of New GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12

Lesion volume is a measure of lesion size determined by a MRI brain scan. The cumulative volume of new GdE T1 lesions at Week 12 were analyzed from screen based on MRI brain scans at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. Anticipating an underlying negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, adjusted for treatment and presence/absence of GdE lesions on the Screening MRI. Treatment group was fitted as a categorical variable. The number of scans contributing to the cumulative volume of lesions was fitted as an offset. Estimates of the rate of cumulative volume of new GdE T1 lesions per scan at Week 12 were determined from the model. The AES dataset was used which included all evaluable on-treatment MRI scans for each par. analyzed.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Ofatumumab 3 mgTotal Volume of New GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12607.5 Cubic millimeter (mm^3)Standard Deviation 1090.89
Ofatumumab 3 mg q12wTotal Volume of New GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12226.5 Cubic millimeter (mm^3)Standard Deviation 449.37
Ofatumumab 30 mg q12wTotal Volume of New GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12452.9 Cubic millimeter (mm^3)Standard Deviation 682.33
Ofatumumab 60 mg q12wTotal Volume of New GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12248.6 Cubic millimeter (mm^3)Standard Deviation 457.62
Ofatumumab 60mg q4wTotal Volume of New GdE Brain Lesions on T1-weighted MRI at Week 12146.6 Cubic millimeter (mm^3)Standard Deviation 304.89
p-value: 0.02695% CI: [0.06, 0.84]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.29695% CI: [0.13, 1.86]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.28595% CI: [0.14, 1.78]Generalized Linear Model
p-value: 0.00995% CI: [0.09, 0.71]Non-Linear Emax Model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026