Skip to content

Study of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment by RiBVD

First Line Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Treatment by RiBVD Schema in Patients Older Than 65 Years or 18 to 65 Years Old Who Cannot or Refuse Receive Conditioning Regimen Followed by Autograft

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01457144
Acronym
RIBVD
Enrollment
76
Registered
2011-10-21
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

Mantle cell lymphoma, Rituximab, bendamustine, Velcade, Dexamethasone

Brief summary

Study of First line mantle cell lymphoma treatment by Rituximab, Velcade, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone schema in patients older than 65 years or 18 to 65 years old who cannot or refuse receive conditioning regimen followed by autograft.

Detailed description

Demonstration of Improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) compared to literature data. 6 months prolongation equal 24 months compared to 18 months obtained whatever the current regimen and in particular compared to RCHOP regimen

Interventions

DRUGRiBVD

Every cycle: Rituximab intravenous infusion dosage 375 mg/m² day 1 Bendamustine direct intervenous 90 mg/m² day 1 and day 2 Velcade®subcutaneous 1,3 mg/m² day 1,4, 8 and 11 dexamethasone 40 mg IVD on day 2

Sponsors

Lymphoma Study Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Janssen-Cilag Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mundipharma Pte Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Roche Pharma AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Chugai Pharma Europe Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
French Innovative Leukemia Organisation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* mantle cell Lymphoma CD20 positive * Untreated patients * 65 ans years old patients or 18 to 65 years old patients who can't or refuse receive conditioning regimen followed by autograft. * Stages Ann Arbor II, III or IV, * ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2 * Without history of neoplasm, except in situ cervix carcinoma and cutaneous basal cell epithelioma, or in complete remission since 3 years, * Without drug contraindication used in the schema (Rituximab, benda-mustine, Velcade, Dexamethasone), * Without heart insufficiency or stabilized, * With the following biological values limits except if pathological values are due to Medullary invading or hypersplenism, hepatic involvement) :PNN more than 1 G/L, Platelets more than 50 G/L,Transaminases (SGOT and SGPT) and alkalin phosphatases alcalines less than 4 x normal,Bilirubin less than 3 x N,- Clearance creatinemia more than 20 mL/min * Hepatitis B negative serology unless the seropositivity is clearly linked to a vaccination. * Can be regularly followed * Who signed the informed consent, * Affiliated to a national insurance or such a same scheme .

Exclusion criteria

* Other type of lymphoma than mantle cell lymphoma according to OMS 2008 classification * Patients in relapse, except those in relapse due to localized stade who only received locoregional irradiation or splenectomized, * Central nervous system localization in particular meninge, * Drug used in the schema contraindication Rituximab , Bendamustine , Velcade® or Dexamethasone * Non stable diabetes, * HIV positive or active hepatitis C or B * ECOG performance status equal or more than 3 * Peripheral neuropathy, whatever its origin, rated more than 2 from NCI * Non stabilized heart insufficiency, * Patient who can't receive hyperhydration in order to treat tumoral lysis syndrome or in prophylaxis, * Patient who can't, whatever the reason, be regularly followed, * Major patient who are on legal protection, or can't give their consent * Patient who has not signed the informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of progression-free survival (PFS)18 monthsImprovement of progression-free survival (PFS) compared to litterature data 6 months prolongation 24 months compared to 18 months obtained whatever the current regimen and in particular compared to RCHOP regimen in reference with Lenz JCO 2005

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual disease evaluated by molecular biology6 yearsResidual disease evaluated by molecular biology on blood and bone marrow, by Hybridation Fluorescente In Situ and Flow cytometry on blood cells
Intermediate response predictive factors study4 monthsPredictive factors are determined at diagnosis are watched at Intermediate response
Toxicity of RiBVD regimen according to NCI criteria Hematological and non-hematological toxicity6 monthsToxicities are collected at every course = every 28 days during 6 months
Overall and complete response rate after 4 cures and 6 cures6 monthsOverall and complete response rate after 4 cures equal intermediate response and after 6 cures equal final response according to Cheson 1999 criteria without Positron Emission Tomography and 2007 with Positron Emission Tomography
Residual disease evaluated by molecular biology Q-PCR on blood and bone marrow, by Hybridation Fluorescente In Situ and Flow cytometry on blood cells42 monthsblood and bone marrow samples sent to central laboratory for molecular residual disease at diagnosis, treatment evaluation and follow-up
Diagnostic PET scan results, at intermediate and final analysis4 and 6 monthsPet scan results at intermediate analysis = 4 months Pet scan results at final analysis = 6 months
Prognosis value on Overall survival and progression free survival and on duration of response, of the MIPI index, MIPIb index and goelams index36 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026