Skip to content

Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve in Heart Failure Patients After Ultrafiltration Versus Diuretics

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study for Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve With Cardiac PET Imaging in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Patients Treated With Diuretics Versus Ultrafiltration

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01457053
Enrollment
4
Registered
2011-10-21
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2016-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Keywords

Acute decompensated heart failure, Myocardial blood flow, Coronary flow reserve, Ultrafiltration, Diuretics

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare the effects (good and bad) of ultrafiltration treatment with standard intravenous (in your vein) diuretic therapy (furosemide, torsemide, bumetanide) on your heart function and blood flow.

Detailed description

The standard of care to treat congestive heart failure is with a class of medication called diuretics, which remove the extra fluid from the body through urination. Another way to remove extra fluid in patients with heart failure is called ultrafiltration. Ultrafiltration may result in more rapid removal of excess fluid and more rapid improvement in your symptoms compared to standard diuretic treatment. Currently, it is unknown what effects these therapies (diuretics or ultrafiltration) have on the small blood vessels in your heart. These small blood vessels are important to supply blood and oxygen to your failing heart. Thus, the purpose of this research study is to compare the effects (good and bad) of ultrafiltration treatment with standard intravenous (in your vein) diuretic therapy on your heart function and blood flow.

Interventions

DRUGLoop diuretics (furosemide, torsemide, bumetanide)

Patients with ADHF and hypervolemia will be enrolled in a prospective, randomized fashion. Subjects will be randomized with a computer generated random number function to either ultrafiltration or diuretic therapy within 24 hours of hospitalization for the management of fluid overload. Patients randomized to diuretic therapy will be treated with intravenous loop diuretics (e.g. furosemide, bumetanide, torsemide). The selection of diuretic, dose and frequency of diuretic administration will be determined by the treating physicians based upon clinical assessment of volume status, response to medication, and perceived safety.

Subjects will be randomized with a computer generated random number function to either ultrafiltration or diuretic therapy within 24 hours of hospitalization or outpatient heart failure clinic for the management of fluid overload. If randomized to the ultrafiltration arm, on admission to the hospital patients will be initiated on ultrafiltration therapy for 2-5 days. Patients randomized to UF will be treated using the Aquadex System 100 ultrafiltration device (CHF Solutions, Minneapolis, MN). The selection of ultrafiltration rate (fluid removal rate)will be determined by the treating physicians based upon clinical assessment of volume status and perceived safety.

Sponsors

University of Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* males and non-pregnant female patients over 18 years admitted to the hospital or treated in an outpatient heart failure clinic with the primary diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure. * evidence of fluid overload more than 8 kg above their dry weight, and conforming to definition of hypervolemia (at least two of the following findings: more than 1+ pitting edema of the lower extremities, jugular venous pressure more than 10 cm water, pulmonary edema or pleural effusion on chest radiograph consistent with ADHF, ascites, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, or equal or more than 2 pillow orthopnea.

Exclusion criteria

* acute coronary syndrome * documented ischemic cardiomyopathy * atrial fibrillation * serum creatinine more than 3.0 mg/dL * systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg * hematocrit \> 45% * clinical instability likely to require intravenous vasopressors and/or intravenous vasoactive drugs (such as milrinone, dobutamine, nitroglycerin or nesiritide) during the present hospitalization * severe pulmonary hypertension or use of pulmonary hypertension drugs (such as sildenafil, bosentan or other endothelin inhibitors) * patients with documented hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy or restrictive cardiomyopathy, * patients with severe valvular heart disease, * patients with recent cocaine use (within one month of presentation) * patients with heart transplant * patients with systemic infection * patients on hemodialysis * inability to obtain venous access * contraindications for anticoagulation * unable to lie flat for at least 20 minutes * pregnant and breast-feeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial Blood Flow1 - 5 daysEvaluate the effects of ultrafiltration (UF) compared to intravenous diuretic therapy on myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR), as assessed by positron emission tomography (PET), in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with acute decompensated heart failure

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
2 subjects completed the study. 2 subjects did not complete either arm and did not have usable data.
4
Total4

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyUnable to undergo selected treatment11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
Gender
Female
1 Participants
Gender
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Myocardial Blood Flow

Evaluate the effects of ultrafiltration (UF) compared to intravenous diuretic therapy on myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR), as assessed by positron emission tomography (PET), in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

Time frame: 1 - 5 days

Population: No data analyzed due to inadequate enrollment.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026