Skip to content

Efficacy of Zylet vs. Lotemax for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Inflammation/MGD/Blepharitis

Relative Efficacy of Loteprednol (Lotemax®) vs. Loteprednol/Tobramycin (Zylet®) in Treatment of Chronic Ocular Surface Inflammation Associated With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD)/Posterior Blepharitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01456780
Acronym
ZvL
Enrollment
60
Registered
2011-10-21
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2017-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Posterior Blepharitis

Keywords

Meibomian gland dysfunction, Blepharitis, Dry Eye, Ocular Inflammation, MGD, Zylet, Lotemax, Artificial Tear

Brief summary

This is a Phase IV, single site, randomized, double masked, parallel control clinical trial of 60 subjects to investigate the variance of efficacy between Lotemax® and Zylet® for treatment of ocular surface inflammation due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Efficacy will be measured by in-vivo confocal microscopy, corneal fluorescein staining, grading of meibomian gland dysfunction and validated ocular symptom assessment questionnaire.

Detailed description

Posterior blepharitis is a common chronic eyelid condition that is described as generalized inflammation of the posterior lid margin and associated with inflammation of the ocular surface and with symptoms of burning, irritation, and discomfort. Posterior blepharitis is associated with various disorders of the meibomian glands, known collectively as meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). It is associated either with obstruction and inflammation of the meibomian glands or, less commonly, atrophy of the meibomian glands. Clinically, MGD often presents with inspissated meibomian glands, oily tear film, as well as inflammation and vascularization of the meibomian gland orifices. Papillary hypertrophy of the tarsal conjunctiva and corneal punctate epitheliopathy are often present, and there are prominent associations with dermatoses, such as acne rosacea, seborrhoeic dermatitis, and atopic dermatitis. Evidence from several sources suggests that MGD of sufficient extent and degree is associated with a deficient tear lipid layer, an increase in tear evaporation, and the occurrence of an evaporative dry eye. In fact MGD is considered to be the most common cause of evaporative dry eye. Individuals with MGD often complain of significant discomfort, including burning, itching, irritation, and photophobia. They may also have other associated symptoms of dry eye and may be plagued by blurred vision, gradual contact lens intolerance. Furthermore, these patients may become functionally handicapped by the negative impact of dry eye on their crucial daily activities such as working, reading, using computer, and driving. Despite the high incidence of posterior blepharitis, there is currently no consistently effective treatment for this condition and it still remains a therapeutic challenge. Posterior blepharitis has traditionally been managed with eyelid hygiene, topical antibiotics (erythromycin or bacitracin ointments), oral tetracyclines (tetracycline, doxycycline, or minocycline) and corticosteroids which are often time consuming, frustrating, and frequently ineffective or variably effective. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of topical loteprednol (corticosteroid) vs. the combination of loteprednol and tobramycin (corticosteroid and antibiotic) against an artificial tear. It is critical to determine to what extent the addition of an antibiotic to a topical steroid can enhance the therapeutic efficacy of the treatment.

Interventions

DRUGLoteprednol/tobramycin

Zylet (loteprednol/tobramycin) drops, 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks.

Eye drops, 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks

DRUGB+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop

Bausch + Lomb (B+L) Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop (Artificial Tears), 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female * At least 18 years of age * Has not worn contact lenses, except for bandage contact lens or rigid gas permeable lens, for at least 2 weeks prior to the study and agrees to not wear contact lenses during study * Patient is in generally good & stable overall health * Minimum corneal fluorescein staining of 4 in at least one eye * OSDI score \>22 * The patient must have a diagnosis of posterior blepharitis * A negative urine pregnancy test result for women of childbearing potential * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. * Normal lid position and closure * Ability to understand and provide informed consent to participate in this study * Willingness to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits

Exclusion criteria

* History of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or ocular pemphigoid * History of eyelid surgery * Intra-ocular surgery or ocular laser surgery within 3 months * History of microbial keratitis, including herpes * Active ocular allergies * Corneal epithelial defect \> 1mm2 * Any change in use of topical anti-inflammatories, such as steroids, Restasis, or NSAID within the past 2 weeks * Any change in dosage of tetracycline compounds (tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline) within the past two weeks * Use of isotretinoin (Accutane) within the past 6 months * Pregnant or lactating women * Signs of current infection, including fever and current treatment with antibiotics * Active liver, renal, or hematologic disease * The use of any other investigational drug * Individuals with a known history of glaucoma, individuals with IOP \>22 Hg in either eye and individuals with a known family history of glaucoma in primary (first degree) relatives (ie. mother, father, sibling or child)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ocular Surface Disease IndexWeek 4 Time PointOSDI is a 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate one symptom on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms.
Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency ScoreWeek 4 Time PointQuestionnaire given to patients to assess the frequency of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the frequency of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE frequency scale is 0-100, with 0 being the minimum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms.
Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity ScoreWeek 4 Time PointQuestionnaire given to patients to assess the severity of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the severity of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE severity scale is 0-100, with minimum level of severity of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of severity of dry eye symptoms.
Corneal Fluorescein Staining ScoreWeek 4 Time PointCorneal Fluorescein Staining is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The CFS scale ranges from 0 to 15 scale, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of corneal epitheliopathy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Zylet
Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with Zylet, twice a day, for 4 weeks. Zylet is a combination of loteprednol and tobramycin. Loteprednol is in a class of drugs called corticosteroids. Loteprednol inhibits processes in the body that cause inflammation. Tobramycin is an antibiotic. Loteprednol/tobramycin: Zylet (loteprednol/tobramycin) drops, 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks.
17
Lotemax
Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with Lotemax, twice a day, for 4 weeks. Lotemax is also known as loteprednol. Loteprednol is in a class of drugs called corticosteroids. Loteprednol inhibits processes in the body that cause inflammation. Loteprednol: Eye drops, 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks
17
Bausch & Lomb Lubricant Drops
Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with artificial tears, twice a day, for 4 weeks. Bausch + Lomb Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Eye Drops: Bausch + Lomb Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Eye Drops (Artificial Tears), 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks.
20
Total54

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up330

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsTotal
Age, Continuous55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS)6.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
6.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
6.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
6.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
Ocular Surface Disease Index59.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
52.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.6
57.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.3
56.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants9 Participants15 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants8 Participants5 Participants22 Participants
Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score77.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
60.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4
68.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8
68.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.3
Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score67.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
58.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
64.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.5
63.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 201 / 202 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score

Corneal Fluorescein Staining is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The CFS scale ranges from 0 to 15 scale, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of corneal epitheliopathy.

Time frame: Week 4 Time Point

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZyletCorneal Fluorescein Staining Score6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
LotemaxCorneal Fluorescein Staining Score5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Bausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsCorneal Fluorescein Staining Score4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Primary

Ocular Surface Disease Index

OSDI is a 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate one symptom on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms.

Time frame: Week 4 Time Point

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZyletOcular Surface Disease Index56.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
LotemaxOcular Surface Disease Index46.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
Bausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsOcular Surface Disease Index48.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Primary

Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score

Questionnaire given to patients to assess the frequency of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the frequency of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE frequency scale is 0-100, with 0 being the minimum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms.

Time frame: Week 4 Time Point

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZyletSymptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score65.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.9
LotemaxSymptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score51.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Bausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsSymptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score50.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.3
Primary

Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score

Questionnaire given to patients to assess the severity of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the severity of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE severity scale is 0-100, with minimum level of severity of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of severity of dry eye symptoms.

Time frame: Week 4 Time Point

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZyletSymptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score64.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
LotemaxSymptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score54.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Bausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsSymptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score51.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026