Skip to content

The Role of Endobronchial Needle Aspiration With Rapid On-site Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Central Malignant Lesions

Endobronchial Needle Aspiration With Rapid On-Site Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Central Malignant Lesions, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01456741
Enrollment
134
Registered
2011-10-21
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2014-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Keywords

endobronchial needle aspiration (EBNA), transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), lung cancer

Brief summary

Endobronchial lung cancer tend to manifest in three different patterns. It can present as a bulky, exophytic mass lesion, submucosal infiltration or extrinsic compression from peribronchial disease. Bronchoscopy with differents techniques as forceps biopsy, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing is recognized as the gold standard to diagnose central airways lung neoplasms. Some authors suggested that the addition of endobronchial needle aspiration (EBNA) to these conventional diagnostic methods may increase the sensitivity of bronchoscopy in submucosal and peribronchial disease but few prospective trials have been performed and this procedure is still underutilized in many centers. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) showed to improve yield of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal nodes and pulmonary peripheral lesions, reducing the number of inadequate specimens and costs. However, its utility during endobronchial needle aspiration has not been substantiated. This prospective study has two primary objectives: to compare the sensitivity of ROSE-EBNA with that of the conventional technique and to investigate the diagnostic yield of endobronchial needle aspiration and its contribution to CDM in the evaluation of patients with endobronchial lesions.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEBNA with ROSE

The patients in this arm will undergo: A) bronchoscopy, endobronchial needle aspiration (EBNA) with a cytologic needle (21 gauge), at least three forceps biopsies, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing in this procedural sequence with rapid on-site evaluation B) if A will be negative transthoracic needle aspiration or surgical biopsy will be performed C) if A and B will be negative follow-up with computed tomography or positron emission tomography and computed tomography

PROCEDUREstandard EBNA

The patients in this arm will undergo: A) bronchoscopy, endobronchial needle aspiration (EBNA) with a cytologic needle (21 gauge), at least three forceps biopsies, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing in this procedural sequence. B)if A will be negative transthoracic needle aspiration or surgical biopsy will be performed C) if A and B will be negative follow-up with computed tomography or positron emission tomography and computed tomography

Sponsors

University of Milan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* consecutive adult patients with a suspected central lung cancer at a chest CT scan who need a bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes

Exclusion criteria

* presence of uncontrolled coagulopathy, preexisting known malignancies, and the refusal to sign an informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the sensitivity of the technique of endobronchial needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation for the diagnosis of endobronchial lung cancer10 dayto determinate the sensitivity of endobronchial needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation compared to the conventional technique for the diagnosis of endobronchial lung cancer
the diagnostic yield of adding endobronchial needle aspiration (with and without rapid on-site evaluation) to conventional diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of endobronchial lung cancer10 daysto investigate the diagnostic yield of adding endobronchial needle aspiration (with and without rapid on-site evaluation) to conventional diagnostic methods versus conventional diagnostic methods (bronchoscopy with forceps biopsies, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing) for the diagnosis of endobronchial lung cancer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the impact of rapid on-site evaluation on number of passes during endobronchial needle aspiration30 minstudy if the presence of rapid on-site evaluation during endobronchial needle aspiration may reduce the number of passes suggested by literature

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026