Skip to content

A Multicenter Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE Based on Kidney-Dosimetry in Patients With Disseminated Neuroendocrine Tumors

A Multicenter Phase II-Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE Based on Kidney-Dosimetry in Patients With Disseminated Neuroendocrine Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01456078
Acronym
ILUMINET
Enrollment
60
Registered
2011-10-20
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2019-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Metastases, Neuroendocrine Tumors

Keywords

Neuroendocrine tumor, Liver metastases, 177Lu-DOTA-TATE, Safety, Kidney dosimetry, Dose escalation, Neuroendocrine tumors, with liver metastases.

Brief summary

By improved kidney dosimetry including biological effective dose and taking into account potential risk factors (especially for kidney toxicity), it might be possible to give an optimal and personalized treatment with 177Lu-DOTA-TATE to the patient with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Interventions

177Lu-DOTA-TATE given as intravenous infusion given during 3-5 treatments. Evaluation is performed after every single cycle. Further more, evaluation is made after last cycle, and delivered cumulative dose to kidneys should be 27 Gy. Patients with stable disease or partial response, and without pronounced toxicity will continue treatment to a step 2, where additional 3-5 treatment cycles are given, with a cumulative dose to kidneys to 40 Gy.

Sponsors

Lund University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Step 1: * ECOG 0-2 * Histologically verified neuroendocrine tumors with a Ki67 of at least 20 % or at least 20 mitoses/high power fields. If the tissue on which this determination is based is several years old, the investigator should consider the option of acquiring a new determination, especially if the behaviour of the tumor has changed since diagnosis * Metastatic disease where complete resection is not considered possible or feasible * Measurable disease * Radiological disease progression during the last 14 months * The largest metastases should have an uptake of 111In-octreotide that is greater than the uptake in the liver by planar scintigraphy. Metastases that are small, or located centrally, can be evaluated by SPECT to enable a correct estimation of the relative uptake. The majority of the tumor burden must demonstrate an increased uptake for lutetium-treatment to be considered * Stable dose of somatostatin analogue for the past 3 months * Estimated survival more than 6 months * ANC more than 1.5 x 10 9/L * Bilirubin less than 1.5 x upper limit of normal * GFR more than 50 ml/min. * Signed written informed concent Step 2: * Continues to fulfill all of the inclusion criteria, and none of the

Exclusion criteria

, from step 1 * A maintained GFR (less than 40 % decrease compared to baseline AND GFR more than 50 ml/min) * The treatment in step 1 have been administered with a maximal interval of 12 weeks * Age under 70 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Objective tumor response after a cumulative kidney biologically effective dose (BED) of 27 +/- 2 Gy3 months after completed step 1

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Objective tumor response after receiving a cumulative BED to the kidneys of 40 +/- 2 Gy as per RECIST v 1.13 months after completing step 2 treatment

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026