Skip to content

HeartLight Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF)

Pivotal Clinical Study of the CardioFocus Endoscopic Ablation System - Adaptive Contact (EAS-AC) or HEARTLIGHT for the Treatment of Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01456000
Acronym
HeartLight
Enrollment
405
Registered
2011-10-20
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2016-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, AF, PAF, PVI, ablation, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the CardioFocus Endoscopic Ablation System with Adaptive Contact (HeartLight) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation by creating electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins.

Detailed description

A randomized, controlled trial designed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the experimental device to deliver pulmonary vein isolation as a treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

Interventions

DEVICEEAS-AC (HeartLight)

Pulmonary vien isolation

PROCEDUREControl Arm Ablation

Treatment with standard ablation.

Sponsors

CardioFocus
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 75 years. * paroxysmal atrial fibrillation * failure of at least one AAD * others

Exclusion criteria

* overall good health as established by multiple criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants That Meeting the Efficacy Success Criteria as Described in the Outcome Measure Description1 yearEpisodes of AF were monitored during the follow-up period and the rate of participants with no documented, symptomatic episodes of AF in follow-up were be compared. Other efficacy success/failure criteria included acute isolation of all clinically relevant pulmonary veins, lack of ablation-induced left atrial flutter, use of AADs during a follow-up period and left heart ablation or implant for AF in follow-up. Randomized and treated participants that were evaluable for efficacy are reported on for the Outcome Measure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

There were 405 participants enrolled in the study. Thirty nine of these participants were enrolled in the run-in phase and are not reported in the pivotal data. Of the remaining 366 enrolled participants, 13 were excluded from the study prior to randomization, resulting in a total of 353 randomized participants.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EAS-AC (HeartLight)
Treatment with the EAS-AC. Randomized and treated cohort. EAS-AC (HeartLight): Pulmonary vien isolation
170
Control Arm Ablation
Treatment with standard ablation. Randomized and treated cohort. Control Arm Ablation: Treatment with standard radiofrequency (RF) ablation.
172
Total342

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEAS-AC (HeartLight)Control Arm AblationTotal
Age, Customized
Age
59.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
60.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
59.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
170 participants172 participants342 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants63 Participants115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
118 Participants109 Participants227 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
92 / 170105 / 172
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 17010 / 172

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants That Meeting the Efficacy Success Criteria as Described in the Outcome Measure Description

Episodes of AF were monitored during the follow-up period and the rate of participants with no documented, symptomatic episodes of AF in follow-up were be compared. Other efficacy success/failure criteria included acute isolation of all clinically relevant pulmonary veins, lack of ablation-induced left atrial flutter, use of AADs during a follow-up period and left heart ablation or implant for AF in follow-up. Randomized and treated participants that were evaluable for efficacy are reported on for the Outcome Measure.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EAS-AC (HeartLight)Number of Participants That Meeting the Efficacy Success Criteria as Described in the Outcome Measure Description102 Successful Participants
Control Arm AblationNumber of Participants That Meeting the Efficacy Success Criteria as Described in the Outcome Measure Description103 Successful Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026