Skip to content

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Supportive Psychotherapy for Body Dysmorphic Disorder

CBT Versus Supportive Psychotherapy for Body Dysmorphic Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01453439
Enrollment
120
Registered
2011-10-17
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2017-06-07
Last updated
2020-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Disorders, Body Dysmorphic Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorder, Somatoform Disorders

Keywords

Body dysmorphic disorder, Obsessive compulsive spectrum disorder, Body image, Appearance concerns

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about two different types of psychotherapy to help individuals who have body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). BDD is a severe, often chronic, and common disorder consisting of distressing or impairing preoccupation with perceived defects in one's physical appearance. Individuals with BDD have very poor psychosocial functioning and high rates of hospitalization and suicidality. Because BDD differs in important ways from other disorders, psychotherapies for other disorders are not adequate for BDD. Despite BDD's severity, there is no adequately tested psychosocial treatment (psychotherapy) of any type for this disorder. This study will compare the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Supportive Psychotherapy as well as predictors of improvement.

Detailed description

Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is a common and severe disorder in which a person is preoccupied by perceived defects in his or her appearance. The purpose of this research study is to learn more about two different forms of therapy to help individuals with BDD: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a promising new treatment for BDD, and supportive psychotherapy (SPT), the most commonly received therapy for BDD. The investigators would like to find out which treatment is more effective for BDD. The investigators will also examine patient characteristics that may predict response to treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to receive 22 sessions (over 24 weeks) of either CBT or SPT. Both treatments teach participants about BDD. CBT focuses on helping participants to develop more adaptive thoughts and beliefs and to gradually reduce avoidance and compulsive (repetitive) behaviors. SPT focuses on relationships, feelings, and other factors that may affect BDD symptoms (e.g., work, stress), and helps participants to cope with challenges in their life by improving self-esteem and positive coping. For each participant, this study will last for 12 months. CBT and SPT sessions occur for 22 sessions over 24 weeks. The severity of participants' BDD-related symptoms and other symptoms will be assessed at the end of treatment (week 24), and at 3- and 6-months after treatment ends.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy

Participants will receive a total of 22 sessions (over 24 weeks) of individual, manual-based CBT. During the sessions, participants will receive education about BDD and CBT, learn to develop more helpful thoughts and beliefs, gradually enter anxiety provoking situations while reducing compulsions (repetitive behaviors), and learn relapse prevention techniques.

BEHAVIORALSupportive Psychotherapy

Participants will receive a total of 22 sessions (over 24 weeks) of individual, manual-based SPT. During the sessions, participants will receive education about BDD and SPT, learn about factors that may affect their symptoms (for example, relationships, work, stress), and learn to cope with challenges in their life by improving self-esteem and positive coping skills.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Outpatient men and women age 18 and older * DSM-IV BDD or its delusional variant for at least 6 months * BDD is the most problematic psychiatric disorder (in the patient's and clinician's opinion) and the primary reason for seeking treatment * Score of 24 or higher on the BDD-Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale

Exclusion criteria

* Current clinically significant suicidality and/or score on the BDI-II suicide item (#9) \> 1 * Any clinical features requiring a higher level of care * Mental retardation or borderline intellectual functioning (estimated IQ \< 80 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence) or dementia, brain damage, or other cognitive impairment that would interfere with ability to engage in CBT * DSM-IV substance abuse or dependence within the past 3 months; or a positive urine drug screen for any illicit substances of abuse * Current manic episode * Psychotic disorder * Borderline personality disorder * Body image concerns accounted for by an eating disorder * Previous treatment with \> 10 sessions of CBT for BDD * Subjects cannot be receiving any other psychotherapy or begin such treatment during the study * Patients can be receiving psychotropic medication if they have taken a stable dose for at least two months before the study baseline assessment and the dose remains stable during the study. * Presence of any behavior (e.g., violence) that would interfere with full cooperation with the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Change in BDD-YBOCS from baseline (week 0) to post-treatment (week 24), assessed every 4 weeks. Followup phase data was measured at week 37 and week 50.The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for BDD (BDD-YBOCS) is a 12-item, semi-structured, clinician-administered measure of BDD symptom severity. The scale's items are summed to yield a total score with a range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating more severe BDD symptoms. Treatment effects on BDD symptom severity were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Measured every week during treatment, but analysis was performed only on BDI-II assessments close to assessment visits; wk 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Followup phase data was measured at week 37 and week 50.The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) is a widely used 21-item self-report scale that assesses the severity of depressive symptoms during the past 2 weeks. Total scale scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Treatment effects on depression were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).
Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Measured at week 0, 4, 12, 16, and 24 during treatment. Follow-up phase data was measured at week 37 and at week 50.The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LESQ-SF) is a 16-item, self-report questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction over the past week. Questions 1-14 are then summed to a total score, and the total score is reported as a percentage maximum possible, such that the % score range is 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life. Treatment effects on life satisfaction were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).
Treatment Credibility (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Measured twice during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment] and at week 4)The Treatment Credibility/Expectancy Rating scale is a 4-item self-report questionnaire that assesses patients' judgments about the credibility of the treatment rationale, expectancy of change, and treatment acceptability. Treatment credibility is based on the mean score of the first three items, which are measured on 10-point Likert scales, so that mean scores range from 1 (lowest/worst) to 10 (highest/most). Treatment credibility was assessed at the baseline assessment (before treatment assignment) and after 1 month of treatment when patients are more familiar with the treatment protocol and rationale.
Beliefs About Appearance (as Measured by the ASI-R)Measured three times during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment], week 12, and week 24 [post-treatment])
Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Measured every 4 weeks during treatment, and at the 3-(wk 37) and 6-month(wk 50) follow-up visitsThe Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale (BABS) is a 7-item, semi-structured, clinician-administered measure that was used to assess insight regarding BDD-related beliefs (e.g., I look deformed). The first six items of the BABS were summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 24, with higher scores reflecting poorer insight. Treatment effects on BABS score were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).
Information Processing (as Measured by the ERT)Measured three times during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment], week 12, and week 24 [post-treatment])
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Measured at baseline, week 4, week 12, week 16, and week 24. Follow-up phase data was measured at week 37 and at week 50.The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a 5-item self-report measure of functional impairment/disability. Items 1-3 (disability in work, social life/leisure, and family life/home responsibilities, respectively) are scored on Likert-scales that range from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extreme). The three items are then summed to yield an SDS total score, ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Treatment effects on functional impairment were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).
Treatment Satisfaction (CSQ-8)The CSQ-8 was assessed twice: at week 12 [mid-treatment] and at week 24 [post-treatment]The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is an 8-item self-report questionnaire that assesses satisfaction with clinical services received and has a score range of 8-32, where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
Treatment Expectancy (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Measured twice during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment] and at week 4)The Treatment Credibility/Expectancy Rating scale is a 4-item self-report questionnaire that assesses patients' judgments about the credibility of the treatment rationale, expectancy of change, and treatment acceptability. Treatment expectancy is a single item rating of By the end of therapy, how much improvement in your anxiety do you think will occur?, rated on a scale from 0% to 100%. It was assessed at the baseline assessment (before treatment assignment) and after 1 month of treatment when patients are more familiar with the treatment protocol and rationale.
Neuropsychological Functioning (as Measured by the ROCF)Measured three times during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment], week 12, and week 24 [post-treatment])

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) is considered the psychosocial treatment of choice for BDD. It is a time-limited treatment that includes cognitive restructuring, mindfulness/attention retraining, exposure, and response prevention, specifically tailored for BDD. CBT is the only fully developed psychosocial treatment for BDD.
61
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)
SPT is a widely received psychosocial treatment by persons with BDD.
59
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-upLost to Follow-up510
Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject01
Treatment PhaseNeed for higher level of care11
Treatment PhaseSuicidal Ideation20
Treatment PhaseTherapist conflict of interest10
Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject1310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSupportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Total
Age, Continuous33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
34.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
33.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Pacific Islander
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, Hispanic
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, Non-Hispanic
53 Participants47 Participants100 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
59 Participants61 Participants120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants46 Participants92 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 610 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 6130 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 613 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)

The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for BDD (BDD-YBOCS) is a 12-item, semi-structured, clinician-administered measure of BDD symptom severity. The scale's items are summed to yield a total score with a range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating more severe BDD symptoms. Treatment effects on BDD symptom severity were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).

Time frame: Change in BDD-YBOCS from baseline (week 0) to post-treatment (week 24), assessed every 4 weeks. Followup phase data was measured at week 37 and week 50.

Population: Intent to treat analysis on 120 subjects randomized to either CBT vs SPT. Some of the assessments visits were missed due to patient cancellations or study dropouts. The exact numbers analyzed are as specified below.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 426.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 2015.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.32
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 1219.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.21
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 2413.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.46
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 824.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 3712.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)week 1617.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 5012.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.75
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Baseline32.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.72
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 5016.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.94
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Baseline31.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.94
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 427.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.41
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 825.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.57
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 1222.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)week 1622.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.33
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 2019.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.44
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 2418.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms (as Measured by the BDD-YBOCS)Week 3717.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.81
Comparison: We compared the difference in the rate of change in BDD symptom severity over time (during treatment phase) between the randomized treatment groups (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of change in BDD symptom severity in the CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group \[to be tested\].p-value: <0.01Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We compared the difference in the rate of change in BDD symptom severity over time (during the follow-up phase) between the randomized treatment groups (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of change in BDD symptom severity during follow-up will not differ significantly between CBT and SPT treatments \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.62Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Beliefs About Appearance (as Measured by the ASI-R)

Time frame: Measured three times during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment], week 12, and week 24 [post-treatment])

Secondary

Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)

The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) is a widely used 21-item self-report scale that assesses the severity of depressive symptoms during the past 2 weeks. Total scale scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Treatment effects on depression were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).

Time frame: Measured every week during treatment, but analysis was performed only on BDI-II assessments close to assessment visits; wk 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Followup phase data was measured at week 37 and week 50.

Population: Intent to treat analysis on 120 subjects randomized to either CBT vs SPT. Some of the assessments visits were missed due to patient cancellations or study dropouts. The exact numbers analyzed are as specified below.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 418.6923077 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7215044
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 2011.4545455 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3474811
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 1215.2000000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1037815
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 2410.5348837 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2966291
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 816.9591837 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4953066
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 379.2307692 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.412047
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)week 1613.4000000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9446374
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 5012.0606061 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3030622
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Baseline22.1639344 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1923972
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 5013.6666667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6541855
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Baseline22.8620690 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6117187
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 421.4035088 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9938793
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 819.3076923 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3178737
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 1219.6041667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.85639
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)week 1617.5416667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3220163
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 2015.9302326 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2300744
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 2415.6041667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2541365
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Depressive Symptoms (as Measured by the BDI-II)Week 3712.8611111 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9328036
Comparison: We compared the change in depressive symptoms over time (During Treatment phase) by randomized treatment group (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of improvement in depressive symptoms in the CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We compared the change in depressive symptoms over time (during the follow-up phase), by randomized treatment group (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of change in depressive symptoms in the CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group during follow-up \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.26Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Information Processing (as Measured by the ERT)

Time frame: Measured three times during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment], week 12, and week 24 [post-treatment])

Secondary

Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)

The Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale (BABS) is a 7-item, semi-structured, clinician-administered measure that was used to assess insight regarding BDD-related beliefs (e.g., I look deformed). The first six items of the BABS were summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 24, with higher scores reflecting poorer insight. Treatment effects on BABS score were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).

Time frame: Measured every 4 weeks during treatment, and at the 3-(wk 37) and 6-month(wk 50) follow-up visits

Population: Intent to treat analysis on 120 subjects randomized to either CBT vs SPT. Some of the assessments visits were missed due to patient cancellations or study dropouts. The exact numbers analyzed are as specified below.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 414.7500000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2538501
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 209.8461538 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5435322
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 1210.8837209 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8562515
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 248.3636364 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5823875
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 814.5128205 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9066056
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 376.6279070 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.0000791
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)week 1610.8571429 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2769983
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 507.1578947 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.96793
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Baseline17.2459016 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2608909
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 507.3783784 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7848046
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Baseline15.4067797 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1817281
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 413.3090909 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.0584463
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 812.8500000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.0765928
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 1211.1304348 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.0428422
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)week 169.7608696 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3465868
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 2010.0277778 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8235292
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 247.9791667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8908136
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Insight Regarding BDD Beliefs (as Measured by the BABS)Week 378.3170732 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8199614
Comparison: We compared the change in Patient Insight over time (During Treatment phase) by randomized treatment group (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of improvement in insight in the CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.1Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We compared the change in Patient Insight over time (during the follow-up phase), by randomized treatment group (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of improvement in insight in the CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group during follow-up \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.45Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)

The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LESQ-SF) is a 16-item, self-report questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction over the past week. Questions 1-14 are then summed to a total score, and the total score is reported as a percentage maximum possible, such that the % score range is 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life. Treatment effects on life satisfaction were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).

Time frame: Measured at week 0, 4, 12, 16, and 24 during treatment. Follow-up phase data was measured at week 37 and at week 50.

Population: Intent to treat analysis on 120 subjects randomized to either CBT vs SPT. Some of the assessments visits were missed due to patient cancellations or study dropouts. The exact numbers analyzed are as specified below.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 1261.0119048 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3217504
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)week 2468.2055749 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3905036
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 449.6648352 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8763522
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 3769.1849817 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5141781
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 1660.8894231 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9117634
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 5066.5095899 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2768017
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Baseline48.7500000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.0603393
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 5065.8928571 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3884669
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Baseline50.6961259 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6428814
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 451.7857143 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.0729259
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 1257.6190476 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.638269
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 1657.3457792 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9192124
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)week 2463.9437690 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.0175684
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Life Satisfaction (Q-LESQ-SF)Week 3764.3339768 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.0683239
Comparison: We compared the change in Quality of life satisfaction over time (During treatment phase) by randomized treatment group (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of change in Quality of life satisfaction severity in the CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.04Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We compared the change in the quality of life satisfaction over time (during the follow-up phase), by randomized treatment group (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of change in the quality of life satisfaction in the CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group during follow-up \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.82Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Neuropsychological Functioning (as Measured by the ROCF)

Time frame: Measured three times during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment], week 12, and week 24 [post-treatment])

Secondary

Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a 5-item self-report measure of functional impairment/disability. Items 1-3 (disability in work, social life/leisure, and family life/home responsibilities, respectively) are scored on Likert-scales that range from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extreme). The three items are then summed to yield an SDS total score, ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Treatment effects on functional impairment were analyzed separately for the treatment period (i.e., weeks 0-24) and the follow-up period (i.e., weeks 24 to 50).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 12, week 16, and week 24. Follow-up phase data was measured at week 37 and at week 50.

Population: Intent to treat analysis on 120 subjects randomized to either CBT vs SPT. Some of the assessments visits were missed due to patient cancellations or study dropouts. The exact numbers analyzed are as specified below.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 376.4871795 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3613628
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Baseline16.3333333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5621806
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 415.1000000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3927574
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 1211.7142857 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4023257
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 169.7250000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6660674
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)week 247.9024390 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2970021
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 506.6388889 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1980931
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 379.2162162 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7428646
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 1611.7272727 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2019953
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Baseline17.4406780 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.0522757
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 508.3666667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8013409
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 415.5000000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.0056
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)week 249.0869565 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2105666
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 1212.2222222 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8534558
Comparison: We compared the change in social functioning over time (During Treatment phase) by randomized treatment group (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts, and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of improvement in social functioning in the CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.3Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We compared the change in social functioning over time (during the follow-up phase), by randomized treatment group (CBT vs. SPT) using a latent growth curve model that included terms for treatment group, time, site, and all their interactions, modeling intercepts and slopes as random effects per person.~Null hypothesis: The rate of improvement in social functioning CBT group will not be significantly different from the SPT group during follow-up \[to be tested\].p-value: 0.85Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Treatment Credibility (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)

The Treatment Credibility/Expectancy Rating scale is a 4-item self-report questionnaire that assesses patients' judgments about the credibility of the treatment rationale, expectancy of change, and treatment acceptability. Treatment credibility is based on the mean score of the first three items, which are measured on 10-point Likert scales, so that mean scores range from 1 (lowest/worst) to 10 (highest/most). Treatment credibility was assessed at the baseline assessment (before treatment assignment) and after 1 month of treatment when patients are more familiar with the treatment protocol and rationale.

Time frame: Measured twice during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment] and at week 4)

Population: The analysis population for this analysis was limited to those participants who completed the questionnaire (n=6 missing responses in the CBT arm, n=5 missing responses in the SPT arm at baseline), and decrease by week 4 due to study drop-out or missed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Treatment Credibility (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Week 07.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Treatment Credibility (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Week 47.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Treatment Credibility (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Week 06.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Treatment Credibility (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Week 46.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Comparison: Null hypothesis: There is no significant different in the perceived credibility of CBT and SPT.p-value: 0.0095ANOVA
Secondary

Treatment Expectancy (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)

The Treatment Credibility/Expectancy Rating scale is a 4-item self-report questionnaire that assesses patients' judgments about the credibility of the treatment rationale, expectancy of change, and treatment acceptability. Treatment expectancy is a single item rating of By the end of therapy, how much improvement in your anxiety do you think will occur?, rated on a scale from 0% to 100%. It was assessed at the baseline assessment (before treatment assignment) and after 1 month of treatment when patients are more familiar with the treatment protocol and rationale.

Time frame: Measured twice during the study (week 0 [pre-treatment] and at week 4)

Population: The analysis population for this analysis was limited to those participants who completed the questionnaire (n=6 missing responses in the CBT arm, n=5 missing responses in the SPT arm at baseline), and decrease by week 4 due to study drop-out or missed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Treatment Expectancy (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Week 058.36 Percent improvement expected (0-100%)Standard Deviation 20.71
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Treatment Expectancy (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Week 456.00 Percent improvement expected (0-100%)Standard Deviation 20.4
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Treatment Expectancy (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Week 050.19 Percent improvement expected (0-100%)Standard Deviation 19.28
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Treatment Expectancy (Credibility/Expectancy Rating Scale)Week 446.73 Percent improvement expected (0-100%)Standard Deviation 20.55
Comparison: Null hypotheses: There is no significant difference in patient expectancy of improvement between BDD patients assigned to CBT vs. SPT.p-value: 0.0069ANOVA
Secondary

Treatment Satisfaction (CSQ-8)

The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is an 8-item self-report questionnaire that assesses satisfaction with clinical services received and has a score range of 8-32, where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.

Time frame: The CSQ-8 was assessed twice: at week 12 [mid-treatment] and at week 24 [post-treatment]

Population: The analysis population for this outcome was limited to those who were still in the study by week 12 (mid-treatmtent) and who completed the questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Treatment Satisfaction (CSQ-8)Week 1228.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Treatment Satisfaction (CSQ-8)Week 2429.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.56
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Treatment Satisfaction (CSQ-8)Week 1226.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.82
Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT)Treatment Satisfaction (CSQ-8)Week 2427.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.07
Comparison: Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in treatment satisfaction between patients with BDD assigned to CBT vs. SPT.p-value: 0.0235ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026