Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate (HYD) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study With an Open-label Run-in to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate (HYD) Tablets 20 to 120 mg Once-daily in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01452529
Enrollment
905
Registered
2011-10-17
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2020-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

Pain, Opioid

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of HYD tablets 20 to 120 mg once-daily dose compared to placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain uncontrolled by their current stable analgesic regimen

Interventions

Hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film-coated tablets 20 - 120 mg once daily

DRUGPlacebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h tablets

Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film coated tablets 20 - 120 mg once daily

Sponsors

Purdue Pharma LP
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

include: * Male and female subjects ≥ 18 years of age with moderate to severe, chronic low back pain (lasting several hours daily) as their predominant pain condition for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit; * Subjects whose low back pain is not adequately treated prior to the screening visit with their stable incoming analgesic regimen; * Subjects deemed by the investigator/medically qualified designee (must be MD or DO) to be appropriate candidates for the protocol specified, around the clock HYD therapeutic regimen; * Female subjects who are premenopausal or postmenopausal less than 1 year and who have not had surgical sterilization (ie, tubal ligation, partial or complete hysterectomy) must have a negative serum pregnancy test, be nonlactating, and willing to use adequate and reliable contraception throughout the study (eg, barrier with additional spermicidal foam or jelly, intra-uterine device, hormonal contraception).

Exclusion criteria

include: * Subjects taking \> 100 mg/day oxycodone or equivalent during last 14 days prior to screening visit; * Subjects who cannot or will not agree to completely stop all incoming opioid and nonopioid analgesic medications and other medications used for chronic pain, excluding herbal and nutraceutical medications; * Subjects who cannot or will not agree to stop local regional pain treatments during the study (nerve/plexus blocks or ablation, neurosurgical procedures for pain control, botulinum toxin injections for control of chronic low back pain, steroid injections in the lower back or inhalation analgesia). The subject must not have had a nerve/plexus block within 4 weeks of the screening visit, neuroablation within 6 months of the screening visit, a botulinum toxin injection in the low back region within 3 months of the screening visit, steroid injections in the lower back within 6 weeks of the screening visit, or intravenous or intramuscular steroid injections within 4 weeks of the screening visit; * Subjects who have used any investigational medication within 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication; * Subjects with any history of seizures (subjects with history of pediatric febrile seizures may participate in the study) or increase in intracranial pressure; * Subjects with current uncontrolled depression or other uncontrolled psychiatric disorder (subjects with controlled depression or other psychiatric disorder must be on a stable medication for ≥ 1 month prior to the screening visit to participate in the study); * Subjects with a history of alcohol, medication, or illicit drug abuse or addiction and/or history of opioid abuse or addiction at any time; * Subjects with clinically unstable cardiac disease, including: unstable atrial fibrillation, symptomatic bradycardia, unstable congestive heart failure, active myocardial ischemia, or indwelling pacemaker; * Subjects with unstable respiratory disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes entry into this study; * Subjects with evidence of impaired liver function upon entry into the study (laboratory test values ≥ 3 times the upper limit of the laboratory reference (normal) range (ULN) for aspartate transaminase \[AST/SGOT\] or alanine transaminase \[ALT/SGPT\], or values \> 2 times the ULN for alkaline phosphatase), or total bilirubin level \> 1.5 times the ULN or, in the opinion of the investigator/medically qualified designee (must be MD or DO), liver function impairment to the extent that the subject should not participate in this study; * Subjects with evidence of impaired kidney function upon entry into the study (ie, serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dL); * Subjects with biliary tract disease, hypothyroidism, adrenal cortical insufficiency, or any other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is inadequately treated and precludes entry into the study; * Subjects who had surgical procedures directed towards the source of chronic low back pain within 6 months of the screening visit or scheduled for surgery of the lower back or any other major surgery during the study conduct period; * Subjects with history of malignancy within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell carcinoma that has been successfully treated; * Subjects with any condition in which opioids are contraindicated, eg, severe respiratory depression with hypoxia and/or hypercapnia, severe chronic obstructive lung disease, cor pulmonale, severe bronchial asthma, or paralytic ileus; * Subjects who are allergic to hydrocodone or who have a history of allergies to other opioids. This does not include subjects who have experienced common opioid side effects (eg, nausea, constipation); * Subjects receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or who have been taking MAOIs within 2 weeks of the screening visit. Other protocol-specific inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Pain Intensity for Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours ScoreWeek 12Mean pain intensity for average pain over the last 24 hours score (on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleWeeks 4, 8, and 12The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered 12-item assessment designed to measure key aspects of sleep. It includes a sleep problems index and 6 subscales - sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, daytime somnolence, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, and quantity of sleep. The sleep disturbance subscale comprised the responses to questions 1, 3, 7, and 8 on the assessment. The individual responses for each question were recorded on a 5-point scale with options ranging from 1 - all of the time to 5 - none of the time. Sleep disturbance scores were transformed linearly on a scale of 0-100. A higher value indicates a better score; therefore, a higher score indicates a better sleep pattern.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12The PGIC is an ordinal scale which assesses the change in overall status relative to the start of the study. The scale has only 1 item, which measures global change of overall status by the subject on a 7-point scale (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse), where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The proportion of subjects responding very much improved and much improved was summarized by treatment group.
Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 12A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.
Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 12A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First subject first visit: 23-March-2012; Last subject last visit: 03-September-2013. The study was conducted at medical/research sites in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain uncontrolled by their current stable analgesic regimen were included.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hydrocodone Bitartrate
Hydrocodone bitartrate (HYD) once daily (q24h) tablets Hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film-coated tablets: Hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film-coated tablets 20 - 120 mg once daily
296
Placebo
Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate once daily tablets Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h tablets: Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film coated tablets 20 - 120 mg once daily
292
Total588

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-blind (DB) PeriodAdministrative0117
Double-blind (DB) PeriodAdverse Event01811
Double-blind (DB) PeriodConfirmed or suspected diversion023
Double-blind (DB) PeriodLack of Efficacy01644
Double-blind (DB) PeriodLost to Follow-up053
Double-blind (DB) PeriodWithdrawal by Subject01514
Run-in PeriodAdministrative2100
Run-in PeriodAdverse Event9600
Run-in PeriodConfirmed or suspected diversion2300
Run-in PeriodDid not qualify for Double-Blind Phase5900
Run-in PeriodLack of Efficacy4600
Run-in PeriodLost to Follow-up1900
Run-in PeriodWithdrawal by Subject4900

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHydrocodone BitartratePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.51
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.23
48.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.38
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
25 participants29 participants54 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
67 participants51 participants118 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
7 participants4 participants11 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
195 participants207 participants402 participants
Screening Baseline Pain Over the Last 24 Hours7.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.13
7.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19
7.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.16
Sex: Female, Male
Female
172 Participants166 Participants338 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
124 Participants126 Participants250 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
265 / 90552 / 29630 / 292
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 9052 / 2964 / 292

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Pain Intensity for Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score

Mean pain intensity for average pain over the last 24 hours score (on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The full analysis population (N = 588) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hydrocodone BitartrateMean Pain Intensity for Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score3.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboMean Pain Intensity for Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score4.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Secondary

Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance Subscale

The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered 12-item assessment designed to measure key aspects of sleep. It includes a sleep problems index and 6 subscales - sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, daytime somnolence, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, and quantity of sleep. The sleep disturbance subscale comprised the responses to questions 1, 3, 7, and 8 on the assessment. The individual responses for each question were recorded on a 5-point scale with options ranging from 1 - all of the time to 5 - none of the time. Sleep disturbance scores were transformed linearly on a scale of 0-100. A higher value indicates a better score; therefore, a higher score indicates a better sleep pattern.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: The full analysis population (N = 588) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hydrocodone BitartrateMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleWeek 850.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.879
Hydrocodone BitartrateMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleWeek 450.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.851
Hydrocodone BitartrateMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleWeek 1251.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.576
Hydrocodone BitartrateMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleScreening44.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.262
PlaceboMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleWeek 1252.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.779
PlaceboMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleWeek 450.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.156
PlaceboMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleWeek 851.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.781
PlaceboMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance SubscaleScreening44.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.871
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC is an ordinal scale which assesses the change in overall status relative to the start of the study. The scale has only 1 item, which measures global change of overall status by the subject on a 7-point scale (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse), where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The proportion of subjects responding very much improved and much improved was summarized by treatment group.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The full analysis population (N = 588) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hydrocodone BitartratePatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Total Subjects Completing PGIC283 Participants
Hydrocodone BitartratePatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Subjects Responding Very Much or Much Improved173 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Total Subjects Completing PGIC267 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Subjects Responding Very Much or Much Improved130 Participants
Secondary

Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline

A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: The full analysis population (N = 588) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hydrocodone BitartrateResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineNumber of Subjects Responding285 Participants
Hydrocodone BitartrateResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineNumber of Subjects with ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain184 Participants
PlaceboResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineNumber of Subjects Responding280 Participants
PlaceboResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineNumber of Subjects with ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain147 Participants
Secondary

Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline

A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: The full analysis population (N = 588) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hydrocodone BitartrateResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineNumber of Subjects Responding285 Participants
Hydrocodone BitartrateResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineNumber of Subjects with ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain137 Participants
PlaceboResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineNumber of Subjects Responding280 Participants
PlaceboResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to BaselineNumber of Subjects with ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain109 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026