Skip to content

The Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on the Composite Variability Index (CVI) During Laryngoscopy

The Effect of Rocuronium on the Response of Composite Variability Index (CVI) to Laryngoscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01450813
Enrollment
80
Registered
2011-10-12
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2017-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Neuromuscular Blockade

Brief summary

The Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor is used in many operating rooms to provide information to the anesthesiologist about a patient's level of consciousness. The Composite Variability Index (CVI) is a new index that may provide the anesthesiologist with more information about the condition of the patient. The CVI is a measure of the combined variability in BIS (bispectral index) and frontal electromyography (EMG) activity that may be useful in assessing the nociception/anti-nociception balance for patients under general anesthesia.The purpose of this study is to determine if a commonly used anesthetic drug (rocuronium) affects the CVI measurement differently with different doses. Rocuronium is a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) routinely used during surgery. It is expected that the group given the highest dose of rocuronium will have diminished CVI values. This study will randomize patients to one of four doses of rocuronium: no rocuronium, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 milligrams per kilo of body weight; the last dose is the standard amount for adults. It is expected that the group given the highest dose of rocuronium will have diminished CVI values. By including intermediate doses, information about the function of CVI in states of less than full muscle relaxation, or paralysis, will be obtained. This information is critically important for the development of the composite variability index, because during general anesthesia patients are usually maintained in a state of less than full paralysis. If the CVI response to stimulation in the intermediate groups is similar to the group receiving no rocuronium, the monitor may find wide clinical applicability. If the response is similar to the maximal rocuronium group, the index may only be reliable in states with no muscle relaxant, which will greatly limit clinical utility.

Detailed description

Consented subjects randomized to one of four doses of rocuronium will be transported to the operating room and be connected to routine monitors that included a BIS (Covidien), M-Entropy sensor (GE Healthcare) and TOF (train of four) monitor. Following preoxygenation, general anesthesia will be induced with propofol and remifentanil using traditional syringe pumps. The induction doses given and subsequent infusion rates will be determined by utilizing pharmacokinetic (Pk) models (Marsh model for propofol, Minto model for remifentanil). Unconsciousness will be confirmed by performing the usual clinical assessments and by obtaining a BIS value between 40 and 50. Once the subject is unconsciousness, they will be given the assigned dose of rocuronium, after which the study anesthesiologist will perform a laryngoscopy. The anesthesiologist performing the laryngoscopy will not know what dose of rocuronium the subject received. Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) will be monitored by a train-of-four twitch monitor (TOF Watch-SX) at the adductor pollicis muscle (2 HZ, 50mAmp) every 15 seconds. At three minutes after the rocuronium administration, a standardized 20-second laryngoscopy will be applied. The CVI, entropy, and hemodynamic responses (heart rate, blood pressure measurement each minute) and train-of-four measurements will be monitored for three minutes before and after the laryngoscopy.

Interventions

DRUGSaline 0.06 ml/kg

IV Infusion x1 prior to laryngoscopy

DRUGRocuronium 0.2 mg/kg

IV Infusion x1 prior to laryngoscopy

DRUGRocuronium 0.4 mg/kg

IV Infusion x1 prior to laryngoscopy

IV Infusion x1 prior to laryngoscopy

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status class I or II. * Body mass index between 18 and 35 kg m-2. * No use of psychotropic or neuropsychiatric medications. * A airway assessment with no indication of a difficult intubation including a class I or II Mallampati airway and a mandible-to-hyoid distance of greater than three fingerbreadths. * Age between 18-75 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Does not meet inclusion criteria.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Mean Difference in CVI Between Pre-laryngoscopy and Post-laryngoscopy for Each of the Four Rocuronium GroupsSix minutes after the dose of rocuronium with laryngoscopy at 3 minutes after the study interventionThe difference between the mean CVI in three minutes prior to laryngoscopy and three minutes following laryngoscopy reported as the mean change in CVI and the +/- 95% confidence interval for each group. The Composite Variability Index (CVI) scale is a logistic regression of three measures of processed electroencephalography (EEG) signals. These signals are Bispectral Index (BIS), the variability of electromyelogram (sEMG), and the variability of BIS (sBIS). The scale ranges from 0 to 100 where a lower CVI value represents a lower likelihood of intraoperative somatic responses, and a higher CVI value represents a higher likelihood of intraoperative somatic responses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Average CVI During the Maintenance Phase of Anesthesia for the Two Remifentanil GroupsMaintenance AnesthesiaMean CVI from incision to propofol off reported as the mean CVI +/- 95% confidence interval for the two groups

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1
Rocuronium dose 0 mg/kg prior to laryngoscopy
19
Group 2
Rocuronium dose 0.2 mg/kg prior to laryngoscopy
19
Group 3
Rocuronium dose 0.4 mg/kg prior to laryngoscopy
20
Group 4
Rocuronium dose 0.6 mg/kg prior to laryngoscopy
17
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1103

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalGroup 1Group 2Group 3Group 4
Age, Continuous37.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.34
35.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
32.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants9 Participants8 Participants8 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants10 Participants11 Participants12 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 190 / 200 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 190 / 200 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

The Mean Difference in CVI Between Pre-laryngoscopy and Post-laryngoscopy for Each of the Four Rocuronium Groups

The difference between the mean CVI in three minutes prior to laryngoscopy and three minutes following laryngoscopy reported as the mean change in CVI and the +/- 95% confidence interval for each group. The Composite Variability Index (CVI) scale is a logistic regression of three measures of processed electroencephalography (EEG) signals. These signals are Bispectral Index (BIS), the variability of electromyelogram (sEMG), and the variability of BIS (sBIS). The scale ranges from 0 to 100 where a lower CVI value represents a lower likelihood of intraoperative somatic responses, and a higher CVI value represents a higher likelihood of intraoperative somatic responses.

Time frame: Six minutes after the dose of rocuronium with laryngoscopy at 3 minutes after the study intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 1The Mean Difference in CVI Between Pre-laryngoscopy and Post-laryngoscopy for Each of the Four Rocuronium Groups2.40 units on a scale
Group 2The Mean Difference in CVI Between Pre-laryngoscopy and Post-laryngoscopy for Each of the Four Rocuronium Groups1.39 units on a scale
Group 3The Mean Difference in CVI Between Pre-laryngoscopy and Post-laryngoscopy for Each of the Four Rocuronium Groups0.48 units on a scale
Group 4The Mean Difference in CVI Between Pre-laryngoscopy and Post-laryngoscopy for Each of the Four Rocuronium Groups0.17 units on a scale
Comparison: Null hypothesis that neuromuscular blocking drugs have no effect on CVI with 95% confidence.p-value: <0.05ANOVA
Secondary

The Average CVI During the Maintenance Phase of Anesthesia for the Two Remifentanil Groups

Mean CVI from incision to propofol off reported as the mean CVI +/- 95% confidence interval for the two groups

Time frame: Maintenance Anesthesia

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 1The Average CVI During the Maintenance Phase of Anesthesia for the Two Remifentanil Groups1.73 units on a scale
Group 2The Average CVI During the Maintenance Phase of Anesthesia for the Two Remifentanil Groups1.38 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026