Skip to content

Prevalence of Dry Eyes in Diabetics Compared to Non Diabetics

Prevalence of Dry Eyes in Diabetics Compared to Non Diabetics

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01450787
Enrollment
63
Registered
2011-10-12
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2013-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eyes

Keywords

dry eyes, diabetes

Brief summary

The purpose is to compare the prevalence of dry eyes in diabetics and non diabetics. This might help identify a group of patients at greater risk for dry eye complications. Diabetics have been shown to have poor ocular surface healing and might benefit from dry eye therapy earlier if they are shown to be at greater risk for dry eyes.

Detailed description

Dry eye disease is one of the most common eye problems seen in ophthalmology. Diabetics are at high risk for multiple eye problems, including retinopathy and glaucoma. They also have been shown to have poor ocular surface healing. I would like to evaluate the prevalence of dry eye disease in diabetics to see if they are also at greater risk for the known complications of dry eye disease. If so, they might benefit from early intervention.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Allergan
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
COA Research Foundation, INC
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 50 patients with diabetes, 25 without diabetes over the age of 40

Exclusion criteria

* current use of glaucoma drops or currently within the postoperative period from eye surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conjunctival Staining Scoreat the time of the evaluationConjunctival staining with lissamine green dye is measured at the time of the evaluation on a scale from 0 to 5 using the oxford scoring system, with 5 being the most severe staining.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tear Film Osmolarityat the time of the examThe tear film osmolarity is measured at the time of the exam.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
OSDI Scoreat the time of the examThe ocular surface disease index survey in completed at the time of the exam. This scale ranges from 0 to 100 higher scores representing greater disability.
Schirmer Scoreat the time of the examThe schirmer tear production test with anesthesia is completed at the time of the exam in mm of tear film absorption on the test strip after five minutes. Higher scores represent greater tear production.
Tear Break-up Timeat the time of the examThe tear break-up time with fluorescein solution is measured at the time of the exam in seconds.
Corneal Stainingat the time of the examCorneal staining with fluorescein solution is graded at the time of the exam on a scale of 0 to 5 using the oxford scoring system with 5 being the most severe staining.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled randomly. Consecutive patients in a private ophthalmology clinic that met inclusion criteria were asked to participate at the time of an already scheduled exam. The non-diabetic group recruitment stopped once the target number of subjects enrolled. The diabetic group recruitment continued until the study was terminated.

Pre-assignment details

Being that there was no intervention and the study only involved taking measurements at the time of the exam, there was no transition required. Any eligible patient that was willing to participate was included. Consecutive diabetic patients and consecutive non-diabetic patients that met criteria were offered the opportunity to enroll.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Diabetics
diabetics over age 40
38
Non Diabetics
non diabetics over age 40
25
Total63

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDiabeticsNon DiabeticsTotal
Age, Customized38 participants25 participants63 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants25 participants63 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants21 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants4 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 380 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Conjunctival Staining Score

Conjunctival staining with lissamine green dye is measured at the time of the evaluation on a scale from 0 to 5 using the oxford scoring system, with 5 being the most severe staining.

Time frame: at the time of the evaluation

Population: There were 38 consecutive diabetics over 40 years of age and 25 consecutive non-diabetics over 40 years of age that qualified and agreed to enroll. A target of 25 non-diabetics was met. The target of 50 was not met as the study was stopped when the PI changed practices. By that time, 38 diabetics enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DiabeticsConjunctival Staining Score2.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Non DiabeticsConjunctival Staining Score2.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Secondary

Tear Film Osmolarity

The tear film osmolarity is measured at the time of the exam.

Time frame: at the time of the exam

Population: Tear film osmolarity was measured in all patients, but two patients in the diabetic group had an insufficient tear film to obtain a reading. Therefore, only 36 diabetics were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DiabeticsTear Film Osmolarity303.41 mOsml/LStandard Error 2.03
Non DiabeticsTear Film Osmolarity312.06 mOsml/LStandard Error 3.05
Other Pre-specified

Corneal Staining

Corneal staining with fluorescein solution is graded at the time of the exam on a scale of 0 to 5 using the oxford scoring system with 5 being the most severe staining.

Time frame: at the time of the exam

Population: All patients underwent corneal staining evaluations using fluorescein.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DiabeticsCorneal Staining0.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Non DiabeticsCorneal Staining0.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Other Pre-specified

OSDI Score

The ocular surface disease index survey in completed at the time of the exam. This scale ranges from 0 to 100 higher scores representing greater disability.

Time frame: at the time of the exam

Population: All patients completed the OSDI survey

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DiabeticsOSDI Score19.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.62
Non DiabeticsOSDI Score27.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.6
Other Pre-specified

Schirmer Score

The schirmer tear production test with anesthesia is completed at the time of the exam in mm of tear film absorption on the test strip after five minutes. Higher scores represent greater tear production.

Time frame: at the time of the exam

Population: Each patient underwent schirmer testing

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DiabeticsSchirmer Score18.36 mmStandard Error 1.06
Non DiabeticsSchirmer Score15.88 mmStandard Error 1.34
Other Pre-specified

Tear Break-up Time

The tear break-up time with fluorescein solution is measured at the time of the exam in seconds.

Time frame: at the time of the exam

Population: Each patient underwent tear break-up time testing

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DiabeticsTear Break-up Time3.38 secondsStandard Error 0.17
Non DiabeticsTear Break-up Time3.66 secondsStandard Error 0.26

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026