Skip to content

Dolutegravir Compared to Darunavir/Ritonavir , Each in Combination With Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) in ART-naive Subjects

A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Open-label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of GSK1349572 (Dolutegravir, DTG) 50 mg Once Daily Compared to Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800 mg/100 mg Once Daily Each Administered With Fixed-dose Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Therapy Over 96 Weeks in HIV-1 Infected Antiretroviral naïve Adult Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01449929
Acronym
FLAMINGO
Enrollment
488
Registered
2011-10-10
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2016-12-26
Last updated
2018-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Keywords

ritonavir, HIV, HAART, darunavir, antiretroviral, dolutegravir, GSK1349572

Brief summary

This study will be conducted in approximately 468 HIV-1 infected antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve subjects. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive dolutegravir (DTG) 50 mg once daily (approximately 234 subjects) or darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800 mg/100 mg once daily (approximately 234 subjects), each in combination with fixed-dose dual nucleoside reverse transriptase inhibitor (NRTI) therapy (either abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC). Subjects will be stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA and background NRTI selection. The primary analysis will take place after the last subject completes 48 weeks on therapy; an additional analysis will be conducted after the last subject completes Week 96 on study.

Detailed description

ING114915 is a Phase IIIb randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre, parallel group, fully-powered non-inferiority study. The study will be conducted in approximately 468 HIV-1 infected ART-naïve subjects. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive DTG 50 mg once daily (approximately 234 subjects) or DRV/r 800 mg/100 mg once daily (approximately 234 subjects), each in combination with fixed-dose dual NRTI therapy (either ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC). The primary analysis will take place after the last subject completes 48 weeks on therapy; an additional analysis will be conducted after the last subject completes Week 96 on study. Subjects who fulfil eligibility requirements will be randomized 1:1 to receive DTG 50 mg once daily or DRV/r 800 mg/100 mg once daily. In order to achieve balance across the two treatment groups of the study, randomization will be stratified by: screening plasma HIV-1 RNA \>/ 100,000 copies/mL (c/mL) or \> 100,000 c/mL and background dual NRTI (ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC) The DTG and DRV/r doses will be administered in an open-label fashion throughout the study. Subjects randomized to receive DTG and who successfully complete 96 weeks of treatment will continue to have access to DTG until either it is locally approved and commercially available, the patient no longer derives clinical benefit, the patient meets a protocol-defined reason for discontinuation or until development of DTG is terminated. Subjects randomized to the DRV/r arm will receive DRV/r through their Week 96 visit, after which they will be discontinued from the study and will need to make alternative arrangements to access antiretroviral medication. All subjects will receive background dual-NRTI therapy through their Week 96 visit.

Interventions

DRUGdolutegravir 50 mg OAD

1 x 50 mg tablet OAD

DRUGdarunavir 800mg OAD

2 x 400mg tablets OAD

DRUGritonavir 100mg OAD

1 x 100mg tablet OAD

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
ViiV Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-1 infected adults greater than or equal to 18 years of age. Females are eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is (1) non-childbearing potential, (2) child bearing potential with negative pregnancy test at screening and Day 1 and agrees to use protocol-specified methods of birth control while on study. * HIV-1 infection with a screening plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than or equal to 1000copies/mL * Antiretroviral-naïve (less than or equal to 10 days of prior therapy with any antiretroviral agent following a diagnosis of HIV-1 infection) * Signed and dated written informed consent is obtained from the subject or the subject's legal representative prior to screening

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Any evidence of an active Centers for Disease and Prevention Control (CDC) Category C disease \[CDC, 1993\], except cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy * Subjects with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (Class B or C) as determined by Child-Pugh classification * Anticipated need for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy during the study * History or presence of allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class * History of malignancy within the past 5 years or ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; other localized malignancies require agreement between the investigator and the Study medical monitor for inclusion of the subject * Treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening * Treatment with any of the following agents within 28 days of Screening: radiation therapy; cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents; any immunomodulators * Treatment with any agent, except recognized ART as allowed above, with documented activity against HIV-1 in vitro within 28 days of first dose of investigational product * Exposure to an experimental drug or experimental vaccine within either 28 days, 5 half-lives of the test agent, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the test agent, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of investigational product * Any evidence of primary viral resistance based on the presence of any major resistance-associated mutation \[IAS-USA, 2010\] in the Screening result or, if known, any historical resistance test result * Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. Any acute laboratory abnormality at Screening, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the subject's participation in the study of an investigational compound is exclusionary * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal * ALT greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal and bilirubin greater than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (with greater than 35% direct bilirubin) * Subject has creatinine clearance of less than 50 mL/min via Cockroft-Gault method * Recent history (less than or equal to 3 months) of any upper or lower gastrointestinal bleed, with the exception of anal or rectal bleeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 48Week 48Assessment was done using Missing, Switch or Discontinuation = Failure (MSDF), as codified by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm.This algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 as nonresponders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant ART prior to Week 48 as follows: background ART substitutions non-permitted per protocol (one background ART substitution was permitted for safety or tolerability); background ART substitutions permitted per protocol unless the decision to switch was documented as being before or at the first on-treatment visit where HIV-1 RNA was assessed. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment in the snapshot window (Week 48 +/- 6 weeks). Modified Intent-To-Treat Exposed (mITT-E) Population:all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/mL at Week 48Week 48The percentage of participants with Plasma HIV-1 RNA \<400 c/mL at Week 48 was assessed MSDF, as codified by the FDA snapshot algorithm. This algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 as nonresponders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant ART prior to Week 48 as follows: background ART substitutions non-permitted per protocol (one background ART substitution was permitted for safety or tolerability); background ART substitutions permitted per protocol unless the decision to switch was documented as being before or at the first on-treatment visit where HIV-1 RNA was assessed. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment in the snapshot window (Week 48 +/- 6 weeks).
Change From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Change from Baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 . Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.
Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48 for CD4+ and Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48 for CD8+Change from Baseline in CD4+ cell counts was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48. Change from Baseline in CD8+ cell counts was assessed at Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits and parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Associated Disease Progression With the Indicated Shift to CDC Class C, or New CDC Class C or Death at Week 48Week 48The number of participants with HIV-1 disease progression (AIDS or death) was assessed per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. The CDC classifies HIV infection as Category A (participants with asymptomatic HIV infection, acute HIV infection with accompanying illness, or persistent generalized lymphadenopathy), Category B (participants with symptomatic non-AIDS condition, i.e., conditions that are attributed to HIV infection or are indicative of a defect in cell-mediated immunity; or conditions are considered by physicians to have a clinical course or to require management that is complicated by HIV infection), and Category C (includes AIDS indicator conditions as defined by diagnostic or presumptive measures).
Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Through Week 48From Baseline through Week 48Fasting LDL cholesterol change from Baseline was analyzed. Values represented are for adjusted means. Estimates are calculated from a repeated measures model including the following covariates: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, background dual NRTI therapy, Baseline LDL cholesterol, treatment\*visit interaction and Baseline LDL cholesterol\*visit interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Through Week 48From Baseline through Week 48Hematology and clinical chemistry data were summarized according to the division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the Severity of adverse events, version 1.0. Grade 1, Mild; Grade 2, Moderate; Grade 3 (G3), Severe; Grade 4 (G4), Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, Death. Data are presented for which an increase in fasting LDL cholesterol to Grade 2 or higher occurred. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesFrom Baseline through Week 48Hematology and clinical chemistry data were summarized according to the division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the Severity of adverse events, version 1.0. Grade 1, Mild; Grade 2, Moderate; Grade 3 (G3), Severe; Grade 4 (G4), Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to Grade 3 or Grade 4 occurred.
Time to Virologic Suppression (<50 Copies/mL) Through Week 48From Baseline through Week 48The time to viral suppression (i.e. first viral load value \<50 copies/mL) through Week 48 was derived and summarized using Kaplan-Meier plots. Participants who withdrew for any reason without having suppressed prior to the analysis were censored. Confidence intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Change From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline, Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48SDM is a 20-item self-reported measure that addresses the presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms commonly associated with HIV or its treatment. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 where 0 (complete absence of symptom) and 4 (very bothersome symptom). Overall score calculated as the sum of the scores for each of the 20 items of the questionnaire and ranged from 0 (best health) and 80 (worst health). Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and baseline symptom bother score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicates a decline in a participant's quality of life over that period.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48The EQ-5D is a 5-question quality of life instrument that provides a utility score and visual analogue scale score that describes the participants' health status. The primary reason for including the EQ-5D is to elicit utility values for potential cost-effectiveness analysis for submission to health technology assessment agencies. The EQ-5D total score ranges from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health state) and 1 reflects the best outcome. Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and Baseline EQ-5D utility score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48The European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a 5-question quality of life instrument that provides a utility score and visual analogue scale score that describes the participants' health status. The primary reason for including the EQ-5D is to elicit utility values for potential cost-effectiveness analysis for submission to health technology assessment agencies. Thermometer score is based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 100 (best imaginable health state) to 0 (worst imaginable health state).Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, Baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and Baseline EQ-5D thermometer score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The treatment satisfaction score (range: 0-60) was the sum of the individual items. HIVTSQ mITT-E Population=Only participants from USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain for whom valid translations were available from the mITT-E Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The lifestyle/ease score is the sum of items 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (range: 0-30). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The convenience score is the score for item 5 (range: 0-6). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.
Number of Participants (Par.) With Detectable Virus That Has Genotypic or Phenotypic Evidence of Treatment-emergent Resistance to DTG, DRV+RTV and Other On-study ART at Time of Protocol Defined Virology Failure (PDVF)Baseline until PDVF up to Week 48An assessment was made of every change across all amino acids within the integrase (IN), reverse transcriptase (RT), and Protease (PRO) encoding region at Baseline and at time of suspected PDVF. PDVF is defined as the confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>200 c/mL \>=Week 24. PDVF Genotypic Population included all participants in the mITT-E population with available on-treatment genotypic resistance data, at time of PDVF. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a 2 sequential treatment period study. In first period (Randomization phase) participants received either dolutegravir (DTG) 50 milligram (mg) or darunavir (DRV) 800 mg with ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg once daily (QD) for 96 weeks. DTG participants who completed 96 Weeks of DTG then continued to receive DTG 50 mg in Extension phase.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 595 participants were screened; 107 were screen failures; 488 were randomized; 485 received at least 1 dose of study medication and comprised the Intent-To-Treat exposed (ITT-E) population of which 1 participant was removed, creating the modified ITT-E population with 484 participants. 123 participants enrolled in Extension Phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DTG 50 mg QD
Participants received DTG 50 mg QD administered in combination with FDC dual NRTI therapy (either ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC) for 96 weeks. Participants were then given the opportunity to receive DTG 50 mg QD during an Extension Phase of the study.
242
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QD
Participants received DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QD administered in combination with FDC dual NRTI therapy (either ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC) for 96 weeks.
242
Total484

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Extension Phase Approximately 3 YearsAdverse Event002
Extension Phase Approximately 3 YearsLack of Efficacy002
Extension Phase Approximately 3 YearsLost to Follow-up004
Randomization Phase 96 WeekAdverse Event5130
Randomization Phase 96 WeekLack of Efficacy340
Randomization Phase 96 WeekLost to Follow-up15180
Randomization Phase 96 WeekOther: study closed/terminated010
Randomization Phase 96 WeekPhysician Decision230
Randomization Phase 96 WeekProtocol-defined Stopping Criteria100
Randomization Phase 96 WeekProtocol Violation560
Randomization Phase 96 WeekWithdrawal by Subject280

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDTotalDTG 50 mg QD
Age, Continuous36.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.64
35.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.64
35.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
53 Participants113 Participants60 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
9 Participants12 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
173 Participants342 Participants169 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants72 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
201 Participants412 Participants211 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 2420 / 2420 / 123
other
Total, other adverse events
221 / 242214 / 24252 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
36 / 24221 / 2424 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 48

Assessment was done using Missing, Switch or Discontinuation = Failure (MSDF), as codified by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm.This algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 as nonresponders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant ART prior to Week 48 as follows: background ART substitutions non-permitted per protocol (one background ART substitution was permitted for safety or tolerability); background ART substitutions permitted per protocol unless the decision to switch was documented as being before or at the first on-treatment visit where HIV-1 RNA was assessed. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment in the snapshot window (Week 48 +/- 6 weeks). Modified Intent-To-Treat Exposed (mITT-E) Population:all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product

Time frame: Week 48

Population: mITT-E Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 4890 Percentage of participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 4883 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.02595% CI: [0.9, 13.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

SDM is a 20-item self-reported measure that addresses the presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms commonly associated with HIV or its treatment. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 where 0 (complete absence of symptom) and 4 (very bothersome symptom). Overall score calculated as the sum of the scores for each of the 20 items of the questionnaire and ranged from 0 (best health) and 80 (worst health). Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and baseline symptom bother score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicates a decline in a participant's quality of life over that period.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: mITT-E Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, n=218, 210-3.20 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24, n=222, 214-2.71 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48, n= 222, 215-2.46 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, n=218, 210-2.19 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24, n=222, 214-1.65 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48, n= 222, 215-0.77 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts

Change from Baseline in CD4+ cell counts was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48. Change from Baseline in CD8+ cell counts was assessed at Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits and parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48 for CD4+ and Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48 for CD8+

Population: mITT-E Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 16, n=227, 227156.8 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 146.6
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 48, n=227, 212243.8 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 180.68
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 12, n=234, 228135.2 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 120.03
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD8+ cell count, Week 4, n=235, 235-47.4 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 276.01
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 24, n=233, 227165.1 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 145.85
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD8+ cell count, Week 12, n=231, 227-42.0 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 343.81
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 8, n=236, 236126.9 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 124.13
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD8+ cell count, Week 24, n=231, 224-108.0 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 350.03
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 36, n=232, 218206.1 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 159.06
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD8+ cell count, Week 48, n=224, 210-109.5 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 360.94
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 4, n=237, 23680.1 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 101.36
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD8+ cell count, Week 48, n=224, 210-162.1 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 421.07
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 4, n=237, 23675.6 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 124.36
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 8, n=236, 236118.8 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 142.54
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 12, n=234, 228131.8 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 143.88
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 16, n=227, 227146.1 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 166.08
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 24, n=233, 227164.3 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 180
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 36, n=232, 218186.5 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 183.61
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD4+ cell count, Week 48, n=227, 212215.4 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 177.26
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD8+ cell count, Week 4, n=235, 235-3.7 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 375.94
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD8+ cell count, Week 12, n=231, 227-68.9 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 373.38
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell CountsCD8+ cell count, Week 24, n=231, 224-132.9 Cells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3)Standard Deviation 389.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and Week 48

The European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a 5-question quality of life instrument that provides a utility score and visual analogue scale score that describes the participants' health status. The primary reason for including the EQ-5D is to elicit utility values for potential cost-effectiveness analysis for submission to health technology assessment agencies. Thermometer score is based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 100 (best imaginable health state) to 0 (worst imaginable health state).Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, Baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and Baseline EQ-5D thermometer score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: mITT-E Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in EQ-5D Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24, n=221, 2164.95 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.885
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in EQ-5D Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48, n=224, 2205.78 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.762
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in EQ-5D Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24, n=221, 2165.96 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.895
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in EQ-5D Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48, n=224, 2206.95 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.769
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Week 24 and Week 48

The EQ-5D is a 5-question quality of life instrument that provides a utility score and visual analogue scale score that describes the participants' health status. The primary reason for including the EQ-5D is to elicit utility values for potential cost-effectiveness analysis for submission to health technology assessment agencies. The EQ-5D total score ranges from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health state) and 1 reflects the best outcome. Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and Baseline EQ-5D utility score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: mITT-E Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24, n=217, 2130.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.012
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48, n=224, 2170.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.012
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24, n=217, 2130.02 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.012
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48, n=224, 2170.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.012
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Through Week 48

Fasting LDL cholesterol change from Baseline was analyzed. Values represented are for adjusted means. Estimates are calculated from a repeated measures model including the following covariates: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, background dual NRTI therapy, Baseline LDL cholesterol, treatment\*visit interaction and Baseline LDL cholesterol\*visit interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 48

Population: mSafety Population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Through Week 480.07 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.041
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Through Week 480.37 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.041
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48

Change from Baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 . Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48

Population: mITT-E Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 12, n=234, 227-2.88 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.653
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 24, n=234, 227-2.86 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.765
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 8, n=237, 236-2.86 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.649
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 36, n=232, 218-2.87 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.715
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 16, n=229, 228-2.86 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.691
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 48, n=227, 212-2.89 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.739
DTG 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 4, n=238, 235-2.80 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.625
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 48, n=227, 212-2.86 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.663
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 4, n=238, 235-2.01 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.454
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 8, n=237, 236-2.40 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.524
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 12, n=234, 227-2.61 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.537
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 16, n=229, 228-2.71 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.618
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 24, n=234, 227-2.83 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.663
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48Week 36, n=232, 218-2.85 Log10 copies per mLStandard Deviation 0.683
Secondary

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The convenience score is the score for item 5 (range: 0-6). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.

Time frame: Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: HIVTSQ mITT-E Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, n=204, 1905.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24, n=211, 200,5.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48, n=212, 2015.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, n=204, 1905.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24, n=211, 200,5.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48, n=212, 2015.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Secondary

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The lifestyle/ease score is the sum of items 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (range: 0-30). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.

Time frame: Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: HIVTSQ mITT-E Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, n=202, 19026.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.61
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24, n=210, 19927.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48, n=211, 20127.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, n=202, 19025.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.48
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24, n=210, 19926.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48, n=211, 20126.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
Secondary

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The treatment satisfaction score (range: 0-60) was the sum of the individual items. HIVTSQ mITT-E Population=Only participants from USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain for whom valid translations were available from the mITT-E Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.

Time frame: Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: HIVTSQ mITT-E Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, n=206, 19254.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.43
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24, n= 211, 20056.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.16
DTG 50 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48, n=212, 20156.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4, n=206, 19252.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.94
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24, n= 211, 20054.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.94
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48, n=212, 20154.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.78
Secondary

Number of Participants (Par.) With Detectable Virus That Has Genotypic or Phenotypic Evidence of Treatment-emergent Resistance to DTG, DRV+RTV and Other On-study ART at Time of Protocol Defined Virology Failure (PDVF)

An assessment was made of every change across all amino acids within the integrase (IN), reverse transcriptase (RT), and Protease (PRO) encoding region at Baseline and at time of suspected PDVF. PDVF is defined as the confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>200 c/mL \>=Week 24. PDVF Genotypic Population included all participants in the mITT-E population with available on-treatment genotypic resistance data, at time of PDVF. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline until PDVF up to Week 48

Population: PDVF Genotypic Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants (Par.) With Detectable Virus That Has Genotypic or Phenotypic Evidence of Treatment-emergent Resistance to DTG, DRV+RTV and Other On-study ART at Time of Protocol Defined Virology Failure (PDVF)0 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants (Par.) With Detectable Virus That Has Genotypic or Phenotypic Evidence of Treatment-emergent Resistance to DTG, DRV+RTV and Other On-study ART at Time of Protocol Defined Virology Failure (PDVF)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HIV-1 Associated Disease Progression With the Indicated Shift to CDC Class C, or New CDC Class C or Death at Week 48

The number of participants with HIV-1 disease progression (AIDS or death) was assessed per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. The CDC classifies HIV infection as Category A (participants with asymptomatic HIV infection, acute HIV infection with accompanying illness, or persistent generalized lymphadenopathy), Category B (participants with symptomatic non-AIDS condition, i.e., conditions that are attributed to HIV infection or are indicative of a defect in cell-mediated immunity; or conditions are considered by physicians to have a clinical course or to require management that is complicated by HIV infection), and Category C (includes AIDS indicator conditions as defined by diagnostic or presumptive measures).

Time frame: Week 48

Population: mITT-E Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With HIV-1 Associated Disease Progression With the Indicated Shift to CDC Class C, or New CDC Class C or Death at Week 480 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With HIV-1 Associated Disease Progression With the Indicated Shift to CDC Class C, or New CDC Class C or Death at Week 480 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Toxicities

Hematology and clinical chemistry data were summarized according to the division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the Severity of adverse events, version 1.0. Grade 1, Mild; Grade 2, Moderate; Grade 3 (G3), Severe; Grade 4 (G4), Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to Grade 3 or Grade 4 occurred.

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 48

Population: mSafety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesAlanine Amino Transferase, G32 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesAlanine Amino Transferase, G41 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesAspartate Amino Transferase, G36 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesAspartate Amino Transferase, G42 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesCholesterol, G30 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesCreatine Kinase, G38 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesCreatine Kinase, G48 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesHyperglycaemia, G31 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesHypoglycaemia, G30 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesLDL Cholesterol, G32 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesLipase, G35 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesLipase, G42 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesPhosphorus, inorganic, G37 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTotal Bilirubin, G31 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTriglycerides, G31 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTriglycerides, G40 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesHemoglobin, G31 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesHemoglobin, G41 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesPlatelet count, G40 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTotal Neutrophils, G35 Participants
DTG 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTotal Neutrophils, G43 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesLipase, G35 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesAlanine Amino Transferase, G31 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesPlatelet count, G41 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesAlanine Amino Transferase, G43 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesLipase, G40 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesAspartate Amino Transferase, G33 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesHemoglobin, G30 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesAspartate Amino Transferase, G40 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesPhosphorus, inorganic, G37 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesCholesterol, G33 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTotal Neutrophils, G41 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesCreatine Kinase, G35 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTotal Bilirubin, G30 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesCreatine Kinase, G44 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesHemoglobin, G40 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesHyperglycaemia, G32 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTriglycerides, G32 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesHypoglycaemia, G31 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTotal Neutrophils, G30 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesLDL Cholesterol, G36 Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory ToxicitiesTriglycerides, G41 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Through Week 48

Hematology and clinical chemistry data were summarized according to the division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the Severity of adverse events, version 1.0. Grade 1, Mild; Grade 2, Moderate; Grade 3 (G3), Severe; Grade 4 (G4), Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, Death. Data are presented for which an increase in fasting LDL cholesterol to Grade 2 or higher occurred. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 48

Population: mSafety Population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Through Week 482 Percentage of Participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Through Week 487 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/mL at Week 48

The percentage of participants with Plasma HIV-1 RNA \<400 c/mL at Week 48 was assessed MSDF, as codified by the FDA snapshot algorithm. This algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 as nonresponders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant ART prior to Week 48 as follows: background ART substitutions non-permitted per protocol (one background ART substitution was permitted for safety or tolerability); background ART substitutions permitted per protocol unless the decision to switch was documented as being before or at the first on-treatment visit where HIV-1 RNA was assessed. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment in the snapshot window (Week 48 +/- 6 weeks).

Time frame: Week 48

Population: mITT-E Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/mL at Week 4892 Percentage of participants
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/mL at Week 4887 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Virologic Suppression (<50 Copies/mL) Through Week 48

The time to viral suppression (i.e. first viral load value \<50 copies/mL) through Week 48 was derived and summarized using Kaplan-Meier plots. Participants who withdrew for any reason without having suppressed prior to the analysis were censored. Confidence intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 48

Population: mITT-E Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DTG 50 mg QDTime to Virologic Suppression (<50 Copies/mL) Through Week 4828.0 Days
DRV 800 mg + RTV 100 mg QDTime to Virologic Suppression (<50 Copies/mL) Through Week 4885.0 Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026