Skip to content

Preemptive Resuscitation for Eradication of Septic Shock

Preemptive Empiric Resuscitation Protocol for the Prevention of Disease Progression in the Treatment of Sepsis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01449721
Enrollment
142
Registered
2011-10-10
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2017-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, Severe Sepsis

Keywords

Sepsis, Multiple organ failure, Resuscitation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of an empiric resuscitation strategy compared to standard care to decrease the incidence of organ failure in normotensive sepsis patients.

Detailed description

Sepsis is a challenging and elusive entity with a high mortality rate. As a syndrome, clinicians are challenged to distinguish individuals with systemic infection warranting further interventions from lower severity patients. Sepsis is now recognized as a time-sensitive emergency, as patients stand the best chance for survival when effective therapeutic interventions are delivered as early as possible. Recent data has shown that in-hospital disease progression from sepsis to septic shock is associated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality than those with shock on initial presentation. Yet, even when identified and treated with early aggressive interventions, the development of septic shock is still associated with a mortality rate of 25-40%. Although the presence of sustained arterial hypotension or serum lactate elevation (\>4.0 mmol/L) are the currently recommended threshold to define the presence of overt shock and the need for aggressive resuscitation, the investigators have shown that, in patients with systemic infection, a moderate lactate elevation (2.0-3.9 mmol/L) is a common occurrence and an important warning sign for the increased risk of disease progression and death. Sepsis with an elevated lactate between 2.0-3.9, referred to as the PRE-SHOCK state, identifies this population of patients at-risk for poor outcome. Current guidelines for sepsis management do not recommend any specific resuscitation measures or therapies for this at-risk population. This study marks the first in a series of investigations addressing the PRE-SHOCK population to further define the adverse events within this cohort and to investigate novel interventions to improve outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that an early quantitative resuscitation strategy using a protocol-directed IV fluid resuscitation will result in a significant reduction in the development of worsening organ failure (including shock) and mortality compared to standard care.

Interventions

0.9% Sodium chloride intravenous fluid

Sponsors

Christiana Care Health Services
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Emergency department patient with suspected or confirmed infection as primary reason for admission * Serum venous lactate 2.0 - 3.9 mmol/L * Hospital admission planned

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years * Pregnancy * Serum lactate ≥ 4.0 mmol/L * Any vasopressor or inotrope requirement * Mechanical ventilation or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation * Chronic end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis * Pulmonary edema as diagnosed by the primary care team * Requirement for surgery within the treatment protocol timeframe * Inability to obtain informed consent from subject or surrogate * Patient to receive comfort measures only

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Worsening Organ System Dysfunction Defined by SOFA Score Increase ≥ 172 hoursDevelopment of worsening organ failure defined by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. The SOFA score defines the presence and severity of dysfunction within 6 organ systems (cardiovascular, respiratory, coagulation, liver, renal, and nervous system) with a value of 0 for assigned to normal function to a maximum value of 4 for severe dysfunction in each of the organ systems. Each component of the SOFA score is added together, ranging from 0 indicating no organ dysfunction in any of the 6 organ systems, to 24 indicating maximal organ dysfunction across all 6 organ systems. Within this trial, the occurrence of organ failure was defined by any increase in the total SOFA score by ≥ 1 point over the first 72 hours after randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-hospital MortalityIn-hospital discharge or up to maximum 30 daysAny occurrence of mortality while the participant is in-hospital is counted as an outcome.
Number of Participants With Experiencing Complications Related to Intravascular Volume Overload12 hours following treatment initiationComposite safety endpoint: * Premature termination of the protocol-directed intravenous fluid administration by the investigator or primary physician due to presumed volume overload * Administration of intravenous diuretic for acute pulmonary edema * Respiratory failure requiring ventilatory assistance (BiPAP, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation) secondary to pulmonary edema per primary care team

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Prior to interventional arm of the trial, a 5-month observational period was performed identifying 94 patients in the control arm. At the initiation of the interventional study, subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to intervention:control, enrolling an additional 18 patients to the control arm, and 30 patients to the intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Standard medical care by the primary treatment team.
112
Interventional Arm
Protocolized empiric resuscitation delivering weight-based intravenous fluid resuscitation targeting lactate normalization Intravenous fluid: 0.9% Sodium chloride intravenous fluid
30
Total142

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlInterventional ArmTotal
Age, Continuous58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants12 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants18 Participants79 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 1120 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1120 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1123 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Worsening Organ System Dysfunction Defined by SOFA Score Increase ≥ 1

Development of worsening organ failure defined by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. The SOFA score defines the presence and severity of dysfunction within 6 organ systems (cardiovascular, respiratory, coagulation, liver, renal, and nervous system) with a value of 0 for assigned to normal function to a maximum value of 4 for severe dysfunction in each of the organ systems. Each component of the SOFA score is added together, ranging from 0 indicating no organ dysfunction in any of the 6 organ systems, to 24 indicating maximal organ dysfunction across all 6 organ systems. Within this trial, the occurrence of organ failure was defined by any increase in the total SOFA score by ≥ 1 point over the first 72 hours after randomization.

Time frame: 72 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlNumber of Participants With Worsening Organ System Dysfunction Defined by SOFA Score Increase ≥ 134 Participants
Interventional ArmNumber of Participants With Worsening Organ System Dysfunction Defined by SOFA Score Increase ≥ 120 Participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: In patients with moderate severity sepsis, there is no change in the incidence of organ dysfunction within 72 hours associated with the use of an empiric fluid resuscitation algorithm.p-value: 0.0642-sample z-test
Secondary

In-hospital Mortality

Any occurrence of mortality while the participant is in-hospital is counted as an outcome.

Time frame: In-hospital discharge or up to maximum 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlIn-hospital Mortality4 Participants
Interventional ArmIn-hospital Mortality0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Experiencing Complications Related to Intravascular Volume Overload

Composite safety endpoint: * Premature termination of the protocol-directed intravenous fluid administration by the investigator or primary physician due to presumed volume overload * Administration of intravenous diuretic for acute pulmonary edema * Respiratory failure requiring ventilatory assistance (BiPAP, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation) secondary to pulmonary edema per primary care team

Time frame: 12 hours following treatment initiation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlNumber of Participants With Experiencing Complications Related to Intravascular Volume Overload4 Participants
Interventional ArmNumber of Participants With Experiencing Complications Related to Intravascular Volume Overload3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026