Skip to content

Efficacy of an Intravitreal DEX Implant in Retinal Vein Occlusion Following Treatment With Anti-VEGF Injections.

Efficacy of an Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant on Macular Function in Retinal Vein Occlusion Following Treatment With Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01449682
Enrollment
10
Registered
2011-10-10
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2017-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retinal Vein Occlusion, Macular Edema

Keywords

BRVO, CRVO, Macular Edema, Anti-VEGF, Ozurdex

Brief summary

To test the efficacy of a 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) on macular function and recalcitrant macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion following treatment with 2 or more prior intravitreal anti-VEGF drug injections.

Detailed description

The efficacy of the DEX implant on macular edema for RVO is well established in multiple clinical trials. However, the duration and frequency of re-treatment have not been extensively explored. In addition, no prior studies have tested the efficacy of the DEX implant on retinal and macular function using diagnostic testing measurements such as multi-focal ERG, microperimetry and RAM testing. Since VA and OCT outcomes do not always correlate, these other assessments (mf-ERG, microperimetry, RAM testing) may be useful as early predictors of when or if patients should be retreated. This study will assess 2 groups (0.7mg PRN and 0.7mg Q16 weeks) and assess high resolution OCT, RAM testing, microperimetry, and Multi-focal ERG outcomes. For the PRN group retreated based on any fluid on OCT, we will investigate if microperimetry or multifocal ERG changes would have been an earlier predictor of fluid returning.

Interventions

0.7 mg intravitreal DEX implant on first visit, then PRN if evidence of macular edema on OCT studies

Sponsors

Allergan
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Retina Macula Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) * Prior treatment with \>= 2 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections but no treatment in last 45 days. * Age 18 years or older * ETDRS Visual acuity between 3 and 72 letters and approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/25 to 20/800 * Central foveal thickness \>275 microns or presence of cystic edema on OCT studies. * For sexually active women of childbearing potential, agreement to the use of an appropriate form of contraception (or abstinence) for the duration of the study. * Ability to provide written informed consent • Capable of complying with study protocol

Exclusion criteria

* History of steroid-related glaucoma (steroid response) requiring more than one topical glaucoma medication. * Intraocular injection of steroid medication within prior 4 months * Evidence of significant retinal ischemia on fluorescein angiography in the opinion of the treating physician. * Previous laser photocoagulation within 4 months of study * Concurrent ocular disease (e.g proliferative diabetic retinopathy, geographic atrophy) that would limit visual acuity in the opinion of the treating physician * Patients who are pregnant. * Unwilling or unable to follow or comply with all study related procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Macular Function Using Microperimetrybaseline to 48 weeksTo determine if there is change in mean macular sensitivity using microperimetry at 48 weeks compared to baseline for both the PRN and Q16weeks treatment groups
Macular Function Using Multi-focal ERGbaseline to 48 weeksTo determine if there is a change in central amplitude responses using multifocal ERG at 48 weeks compared to baseline values for both the PRN and Q16weeks treatment groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To Determine if There is a Change in Visual Acuity (Number of ETDRS Letters) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment Groupsbaseline to 48 weeks
To Determine if There is a Change in Central Foveal Thickness (Microns on High Resolution OCT) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment Groupsbaseline to 48 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ozurdex PRN
Drug: dexamethasone intravitreal implant Ozurdex, 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant, given at initial visit and PRN every 16 weeks Other Name: Ozurdex PRN
5
Ozurdex q16 Weeks
Drug: dexamethasone intravitreal implant Ozurdex, 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant, given at initial visit and every 16 weeks Other Name: Ozurdex PRN
5
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyDeath01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOzurdex q16 WeeksOzurdex PRNTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Age, Continuous63.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 51 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 51 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 50 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Macular Function Using Microperimetry

To determine if there is change in mean macular sensitivity using microperimetry at 48 weeks compared to baseline for both the PRN and Q16weeks treatment groups

Time frame: baseline to 48 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ozurdex PRNMacular Function Using MicroperimetryBaseline2.7 dBStandard Error 0.8
Ozurdex PRNMacular Function Using MicroperimetryFinal Visit4.2 dBStandard Error 1.7
Ozurdex Q16 WeeksMacular Function Using MicroperimetryBaseline12.7 dBStandard Error 2.6
Ozurdex Q16 WeeksMacular Function Using MicroperimetryFinal Visit10.7 dBStandard Error 1.9
Primary

Macular Function Using Multi-focal ERG

To determine if there is a change in central amplitude responses using multifocal ERG at 48 weeks compared to baseline values for both the PRN and Q16weeks treatment groups

Time frame: baseline to 48 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ozurdex PRNMacular Function Using Multi-focal ERGFinal Visit18.20 nV/deg2Standard Error 4.03
Ozurdex PRNMacular Function Using Multi-focal ERGBaseline3.61 nV/deg2Standard Error 0.39
Ozurdex Q16 WeeksMacular Function Using Multi-focal ERGBaseline6.62 nV/deg2Standard Error 0.83
Ozurdex Q16 WeeksMacular Function Using Multi-focal ERGFinal Visit30.18 nV/deg2Standard Error 9.6
Secondary

To Determine if There is a Change in Central Foveal Thickness (Microns on High Resolution OCT) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment Groups

Time frame: baseline to 48 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ozurdex PRNTo Determine if There is a Change in Central Foveal Thickness (Microns on High Resolution OCT) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment GroupsBaseline501.7 micronsStandard Error 59.7
Ozurdex PRNTo Determine if There is a Change in Central Foveal Thickness (Microns on High Resolution OCT) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment GroupsFinal Visit361.4 micronsStandard Error 47.3
Ozurdex Q16 WeeksTo Determine if There is a Change in Central Foveal Thickness (Microns on High Resolution OCT) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment GroupsBaseline353.5 micronsStandard Error 27
Ozurdex Q16 WeeksTo Determine if There is a Change in Central Foveal Thickness (Microns on High Resolution OCT) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment GroupsFinal Visit326.7 micronsStandard Error 21.2
Secondary

To Determine if There is a Change in Visual Acuity (Number of ETDRS Letters) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment Groups

Time frame: baseline to 48 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ozurdex PRNTo Determine if There is a Change in Visual Acuity (Number of ETDRS Letters) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment GroupsBaseline46.4 ETDRS lettersStandard Error 7.1
Ozurdex PRNTo Determine if There is a Change in Visual Acuity (Number of ETDRS Letters) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment GroupsFinal Visit27.8 ETDRS lettersStandard Error 8.4
Ozurdex Q16 WeeksTo Determine if There is a Change in Visual Acuity (Number of ETDRS Letters) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment GroupsBaseline55.6 ETDRS lettersStandard Error 7.5
Ozurdex Q16 WeeksTo Determine if There is a Change in Visual Acuity (Number of ETDRS Letters) at 48 Weeks Compared to Baseline Values for Both the PRN and Q16weeks Treatment GroupsFinal Visit53.2 ETDRS lettersStandard Error 8.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026