Skip to content

Athermal Nerve-sparing During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using a Hemostatic Matrix.

Prospective Randomized Investigation of Athermal Nerve-sparing During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Using a Hemostatic Gelatin-thrombin Matrix

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01448798
Acronym
AnPro
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-10-07
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2011-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction, Prostate Cancer

Keywords

radical prostatectomy, robotic surgery, erectile dysfunction, continence

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a hemostatic gelatine-thrombin matrix during athermal nerve-sparing prostate resection compared to conventional hemostasis using electrocautery in patients with localized prostate cancer and to investigate effects on postoperative erectile function and continence.

Interventions

PROCEDUREApplication of a hemostatic gelatin-thrombin matrix

Hemostatic gelatin-thrombin matrix is used for hemostasis during nerve-sparing dissection of the prostate.

PROCEDUREUse of mono- and bipolar electrocautery and surgical clips

Mono- and bipolar electrocautery and surgical clips are used for hemostasis during nerve-sparing dissection of the prostate.

Sponsors

Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient age \>18 * Histologically proven prostate cancer ( Gleason \<8; PSA\<10ng/ml) * Disease confined to prostate in clinical examination * Preoperative IEEF-5-Score\>20 * Patient is able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* ASA IV-V * Prior extensive abdominal surgery * Signs for metastatic disease * Known allergy against bovine material * Patient is unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative erectile function12 monthsPostoperative erectile function compared to preoperative status assessed validated questionnaires.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative continence12 monthsPostoperative continence compared to preoperative status assessed by validated questionnaires.
Intraoperative bloodlossDuring surgeryAmount of blood collected in the suction during surgery.
Intra- and postoperative complicationsPerioperative periodIntra- and postoperative complications associated to the study´s intervention.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactAxel Haferkamp, Prof.
axel.haferkamp@kgu.de+49-69-6301-5352
Backup ContactMichael A Reiter, Dr.
michael.reiter@kgu.de+49-69-6301-5352

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026