Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infections
Conditions
Keywords
Darunavir (DRV), TMC114, Prezista, HIV, virologic response, neurocognitive function
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg monotherapy with a triple combination therapy containing darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg and 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) in approximately 260 Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) infected patients who have been on Highly Active AntiRetroviral Therapy (HAART) medication and have a plasma Viral Load below 50 copies/mL for at least 48 weeks. Also the changes in neurocognitive function will be compared throughout the study.
Detailed description
This is phase IIIb, randomised (study medication is assigned by chance), open-label (both the patient and the study physician will know to which treatment group the patient is assigned) trial to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/rtv) 800/100 mg once daily monotherapy with a triple combination therapy containing DRV/rtv 800/100 mg once daily and an investigator-selected background of 2 other anti-HIV drugs of the class nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs). The investigator-selected N\[t\]RTIs is a dual combination of either be abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (AZT), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or emtricitabine (FTC). Approximately 260 HIV-1 infected patients, who have received HAART for at least 48 weeks, have not changed their treatment within the last 8 weeks, and who have documented evidence of plasma viral load (plasma HIV-1 RNA) below 50 copies/mL for at least 48 weeks prior to being screened, participate in the study. The study period includes a screening period of maximum 6 weeks, a 4-week run-in period, a 96 week treatment period, followed by a 4 weeks follow-up period. According to the original protocol, at the start of the 4-week run-in period all patients replaced their 3rd agent (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI), protease inhibitor (PI) or integrase inhibitor) of the HAART medication with DRV/rtv and continued with the 2 N\[t\]RTIs. After 4 weeks the patient was randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to either the monotherapy group or the triple therapy group. If assigned to the monotherapy group, the 2 N\[t\]RTIs were stopped and only DRV/rtv was continued. If assigned to the triple therapy group, DRV/rtv were continued together with 2 N\[t\]RTIs, which can be the same as already taken or are switched to new N\[t\]RTIs. Based on the primary efficacy analysis after Week 48, the protocol was amended such that subjects in the monotherapy arm who entered the study with a nadir CD4+ count of \<200 cells/μL will also receive 2 N\[t\]RTIs (ie, triple therapy) as soon as possible. The main purpose of this study is to demonstrate that DRV/rtv monotherapy is as effective as a triple combination therapy containing DRV/rtv and 2N\[t\]RTIs. In addition, the study looks at overall safety and tolerability between the two treatment groups. During the study, patients' health are monitored by physical examination, checking of vital signs (blood pressure / pulse), and laboratory testing on blood and urine samples. Also blood samples are drawn to measure the antiviral effectiveness (i.e., decrease of the plasma viral load to a level \<50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) and immunology assessments (to assess the body's immune system). A battery of neurocognitive function tests is performed during the study visits. A sub-study takes place in selected hospitals. Approximately 100 patients have 2 additional tests done, at the start of the run-in phase and after 48-weeks of randomisation. For this substudy a lumbar puncture (extraction of cerebrospinal fluid \[CSF\] from the spinal canal) for laboratory testing (antiviral effectiveness, pharmacokinetic analysis, biochemistry and immune markers) and an additional blood sample for pharmacokinetic analysis (to measure the drug level in blood) is taken. The study hypothesis is that, after 48 weeks of randomised treatment, DRV/rtv monotherapy is as effective as the triple therapy containing DRV/rtv plus 2 N\[t\]RTIs. Two 400 mg tablets of darunavir and one 100 mg tablet ritonavir are taken together once daily orally within 30 minutes after completion of a meal, for 100 weeks. The intake of the investigator-selected N\[t\]RTIs as according the local prescribing information.
Interventions
Darunavir (DRV): type = exact number, unit = mg, number = 800, form = tablet, route = oral use
ritonavir (rtv): type = exact number, unit = mg, number = 100, form = tablet, route = oral use
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* HIV-1 infection * receiving HAART for at least 48 weeks * Have at least 2 documented plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL, and no HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL in the 48 weeks prior to the screening * Be taking the same antiretroviral (ARV) combination for at least 8 weeks before screening * Have the preference, together with the physician, to change the current HAART regimen for reasons of simplification and/or toxicity
Exclusion criteria
* Has a history of virologic failure defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA \>500 copies/mL while on previous or current antiretroviral therapy * Has a history of any primary PI mutations * Has clinical or laboratory evidence of significantly decreased hepatic function or decompensation, irrespective of liver enzyme levels (liver insufficiency) * Is diagnosed with acute viral hepatitis at screening or before Baseline 1 * Is co-infected with hepatitis B
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure) | Week 48 | The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 48 weeks of follow-up. Switch = Failure is defined as switch in background nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) not permitted by the trial protocol or plasma HIV-1 RNA assessment closest to target date of the analysis time point window (44-52 weeks) and next/confirmation of Plasma HIV-1 RNA in the analysis time point window above the threshold or discontinuation for any other reason. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included) | Week 48 and 96 | The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 48 and 96 weeks of follow-up after switching to DRV/ritonavir(rtv) monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv. Switch included is defined as all participants who discontinued randomized medication were followed up on their subsequent treatment. |
| Change From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-Score | Baseline, Week 48 and 96 | Change in neurocognitive function of DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv over 48 and 96 weeks. Neurocognitive function will be measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (verbal learning and memory), Colour Trail Test (psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility) and Grooved Pegboard Test (psychomotor speed and fine motor function). Higher values for change in z-score represent an improvement in Neurocognitive Performance (NP). |
| Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure) | Week 96 | The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 96 weeks of follow-up after switching to DRV/ritonavir(rtv) monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv. Switch = Failure is defined as switch in background nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) not permitted by the trial protocol. |
| Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance | At Weeks 48 and 96 | The loss of treatment options of DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv at Weeks 48 and 96, as defined by treatment-emergent phenotypic drug resistance. Drug resistance is classified as: 1) Confirmed HIV RNA \>= 400 copies/mL, 2) Post-baseline phenotypic data and 3) Phenotypic resistance to any of the drug classes (NRTI, NNRTI, or PI). |
| Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Over 48 and 96 Weeks | The viral genotype of participants treated with DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv over 48 and 96 weeks. Genotypic resistance (number of resistance mutations) at any time point when a participant had a confirmed plasma VL \>400 copies/mL after randomization was performed per treatment group for the ITT population. Results were summarized based on individual treatment received: Darunavir resistance mutations, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations, protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations, PR mutations, RT mutations, extended NNRTI mutations, primary PI mutations. |
| Time to Loss of Virologic Response | Baseline up to Week 96 or early withdrawal | Time (in days) it takes to show loss of response per time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) algorithm: confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL or premature discontinuation. |
Countries
Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
325 participants screened, among them 282 were eligible for run-in phase and among them 274 enrolled to the study. 1 randomized participant was not treated (274 participants were randomized).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| DRV/Rtv MONO Darunavir (DRV) and ritonavir (rtv): 2 tablets DRV 400 mg were taken together with 1 tablet rtv 100 mg within 30 minutes after a meal. | 137 |
| DRV/Rtv + 2NRTIs Darunavir (DRV), ritonavir (rtv) and 2 N\[t\]RTIs: 2 tablets DRV 400 mg were taken together with 1 tablet rtv 100 mg within 30 minutes after a meal in combination with 2 N\[t\]RTIs (an investigator-selected dual combination of either abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (AZT), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or emtricitabine (FTC). | 136 |
| Total | 273 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Other | 7 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | DRV/Rtv MONO | DRV/Rtv + 2NRTIs | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 44.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.21 | 43.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41 | 43.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82 |
| Region of Enrollment AUSTRIA | 5 participants | 5 participants | 10 participants |
| Region of Enrollment BELGIUM | 7 participants | 8 participants | 15 participants |
| Region of Enrollment DENMARK | 8 participants | 7 participants | 15 participants |
| Region of Enrollment FRANCE | 16 participants | 12 participants | 28 participants |
| Region of Enrollment GERMANY | 11 participants | 11 participants | 22 participants |
| Region of Enrollment HUNGARY | 5 participants | 3 participants | 8 participants |
| Region of Enrollment IRELAND | 3 participants | 5 participants | 8 participants |
| Region of Enrollment ISRAEL | 5 participants | 5 participants | 10 participants |
| Region of Enrollment ITALY | 22 participants | 24 participants | 46 participants |
| Region of Enrollment POLAND | 7 participants | 6 participants | 13 participants |
| Region of Enrollment SPAIN | 17 participants | 23 participants | 40 participants |
| Region of Enrollment SWEDEN | 3 participants | 4 participants | 7 participants |
| Region of Enrollment SWITZERLAND | 10 participants | 5 participants | 15 participants |
| Region of Enrollment UNITED KINGDOM | 18 participants | 18 participants | 36 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 26 Participants | 21 Participants | 47 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 111 Participants | 115 Participants | 226 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 61 / 137 | 47 / 136 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 18 / 137 | 14 / 136 |
Outcome results
Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)
The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 48 weeks of follow-up. Switch = Failure is defined as switch in background nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) not permitted by the trial protocol or plasma HIV-1 RNA assessment closest to target date of the analysis time point window (44-52 weeks) and next/confirmation of Plasma HIV-1 RNA in the analysis time point window above the threshold or discontinuation for any other reason.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DRV/r | Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure) | 87.0 Percentage of Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure) | 95.0 Percentage of Participants |
Change From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-Score
Change in neurocognitive function of DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv over 48 and 96 weeks. Neurocognitive function will be measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (verbal learning and memory), Colour Trail Test (psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility) and Grooved Pegboard Test (psychomotor speed and fine motor function). Higher values for change in z-score represent an improvement in Neurocognitive Performance (NP).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and 96
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRV/r | Change From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-Score | Change at Week 48 | 0.39 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.048 |
| DRV/r | Change From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-Score | Change at Week 96 | 0.63 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Change From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-Score | Change at Week 48 | 0.42 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.057 |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Change From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-Score | Change at Week 96 | 0.57 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.057 |
Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results
The viral genotype of participants treated with DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv over 48 and 96 weeks. Genotypic resistance (number of resistance mutations) at any time point when a participant had a confirmed plasma VL \>400 copies/mL after randomization was performed per treatment group for the ITT population. Results were summarized based on individual treatment received: Darunavir resistance mutations, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations, protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations, PR mutations, RT mutations, extended NNRTI mutations, primary PI mutations.
Time frame: Over 48 and 96 Weeks
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 0 Darunavir resistance mutations | 2 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 7 PR mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 5 PI resistance mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 14 RT mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 1 NNRTI mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 16 RT mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 6 PI resistance mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 33 RT mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 0 NNRTI mutations | 2 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of extended 0 NNRTI mutations | 2 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 11 PR mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of extended 1 NNRTI mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 1 PI resistance mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of primary 0 PI mutations | 2 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 15 PR mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of participants with no mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Participans with HIV RNA >= 400 copies/mL | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of participants with no mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Participans with HIV RNA >= 400 copies/mL | 2 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 0 Darunavir resistance mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 0 NNRTI mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 1 NNRTI mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 1 PI resistance mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 5 PI resistance mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 6 PI resistance mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 11 PR mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 15 PR mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 7 PR mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 14 RT mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 16 RT mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of 33 RT mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of extended 0 NNRTI mutations | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of extended 1 NNRTI mutations | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results | Number of primary 0 PI mutations | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance
The loss of treatment options of DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv at Weeks 48 and 96, as defined by treatment-emergent phenotypic drug resistance. Drug resistance is classified as: 1) Confirmed HIV RNA \>= 400 copies/mL, 2) Post-baseline phenotypic data and 3) Phenotypic resistance to any of the drug classes (NRTI, NNRTI, or PI).
Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance | Confirmed HIV RNA >= 400 copies/mL | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance | Post-baseline phenotypic data | 2 Participants |
| DRV/r | Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance | Phenotypic resistance to any of the drug classes | 0 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance | Confirmed HIV RNA >= 400 copies/mL | 2 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance | Post-baseline phenotypic data | 1 Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance | Phenotypic resistance to any of the drug classes | 0 Participants |
Time to Loss of Virologic Response
Time (in days) it takes to show loss of response per time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) algorithm: confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL or premature discontinuation.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96 or early withdrawal
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRV/r | Time to Loss of Virologic Response | NA Days | Full Range 19.92 |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Time to Loss of Virologic Response | NA Days | Full Range 18.88 |
Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included)
The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 48 and 96 weeks of follow-up after switching to DRV/ritonavir(rtv) monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv. Switch included is defined as all participants who discontinued randomized medication were followed up on their subsequent treatment.
Time frame: Week 48 and 96
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRV/r | Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included) | Week 48 | 93.0 Percentage of Participants |
| DRV/r | Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included) | Week 96 | 89.3 Percentage of Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included) | Week 48 | 96.5 Percentage of Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included) | Week 96 | 89.9 Percentage of Participants |
Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)
The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 96 weeks of follow-up after switching to DRV/ritonavir(rtv) monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv. Switch = Failure is defined as switch in background nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) not permitted by the trial protocol.
Time frame: Week 96
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DRV/r | Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure) | 75.2 Percentage of Participants |
| DRV/r + 2NRTIs | Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure) | 85.3 Percentage of Participants |