Skip to content

A Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus a Triple Combination Therapy Containing Darunavir/Ritonavir and 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Patients With Undetectable Plasma HIV-1 RNA on Current Treatment

PROTEAse Inhibitor (DRV/Rtv) in Mono- or Triple Therapy in Suppressed HIV-1 Infected Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01448707
Acronym
PROTEA
Enrollment
274
Registered
2011-10-07
Start date
2012-03-15
Completion date
2015-03-18
Last updated
2017-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infections

Keywords

Darunavir (DRV), TMC114, Prezista, HIV, virologic response, neurocognitive function

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg monotherapy with a triple combination therapy containing darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg and 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) in approximately 260 Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) infected patients who have been on Highly Active AntiRetroviral Therapy (HAART) medication and have a plasma Viral Load below 50 copies/mL for at least 48 weeks. Also the changes in neurocognitive function will be compared throughout the study.

Detailed description

This is phase IIIb, randomised (study medication is assigned by chance), open-label (both the patient and the study physician will know to which treatment group the patient is assigned) trial to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/rtv) 800/100 mg once daily monotherapy with a triple combination therapy containing DRV/rtv 800/100 mg once daily and an investigator-selected background of 2 other anti-HIV drugs of the class nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs). The investigator-selected N\[t\]RTIs is a dual combination of either be abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (AZT), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or emtricitabine (FTC). Approximately 260 HIV-1 infected patients, who have received HAART for at least 48 weeks, have not changed their treatment within the last 8 weeks, and who have documented evidence of plasma viral load (plasma HIV-1 RNA) below 50 copies/mL for at least 48 weeks prior to being screened, participate in the study. The study period includes a screening period of maximum 6 weeks, a 4-week run-in period, a 96 week treatment period, followed by a 4 weeks follow-up period. According to the original protocol, at the start of the 4-week run-in period all patients replaced their 3rd agent (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI), protease inhibitor (PI) or integrase inhibitor) of the HAART medication with DRV/rtv and continued with the 2 N\[t\]RTIs. After 4 weeks the patient was randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to either the monotherapy group or the triple therapy group. If assigned to the monotherapy group, the 2 N\[t\]RTIs were stopped and only DRV/rtv was continued. If assigned to the triple therapy group, DRV/rtv were continued together with 2 N\[t\]RTIs, which can be the same as already taken or are switched to new N\[t\]RTIs. Based on the primary efficacy analysis after Week 48, the protocol was amended such that subjects in the monotherapy arm who entered the study with a nadir CD4+ count of \<200 cells/μL will also receive 2 N\[t\]RTIs (ie, triple therapy) as soon as possible. The main purpose of this study is to demonstrate that DRV/rtv monotherapy is as effective as a triple combination therapy containing DRV/rtv and 2N\[t\]RTIs. In addition, the study looks at overall safety and tolerability between the two treatment groups. During the study, patients' health are monitored by physical examination, checking of vital signs (blood pressure / pulse), and laboratory testing on blood and urine samples. Also blood samples are drawn to measure the antiviral effectiveness (i.e., decrease of the plasma viral load to a level \<50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) and immunology assessments (to assess the body's immune system). A battery of neurocognitive function tests is performed during the study visits. A sub-study takes place in selected hospitals. Approximately 100 patients have 2 additional tests done, at the start of the run-in phase and after 48-weeks of randomisation. For this substudy a lumbar puncture (extraction of cerebrospinal fluid \[CSF\] from the spinal canal) for laboratory testing (antiviral effectiveness, pharmacokinetic analysis, biochemistry and immune markers) and an additional blood sample for pharmacokinetic analysis (to measure the drug level in blood) is taken. The study hypothesis is that, after 48 weeks of randomised treatment, DRV/rtv monotherapy is as effective as the triple therapy containing DRV/rtv plus 2 N\[t\]RTIs. Two 400 mg tablets of darunavir and one 100 mg tablet ritonavir are taken together once daily orally within 30 minutes after completion of a meal, for 100 weeks. The intake of the investigator-selected N\[t\]RTIs as according the local prescribing information.

Interventions

DRUGDarunavir

Darunavir (DRV): type = exact number, unit = mg, number = 800, form = tablet, route = oral use

DRUGRitonavir

ritonavir (rtv): type = exact number, unit = mg, number = 100, form = tablet, route = oral use

Sponsors

Janssen-Cilag International NV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-1 infection * receiving HAART for at least 48 weeks * Have at least 2 documented plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL, and no HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL in the 48 weeks prior to the screening * Be taking the same antiretroviral (ARV) combination for at least 8 weeks before screening * Have the preference, together with the physician, to change the current HAART regimen for reasons of simplification and/or toxicity

Exclusion criteria

* Has a history of virologic failure defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA \>500 copies/mL while on previous or current antiretroviral therapy * Has a history of any primary PI mutations * Has clinical or laboratory evidence of significantly decreased hepatic function or decompensation, irrespective of liver enzyme levels (liver insufficiency) * Is diagnosed with acute viral hepatitis at screening or before Baseline 1 * Is co-infected with hepatitis B

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)Week 48The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 48 weeks of follow-up. Switch = Failure is defined as switch in background nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) not permitted by the trial protocol or plasma HIV-1 RNA assessment closest to target date of the analysis time point window (44-52 weeks) and next/confirmation of Plasma HIV-1 RNA in the analysis time point window above the threshold or discontinuation for any other reason.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included)Week 48 and 96The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 48 and 96 weeks of follow-up after switching to DRV/ritonavir(rtv) monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv. Switch included is defined as all participants who discontinued randomized medication were followed up on their subsequent treatment.
Change From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-ScoreBaseline, Week 48 and 96Change in neurocognitive function of DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv over 48 and 96 weeks. Neurocognitive function will be measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (verbal learning and memory), Colour Trail Test (psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility) and Grooved Pegboard Test (psychomotor speed and fine motor function). Higher values for change in z-score represent an improvement in Neurocognitive Performance (NP).
Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)Week 96The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 96 weeks of follow-up after switching to DRV/ritonavir(rtv) monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv. Switch = Failure is defined as switch in background nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) not permitted by the trial protocol.
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug ResistanceAt Weeks 48 and 96The loss of treatment options of DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv at Weeks 48 and 96, as defined by treatment-emergent phenotypic drug resistance. Drug resistance is classified as: 1) Confirmed HIV RNA \>= 400 copies/mL, 2) Post-baseline phenotypic data and 3) Phenotypic resistance to any of the drug classes (NRTI, NNRTI, or PI).
Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsOver 48 and 96 WeeksThe viral genotype of participants treated with DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv over 48 and 96 weeks. Genotypic resistance (number of resistance mutations) at any time point when a participant had a confirmed plasma VL \>400 copies/mL after randomization was performed per treatment group for the ITT population. Results were summarized based on individual treatment received: Darunavir resistance mutations, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations, protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations, PR mutations, RT mutations, extended NNRTI mutations, primary PI mutations.
Time to Loss of Virologic ResponseBaseline up to Week 96 or early withdrawalTime (in days) it takes to show loss of response per time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) algorithm: confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL or premature discontinuation.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

325 participants screened, among them 282 were eligible for run-in phase and among them 274 enrolled to the study. 1 randomized participant was not treated (274 participants were randomized).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DRV/Rtv MONO
Darunavir (DRV) and ritonavir (rtv): 2 tablets DRV 400 mg were taken together with 1 tablet rtv 100 mg within 30 minutes after a meal.
137
DRV/Rtv + 2NRTIs
Darunavir (DRV), ritonavir (rtv) and 2 N\[t\]RTIs: 2 tablets DRV 400 mg were taken together with 1 tablet rtv 100 mg within 30 minutes after a meal in combination with 2 N\[t\]RTIs (an investigator-selected dual combination of either abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (AZT), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or emtricitabine (FTC).
136
Total273

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up26
Overall StudyOther74
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject67

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDRV/Rtv MONODRV/Rtv + 2NRTIsTotal
Age, Continuous44.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.21
43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41
43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82
Region of Enrollment
AUSTRIA
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
BELGIUM
7 participants8 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
DENMARK
8 participants7 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
FRANCE
16 participants12 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
11 participants11 participants22 participants
Region of Enrollment
HUNGARY
5 participants3 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
IRELAND
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
ISRAEL
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
ITALY
22 participants24 participants46 participants
Region of Enrollment
POLAND
7 participants6 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
17 participants23 participants40 participants
Region of Enrollment
SWEDEN
3 participants4 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
SWITZERLAND
10 participants5 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED KINGDOM
18 participants18 participants36 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants21 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
111 Participants115 Participants226 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
61 / 13747 / 136
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 13714 / 136

Outcome results

Primary

Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)

The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 48 weeks of follow-up. Switch = Failure is defined as switch in background nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) not permitted by the trial protocol or plasma HIV-1 RNA assessment closest to target date of the analysis time point window (44-52 weeks) and next/confirmation of Plasma HIV-1 RNA in the analysis time point window above the threshold or discontinuation for any other reason.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/rVirologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)87.0 Percentage of Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsVirologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)95.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.233195% CI: [-14.64, -1.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-Score

Change in neurocognitive function of DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv over 48 and 96 weeks. Neurocognitive function will be measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (verbal learning and memory), Colour Trail Test (psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility) and Grooved Pegboard Test (psychomotor speed and fine motor function). Higher values for change in z-score represent an improvement in Neurocognitive Performance (NP).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and 96

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-ScoreChange at Week 480.39 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.048
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-ScoreChange at Week 960.63 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.06
DRV/r + 2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-ScoreChange at Week 480.42 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.057
DRV/r + 2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Global Neurocognitive Performance z-ScoreChange at Week 960.57 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.057
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance Results

The viral genotype of participants treated with DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv over 48 and 96 weeks. Genotypic resistance (number of resistance mutations) at any time point when a participant had a confirmed plasma VL \>400 copies/mL after randomization was performed per treatment group for the ITT population. Results were summarized based on individual treatment received: Darunavir resistance mutations, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations, protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations, PR mutations, RT mutations, extended NNRTI mutations, primary PI mutations.

Time frame: Over 48 and 96 Weeks

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 0 Darunavir resistance mutations2 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 7 PR mutations1 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 5 PI resistance mutations0 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 14 RT mutations1 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 1 NNRTI mutations0 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 16 RT mutations0 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 6 PI resistance mutations1 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 33 RT mutations1 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 0 NNRTI mutations2 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of extended 0 NNRTI mutations2 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 11 PR mutations0 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of extended 1 NNRTI mutations0 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 1 PI resistance mutations1 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of primary 0 PI mutations2 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 15 PR mutations1 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of participants with no mutations0 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsParticipans with HIV RNA >= 400 copies/mL1 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of participants with no mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsParticipans with HIV RNA >= 400 copies/mL2 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 0 Darunavir resistance mutations1 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 0 NNRTI mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 1 NNRTI mutations1 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 1 PI resistance mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 5 PI resistance mutations1 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 6 PI resistance mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 11 PR mutations1 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 15 PR mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 7 PR mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 14 RT mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 16 RT mutations1 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of 33 RT mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of extended 0 NNRTI mutations0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of extended 1 NNRTI mutations1 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Resistance Mutations With Confirmed Virologic Failure Who Have HIV RNA >400 Copies/mL and Genotype Resistance ResultsNumber of primary 0 PI mutations1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug Resistance

The loss of treatment options of DRV/rtv monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv at Weeks 48 and 96, as defined by treatment-emergent phenotypic drug resistance. Drug resistance is classified as: 1) Confirmed HIV RNA \>= 400 copies/mL, 2) Post-baseline phenotypic data and 3) Phenotypic resistance to any of the drug classes (NRTI, NNRTI, or PI).

Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug ResistanceConfirmed HIV RNA >= 400 copies/mL1 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug ResistancePost-baseline phenotypic data2 Participants
DRV/rNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug ResistancePhenotypic resistance to any of the drug classes0 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug ResistanceConfirmed HIV RNA >= 400 copies/mL2 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug ResistancePost-baseline phenotypic data1 Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Phenotypic Drug ResistancePhenotypic resistance to any of the drug classes0 Participants
Secondary

Time to Loss of Virologic Response

Time (in days) it takes to show loss of response per time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) algorithm: confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL or premature discontinuation.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96 or early withdrawal

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
DRV/rTime to Loss of Virologic ResponseNA DaysFull Range 19.92
DRV/r + 2NRTIsTime to Loss of Virologic ResponseNA DaysFull Range 18.88
Secondary

Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included)

The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 48 and 96 weeks of follow-up after switching to DRV/ritonavir(rtv) monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv. Switch included is defined as all participants who discontinued randomized medication were followed up on their subsequent treatment.

Time frame: Week 48 and 96

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DRV/rVirologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included)Week 4893.0 Percentage of Participants
DRV/rVirologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included)Week 9689.3 Percentage of Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsVirologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included)Week 4896.5 Percentage of Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsVirologic Response (FDA Snapshot, Switch Included)Week 9689.9 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.001695% CI: [-8.77, 1.72]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.002295% CI: [-7.89, 6.58]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Virologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)

The percentage of participants who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \<50 copies/milliliters \[mL\] after 96 weeks of follow-up after switching to DRV/ritonavir(rtv) monotherapy versus triple therapy containing DRV/rtv. Switch = Failure is defined as switch in background nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N\[t\]RTIs) not permitted by the trial protocol.

Time frame: Week 96

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is the set of all participants who were randomized and who took at least one dose of study medication in the treatment phase.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/rVirologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)75.2 Percentage of Participants
DRV/r + 2NRTIsVirologic Response (Food Drug and Administration [FDA] Snapshot, Switch = Failure)85.3 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.693395% CI: [-19.5, -0.73]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026