Skip to content

Tolerance and Efficacy of a Predigested, High Protein, High Omega 3 Fat Enteral Feeding Formula Versus a Standard Formula In Multiple Intensive Care Unit Settings

Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Tolerance and Safety of VITAL AF (Semi Elemental, High Protein, High Omega 3 Fat Enteral Formula) Versus Osmolite 1.2 (High Protein Enteral Formula) in Multiple ICU Settings (Medical, Surgical, Cardiothoracic)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01448135
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-10-07
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2015-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness, Enteral Feeding

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerance profile of the enteral feeding product VITAL AF (a semi-elemental, high protein, and high omega-3 fish oil) when compared to Osmolite 1.2, a standard feeding product in critically ill and/or post surgical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). If enough patients are recruited, inferences about impact on outcomes may also be drawn.

Interventions

OTHERVITAL AF

Semi-elemental, high protein, and high omega-3 fish oil enteral formula

OTHEROsmolite 1.2

High protein enteral formula

Sponsors

Abbott Nutrition
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject requires enteral tube feeding as sole source of nourishment * Subject, or subject's legally acceptable representative (LAR), has provided voluntarily and informed consent form, as deemed appropriate and approved by the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Review Board * Subject is ≥ 18 years of age * Subject is male or non-pregnant female at least six weeks postpartum and non-lactating females of childbearing potential will be required to confirm non-pregnancy status with a pregnancy test at screening * Subject has an initial APACHE II score less than or equal to 24

Exclusion criteria

* Subject requires parenteral nutrition * Subject is acutely impacted or constipated * Subject has intestinal obstruction * Subject is too hemodynamically unstable for enteral feeding * Subject has an allergy or intolerance to any ingredient in the study product by documentation or verbal report by subject or subject's LAR * Subject is participating in a non-Abbott approved concomitant trial * Subject has gastrointestinal disease, including acute pancreatitis, active gastrointestinal bleeding, acute inflammatory bowel disease, or has undergone intestinal surgery within the past month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improved tolerance to enteral (tube) feedingBaseline and 21 DaysMeasure incidence of diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, increased gastric residual, etc.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improved delivery of prescribed caloriesBaseline and 21 DaysMeasurement of volume of feeding product actually delivered to patient is part of the daily flow-sheet data.
Decreased incidence of complicationsBaseline and 21 DaysMeasure incidence of diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, increased gastric residual, etc.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026