Skip to content

SMART Clinical Study: Surgical Multi-center Assessment of RF Ablation for the Treatment of Vertebrogenic Back Pain

A Prospective Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Investigation Evaluating the Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System for the Reduction of Pain in Patients With Chronic Axial Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01446419
Acronym
SMART
Enrollment
225
Registered
2011-10-05
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

chronic axial low back pain, vertebrogenic pain, Radio frequency ablation

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of RF ablation using the Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System to ablate intraosseous nerves for the relief of chronic axial low back pain. This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial with an optional crossover component.

Interventions

DEVICEIntracept Treatment

Percutaneous transpedicular RF ablation of an intraosseous nerve within the lumbar vertebral body to treat chronic axial low back.

DEVICESham Treatment

Percutaneous transpedicular access to the lumbar vertebra, no RF ablation delivered.

Sponsors

Relievant Medsystems, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Skeletally mature patients age 25 - 70 years, inclusive * Chronic lower back pain for at least six (6) months * Failure to respond to at least six (6) months of non-operative conservative management. The minimum requirement is as follows: * Analgesic therapy (minimum of 2 weeks) and a minimum of 4 weeks of NSAID therapy * Supervised exercise program(minimum of 12 sessions) * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at time of evaluation of at least 30 points * Baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of at least 4cm on a 10cm scale * The following test indicating that the vertebral body is the source of pain: 1.MRI showing Type 1 or Type II Modic changes at least one vertebral endplate, at one or more levels from L3 to S1 * Understands the local language and is willing and able to follow the requirements of the protocol * Understands the informed consent and signs the institutional review board/ independent ethics committee (IRB/IEC) approved informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Radicular pain by history or evidence of pain or neurological deficit in a dermatomal zone at or below the medial thigh. * Previous surgery performed on the lumbar spine * History of symptomatic spinal stenosis * History of osteoporotic or tumor-related vertebral body compression fracture * History of vertebral cancer or spinal metastasis * History of spinal infection * Metabolic bone disease (e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta) * BMI ≥40 * Osteoporosis, defined as T score \<-2.5 * Any radiographic evidence of other important back pathology, such as: 1. Nerve root compression or severe effacement of the thecal sac that correlates with radicular pain or muscle weakness 2. Disc extrusion or disc protrusion \>5mm 3. Facet arthrosis or facet effusion at any lumbar level that correlates with clinical evidence of facet mediated low back pain 4. Spondylolisthesis 2mm or greater at any level 5. Spondylolysis at any level * MRI evidence of Modic changes, Type I or Type II at greater than 3 vertebral bodies. * Any back pathology related to trauma, evidence of vertebral compression fracture or other spinal pathology that could affect assessment of response to back pain * Demonstrates 3 or more Waddell's signs of Inorganic Behavior * Any evidence of current systemic infection * Uncorrected bleeding diathesis * Any neurologic problem that prevents early mobilization after surgery or interferes with assessment of ODI * Contraindication to MRI or patients who have allergies to the components of the Intracept device * Pregnant, lactating or plan to become pregnant in next year * Diabetes requiring daily insulin * Current use of steroid therapy, with the exception of inhalation steroids for asthma * Evidence of mental instability or uncontrolled depression; patients requiring anti-depressants or anti-psychotics within 3 months of enrollment are not eligible; patients with a Beck Depression Score of greater than 24 are not eligible * Receiving Workmen's Compensation * Currently involved in litigation regarding back pain/injury or financial incentive to remain impaired * Any medical condition that impairs follow-up * Contraindications to the proposed anesthetic protocol. * Evidence of substance abuse; patients using prescribed extended release narcotics are not eligible (e.g. fentanyl patch,MS contin, oxycontin) * Known to require at the time of screening and/or randomization, additional surgery to the lumbar spinal region within six months * Being treated with radiation, chemotherapy, immunosuppression, or chronic steroid therapy (prednisone use up to 5 mg/qd or its equivalent is allowed) * Has a life expectancy of less than 1 year * Has active implantable devices, such as cardiac pacemakers, spinal cord stimulators, etc. * Is a prisoner

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ODI From Baseline to 3 Months Post-treatment3 monthsThe primary variable is the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the primary efficacy endpoint is the mean improvement from baseline to 3 months in the ODI. The primary endpoint will be evaluated in both the treatment and sham groups with between-group comparisons used to assess the success of the Intracept System in reducing chronic axial low back pain. ODI is a patient questionnaire that assesses back dysfunction due to back pain. There are 10 questions that are scored from 0-5. The obtained score is multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score that is reported on a scale of 0-100. Scores are interpreted as follows: 0-20% minimum disability; 21-40% moderate disability; 41-60% severe disability; 61-80% crippled; 81-100% bed bound or exaggerating their symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Success at 3 Months3 monthsProportion of subjects with clinical success at 3 months, where clinical success was defined as: * 3 month ODI score represented at least a 15-point reduction from baseline * no device or procedure related SAE between baseline and 3 mos. * no increase in opioid use between procedure and 3 mos. * no deficit in a motor or dermatomal sensory group at the treated level at 3 mos. * no operative interventions or invasive procedures for lumbar back pain by a pain management or spinal specialist between procedure and 3 mos.
Change in ODI From Baseline to 6 Months Post-treatment6 monthsThe improvement in ODI at 6 months compared to baseline. ODI is a patient questionnaire that assesses back dysfunction due to back pain. There are 10 questions that are scored from 0-5. The obtained score is multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score that is reported on a scale of 0-100. Scores are interpreted as follows: 0-20% minimum disability; 21-40% moderate disability; 41-60% severe disability; 61-80% crippled; 81-100% bed bound or exaggerating their symptoms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were screened and enrolled at 15 sites in the US and 3 sites in Germany

Pre-assignment details

2:1 Randomization (treatment: sham)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intracept Treatment
Intracept Treatment: Percutaneous access and RF ablation of the basivertebral nerve within the lumbar vertebral body to treat chronic axial low back.
147
Sham Treatment
Sham Treatment: Percutaneous access to the lumbar vertebra, no RF ablation delivered.
78
Total225

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyTerminated per protocol30
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham TreatmentIntracept TreatmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants9 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
74 Participants138 Participants212 Participants
Age, Continuous47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.46
47.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.95
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants138 Participants211 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Gender
Female
37 Participants65 Participants102 Participants
Gender
Male
41 Participants82 Participants123 Participants
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)41.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.39
42.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.73
42.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.63
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
71 Participants134 Participants205 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
9 participants14 participants23 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
69 participants133 participants202 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
78 / 14724 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 1475 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Change in ODI From Baseline to 3 Months Post-treatment

The primary variable is the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the primary efficacy endpoint is the mean improvement from baseline to 3 months in the ODI. The primary endpoint will be evaluated in both the treatment and sham groups with between-group comparisons used to assess the success of the Intracept System in reducing chronic axial low back pain. ODI is a patient questionnaire that assesses back dysfunction due to back pain. There are 10 questions that are scored from 0-5. The obtained score is multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score that is reported on a scale of 0-100. Scores are interpreted as follows: 0-20% minimum disability; 21-40% moderate disability; 41-60% severe disability; 61-80% crippled; 81-100% bed bound or exaggerating their symptoms.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Per Protocol Population: subjects that received the intended therapy per randomization assignment (appropriate ablation of the basivertebral nerve in the Intracept System arm) and completed follow-up per the study protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Intracept TreatmentChange in ODI From Baseline to 3 Months Post-treatment-20.5 units on a scale
Sham TreatmentChange in ODI From Baseline to 3 Months Post-treatment-15.2 units on a scale
p-value: 0.019ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in ODI From Baseline to 6 Months Post-treatment

The improvement in ODI at 6 months compared to baseline. ODI is a patient questionnaire that assesses back dysfunction due to back pain. There are 10 questions that are scored from 0-5. The obtained score is multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score that is reported on a scale of 0-100. Scores are interpreted as follows: 0-20% minimum disability; 21-40% moderate disability; 41-60% severe disability; 61-80% crippled; 81-100% bed bound or exaggerating their symptoms.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Per Protocol Population: subjects that received the intended therapy per randomization assignment (appropriate ablation of the basivertebral nerve in the Intracept System arm) and completed follow-up per the study protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Intracept TreatmentChange in ODI From Baseline to 6 Months Post-treatment-20.8 units on a scale
Sham TreatmentChange in ODI From Baseline to 6 Months Post-treatment-17.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Patient Success at 3 Months

Proportion of subjects with clinical success at 3 months, where clinical success was defined as: * 3 month ODI score represented at least a 15-point reduction from baseline * no device or procedure related SAE between baseline and 3 mos. * no increase in opioid use between procedure and 3 mos. * no deficit in a motor or dermatomal sensory group at the treated level at 3 mos. * no operative interventions or invasive procedures for lumbar back pain by a pain management or spinal specialist between procedure and 3 mos.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Per Protocol Population: subjects that received the intended therapy per randomization assignment (appropriate ablation of the basivertebral nerve in the Intracept System arm) and completed follow-up per the study protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intracept TreatmentPatient Success at 3 Months55.5 percentage of patients
Sham TreatmentPatient Success at 3 Months45.5 percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026