Central Obesity, Hypertriglyceridemia
Conditions
Keywords
fructose, hypertriglyceridemia, postprandial lipids, de novo lipogenesis, stable isotopes
Brief summary
High fructose intake is increasingly recognized as causative in development of prediabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The mechanisms underlying fructose-induced metabolic disturbances are unclear but are beginning to be unraveled. In contrast to metabolism of glucose, the breakdown of fructose leads to the generation of metabolites that stimulate hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and increased levels of both fasting and postprandial triglycerides. The key lipogenic transcription factor seems to be activated by fructose independently of insulin. However, it is still controversial whether fructose consumption increases DNL in man to the extent that it induces metabolic disturbances. Animal studies have shown that also the adipose tissue is responsive to fructose feeding fructose, and that high fructose-feeding induces insulin resistance and inflammation in the adipose tissue. The role of intestinal insulin resistance in fructose-induced dysmetabolism has not been studied in detail. The critical question is whether the metabolic disturbances are induced by calorie excess or by fructose per se.
Detailed description
Detailed description: Study subjects will participate to studies 1-4 before and 3 m after fructose diet: 1. An oral fat load or a kinetic study with stable isotopes combined with an oral fat load. 2. Determination of liver, subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat. (Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ) 3. Lipolytic enzymes, advanced lipid analysis, fat biopsies and genetic studies and gut microbiota profiling 4. Oral glucose tolerance test and analysis of incretins and inflammatory biomarkers.
Interventions
3 month fructose diet 75 g/day
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Body mass index 27-40 * Waist \> 96 cm * Age 20-60 years * Male
Exclusion criteria
* Smoking * Active health problems * Contraindications to MRI scanning * Bleeding tendency * Abnormal liver or renal function tests * Type 2 diabetes * Evidence of metabolic or viral liver disease * Alcohol intake \> 21 units per week * Chronic medication except ones needed for stable hypertension
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| TG Plasma AUC | Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2) | Before vs. after fructose challenge: Triglycerides (TG) plasma Area Under Curve (AUC) |
| B48 Plasma AUC | Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2) | Before vs. after fructose challenge: apolipoprotein (apo)B48 plasma Area Under Curve (AUC) |
| TG Plasma iAUC | Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2) | Before vs. after fructose challenge:Triglycerides (TG) plasma incremental Area Under Curve (iAUC) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DNL | Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2) | Before vs. after fructose challenge: de novo lipogenesis (DNL) |
| Liver Fat | Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2) | Before vs. after fructose challenge |
| ApoC-III | Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2) | Before vs. after fructose challenge: Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) |
| β-OH Butyrate | Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2) | Before vs. after fructose challenge: beta-OH butyrate (β-OH butyrate) |
Countries
Canada, Finland, Italy, Sweden
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| After Fructose Feeding After 3 month fructose diet 75 g/day | 82 |
| Total | 82 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 |
| Overall Study | For the advice of a dentist | 1 |
| Overall Study | The data from magnetic resonance examinations were not sufficient | 9 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | After Fructose Feeding | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 82 Participants | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 4 participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Finland | 50 participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 18 participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Sweden | 10 participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 82 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 82 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 82 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 82 |
Outcome results
B48 Plasma AUC
Before vs. after fructose challenge: apolipoprotein (apo)B48 plasma Area Under Curve (AUC)
Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Fructose Feeding | B48 Plasma AUC | Time point 1 | 7660 mg/l*min | Standard Deviation 3210 |
| After Fructose Feeding | B48 Plasma AUC | Time point 2 | 8200 mg/l*min | Standard Deviation 3340 |
TG Plasma AUC
Before vs. after fructose challenge: Triglycerides (TG) plasma Area Under Curve (AUC)
Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Fructose Feeding | TG Plasma AUC | Time point 1 | 1130 mmol/l*min | Standard Deviation 590 |
| After Fructose Feeding | TG Plasma AUC | Time point 2 | 1220 mmol/l*min | Standard Deviation 598 |
TG Plasma iAUC
Before vs. after fructose challenge:Triglycerides (TG) plasma incremental Area Under Curve (iAUC)
Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Fructose Feeding | TG Plasma iAUC | Time point 1 | 377 mmol/l*min | Standard Deviation 422 |
| After Fructose Feeding | TG Plasma iAUC | Time point 2 | 422 mmol/l*min | Standard Deviation 270 |
ApoC-III
Before vs. after fructose challenge: Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III)
Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Fructose Feeding | ApoC-III | Time point 1 | 10.4 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| After Fructose Feeding | ApoC-III | Time point 2 | 11.2 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 5 |
DNL
Before vs. after fructose challenge: de novo lipogenesis (DNL)
Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Fructose Feeding | DNL | Time point 1 | 12.3 μmol/L | Standard Deviation 10 |
| After Fructose Feeding | DNL | Time point 2 | 16.5 μmol/L | Standard Deviation 11 |
Liver Fat
Before vs. after fructose challenge
Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Fructose Feeding | Liver Fat | Time point 1 | 6.66 percentage of liver fat content | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
| After Fructose Feeding | Liver Fat | Time point 2 | 7.33 percentage of liver fat content | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
β-OH Butyrate
Before vs. after fructose challenge: beta-OH butyrate (β-OH butyrate)
Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Fructose Feeding | β-OH Butyrate | Time point 1 | 0.699 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| After Fructose Feeding | β-OH Butyrate | Time point 2 | 0.542 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.48 |