Skip to content

Fructose Consumption and Metabolic Dysregulation

Fructose Consumption Aggravates Dysregulation of Postprandial Lipid Metabolism in Obese Hypertriglyceridemic Men With High Cardiometabolic Risk Profile and Associates With Liver Fat Deposition

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01445730
Enrollment
82
Registered
2011-10-04
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2021-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Obesity, Hypertriglyceridemia

Keywords

fructose, hypertriglyceridemia, postprandial lipids, de novo lipogenesis, stable isotopes

Brief summary

High fructose intake is increasingly recognized as causative in development of prediabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The mechanisms underlying fructose-induced metabolic disturbances are unclear but are beginning to be unraveled. In contrast to metabolism of glucose, the breakdown of fructose leads to the generation of metabolites that stimulate hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and increased levels of both fasting and postprandial triglycerides. The key lipogenic transcription factor seems to be activated by fructose independently of insulin. However, it is still controversial whether fructose consumption increases DNL in man to the extent that it induces metabolic disturbances. Animal studies have shown that also the adipose tissue is responsive to fructose feeding fructose, and that high fructose-feeding induces insulin resistance and inflammation in the adipose tissue. The role of intestinal insulin resistance in fructose-induced dysmetabolism has not been studied in detail. The critical question is whether the metabolic disturbances are induced by calorie excess or by fructose per se.

Detailed description

Detailed description: Study subjects will participate to studies 1-4 before and 3 m after fructose diet: 1. An oral fat load or a kinetic study with stable isotopes combined with an oral fat load. 2. Determination of liver, subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat. (Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ) 3. Lipolytic enzymes, advanced lipid analysis, fat biopsies and genetic studies and gut microbiota profiling 4. Oral glucose tolerance test and analysis of incretins and inflammatory biomarkers.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTFructose

3 month fructose diet 75 g/day

Sponsors

Sahlgrenska University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Lund University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Naples
CollaboratorOTHER
Laval University
CollaboratorOTHER
Marja-Riitta Taskinen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Body mass index 27-40 * Waist \> 96 cm * Age 20-60 years * Male

Exclusion criteria

* Smoking * Active health problems * Contraindications to MRI scanning * Bleeding tendency * Abnormal liver or renal function tests * Type 2 diabetes * Evidence of metabolic or viral liver disease * Alcohol intake \> 21 units per week * Chronic medication except ones needed for stable hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TG Plasma AUCForm the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)Before vs. after fructose challenge: Triglycerides (TG) plasma Area Under Curve (AUC)
B48 Plasma AUCForm the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)Before vs. after fructose challenge: apolipoprotein (apo)B48 plasma Area Under Curve (AUC)
TG Plasma iAUCForm the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)Before vs. after fructose challenge:Triglycerides (TG) plasma incremental Area Under Curve (iAUC)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DNLForm the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)Before vs. after fructose challenge: de novo lipogenesis (DNL)
Liver FatForm the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)Before vs. after fructose challenge
ApoC-IIIForm the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)Before vs. after fructose challenge: Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III)
β-OH ButyrateForm the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)Before vs. after fructose challenge: beta-OH butyrate (β-OH butyrate)

Countries

Canada, Finland, Italy, Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
After Fructose Feeding
After 3 month fructose diet 75 g/day
82
Total82

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyFor the advice of a dentist1
Overall StudyThe data from magnetic resonance examinations were not sufficient9

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAfter Fructose Feeding
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
82 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
50 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
82 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 82
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 82
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 82

Outcome results

Primary

B48 Plasma AUC

Before vs. after fructose challenge: apolipoprotein (apo)B48 plasma Area Under Curve (AUC)

Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
After Fructose FeedingB48 Plasma AUCTime point 17660 mg/l*minStandard Deviation 3210
After Fructose FeedingB48 Plasma AUCTime point 28200 mg/l*minStandard Deviation 3340
p-value: 0.04Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

TG Plasma AUC

Before vs. after fructose challenge: Triglycerides (TG) plasma Area Under Curve (AUC)

Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
After Fructose FeedingTG Plasma AUCTime point 11130 mmol/l*minStandard Deviation 590
After Fructose FeedingTG Plasma AUCTime point 21220 mmol/l*minStandard Deviation 598
p-value: 0.005Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

TG Plasma iAUC

Before vs. after fructose challenge:Triglycerides (TG) plasma incremental Area Under Curve (iAUC)

Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
After Fructose FeedingTG Plasma iAUCTime point 1377 mmol/l*minStandard Deviation 422
After Fructose FeedingTG Plasma iAUCTime point 2422 mmol/l*minStandard Deviation 270
p-value: 0.04Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

ApoC-III

Before vs. after fructose challenge: Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III)

Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
After Fructose FeedingApoC-IIITime point 110.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.1
After Fructose FeedingApoC-IIITime point 211.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5
p-value: 0.006Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

DNL

Before vs. after fructose challenge: de novo lipogenesis (DNL)

Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
After Fructose FeedingDNLTime point 112.3 μmol/LStandard Deviation 10
After Fructose FeedingDNLTime point 216.5 μmol/LStandard Deviation 11
p-value: 0.005Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Liver Fat

Before vs. after fructose challenge

Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
After Fructose FeedingLiver FatTime point 16.66 percentage of liver fat contentStandard Deviation 6.1
After Fructose FeedingLiver FatTime point 27.33 percentage of liver fat contentStandard Deviation 6.6
p-value: 0.008Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

β-OH Butyrate

Before vs. after fructose challenge: beta-OH butyrate (β-OH butyrate)

Time frame: Form the baseline (time point 1) to end of treatment at 3 months (time point 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
After Fructose Feedingβ-OH ButyrateTime point 10.699 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.55
After Fructose Feedingβ-OH ButyrateTime point 20.542 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.48
p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026