Skip to content

Cost of Cancer Risk Management in Women at Elevated Genetic Risk for Ovarian Cancer Who Participated on GOG-0199

A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Cancer Risk Management for Women at Elevated Genetic Risk of Ovarian Cancer

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01445275
Enrollment
0
Registered
2011-10-03
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, Ovarian Carcinoma, Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

Brief summary

This research trial collects information about types of treatment and the cost of these procedures in women with elevated genetic risk for ovarian cancer who participated on the Gynecology Oncology Group (GOG)-0199 trial. Gathering information about women at elevated genetic risk for ovarian cancer may help doctors learn more about risk reduction procedures and the cost of these procedures.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the cost-effectiveness, defined as cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved, of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) versus ovarian cancer screening (OCS) for women at elevated genetic risk of ovarian cancer over a five-year period, using data from GOG-0199 to model survival. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the cost-effectiveness, defined as cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved, of RRSO versus OCS for women at elevated genetic risk of ovarian cancer over a lifetime, using stage-specific cohorts and population-based data to model long-term survival. (Exploratory) II. To use value of information (VOI) methodology to set future research priorities aimed at developing evidence-based approaches to the management of women who are at elevated genetic risk of ovarian cancer. (Exploratory) OUTLINE: Outcome data, such as incidence and stage at diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers; number and timing of screening and serum tests performed; number and timing of pelvic ultrasounds performed; surgical procedures performed; cancer-specific and overall survival (if available); and the incidence, type, and grade of significant adverse events, are collected from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-0199 records and analyzed. Cost of each medical intervention is also estimated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEvaluation of Cancer Risk Factors

Ancillary studies

OTHERMedical Chart Review

Ancillary study

OTHERStudy of Socioeconomic and Demographic Variables

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Gynecologic Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women who were eligible and evaluable for GOG-0199, a prospective, non-randomized, natural history study * Data collected from GOG-0199 available

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost-effectiveness of RRSO versus OCS6 monthsIncidence and stage at diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in the OCS arm and in the RRSO arm will be collected. This information will be obtained from the CANCER UPDATE FORM (CA-0199) and the Ovarian Surgery Form (C-0199). Summary of the number and timing of screening serum tests, pelvic ultrasound, and surgery procedures will be used to calculate costs, and will be incorporated into the model of Markov stage that corresponds to the study timepoint at which these studies were performed.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026