Skip to content

A 6 Month Safety Study Comparing Symbicort With Inhaled Corticosteroid Only in Asthmatic Adults and Adolescents

A 26 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active Controlled, Multicenter, Multinational Safety Study Evaluating the Risk of Serious Asthma-related Events During Treatment With Symbicort®, a Fixed Combination of Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) (Budesonide) and a Long Acting β2-agonist (LABA) (Formoterol) as Compared to Treatment With ICS (Budesonide) Alone in Adult and Adolescent (≥12 Years of Age) Patients With Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01444430
Enrollment
12460
Registered
2011-09-30
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2016-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Symbicort pMDI, Asthma, safety, budesonide

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety of Symbicort compared to inhaled corticosteroid alone during 6 months in adult and adolescent patients with asthma

Detailed description

A 26 week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active controlled, multicenter, multinational safety study evaluating the risk of serious asthma-related events during treatment with Symbicort®, a fixed combination of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) (budesonide) and a long acting β2-agonist (LABA) (formoterol) as compared to treatment with ICS (budesonide) alone in adult and adolescent (≥12 years of age) patients with asthma.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to Symbicort and assigned to one of the following treatments (based upon ACQ at baseline and prior asthma therapy): Symbicort pMDI 80/4.5 μg x 2 actuations bid (morning and evening) or Symbicort pMDI 160/4.5 μg x 2 actuations bid (morning and evening), for oral inhalation.

Patients were randomized to budesonide and assigned to one of the following treatments (based upon ACQ at baseline and prior asthma therapy): budesonide pMDI 80 μg x 2 actuations bid (morning and evening) or budesonide pMDI 160 μg x 2 actuations bid (morning and evening), for oral inhalation.

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provision of signed informed consent/ paediatric assent (if applicable) prior to any study specific procedures including medication withdrawal * Male or Female, ≥12 years of age * Documented clinical diagnosis of asthma for at least 1 year prior to Visit 2 * Patient must have history of at least 1 asthma exacerbation including one of the following: * requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids * an asthma-related hospitalization between 4 weeks and 12 months prior to randomization * Current Asthma Therapy: Patients must be appropriately using one of the treatments for asthma listed in the protocol combined with achieving certain results when recording an Asthma Control Questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a history of life-threatening asthma. Defined for this protocol as an asthma episode that required intubation and/or was associated with hypercapnea requiring non-invasive ventilatory support. * Patient has required treatment with systemic corticosteroids (tablets, suspensions or injectable) for any reason within 4 weeks prior to Visit 2 * Patient has an ongoing exacerbation, defined as a worsening of asthma that requires treatment with systemic corticosteroids (tablets, suspension, or injectable) * An asthma exacerbation within 4 weeks of randomization or more than 4 separate exacerbations in the 12 months preceding randomization or more than 2 hospitalizations for treatment of asthma in the 12 months preceding randomization * Patient has a respiratory infection or other viral/bacterial illness, or is recovering from such an illness at the time of Visit 2 that, in the investigator's opinion, will interfere with the patient's lung function * Patient must not meet unstable asthma severity criteria as listed in the protocol * Peak expiratory flow must not be below 50% o predicted normal * Pregnancy, breast-feeding or planned pregnancy during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Experiencing an Event in the Composite Endpoint (Asthma-related Death, Asthma-related Intubation or Asthma-related Hospitalization)Up to 27 weeksNumber of participants experiencing an event in the composite endpoint (asthma-related death, asthma-related intubation or asthma-related hospitalization), using events adjudicated and confirmed by the Joint Adjudication Committee. Cox proportional hazards model with terms for randomized treatment and strata for incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated.
Number of Participants Experiencing an Event Included in the Definition of Asthma ExacerbationUp to 26 weeksNumber of participants experiencing an event included in the definition of asthma exacerbation. An asthma exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days or an inpatient hospitalization or emergency room visit due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids. Cox proportional hazards model with terms for randomized treatment and strata for incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per 24 HoursDaily up to 26 weeksMean number of puffs of rescue medication per day (24 hours) during the randomized treatment period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide.
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6)baseline, day 28, day 84, day 182The outcome variable for ACQ6 was the difference between the average of values recorded during the treatment period (day 28, day 84 and day 182) and the baseline measure. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment and baseline ACQ6 as covariate was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide. The asthma control questionnaire, ACQ6, consists of six questions; all assessed on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6, where 0 represents good control and 6 represents poor control. The overall score is the mean of the responses to each of the six questions.
Percent of Days With no Asthma SymptomsDaily up to 26 weeksPercent of days with no asthma symptoms during the randomized treatment period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide.
Number of Participants Experiencing Discontinuation of Investigational Product Due to a Protocol Defined Asthma ExacerbationUp to 26 weeksNumber of participants experiencing discontinuation of investigational product due to a protocol defined asthma exacerbation. An asthma exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days or an inpatient hospitalization or emergency room visit due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids. Cox proportional hazards model with terms for randomized treatment and strata for incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated.
Percent of Nights With Awakening(s) Due to AsthmaDaily up to 26 weeksPercent of nights with awakening(s) due to asthma during the randomized treatment period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide.
Percent of Days With Activity Limitation Due to AsthmaDaily up to 26 weeksPercent of days with activity limitation due to asthma during the randomized treatment period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide.

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, France, Germany, India, Italy, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study started with an assessment visit where inclusion/exclusion criteria were reviewed and informed consent obtained. Eligible patients were randomized at the next visit. Patients then entered a 26 weeks double-blind treatment period followed by a 1 week follow-up telephone contact. Patients were recruited in 25 countries with 25% in the US.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible adult and adolescent patients were stratified based upon assessment of ACQ and prior asthma therapy and randomized 1:1 to double-blind Symbicort or budesonide. 12460 patients were enrolled (informed consent received) and 11693 were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Symbicort
Patients were randomized to Symbicort and assigned to one of the following treatments (based upon ACQ at baseline and prior asthma therapy): Symbicort pMDI 80/4.5 μg x 2 actuations bid (morning and evening) or Symbicort pMDI 160/4.5 μg x 2 actuations bid (morning and evening).
5,846
Budesonide
Patients were randomized to budesonide and assigned to one of the following treatments (based upon ACQ at baseline and prior asthma therapy): budesonide pMDI 80 μg x 2 actuations bid (morning and evening) or budesonide pMDI 160 μg x 2 actuations bid (morning and evening).
5,847
Total11,693

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCRF termination module not completed.01
Overall StudyDeath68
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5372

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalBudesonideSymbicort
Age, Continuous43.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
43.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
43.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
Gender
Female
7669 Participants3820 Participants3849 Participants
Gender
Male
4024 Participants2027 Participants1997 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska Native
432 Participants207 Participants225 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1755 Participants907 Participants848 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
797 Participants401 Participants396 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
650 Participants326 Participants324 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
8053 Participants4003 Participants4050 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5,8460 / 5,847
serious
Total, serious adverse events
125 / 5,846123 / 5,847

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Experiencing an Event Included in the Definition of Asthma Exacerbation

Number of participants experiencing an event included in the definition of asthma exacerbation. An asthma exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days or an inpatient hospitalization or emergency room visit due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids. Cox proportional hazards model with terms for randomized treatment and strata for incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated.

Time frame: Up to 26 weeks

Population: The On treatment Analysis set comprised of all randomized patients and included data that corresponded to each patient's period of exposure to study drug plus 7 days after the last date of study drug treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SymbicortNumber of Participants Experiencing an Event Included in the Definition of Asthma Exacerbation539 Participants
BudesonideNumber of Participants Experiencing an Event Included in the Definition of Asthma Exacerbation633 Participants
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.745, 0.937]Regression, Cox
Primary

Number of Participants Experiencing an Event in the Composite Endpoint (Asthma-related Death, Asthma-related Intubation or Asthma-related Hospitalization)

Number of participants experiencing an event in the composite endpoint (asthma-related death, asthma-related intubation or asthma-related hospitalization), using events adjudicated and confirmed by the Joint Adjudication Committee. Cox proportional hazards model with terms for randomized treatment and strata for incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated.

Time frame: Up to 27 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) population comprised of all patients randomized to study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SymbicortNumber of Participants Experiencing an Event in the Composite Endpoint (Asthma-related Death, Asthma-related Intubation or Asthma-related Hospitalization)43 Participants
BudesonideNumber of Participants Experiencing an Event in the Composite Endpoint (Asthma-related Death, Asthma-related Intubation or Asthma-related Hospitalization)40 Participants
95% CI: [0.698, 1.65]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6)

The outcome variable for ACQ6 was the difference between the average of values recorded during the treatment period (day 28, day 84 and day 182) and the baseline measure. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment and baseline ACQ6 as covariate was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide. The asthma control questionnaire, ACQ6, consists of six questions; all assessed on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6, where 0 represents good control and 6 represents poor control. The overall score is the mean of the responses to each of the six questions.

Time frame: baseline, day 28, day 84, day 182

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) population comprised of all patients randomized to study drug with at least one post-baseline ACQ6 score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SymbicortAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6)-0.70 ACQ6 overall score change from baselineStandard Error 0.01
BudesonideAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6)-0.62 ACQ6 overall score change from baselineStandard Error 0.01
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.1, -0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per 24 Hours

Mean number of puffs of rescue medication per day (24 hours) during the randomized treatment period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide.

Time frame: Daily up to 26 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) population comprised of all patients randomized to study drug and had at least one entry of diary data after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SymbicortMean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per 24 Hours0.8 Inhalations/dayStandard Error 0
BudesonideMean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per 24 Hours0.9 Inhalations/dayStandard Error 0
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.2, -0.1]ANOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Discontinuation of Investigational Product Due to a Protocol Defined Asthma Exacerbation

Number of participants experiencing discontinuation of investigational product due to a protocol defined asthma exacerbation. An asthma exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days or an inpatient hospitalization or emergency room visit due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids. Cox proportional hazards model with terms for randomized treatment and strata for incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated.

Time frame: Up to 26 weeks

Population: The On treatment Analysis set comprised of all randomized patients and included data that corresponded to each patient's period of exposure to study drug plus 7 days after the last date of study drug treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SymbicortNumber of Participants Experiencing Discontinuation of Investigational Product Due to a Protocol Defined Asthma Exacerbation53 Participants
BudesonideNumber of Participants Experiencing Discontinuation of Investigational Product Due to a Protocol Defined Asthma Exacerbation71 Participants
p-value: 0.09595% CI: [0.518, 1.055]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Percent of Days With Activity Limitation Due to Asthma

Percent of days with activity limitation due to asthma during the randomized treatment period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide.

Time frame: Daily up to 26 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) population comprised of all patients randomized to study drug. The analysis set comprises of all patients with at least one day with asthma symptoms, i.e. the denominator is the number of days with asthma symptoms.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SymbicortPercent of Days With Activity Limitation Due to Asthma19.7 Percentage of daysStandard Error 0.4
BudesonidePercent of Days With Activity Limitation Due to Asthma19.1 Percentage of daysStandard Error 0.4
p-value: 0.27295% CI: [-0.5, 1.7]ANOVA
Secondary

Percent of Days With no Asthma Symptoms

Percent of days with no asthma symptoms during the randomized treatment period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide.

Time frame: Daily up to 26 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) population comprised of all patients randomized to study drug and had at least one entry of diary data after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SymbicortPercent of Days With no Asthma Symptoms81.1 Percentage of daysStandard Error 0.4
BudesonidePercent of Days With no Asthma Symptoms76.8 Percentage of daysStandard Error 0.4
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.3, 5.4]ANOVA
Secondary

Percent of Nights With Awakening(s) Due to Asthma

Percent of nights with awakening(s) due to asthma during the randomized treatment period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model including the fixed factors of treatment and strata by incoming control/asthma treatment was used to compare Symbicort and budesonide.

Time frame: Daily up to 26 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) population comprised of all patients randomized to study drug and had at least one entry of diary data after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SymbicortPercent of Nights With Awakening(s) Due to Asthma4.0 Percentage of nightsStandard Error 0.2
BudesonidePercent of Nights With Awakening(s) Due to Asthma4.7 Percentage of nightsStandard Error 0.2
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-1, -0.2]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026