Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Romiplostim to Treat Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Pediatric Patients

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Pediatric Subjects With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01444417
Enrollment
62
Registered
2011-09-30
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2017-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Immune Thrombocytopenia, Thrombocytopenia, Thrombocytopenia in Pediatric Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Keywords

Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Pediatric Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Immune Thrombocytopenia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of romiplostim in the treatment of thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients with Immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) as measured by durable platelet response.

Interventions

DRUGRomiplostim

The starting dose of romiplostim is 1 µg/kg administered weekly by subcutaneous injection. Participants will return to the clinic weekly to provide platelet counts and undergo dose titrations under the supervision of the treating physician. Weekly dose increases will continue in increments of 1 µg/kg up to a maximum dose of 10 µg/kg in an attempt to reach a target platelet count of ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L. Dose adjustment will be allowed during the treatment period to maintain a platelet count between ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L and ≤ 200 x 10\^9/L.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo administered by subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary ITP according to the American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines at least 6 months prior to screening, regardless of splenectomy status * Subject must be refractory to a prior ITP therapy, having relapsed after at least 1 prior ITP therapy, or ineligible for other ITP therapies; prior therapy includes first-line therapies * Age ≥ 1 year and \< 18 years at the time of providing informed consent * The mean of 2 platelet counts taken during the screening period must be ≤ 30 x 10\^9/L with neither count \> 35 x 10\^9/L * A serum creatinine concentration ≤ 1.5 times the laboratory normal range (for each age category) during the screening period * Adequate liver function; serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the laboratory normal range during the screening period; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3.0 times the laboratory normal range during the screening period * Hemoglobin \> 10.0 g/dL during the screening period * Subject and/or subject's legally acceptable representative has provided informed consent prior to any study-specific procedure; subject has provided assent, where required

Exclusion criteria

* Known history of a bone marrow stem cell disorder; any abnormal bone marrow findings other than those typical of ITP must be approved by Amgen before a subject may be enrolled in the study * Known active or prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell carcinoma * Known history of congenital thrombocytopenia * Known history of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Known history of H. pylori by urea breath test or stool antigen test within 6 months of enrollment or successfully treated with no evidence of infection * Known history of systemic lupus erythematosus, evans syndrome, or autoimmune neutropenia * Known history of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome or positive for lupus anticoagulant * Known history of disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemolytic uremic syndrome, or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura * Previous history of venous thromboembolism or thrombotic events * Previous use of romiplostim, pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF), Eltrombopag, recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO) or any platelet producing agent * Rituximab (for any indication) or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) within 14 weeks before the screening visit, or anticipated use during the time of the proposed study * Splenectomy within 4 weeks of the screening visit * All hematopoietic growth factors including interleukin-11 (IL-11) (oprelvekin) within 4 weeks before the screening visit * Alkylating agents within 8 weeks before the screening visit or anticipated use during the time of the proposed study * Vaccinations known to decrease platelet counts within 8 weeks before the screening visit * Known hypersensitivity to any recombinant E coli-derived product (eg, Infergen, Neupogen, Somatropin, and Actimmune) * Other criteria may apply

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Durable Platelet ResponseWeek 18 to week 25A participant with durable platelet response was defined as achieving at least 6 weekly platelet counts of ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L during the last 8 weeks of treatment (platelet counts obtained from week 18 to week 25). If a platelet count from a participant was not available (missing) in a certain week, that week was imputed as non-response for that participant. Platelet counts were not deemed as a positive response for 4 weeks after the administration of rescue medication.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Received Rescue Medication During the Treatment Period24 weeksRescue medication is any medication (other than excluded medications) that is intended to increase platelet counts or prevent bleeding.
Percentage of Participants With an Overall Platelet ResponseWeek 2 to week 25Overall platelet response is defined as either a durable platelet response or transient platelet response. Durable platelet response was defined as weekly platelet count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L for 6 or more times during week 18 to week 25 measurements. Participants may not have had a weekly response within 4 weeks after receiving any rescue medication. Transient platelet response was defined as weekly platelet count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L for 4 or more times during week 2 to week 25 measurements but without durable platelet response. Participants may not have had a weekly response within 4 weeks after receiving any rescue medications.
Number of Weeks With Platelet ResponseWeek 2 to week 25Number of weeks with platelet counts ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L during week 2 to week 25 measurements. Participants may not have had a weekly response within 4 weeks after receiving any rescue medications.
Total Number of Composite Bleeding EpisodesWeek 2 to week 25A composite bleeding episode was defined as clinically significant bleeding events or the use of a rescue medication to prevent a clinical significant bleeding event during weeks 2 through 25 of the treatment period. A clinically significant bleeding event was defined as a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 grade ≥ 2 bleeding event.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom the first dose of study drug until 4 weeks after last dose; 28 weeks.A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * fatal, * life threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death), * requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, * congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or * other significant medical hazard. Adverse events were graded for severity according to the CTCAE version 3.0 grading scale, where Grade 3 = moderate, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = fatal. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were those assessed by the investigator as possibly related to study drug. This relationship was determined by a yes or no response to the question: Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by study drug?

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 27 centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Participants were enrolled from 24 January 2012 to 03 September 2014.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who met eligibility criteria were enrolled and stratified by the following 3 age categories: ≥ 1 to \< 6 years; 6 to \< 12 years; and 12 to \< 18 years.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received weekly subcutaneous placebo for 24 weeks.
20
Romiplostim
Participants received once weekly subcutaneous romiplostim for 24 weeks at a starting dose of 1 µg/kg; weekly dose increases continued in increments of 1 µg/kg/week to a maximum dose of 10 µg/kg in an attempt to reach a target platelet count of ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L.
42
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyIneligibility Determined01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboRomiplostim
Age, Continuous9.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
9.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
9.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Age, Customized
≥ 12 - < 18 years
23 participants7 participants16 participants
Age, Customized
≥ 1 - < 6 years
12 participants4 participants8 participants
Age, Customized
≥ 6 - < 12 years
27 participants9 participants18 participants
Platelets18.3 10^9/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
19.9 10^9/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
17.5 10^9/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
8 participants2 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 participants1 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
41 participants15 participants26 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants11 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants9 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 1941 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1910 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Durable Platelet Response

A participant with durable platelet response was defined as achieving at least 6 weekly platelet counts of ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L during the last 8 weeks of treatment (platelet counts obtained from week 18 to week 25). If a platelet count from a participant was not available (missing) in a certain week, that week was imputed as non-response for that participant. Platelet counts were not deemed as a positive response for 4 weeks after the administration of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 18 to week 25

Population: Efficacy analysis set (all randomized participants)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Durable Platelet Response10.0 percentage of participants
RomiplostimPercentage of Participants With a Durable Platelet Response52.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: The incidence of durable platelet response was compared by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the baseline age group. The Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio (romiplostim vs placebo) was estimated along with its 95% confidence interval.p-value: 0.001895% CI: [1.896, 43.199]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * fatal, * life threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death), * requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, * congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or * other significant medical hazard. Adverse events were graded for severity according to the CTCAE version 3.0 grading scale, where Grade 3 = moderate, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = fatal. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were those assessed by the investigator as possibly related to study drug. This relationship was determined by a yes or no response to the question: Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by study drug?

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug until 4 weeks after last dose; 28 weeks.

Population: Safety analysis set (all participants who received at least one dose of study drug)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event (AE)19 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events (SAE)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAE leading to discontinuation from study0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 3 AE3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 4 AE1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 5 AE0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events (TRAE)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE leading to discontinuation from study0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE Grade 40 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE Grade 50 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE leading to discontinuation from study0 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event (AE)41 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events (TRAE)11 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events (SAE)10 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE Grade 40 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events1 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAE leading to discontinuation from study0 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE Grade 31 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 3 AE6 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 4 AE2 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE Grade 50 participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 5 AE0 participants
Secondary

Number of Weeks With Platelet Response

Number of weeks with platelet counts ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L during week 2 to week 25 measurements. Participants may not have had a weekly response within 4 weeks after receiving any rescue medications.

Time frame: Week 2 to week 25

Population: Efficacy analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboNumber of Weeks With Platelet Response1.0 weeks
RomiplostimNumber of Weeks With Platelet Response12.0 weeks
p-value: 0.0004ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Received Rescue Medication During the Treatment Period

Rescue medication is any medication (other than excluded medications) that is intended to increase platelet counts or prevent bleeding.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Efficacy analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Received Rescue Medication During the Treatment Period45.0 percentage of participants
RomiplostimPercentage of Participants Who Received Rescue Medication During the Treatment Period40.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.710395% CI: [0.277, 2.391]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Overall Platelet Response

Overall platelet response is defined as either a durable platelet response or transient platelet response. Durable platelet response was defined as weekly platelet count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L for 6 or more times during week 18 to week 25 measurements. Participants may not have had a weekly response within 4 weeks after receiving any rescue medication. Transient platelet response was defined as weekly platelet count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L for 4 or more times during week 2 to week 25 measurements but without durable platelet response. Participants may not have had a weekly response within 4 weeks after receiving any rescue medications.

Time frame: Week 2 to week 25

Population: Efficacy analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Overall Platelet Response20.0 percentage of participants
RomiplostimPercentage of Participants With an Overall Platelet Response71.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: The incidence of overall platelet response was compared by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the baseline age group. The Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio (romiplostim vs placebo) was estimated along with its 95% confidence interval.p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.535, 32.265]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Total Number of Composite Bleeding Episodes

A composite bleeding episode was defined as clinically significant bleeding events or the use of a rescue medication to prevent a clinical significant bleeding event during weeks 2 through 25 of the treatment period. A clinically significant bleeding event was defined as a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 grade ≥ 2 bleeding event.

Time frame: Week 2 to week 25

Population: Efficacy analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTotal Number of Composite Bleeding Episodes4.0 bleeding episodesStandard Deviation 6.9
RomiplostimTotal Number of Composite Bleeding Episodes1.9 bleeding episodesStandard Deviation 4.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026