Rectal Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Neorec, rectal cancer, KRAS, Panitumumab, neoadjuvant, Radiochemotherapy, antibody, locally advanced KRAS wild type rectal cancer
Brief summary
This study aims to investigate the combination of panitumumab and a 5-FU-based RCTX in patients with locally advanced KRAS wild-type rectal cancer.
Detailed description
Significant progress in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer has been achieved during the last decade. This includes surgical techniques as the widespread implementation of total mesorectal excision as well as preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCTX). The results of the recent randomized trials led to a current standard in which most (radio-) oncologists now use continuous-infusion 5-FU concomitantly with preoperative radiotherapy. It has been demonstrated that this provides improved tumor downstaging and local control; however, no significant differences have yet been achieved in the 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates. Thus, the challenge is to integrate more effective systemic therapy into the combined-modality programs. The combination of RCTX with novel chemotherapeutic agents like oxaliplatin and irinotecan in phase I/II trials suggested higher rates of histopathological complete remission (pCR) compared with 5-FU RCTX alone. However, due to the lack of results from randomized trials, to date no improvement of the long-term outcomes could be demonstrated, moreover, for some studies the increased pCR rate was associated with an increase in toxicity. Another strategy to improve outcome is to incorporate newer, biologically active, targeted therapies into established RCTX regimens. Because of its key role in signalling proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis and angiogenesis the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a promising target of antitumor treatment. To date a few clinical phase I/II studies of preoperative RCTX have been initiated to evaluate EGFR inhibitors as radiosensitizer in rectal cancer. These trials demonstrated that a combination of cetuximab and RCTX could be safely applied without dose compromises of the respective treatment components. However, the pCR rates could not be improved in these studies. Given the strong preclinical rationale to combine EGFR inhibition with RCTX in rectal cancer patients, this study aims to investigate the combination of panitumumab and a 5-FU-based RCTX in patients with locally advanced KRAS wild-type rectal cancer.
Interventions
BIOLOGICALPanitumumab
Intravenous (IV), Panitumumab 6 mg/kg BW q2w d1-d57 (5 times total); begin on day 1 (run-in-phase) and subsequent application on days 15, 29 43 and 57.
Sponsors
National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed, potentially resectable rectal adenocarcinoma staged as uT3/4 N0/1 by endosonography or cT3/4 by MRI of the pelvis with or without local lymph node metastases. * Wild-type KRAS. * ECOG-performance status 0 or 1. * Age ≥ 18 years. * Laboratory requirements: * Haematology: Leucocyte count \> 3,000/mm³, neutrophil count ≥1.5x109/L, hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL, platelet count ≥100x109/L. * Hepatic Function: Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 time the upper normal limit (UNL), ASAT ≤ 2.5xUNL in absence of liver metastases or ≤ 5xUNL in presence of liver metastases, ALAT ≤ 2.5xUNL in absence of liver metastases or ≤ 5xUNL in presence of liver metastases * Renal Function: Creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min or serum creatinine ≤1.5xUNL * Metabolic Function: Magnesium ≥ lower limit of normal, Calcium ≥ lower limit of normal. * Negative ß-HCG-serum pregnancy test (females of child bearing potential). * Willing to use double-barrier contraception during study and for 6 months after the end of treatment. * Ability of patient to understand character and individual consequences of clinical trial * Written informed consent (must be available before enrollment in the trial)
Exclusion criteria
* Prior EGFR targeting or prior chemo- or radiotherapy or tumor surgery. * Evidence of any distant metastases. * Manifest or previous secondary malignancies within the last 5 years. * Uncontrolled infection. * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease NYHA classification III or IV (including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart failure, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia) ≤ 1 year before enrollment/randomization. * History of interstitial lung disease e.g. pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis or evidence of interstitial lung disease on screening chest CT scan. * Diabetes mellitus * Subject pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant within 6 month after the end of treatment. * Subject (male or female) is not willing to use highly effective methods of contraception (per institutional standard) during treatment and for 6 months (male or female) after the end of treatment. * Active serious illness which renders the patient unsuitable for study entrance, multiple blood sampling or the above mentioned biopsies. * History of hypersensitivity to the investigational medicinal product or to any drug with similar chemical structure or to any excipient present in the pharmaceutical form of the investigational medicinal product. * Participation in other clinical trials or observation period of competing trials, respectively.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Histopathological complete response rate (pCR) | at week 14 after tumor resection | pCR determined by means of the resection specimens |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Metabolic tumor response rate assessed by means of changes in the standardized uptake values (SUV) using FDG-PET-CT (incl. RECIST) | day 14 and at week 14 before surgery | — |
| Pathological tumor regression grades will be classified according to Becker | at week 14 after surgery | — |
| Quality of Life (QoL) will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in combination with the colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionaire module (QLQ-CR29) | between day 0 and week 18 end of study | — |
| Objective tumor response rate assessed by MRI of the pelvis (incl. RECIST) | at day 14 and week 12 | — |
| relapse-free survival | during follow up every 6 months until death or until 2 years after LPO | relapse-free survival after end of study |
| overall survival | during follow up every 6 months until death or until 2 years after LPO | overall survival after EOS |
| distant metastases-free survival | during follow up every 6 months until death or until 2 years after LPO | distant metastases-free survival after EOS |
Countries
Germany
Outcome results
None listed