Skip to content

Secondary Intention Wound Healing Versus Micrografting in Patients Undergoing Mohs Surgery

Secondary Intention Wound Healing Versus Micrografting in Patients Undergoing Mohs Surgery

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01442844
Acronym
MomelanMohs
Enrollment
3
Registered
2011-09-29
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impaired Wound Healing

Keywords

Mohs, Scalp

Brief summary

This study evaluates a novel micrografting technique to see how it will influence the healing rate and cosmetic result of second intention wounds. The graft harvesting and micrografting process was designed by MoMelan Technologies The Epidermal Expansion System, which is composed of a commercially available Blister Generation Device and the Microblister Generation and Excision Device (MBGED), will generate an array of small microblisters and transfer the micrografts to a sterile dressing (Tegaderm™ - an FDA approved wound dressing) for application to the subject's surgical area. The investigators predict that applying expanded micrografts to wounds that otherwise would have healed by second intention alone will hasten healing and possible reduce scarring.

Detailed description

Participants with a scalp wound s/p Mohs procedure will be randomized to a micrografting technique intervention or to no intervention/heal with secondary intention alone (control). Intervention consists of harvesting skin micrografts (1.75mm) from pigmented skin using the Microblister generation and excision device and transfer the micrografts to a sterile dressing for application to the participants scalp wound. Percent wound re-epithelialization will be compared between two groups.

Interventions

DEVICEMicrografting

Several small pieces of skin, each measuring 1.75 mm in diameter will be harvested from a normal pigmented area using a commercially available suction blister device. This will be attached to a sterile dressing that will be placed on the surgical wound.

Sponsors

Momelan Technologies
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Between 40-75 years old 2. Status post Mohs procedure on the scalp with a wound that would otherwise be allowed to heal by second intention 3. Superficial would-at deepest of 2.0 mm or to superficial fat, but not deep to muscle 4. Area is less then 6 cm2 (wound diameter less than 2cm)

Exclusion criteria

1. Female patients who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant 2. Abnormal bleeding observed during initial Mohs procedure that would suggest a higher risk of post-operative bleeding 3. Subjects currently on immunosuppressive medications, chemotherapy or a cytotoxic agent 4. Participation in another interventional study with potential exposure to an investigational drug within past 30 days or planned study entry within 90 days after study entrance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Wound Re-epithelialization4 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Micrografting
Several small pieces of skin, each measuring 1.75 mm in diameter will be harvested from a normal pigmented area using a commercially available suction blister device. This will be attached to a sterile dressing that will be placed on the surgical wound. Micrografting: Several small pieces of skin, each measuring 1.75 mm in diameter will be harvested from a normal pigmented area using a commercially available suction blister device. This will be attached to a sterile dressing that will be placed on the surgical wound.
1
No Intervention
No intervention will be performed. Subject will receive dressings that are standard of care.
2
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMicrograftingNo InterventionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous74 years66.5 years69 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Wound Re-epithelialization

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
MicrograftingPercentage of Wound Re-epithelialization50 percentage of wound re-epithelialization
No InterventionPercentage of Wound Re-epithelialization37.5 percentage of wound re-epithelialization

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026