Skip to content

The Impact of Nebivolol Versus Metoprolol on Quality of Life

The Impact of Nebivolol Versus Metoprolol on Quality of Life Measures and Cost-effectiveness in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01441570
Enrollment
11
Registered
2011-09-27
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2017-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, Transplant; Failure, Kidney

Keywords

kidney, transplant, hypertension, nebivolol, metoprolol, bystolic, toprol

Brief summary

In an open label analysis, nebivolol has been shown to have a positive impact on quality of life in the general hypertensive population. That is, patients treated with nebivolol reported less side effects compared to those treated with metoprolol. Also, more nebivolol treated patients reached normalization of blood pressure. Although there is no data, it is believed that the impact would be similar in renal transplant recipients. The primary goal of this study is to determine if nebivolol will improve the quality of life measurements of kidney transplant recipients as compared to those treated with metoprolol succinate. This will be measured by comparing the scores of four quality of life questionnaires taken before and after 12 weeks of treatment with study drug. Other aims of this study are to determine if the use of nebivolol is cost-effective in the renal transplant recipient; determine if there is a change in urine protein excretion and renal function with the use of nebivolol; and determine the number of patients that maintain or achieve a target blood pressure of ≤ 120/80 mmHg.

Interventions

DRUGNebivolol

Subject will take nebivolol daily for 12 weeks.

DRUGMetoprolol succinate

Subject will take metoprolol succinate daily for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Lahey Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult renal transplant recipients, men and women between 18 and 75 years of age, inclusive. * Patients must be \> 3 months post-transplant. * Patients must have stable renal function (stable renal function will be defined as those patients without infection or hospitalization \[for any reason\] over the past 30 days, and patients with \< 20% change in their serum creatinine over the past 30 days. * Patients receiving corticosteroids must be receiving a daily dose of \< 7.5 mg of prednisone (or therapeutic equivalents based on glucocorticoid equivalency scale). * All eligible patients must be receiving antihypertensive medication management which must include metoprolol tartrate or metoprolol succinate. * Patients may be on more than one medication to control their hypertension. Use of any other FDA-approved antihypertensive agent is permitted. * All eligible patients will either be at goal blood pressure (\<120/80 mmHg) or have Pre-hypertension (\<140/90 mmHg) or Stage I hypertension (\<160/100 mmHg) at the time of study inclusion. * Patients who are able to comprehend and satisfactorily comply with protocol requirements. * Patients who signed the written informed consent given prior to entering any study procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with Stage II/uncontrolled hypertension (\>159/99 mmHg). * Patients with an easily identifiable etiology for fatigue (i.e. anemia, iron-deficiency, poor sleep patterns, etc.). * Patients who have a medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, would expose them to an increased risk of a significant adverse event or interfere with assessments of safety and efficacy during the course of the trial (i.e. arrhythmia). * Patients with any current malignancy, or any clinically significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular, hepatic, gastrointestinal or neurological disease (including any form of epilepsy). If there is a history of such disease but the condition has been stable for at least the past year and is judged by the investigator not to interfere with the patient's participation in the study, the patient may be included. * Patients who are judged by the investigator to be unable or unlikely to follow the study protocol and complete all scheduled visits. * Patients with any contraindications to beta blocker therapy as listed in the package labeling for both metoprolol succinate and nebivolol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life12 weeks; Baseline scores were measured at the Initial Screening/Enrollment Visit (Visit 1 - beginning of week 1); Follow-Up scores were measured at the End of the Study (Visit 2 - End of week 12)Primary outcome measure will be the change from the Screening/Enrollment Visit to the End of the Study/Early Termination visit in scores of four quality of life questionnaires. The four quality of life questionnaires that were used included the following: 1. Short Form (SF)-36v2 Health Survey (Score Range = 0-100; the lower the score the more disability) 2. Sexual Dysfunction Tool for Men = International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire (Score Range = 5-25; a score of 22-25 = No erectile dysfunction; 17-21 = Mild erectile dysfunction; 12-16 = Mild to moderate erectile dysfunction; 8-11 = Moderate erectile dysfunction; 5-7 = Severe erectile dysfunction) 3. Sexual Dysfunction Tool for Women = Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14-F; Score Range = 14-70; a score at or below 42 is indicative of sexual dysfunction) 4. Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scale (Score Range = 1-50; the higher the score the more fatigue)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood Pressure12 weeksEvaluate the baseline and follow-up systolic and diastolic blood pressures for all subjects in both groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nebivolol
Nebivolol: Subject will take nebivolol daily for 12 weeks.
6
Metoprolol Succinate
Metoprolol succinate: Subject will take metoprolol succinate daily for 12 weeks.
5
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNebivololMetoprolol SuccinateTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants5 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Quality of Life

Primary outcome measure will be the change from the Screening/Enrollment Visit to the End of the Study/Early Termination visit in scores of four quality of life questionnaires. The four quality of life questionnaires that were used included the following: 1. Short Form (SF)-36v2 Health Survey (Score Range = 0-100; the lower the score the more disability) 2. Sexual Dysfunction Tool for Men = International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire (Score Range = 5-25; a score of 22-25 = No erectile dysfunction; 17-21 = Mild erectile dysfunction; 12-16 = Mild to moderate erectile dysfunction; 8-11 = Moderate erectile dysfunction; 5-7 = Severe erectile dysfunction) 3. Sexual Dysfunction Tool for Women = Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14-F; Score Range = 14-70; a score at or below 42 is indicative of sexual dysfunction) 4. Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scale (Score Range = 1-50; the higher the score the more fatigue)

Time frame: 12 weeks; Baseline scores were measured at the Initial Screening/Enrollment Visit (Visit 1 - beginning of week 1); Follow-Up scores were measured at the End of the Study (Visit 2 - End of week 12)

Population: Adult (\>18 years of age) renal transplant recipients, both men and women, requiring pharmacotherapy for high blood pressure were evaluated for inclusion in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NebivololQuality of LifeBaseline SF-36 (mental) Score40.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
NebivololQuality of LifeBaseline MAF Score27.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
NebivololQuality of LifeFollow-Up SF-36 (physical) Score46.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
NebivololQuality of LifeFollow-Up CSFQ53.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
NebivololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline CSFQ4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
NebivololQuality of LifeFollow-Up MAF Score22.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
NebivololQuality of LifeBaseline SF-36 (physical) Score41.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
NebivololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline MAF-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
NebivololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline SF-36 (physical)5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
NebivololQuality of LifeFollow-Up SF-36 (mental) Score48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
NebivololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline SF-36 (mental)7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
NebivololQuality of LifeBaseline IIEF Score10.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
NebivololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline IIEF6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
NebivololQuality of LifeBaseline CSFQ48.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
NebivololQuality of LifeFollow-Up IIEF Score16.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
MetoprololQuality of LifeFollow-Up CSFQ49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
MetoprololQuality of LifeBaseline SF-36 (mental) Score40.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
MetoprololQuality of LifeFollow-Up SF-36 (mental) Score42.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
MetoprololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline SF-36 (mental)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
MetoprololQuality of LifeBaseline MAF Score31.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
MetoprololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline MAF-13.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
MetoprololQuality of LifeBaseline IIEF Score15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
MetoprololQuality of LifeFollow-Up IIEF Score14.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
MetoprololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline IIEF-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
MetoprololQuality of LifeBaseline CSFQ49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
MetoprololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline CSFQ0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
MetoprololQuality of LifeFollow-Up SF-36 (physical) Score43.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
MetoprololQuality of LifeChange from Baseline SF-36 (physical)-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
MetoprololQuality of LifeFollow-Up MAF Score17.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
MetoprololQuality of LifeBaseline SF-36 (physical) Score45.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Secondary

Blood Pressure

Evaluate the baseline and follow-up systolic and diastolic blood pressures for all subjects in both groups.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NebivololBlood PressureBaseline Diastolic Blood Pressure73.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.5
NebivololBlood PressureChange from Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure1.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.8
NebivololBlood PressureFollow-Up Systolic Blood Pressure142.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.7
NebivololBlood PressureChange from Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure3.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.9
NebivololBlood PressureFollow-Up Diastolic Blood Pressure76.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.7
NebivololBlood PressureBaseline Systolic Blood Pressure142.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.6
MetoprololBlood PressureChange from Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure-4.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.2
MetoprololBlood PressureBaseline Systolic Blood Pressure138.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.3
MetoprololBlood PressureBaseline Diastolic Blood Pressure77.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.9
MetoprololBlood PressureFollow-Up Diastolic Blood Pressure73.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.7
MetoprololBlood PressureFollow-Up Systolic Blood Pressure136.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.9
MetoprololBlood PressureChange from Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure-2.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026