Skip to content

AIR OPTIX® COLORS Registration Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01440322
Enrollment
150
Registered
2011-09-26
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2014-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractive Error

Keywords

Myopia, Contact lenses

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the subjective and objective performance and the physiological response to AIR OPTIX® COLORS soft contact lenses compared with AIR OPTIX® AQUA contact lenses in participants with normal eyes and prescription needs.

Detailed description

This study consisted of 7 scheduled visits conducted over a 3-month period. Enrolled participants were randomized (2:1) to receive either AIR OPTIX® COLORS lenses in both eyes or AIR OPTIX® AQUA lenses in both eyes.

Interventions

Silicone hydrogel contact lens with color

Silicone hydrogel contact lens

Sponsors

CIBA VISION
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be of legal age of consent and sign Informed Consent document. If under legal age of consent, legally authorized representative must sign Informed Consent document and subject must sign Assent document. * Normal eyes and not using any ocular medications. * Willing to wear visitint or gray-colored spherical contact lenses in both eyes within available power ranges. * Manifest cylinder less than or equal to 0.75 diopter. * Best spectacle corrected visual acuity greater than or equal to 20/25. * Have current prescription glasses. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Anterior segment infection, inflammation, or abnormality. * Any active anterior segment ocular or systemic disease that would contraindicate contact lens wear. * Use of ocular or systemic medications for which contact lens wear could be contraindicated as determined by the investigator. * History of refractive surgery or irregular cornea. * History of pathologically dry eye. * Corneal vascularization greater than 1 millimeter of penetration. * History of herpetic keratitis. * Eye injury within 12 weeks immediately prior to enrollment in this trial. * Currently enrolled in any clinical trial or participation in any clinical trial within the previous 30 days. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Up to Month 3Visual acuity, as assessed for each eye individually. Participant read a distance Snellen chart while wearing study lenses. The percentage of eyes with VA recorded as 20/30 or better is reported. Both eyes contributed to the percentage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Rating of Overall ComfortUp to Month 3Overall comfort, as rated by the participant on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent. The participant rated both eyes together by providing one single rating.
Subjective Rating of Overall HandlingUp to Month 3Overall handling, as rated by the participant on a 10-point scale, with 1 being difficult and 10 being easy. The participant rated both eyes together by providing one single rating.
Lens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Up to Month 3Lens fit, as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Lens fit was rated on a 5-point scale: 2=unacceptably loose, 1=acceptably loose, 0=optimal, -1=acceptably tight, -2=unacceptably tight. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as optimal, acceptably loose, or acceptably tight is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.
Subjective Rating of Overall VisionUp to Month 3Overall vision, as rated by the participant on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent. The participant rated both eyes together by providing one single rating.
Dry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Up to Month 3Dry areas/non-wetting (i.e., assessment of the disruption of the front surface wettability of the contact lens), as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Dry areas/non-wetting was rated on a 5-point scale: 0=none, 1=very slight, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=severe. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as none or very slight is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.
Front Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Up to Month 3Front surface deposits on the contact lens, as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Front surface deposits were rated on a 5-point scale: 0=none, 1=very slight, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=severe. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as none or very slight is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.
Back Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Up to Month 3Back surface deposits on the contact lens, as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Back surface deposits were rated on a 5-point scale: 0=none, 1=very slight, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=severe. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as none or very slight is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.
Lens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Up to Month 3Lens centration, as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Lens centration was rated on a 5-point scale: 0=centered, 1=slight decentration, 2=mild decentration, 3=moderate decentration, 4=severe decentration. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as centered or slight decentration is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from 10 investigational centers located in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 150 participants enrolled, 3 were exited from the study as screen failures prior to study product dispense. This reporting group includes all randomized and dispensed participants (147).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AIR OPTIX® COLORS
Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with color worn in both eyes on a daily wear, monthly replacement basis for 3 months
100
AIR OPTIX® AQUA
Lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn in both eyes on a daily wear, monthly replacement basis for 3 months
50
Total150

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyBiomicroscopy10
Overall StudyDiscomfort20
Overall StudyOther Non-Product Related10
Overall StudyOther Product Related10
Overall StudySymptoms and Problems10
Overall StudyUnacceptable Subjective Vision10
Overall StudyUnrelated Medical Problem01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAIR OPTIX® COLORSAIR OPTIX® AQUATotal
Age, Continuous31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.28
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.91
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.13
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants34 Participants110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants16 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 970 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 970 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Contact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)

Visual acuity, as assessed for each eye individually. Participant read a distance Snellen chart while wearing study lenses. The percentage of eyes with VA recorded as 20/30 or better is reported. Both eyes contributed to the percentage.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of eyes with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group, used as the denominator for percentage calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIR OPTIX® COLORSContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® COLORSContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Week 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® COLORSContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Week 2 (n=180,96)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® COLORSContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® COLORSContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Month 2 (n=179,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® COLORSContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Month 3 (n=178,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® AQUAContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Month 2 (n=179,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® AQUAContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® AQUAContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® AQUAContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Week 1 (n=180,98)98.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® AQUAContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Month 3 (n=178,98)100.0 Percentage of eyes
AIR OPTIX® AQUAContact Lens-Corrected Distance Monocular Snellen Visual Acuity (VA) (20/30 or Better)Week 2 (n=180,96)97.9 Percentage of eyes
Secondary

Back Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)

Back surface deposits on the contact lens, as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Back surface deposits were rated on a 5-point scale: 0=none, 1=very slight, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=severe. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as none or very slight is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of eyes with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group, used as the denominator for percentage calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIR OPTIX® COLORSBack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSBack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Week 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSBack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Week 2 (n=180,96)99.4 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSBack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSBack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 2 (n=179,98)99.4 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSBack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 3 (n=180,98)99.4 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUABack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 2 (n=179,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUABack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Dispense (n=180,98)99.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUABack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 1 (n=180,98)95.9 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUABack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Week 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUABack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 3 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUABack Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Week 2 (n=180,96)100.0 Percentage of lenses
Secondary

Dry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)

Dry areas/non-wetting (i.e., assessment of the disruption of the front surface wettability of the contact lens), as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Dry areas/non-wetting was rated on a 5-point scale: 0=none, 1=very slight, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=severe. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as none or very slight is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of eyes with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group, used as the denominator for percentage calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIR OPTIX® COLORSDry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Week 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSDry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSDry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSDry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Month 2 (n=179,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSDry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Week 2 (n=180,96)99.4 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSDry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Month 3 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUADry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Month 3 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUADry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUADry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Week 1 (n=180,98)99.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUADry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Week 2 (n=180,96)99.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUADry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUADry Areas/Non-Wetting (None, Very Slight)Month 2 (n=179,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
Secondary

Front Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)

Front surface deposits on the contact lens, as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Front surface deposits were rated on a 5-point scale: 0=none, 1=very slight, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=severe. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as none or very slight is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of eyes with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group, used as the denominator for percentage calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIR OPTIX® COLORSFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Week 1 (n=180,98)96.7 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Week 2 (n=180,96)97.8 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 1 (n=180,98)96.7 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 2 (n=179,98)97.2 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 3 (n=180,98)94.4 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUAFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 2 (n=179,98)98.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUAFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUAFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 1 (n=180,98)95.9 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUAFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Week 1 (n=180,98)98.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUAFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Month 3 (n=180,98)98.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUAFront Surface Deposits (None, Very Slight)Week 2 (n=180,96)99.0 Percentage of lenses
Secondary

Lens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)

Lens centration, as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Lens centration was rated on a 5-point scale: 0=centered, 1=slight decentration, 2=mild decentration, 3=moderate decentration, 4=severe decentration. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as centered or slight decentration is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of eyes with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group, used as the denominator for percentage calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Week 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Week 2 (n=180,96)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Month 2 (n=179,98)98.3 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Month 3 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Month 2 (n=179,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Week 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Month 3 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Centration (Centered, Slight Decentration)Week 2 (n=180,96)100.0 Percentage of lenses
Secondary

Lens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)

Lens fit, as assessed by the investigator for each eye individually. Lens fit was rated on a 5-point scale: 2=unacceptably loose, 1=acceptably loose, 0=optimal, -1=acceptably tight, -2=unacceptably tight. The combined percentage of lenses assessed as optimal, acceptably loose, or acceptably tight is reported. Lenses from both eyes contributed to the percentage.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of eyes with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group, used as the denominator for percentage calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Week 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Week 2 (n=180,96)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Month 2 (n=179,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® COLORSLens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Month 3 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Month 2 (n=179,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Dispense (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Month 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Week 1 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Month 3 (n=180,98)100.0 Percentage of lenses
AIR OPTIX® AQUALens Fit (Optimal, Acceptably Loose, Acceptably Tight)Week 2 (n=180,96)100.0 Percentage of lenses
Secondary

Subjective Rating of Overall Comfort

Overall comfort, as rated by the participant on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent. The participant rated both eyes together by providing one single rating.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of participants with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall ComfortWeek 1 (n=90,49)8.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall ComfortMonth 1 (n=90,49)8.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall ComfortDispense (n=90,49)9.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall ComfortMonth 2 (n=90,49)8.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall ComfortWeek 2 (n=90,48)8.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall ComfortMonth 3 (n=90,49)8.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall ComfortWeek 2 (n=90,48)9.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall ComfortDispense (n=90,49)9.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall ComfortWeek 1 (n=90,49)9.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall ComfortMonth 3 (n=90,49)8.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall ComfortMonth 1 (n=90,49)8.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall ComfortMonth 2 (n=90,49)8.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Subjective Rating of Overall Handling

Overall handling, as rated by the participant on a 10-point scale, with 1 being difficult and 10 being easy. The participant rated both eyes together by providing one single rating.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of participants with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall HandlingDispense (n=90,49)9.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall HandlingWeek 1 (n=90,49)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall HandlingWeek 2 (n=90,48)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall HandlingMonth 1 (n=90,49)9.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall HandlingMonth 2 (n=90,49)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall HandlingMonth 3 (n=90,49)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall HandlingMonth 2 (n=90,49)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall HandlingDispense (n=90,49)9.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall HandlingMonth 1 (n=90,49)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall HandlingWeek 1 (n=90,49)9.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall HandlingMonth 3 (n=90,49)9.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall HandlingWeek 2 (n=90,48)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Subjective Rating of Overall Vision

Overall vision, as rated by the participant on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent. The participant rated both eyes together by providing one single rating.

Time frame: Up to Month 3

Population: The analysis population includes all enrolled and dispensed participants who completed the study. No imputation was used for missing values. Here, n is the number of participants with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall VisionDispense (n=90,49)8.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall VisionWeek 1 (n=90,49)8.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall VisionWeek 2 (n=90,48)8.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall VisionMonth 1 (n=90,49)8.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall VisionMonth 2 (n=90,49)8.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
AIR OPTIX® COLORSSubjective Rating of Overall VisionMonth 3 (n=90,49)8.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall VisionMonth 2 (n=90,49)9.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall VisionDispense (n=90,49)9.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall VisionMonth 1 (n=90,49)9.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall VisionWeek 1 (n=90,49)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall VisionMonth 3 (n=90,49)9.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
AIR OPTIX® AQUASubjective Rating of Overall VisionWeek 2 (n=90,48)9.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026